In 1741 broke out the war of the Austrian Succession, and the French

troops, which were needed elsewhere, were recalled. Once more the island

rose; even young boys took the field. The Genoese were driven into the

fortified towns. The Corsican leader Gaffori was besieging the Castle of

Corte, when the defenders, making a sudden sally, seized his infant son,

whom his nurse had thoughtlessly carried too near the walls. "The

General," says Boswell, in language which strikes us as most odd,

though, to the men of his time, it sounded perhaps natural enough,

"showed a decent concern at this unhappy accident, which struck a damp

into the whole army. The Genoese," he goes on to say, "thought they

could have Gaffori upon their own terms, since they were possessed of so

dear a pledge. When he advanced to make some cannon play, they held up

his son, directly over that part of the wall against which his artillery

was levelled. The Corsicans stopped, and began to draw back; but

Gaffori, with the resolution of a Roman, stood at their head, and

ordered them to continue the fire." The child escaped and lived to tell

Boswell this curious story.

In 1745, England "not, as if from herself, but as complying with the

request of her ally, the king of Sardinia," sent a squadron of ships to

the assistance of the Corsicans. They came before Bastia on November

18th--three days, as it is worth while noticing, after the town of

Carlisle had surrendered to the forces of the Young Pretender. "There

was but little wind blowing, and the men of war had to be towed up by

the long boats. The fortress of Bastia let fly first, and made a

terrible fire, particularly against the commodore's ship, whose flag was

beat down three times, and her main and mizen masts broke. The Commodore

being exasperated immediately ordered the Castle to be cannonaded and

bombarded, which was continued near two hours with extraordinary fury,

when part of the wall was seen to tumble down."[67] The place

surrendered in a few days to the Corsicans. In the following year the

patriots sent envoys to the English ambassador at Turin with proposals

that Corsica should put herself entirely under the protection of Great

Britain. No definite answer was given. In 1748 some English troops were

landed in the island, but on the conclusion of the peace of

Aix-la-Chapelle they were withdrawn, and the Corsicans and Genoese were

again left to fight out their own battles.

[Footnote 67: "The Gentleman's Magazine," vol. xv., p. 628.]

Five years later (1753) Gaffori, who had long held the office of sole

general of the island, was carried off by assassination. "The

murderers," says Boswell, "were set on by the Republic. At least, it is

a fact that some of these wretches have still a miserable pension to

support them, in the territory of Genoa." His place was filled by Pascal

Paoli, the son of the old Corsican leader, who ever since the French

invasion had lived with his boy in retirement at Naples. When the young

man was sent for by his countrymen, his old father, "hoary and gray with

years, fell on his neck and kissed him, gave him his blessing, and with

a broken feeble voice, encouraged him in the undertaking on which he was

entering: 'My son,' said he, 'I may, possibly, never see you more; but

in my mind I shall ever be present with you. Your design is a great and

a noble one; and I doubt not, but God will bless you in it.'"

Paoli's task was full of difficulties. In "the affairs of Corsica, he

found the utmost disorder and confusion. There was no subordination, no

discipline, no money, hardly any arms and ammunition; and, what was

worse than all, little union among the people. He immediately began to

remedy these defects. His persuasion and example had wonderful force. In

a short time he drove the Genoese to the remotest corners of the

island.... He, in a manner, new-modelled the government upon the

soundest principles of democratical rule, which was always his favourite

idea." He carried a law by which assassination was made capital on

whatever pretence it had been committed. He set about establishing

schools in every village, and he founded a University at Corte. Boswell

writing to Temple in 1767 says, "I have received an elegant letter from

the University of Corte, and also an extract of an oration pronounced

this year at the opening of the University, in which oration I am

celebrated in a manner which does me the greatest honour."

But the jealousy of France was again excited, and again she sent troops

to the island. This was in 1764, nine years after Paoli had received the

supreme command. Rousseau, full of indignation at this monstrous

proceeding, thus expressed himself in a letter to a friend, "Il faut

avouer que vos François, sont un peuple bien servile, bien vendu à la

tyrannie, bien cruel, et bien acharné sur les malheureux. S'ils savoient

un homme libre à l'autre bout du monde, je crois qu'ils iroient pour le

seul plaisir de l'exterminer. It must be owned that your countrymen, the

French, are a very servile nation, wholly sold to tyranny, exceedingly

cruel and relentless in persecuting the unhappy. If they knew of a free

man at the other end of the world I believe they would go thither for

the mere pleasure of extirpating him." The French did not act on the

offensive. They merely garrisoned certain towns, and professed to limit

their occupation to the space of four years. It was in the second year

of their occupation (1765) that Boswell visited the island.

At the end of the four years the Republic of Genoa ceded Corsica to the

crown of France. In the cession there was a pretence of a reservation

with which it is needless to trouble the reader. "Genoa," writes

Voltaire, "made a good bargain, and France made a better." "Il restait à

savoir," he added, "si les hommes ont le droit de vendre d'autres

hommes, mais c'est une question qu'on n'examina jamais dans aucun

traité." Negociations were opened with Paoli, but there was no common

ground between the free chief of a free people and the despot who wished

to enslave them. Paoli might have looked for high honours and rewards

had he consented to enter the French service. He had the far greater and

purer glory of resisting a King of France for nearly a whole year. No

foreign power came to his aid. "A few Englishmen alone," wrote Voltaire,

"full of love for that liberty which he upheld, sent him some money and

arms." His troops were badly armed. Their muskets were not even

furnished with bayonets. Their courage went some way to make up for

their want of proper weapons. In one battle they piled up in front of

them a rampart of their dead, and behind this bloody pile they loaded

their pieces before they began their retreat.

But against the disciplined forces that France could bring, all

resistance was in vain. "Poor brave Paoli!" wrote Horace Walpole, "but

he is not disgraced. We, that have sat still and seen him overwhelmed,

must answer it to history. Nay, the Mediterranean will taunt us in the

very next war." Walpole wrote this letter but two months before the

birth of Buonaparte. Had England, who has joined in many a worthless

quarrel, struck in for the Corsicans, what a change might have been made

in the history of the world! If Buonaparte had never been a citizen of

France the name of Napoleon might be unknown. Paoli escaped in an

English ship, and settled in England. Walpole met him one day at Court.

"I could not believe it," he wrote, "when I was told who he was....

Nobody sure ever had an air so little foreign!... The simplicity of his

whole appearance had not given me the slightest suspicion of anything

remarkable in him."

Paoli remained in England, an honoured guest, for thirty years. In 1789

Mirabeau moved, in the National Assembly, the recall of all the Corsican

patriots. Paoli went to Paris, where "he was received with enthusiastic

veneration. The Assembly and the Royal Family contended which should

show him most distinction." The king made him lieutenant-general and

military commandant in Corsica. "He used the powers entrusted to him

with great wisdom and moderation." The rapid changes that swept over

France did not leave him untouched. He was denounced in the Convention

and "was summoned to attend for the purpose of standing on his defence.

He declined the journey on account of his age." A large part of his

countrymen stood by him, and in an assembly appointed him

general-in-chief, and president of the council of government. The

Convention sent an expedition to arrest him. Buonaparte happened at the

time to be in Corsica, on leave of absence from his regiment. He and

Paoli had been on friendly terms, indeed they were distantly related,

but Buonaparte did not hesitate for a moment which side to take. He

commanded the French troops in an attack on his native town. Paoli's

party proved the stronger, and Napoleon Buonaparte and his brother

Lucien were banished. The Corsicans sought the aid of the English who,

in the year 1794, landed, five regiments strong, in the island. A

deputation went to London to offer the Crown of Corsica to the King of

Great Britain. The offer was accepted, but contrary to the hopes and the

expectations of the islanders, not Paoli, but Sir Gilbert Eliot was made

Viceroy. The great patriot then found that he could best serve his

country by leaving it. For about two years Corsica remained part of the

British Empire; but in 1796 the English were forced to abandon it. Paoli

returned to England, where he passed the rest of his years. He died in

1807 at the age of eighty-two. His monument is in Westminster Abbey.

AN

ACCOUNT

OF

CORSICA,

THE JOURNAL OF A TOUR

TO THAT ISLAND;

AND MEMOIRS OF

PASCAL PAOLI.

BY JAMES BOSWELL, Esq;

ILLUSTRATED with a New and Accurate MAP OF CORSICA.

Non enim propter gloriam, divitias aut honores pugnamus, sed

propter libertatem solummodo, quam nemo bonus nisi simul cum

vita amittit.

Lit. Comit. et Baron. Scotiae ad Pap. A.D. 1320.

GLASGOW,

PRINTED BY ROBERT AND ANDREW FOULIS FOR

EDWARD AND CHARLES DILLY IN THE POULTRY, LONDON;

MDCCLXVIII.

DEDICATION

TO

PASCAL PAOLI,

GENERAL OF

THE CORSICANS.

SIR,--Dedications are for most part the offerings of interested

servility, or the effusions of partial zeal; enumerating the virtues of

men in whom no virtues can be found, or predicting greatness to those

who afterwards pass their days in unambitious indolence, and die leaving

no memorial of their existence, but a dedication, in which all their

merit is confessedly future, and which time has turned into a silent

reproach.

He who has any experience of mankind, will be cautious to whom he

dedicates. Publickly to bestow praise on merit of which the publick is

not sensible, or to raise flattering expectations which are never

fulfilled, must sink the character of an authour, and make him appear a

cringing parasite, or a fond enthusiast.

I am under no apprehensions of that nature, when I inscribe this book to

Pascal Paoli. Your virtues, Sir, are universally acknowledged; they

dignify the pages which I venture to present to you; and it is my

singular felicity that my book is the voucher of its dedication.

In thus addressing you, my intention is not to attempt your panegyrick.

That may in some measure be collected from my imperfect labours. But I

wish to express to the world, the admiration and gratitude with which

you have inspired me.

This, Sir, is all the return that I can make for the many favours which

you have deigned to confer upon me. I intreat you to receive it as a

testimony of my disposition. I regret that I have neither power nor

interest to enable me to render any essential service to you and to the

brave Corsicans. I can only assure you of the most fervent wishes of a

private gentleman. I have the honour to be, with all respect and

affection,

Sir,

Your ever devoted

obliged humble servant

JAMES BOSWELL.

Auchinleck, Ayrshire,

29 October,[68] 1767.

[Footnote 68: Boswell's birthday. The preface to the third edition also

bears the date of his birthday.--ED.]

PREFACE.

No apology shall be made for presenting the world with An Account of

Corsica. It has been for some time expected from me; and I own that the

ardour of publick curiosity has both encouraged and intimidated me. On

my return from visiting Corsica, I found people wherever I went,

desirous to hear what I could tell them concerning that island and its

inhabitants. Unwilling to repeat my tale to every company, I thought it

best to promise a book which should speak for me.

But I would not take upon me to do this till I consulted with the

General of the nation. I therefore informed him of my design. His answer

is perhaps too flattering for me to publish: but I must beg leave to

give it as the licence and sanction of this work.

Paoli was pleased to write to me thus; "Nothing can be more generous

than your design to publish the observations which you have made upon

Corsica. You have seen its natural situation, you have been able to

study the manners of its inhabitants, and to see intimately the maxims

of their government, of which you know the constitution. This people

with an enthusiasm of gratitude, will unite their applause with that of

undeceived Europe."

* * * * *

It is amazing that an island so considerable, and in which such noble

things have been doing, should be so imperfectly known. Even the

succession of chiefs has been unperceived; and because we have read of

Paoli being at the head of the Corsicans many years back, and Paoli

still appears at their head, the command has been supposed all this time

in the person of the same man. Hence all our newspapers have confounded

the gallant Pascal Paoli in the vigour of manhood, with the venerable

chief his deceased father, Giacinto Paoli. Nay the same errour has found

its way into the page of the historian; for Dr. Smollet when mentioning

Paoli at the siege of Furiani a few years ago, says he was then past

fourscore.

I would in the first place return my most humble thanks to Pascal Paoli,

for the various communications with which he has been pleased to favour

me; and as I have related his remarkable sayings, I declare upon honour,

that I have neither added nor diminished; nay so scrupulous have I been,

that I would not make the smallest variation even when my friends

thought it would be an improvement. I know with how much pleasure we

read what is perfectly authentick.

Count Rivarola[69] was so good as to return me full and distinct answers

to a variety of queries which I sent him with regard to many particulars

concerning Corsica. I am much indebted to him for this, and

particularly so, from the obliging manner in which he did it.

[Footnote 69: The Sardinian Consul in Corsica. See page 142.--ED.]

The reverend Mr. Burnaby, chaplain to the British factory at Leghorn,

made a tour to Corsica in 1766, at the same time with the honourable and

reverend Mr. Hervey, now bishop of Cloyne.[70] Mr. Burnaby was absent

from Leghorn when I was there, so I had not the pleasure of being

personally known to him. But he with great politeness of his own accord,

sent me a copy of the Journal which he made of what he observed in

Corsica. I had the satisfaction to find that we agreed in every thing

which both of us had considered. But I found in his Journal,

observations on several things which I had omitted; and several things

which I had remarked, I found set in a clearer light. As Mr. Burnaby was

so obliging as to allow me to make what use I pleased of his Journal, I

have freely interwoven it into my work.

[Footnote 70: The son of Pope's Lord Hervey. He succeeded in 1779 to the

Earldom of Bristol.--ED.]

I acknowledge my obligations to my esteemed friend John Dick Esquire,

his Britannick Majesty's Consul at Leghorn, to Signor Gian Quilico Casa

Bianca, to the learned Greek physician Signor Stefanopoli, to Colonel

Buttafoco,[71] and to the Abbé Rostini. These gentlemen have all

contributed their aid in erecting my little monument to liberty.

[Footnote 71: Colonel Buttafoco was one of Rousseau's correspondents. At

the time of the French Revolution he was elected Deputy from Corsica to

the National Assembly. He was most violently attacked by Napoleon

Buonaparte in a letter dated "From my closet at Milleli, 23rd January,

Year 2." The letter thus begins:--"From Bonifacio to Cape Corso, from

Ajaccio to Bastia, there is one chorus of imprecations against you." The

writer goes on to say, "Your countrymen, to whom you are an object of

horror, will enlighten France as to your character. The wealth, the

pensions, the fruits of your treasons, will be taken from you.... O

Lameth! O Robespierre! O Petion! O Volney! O Mirabeau! O Barnave! O

Bailly! O La Fayette! this is the man who dares to seat himself by your

side!"--Scott's "Life of Napoleon Buonaparte," vol. ix., Appendix

I.--ED.]

I am also to thank an ingenious gentleman who has favoured me with the

translations of Seneca's Epigrams. I made application for this favour,

in the "London Chronicle;" and to the honour of literature, I found her

votaries very liberal. Several translations were sent, of which I took

the liberty to prefer those which had the signature of Patricius, and

which were improved by another ingenious correspondent under the

signature of Plebeius. By a subsequent application I begged that

Patricius would let me know to whom I was obliged for what I considered

as a great ornament to my book. He has complied with my request; and I

beg leave in this publick manner, to acknowledge that I am indebted for

those translations to Thomas Day Esquire,[72] of Berkshire, a gentleman

whose situation in life is genteel, and his fortune affluent. I must add

that although his verses have not only the fire of youth, but the

maturity and correctness of age, Mr. Day is no more than nineteen.

[Footnote 72: This is, I believe the author of "Sandford and Merton,"

who was born in 1748, and was nineteen years old at the date of the

dedication of Boswell's work. His father had died when Day was a year

old, and had left him a fortune of £1,200 a year.--ED.]

Nor can I omit to express my sense of the candour and politeness with

which Sir James Steuart received the remark which I have ventured to

make in opposition to a passage concerning the Corsicans, in his

"Inquiry into the principles of Political Oeconomy."

I have submitted my book to the revisal of several gentlemen who honour

me with their regard, and I am sensible how much it is improved by their

corrections. It is therefore my duty to return thanks to the reverend

Mr. Wyvill rectour of Black Notely in Essex, and to my old and most

intimate friend the reverend Mr. Temple[73] rectour of Mamhead in

Devonshire. I am also obliged to My Lord Monboddo for many judicious

remarks, which his thorough acquaintance with ancient learning enabled

him to make. But I am principally indebted to the indulgence and

friendly attention of My Lord Hailes, who under the name of Sir David

Dalrymple,[74] has been long known to the world as an able Antiquarian,

and an elegant and humourous Essayist; to whom the world has no fault

but that he does not give them more of his own writings, when they value

them so highly.[75]

[Footnote 73: See "Letters of James Boswell addressed to the Rev. W.J.

Temple."--Bentley, London, 1857.--ED.]

[Footnote 74: It is the custom in Scotland to give the Judges of the

Court of Session the title of Lords by the names of their estates. Thus

Mr. Burnett is Lord Monboddo, and Sir David Dalrymple is Lord Hailes.]

[Footnote 75: "Johnson this evening drank a bumper to Sir David

Dalrymple, 'as a man of worth, a scholar, and a wit. I have,' said he,

'never heard of him, except from you; but let him know my opinion of

him: for as he does not show himself much in the world, he should have

the praise of the few who hear of him.'"--Boswell's "Johnson." Date of

July 20, 1763.--ED.]

I would however have it understood, that although I received the

corrections of my friends with deference, I have not always agreed with

them. An authour should be glad to hear every candid remark. But I look

upon a man as unworthy to write, who has not force of mind to determine

for himself. I mention this, that the judgement of the friends I have

named may not be considered as connected with every passage in this

book.

Writing a book I have found to be like building a house. A man forms a

plan and collects materials. He thinks he has enough to raise a large

and stately edifice; but after he has arranged, compacted and polished,

his work turns out to be a very small performance. The authour, however,

like the builder, knows how much labour his work has cost him; and

therefore estimates it at a much higher rate than other people think it

deserves.

I have endeavoured to avoid an ostentatious display of learning. By the

idle and the frivolous indeed, any appearance of learning is called

pedantry. But as I do not write for such readers, I pay no regard to

their censures. Those by whom I wish to be judged, will I hope, approve

of my adding dignity to Corsica, by shewing its consideration among the

ancients, and will not be displeased to find my page sometimes

embellished with a seasonable quotation from the Classicks. The

translations are ascribed to their proper authours. What are not so

ascribed are my own.

It may be necessary to say something in defence of my orthography. Of

late it has become the fashion to render our language more neat and trim

by leaving out k after c, and u in the last syllable of words which used

to end in our. The illustrious Mr. Samuel Johnson, who has alone[76]

executed in England what was the task of whole academies in other

countries, has been careful in his Dictionary to preserve the k as a

mark of Saxon original. He has for most part, too, been careful to

preserve the u, but he has also omitted it in several words. I have

retained the k, and have taken upon me to follow a general rule with

regard to words ending in our. Wherever a word originally Latin has been

transmitted to us through the medium of the French, I have written it

with the characteristical u. An attention to this may appear trivial.

But I own I am one of those who are curious in the formation of language

in its various modes; and therefore wish that the affinity of English

with other tongues may not be forgotten. If this work should at any

future period be reprinted, I hope that care will be taken of my

orthography.[77]

[Footnote 76: "ADAMS.--But, Sir, how can you do this in three years?

JOHNSON.--Sir, I have no doubt that I can do it in three years.

ADAMS.--But the French Academy, which consists of forty members, took

forty years to compile their Dictionary. JOHNSON.--Sir, thus it is. This

is the proportion. Let me see; forty times forty is sixteen hundred. As

three to sixteen hundred, so is the proportion of an Englishman to a

Frenchman."--Boswell's "Johnson." Date of 1748.--ED.]

[Footnote 77: I have not dared to disregard Boswell's request. His

orthography is retained.--ED.]

He who publishes a book, affecting not to be an authour, and professing

an indifference for literary fame, may possibly impose upon many people

such an idea of his consequence as he wishes may be received. For my

part, I should be proud to be known as an authour; and I have an ardent

ambition for literary fame; for of all possessions I should imagine

literary fame to be the most valuable. A man who has been able to

furnish a book which has been approved by the world, has established

himself as a respectable character in distant society, without any

danger of having that character lessened by the observation of his

weaknesses. To preserve an uniform dignity among those who see us every

day, is hardly possible; and to aim at it must put us under the fetters

of a perpetual restraint. The authour of an approved book may allow his

natural disposition an easy play, and yet indulge the pride of superiour

genius when he considers that by those who know him only as an authour,

he never ceases to be respected. Such an authour when in his hours of

gloom and discontent, may have the consolation to think that his

writings are at that very time giving pleasure to numbers; and such an

authour may cherish the hope of being remembered after death, which has

been a great object to the noblest minds in all ages.[78]

[Footnote 78: "The rational pride of an author may be offended, rather

than flattered, by vague, indiscriminate praise; but he cannot, he

should not, be indifferent to the fair testimonies of private and public

esteem. Even his moral sympathy may be gratified by the idea, that now,

in the present hour, he is imparting some degree of amusement or

knowledge to his friends in a distant land; that one day his mind will

be familiar to the grand-children of those who are yet unborn."--"Memoirs

of my Life and Writings," by Edward Gibbon, vol. i., p. 273.

Boswell's Correspondence with the Honourable Andrew Erskine, and His Journal of a Tour to Corsica · 第 7 / 14 段