Temporal Variability of Fauna in the Same Areas

The variability of the population in successive collections from the

same area is presented in Table 14. Supplementary data obtained in Areas

2, 4 and 7 support conclusions discussed below for Areas 1, 3 and 6. The

abundance of some species maintained a constant level, whereas that of

others varied.

TABLE 14. NUMBERS OF INDIVIDUALS COLLECTED BY MEANS OF THE SHOCKER

AT VARYING INTERVALS IN SEPTEMBER, 1959. THE NUMBER AT THE TOP OF

EACH COLUMN IS THE DATE WHEN THE COLLECTION WAS MADE.

======================================================================

| Area 1 | Area 3 | Area 6

SPECIES +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----

| 3 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 20

----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----

Golden Redhorse | 2 | 2 | ... | 5 | 5 | 2 | ... | ... | 3

Creek Chub | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 | ... | ... | 1 | 2 | ...

Sucker-mouthed | | | | | | | | |

Minnow | ... | ... | ... | 54 | 42 | 25 | 31 | 7 | 6

Red-finned | | | | | | | | |

Shiner | ... | ... | 1 | ... | ... | 4 | 31 | 13 | 4

Red Shiner | 44 | 7 | 211 | 117 | 170 | 438 | 186 | 209 | 62

Blunt-nosed | | | | | | | | |

Minnow | ... | ... | ... | 4 | 10 | 19 | 108 | 91 | 13

Fat-headed | | | | | | | | |

Minnow | 1 | ... | ... | 1 | 2 | 3 | 112 | 156 | 48

Stoneroller | 67 | 39 | 49 | 84 | 107 | 55 | 54 | 67 | 22

Black Bullhead | 5 | ... | 1 | 2 | 1 | ... | ... | 3 | 7

Yellow Bullhead | 1 | 1 | ... | 2 | 1 | ... | 1 | ... | 3

Channel Catfish | 14 | 7 | ... | 36 | 16 | ... | 3 | 1 | 23

Channel | | | | | | | | |

Catfish(yy)[H]| 23 | 16 | 17 | 34 | 34 | 22 | 40 | 23 | 28

Flathead | ... | ... | ... | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | ... | 1

Flathead(yy) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ... | ... | ...

Stonecat | 25 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 5 | ... | ... | ...

Green Sunfish | 27 | 17 | 12 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 62 | 62 | 74

Long-eared | | | | | | | | |

Sunfish | 13 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 22 | 31

Logperch | 1 | ... | ... | 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ...

Slender-headed | | | | | | | | |

Darter | ... | 1 | 2 | 55 | 45 | 23 | 15 | 1 | 1

Orange-throated | | | | | | | | |

Darter | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 5 | ... | 1

----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----

Total | 233 | 115 | 316 | 438 | 480 | 626 | 661 | 657 | 347

----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----

[H] (yy) means young-of-the-year only.

Stoneroller, channel catfish (young-of-the-year), green sunfish, and

long-eared sunfish formed the most stable element of the population, in

that the numbers of these species varied less in successive collections

than did numbers of other species.

The number of orange-throated darters remained constant at Areas 1 and

3, and the number of stonecats changed little in successive collections

from Area 3. I suspect that an apparent decline in stonecats at Area 1

on September 4 was due to a slow rate of dispersal from the point of

release (see pages 413, 414).

Some species (sucker-mouthed minnow, red-finned shiner, slender-headed

darter, and fat-headed minnow) decreased significantly in successive

samples from the same area because of mortality in handling or movement

out of the area of initial capture.

The decrease in abundance of the sucker-mouthed minnow may have been due

to some mobility of the species. Evidence for mortality caused by

handling was obtained for the red-finned shiner and probably accounts

for the reduction of this species in Area 6. The red-finned shiner is

also probably a mobile species. The reduction in abundance of the

slender-headed darter seems unexplainable because no evidence was

obtained for either movement or mortality.

Fat-headed minnows also declined markedly in successive collections from

Area 6, the only area in which the species was common. No marked

fat-headed minnows were taken outside the area of release, indicating

low mobility of the species. I cannot certainly account for their

decline; possibly there was latent mortality due to shocking.

The numbers of red shiners, blunt-nosed minnows, and juvenile channel

catfish varied erratically in successive collections, probably as a

result of movement. This problem is discussed for all species in a later

section.

Fish Populations, Following a Drought, in the Neosho and Marais des Cygnes Rivers of Kansas · 第 88 / 119 题