Methods

_Rotenone_

Rotenone was applied to an intermittent pool in 1957. In 1958 and 1959

rotenone was applied to the upper end of a pool and mixed by agitating

the water. The concentration in the pool was maintained by slowly

introducing part of the rotenone into the riffle at the head of the

pool. This was the most effective means of obtaining a large sample of

fish from the deeper, slowly flowing water of the upper Neosho. Pools in

which rotenone was used had areas of as much as one-half acre and depths

in excess of six feet.

_Shocker_

In 1959 the shocker was used extensively in several areas of the upper

Neosho. Because of the small size of the stream, "tennis-racket"

electrodes were used effectively by two men--one carrying the electrodes

and one picking up fish and placing them in a live-box. In fast water,

many fish floated into a seine placed across the lower end of the area.

A large segment of the population was collected in this manner. Areas in

which fish were collected by means of the shocker included riffles, and

pools having flowing water no more than three feet in maximum depth. The

bottom-type was usually gravel, rubble or bedrock, but a small amount of

mud bottom was present in many pools.

Because of the necessity of wading, we could not use the shocker

effectively in water more than three feet deep. In addition, turbidity

of the water prevented effective collection of stunned fish in the

deeper pools. Therefore, rotenone was more effective in deep water than

was the shocker. In shallow, swift riffles and pools, the shocker

yielded more reliable samples than did rotenone, because of difficulty

in maintaining adequate concentrations of rotenone where flow was swift.

The relative abundance of each species in the upper Neosho was

calculated from cumulative results obtained by use of the shocker in

seven areas in 1959. Population estimates were made by collecting fish

with the shocker, marking them by clipping fins or staining them in

Bismark Brown Y at a concentration of 1:20,000 (Deacon, 1961), returning

them to the stream, and making a second collection three hours (Areas 1

and 3) or 24 hours (Area 6) later. The same area was shocked again

within two to eight days. Collections throughout the one-half-mile

section yielded information on movement.

Changes in the Fauna at the Upper Neosho Station, 1957 Through 1959.

The following discussion is based principally on collections made with

rotenone in 1957, 1958 and 1959 (Table 12). Other supplementary data aid

in understanding the changes that occurred after the resumption of

normal flow at the upper Neosho station.

The population in 1957 was strongly dominated by black bullhead and

young-of-the-year channel catfish. Other common species were long-eared

sunfish, red shiner, yellow bullhead, orange-spotted sunfish and green

sunfish. This fauna, with the exception of young-of-the-year

individuals, was a fauna produced during the years of drought. Deacon

and Metcalf (1961:318-321) found a similar fauna in streams of the

Wakarusa River Basin that had been seriously affected by drought.

The black bullheads taken in 1957 were predominately yearlings. It is

likely that by 1956 the total fish population in the upper Neosho had

been decimated by drought. The ponded conditions prevalent in that year

were conducive to production and survival of young black bullheads. Fig.

3 shows that this dominant 1956 year-class reached an average length of

approximately 6.5 inches by August, 1959.

Reproduction by black bullheads was limited in 1957, 1958, and 1959, and

slight reduction in relative abundance occurred from 1957 to 1958. The

relative abundance in 1959 remained nearly stable. If stream-flow

remains essentially continuous for the next few years, the number of

black bullheads probably will decline as individuals of the 1956

year-class reach the end of their life-span.

Reference has been made to the large hatch of channel catfish in 1957,

in a discussion of that species. Conditions for survival of young

channel catfish at the upper Neosho station in 1957 were good because

there was continuous flow over many gravel-rubble riffles, which were

largely unoccupied by other fish, in the spring and summer of 1957.

TABLE 12. PERCENTAGE-COMPOSITION OF THE FISH-FAUNA AT THE UPPER

NEOSHO STATION IN 1957, 1958 AND 1959, AS COMPUTED FROM COLLECTIONS

OBTAINED BY USING ROTENONE.

============================================================

SPECIES | 1957 | 1958 | 1959

----------------------------------+--------+-------+--------

Big-mouthed Buffalo...............| ...... | T[D] | T

Small-mouthed Buffalo.............| ...... | ..... | T

River Carpsucker..................| T | 0.8 | 1.8

Golden Redhorse...................| T | 3.0 | 5.7

Creek Chub........................| ...... | T | 0.8

Red-finned Shiner.................| 1.3 | 3.0 | 0.8

Red Shiner........................| 6.5 | 13.1 | 12.1

Ghost Shiner......................| T | T | ......

Blunt-nosed Minnow................| T | T | T

Fat-headed Minnow.................| T | T | 1.4

Stoneroller.......................| 0.8 | 1.5 | 3.5

Black Bullhead....................| 40.8 | 30.5 | 32.0

Yellow Bullhead...................| 5.3 | 8.8 | 2.5

Channel Catfish...................| 28.4 | 15.5 | 18.5

Flathead..........................| T | T | T

Stonecat..........................| T | T | 1.4

Spotted Bass......................| T | T | 0.8

Largemouth........................| T | T | T

Green Sunfish.....................| 3.1 | 6.8 | 6.4

Long-eared Sunfish................| 8.8 | 3.7 | 1.9

Orange-spotted Sunfish............| 3.1 | 8.9 | 2.5

Bluegill..........................| T | T | T

White Crappie.....................| T | ..... | T

Logperch......................... | T | 2.1 | 0.8

Slender-headed Darter.............| 0.6 | 0.6 | 3.1

Orange-throated Darter............| ...... | T | 2.5

Total number of fish..............| 786 | 965 | 513

Size of sample-area in acre-feet..| .002 | .33 | .33

----------------------------------+--------+-------+--------

[D] T denotes less than one-half of one per cent of the population.

Channel catfish also showed a slight decline in relative abundance after

1957, resulting from mortality in the 1957 year-class. With continuous

flow, channel catfish will probably remain abundant, although annual

reproductive success probably will be less than in 1957.

The big-mouthed buffalo, small-mouthed buffalo, creek chub and

orange-throated darter were not taken in 1957, but appeared in

collections in 1958. The river carpsucker, golden redhorse, red shiner,

fat-headed minnow, stoneroller, stonecat, and slender-headed darter also

increased in abundance between 1957 and 1959. The increased abundance of

all these species in 1958 and 1959 resulted in a more diversified fauna,

with lesser predominance by any single species, than in 1957 (Table 12);

this change is related to the increased, permanent flow in 1958 and

1959.

Local Variability of the Fauna in Different Areas at the Upper Neosho

Station, 1959

The shallow areas in which the shocker was used in 1959 are the

prevalent habitat in the upper Neosho River. The relative abundance of

fishes found in these areas is presented in Table 13. The red shiner was

most abundant and was followed (in decreasing order) by long-eared

sunfish, minnows of the genus _Pimephales_, green sunfish, red-finned

shiner, channel catfish, and stoneroller. Other species combined

comprise less than ten per cent of the population.

Table 13 also shows the variability in relative abundance of different

species among areas that have the same general kind of habitat. The

species composition is similar in all areas. The sample obtained with

rotenone in 1959 is included in Table 13 to show differences in the

fauna of deep, slowly flowing areas and shallower areas with stronger

current. The differences in relative abundance indicate the kind of

habitat that each species is able to utilize most fully.

Golden redhorse and black bullhead were most abundant in large, deep,

quiet pools (5.7 per cent and 32 per cent of the total population)

and were more abundant in Area 5 (3.2 per cent and 7.3 per cent

respectively) than in any of the other shallow areas. Area 5 has greater

average depth, more mud bottom, and less riffle area than areas 1, 3 and

6.

The golden redhorse and black bullhead have specific habitat preferences

that are not evident in the above discussion. My collections indicate

that the golden redhorse prefers deep water having some current, whereas

the black bullhead prefers little or no current.

Species that prevailed in or near riffles were: creek chub,

sucker-mouthed minnow, stoneroller, channel catfish (young-of-the-year

only), flathead (young-of-the-year only), stonecat, slender-headed

darter, and orange-throated darter. Of these species, the sucker-mouthed

minnow, slender-headed darter and orange-throated darter reached their

greatest abundance at Area 3, where the riffle is shallow, slow, and has

a bottom composed of flat limestone rubble.

The riffle at Area 1 is, for the most part, deeper and faster than at

Area 3 and has a bottom composed of gravel and small rocks. The creek

chub, stoneroller, channel catfish (young-of-the-year), flathead

(young-of-the-year), and stonecat reached their greatest abundance in

Area 1. All species that showed a preference for riffles were rare or

absent in Area 5 where no riffle-habitat was sampled. The

riffle-dwelling species that were present in collections made with

rotenone in the deeper pools were taken from the riffle into which

rotenone was introduced.

The river carpsucker, blunt-nosed minnow, fat-headed minnow, channel

catfish (yearlings and two-year-olds), flathead (yearlings and

two-year-olds), green sunfish and long-eared sunfish showed a preference

for shallow, quiet water. All of these species were more common in

collections from Areas 5 and 6 than in collections from other areas.

TABLE 13. RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF FISH (PER CENT OF TOTAL POPULATION

MADE UP BY EACH SPECIES), IN THE FIRST COLLECTION MADE IN EACH OF

FOUR DIFFERENT SHALLOW AREAS BY MEANS OF THE SHOCKER, IS SHOWN IN

VERTICAL COLUMNS 1-4. RESULTS OF THE USE OF ROTENONE IN A FIFTH,

DEEPER AREA ARE SHOWN IN COLUMN 5. COLUMN 6 COMBINES DATA FROM

ALL COLLECTIONS MADE BY USING THE SHOCKER IN SEVEN SHALLOW AREAS

(INCLUDING COLUMNS 1-4).

======================================================================

| Area | Area | Area | Area | | All

| 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | Rotenone | areas

------------------------+------+------+------+------+----------+------

Big-mouthed Buffalo | .... | .... | T[E] | .... | T | T

Small-mouthed Buffalo | .... | .... | .6 | .... | T | T

River Carpsucker | .... | T | 10.6 | T | 1.8 | .8

River Carpsucker (yy)[F]| .... | .8 | T | 3.7 | .... | 1.0

Short-headed Redhorse | .... | .... | .6 | .... | .... | T

Golden Redhorse | .8 | 1.0 | 3.2 | .... | 5.7 | T

Carp | .... | .... | .... | .... | .... | T

Golden Shiner | .... | .... | .... | .... | .... | T

Creek Chub | 1.6 | T | T | T | .8 | T

Sucker-mouthed Minnow | .... | 11.2 | T | 3.4 | .... | 1.4

Red-finned Shiner | .... | .... | .... | 4.0 | .8 | 8.1

Red Shiner | 18.2 | 24.0 | 7.8 | 20.1 | 12.1 | 35.9

Sand Shiner | .... | 5.2 | .... | 1.1 | .... | T

Pimephales (yy) | .... | .... | .... | .... | .... | 6.7

Mountain Minnow | .... | .... | .... | T | .... | T

Blunt-nosed Minnow | .... | .8 | 4.1 | 11.7 | T | 3.4

Parrot Minnow | .... | .... | .... | .... | .... | T

Fat-headed Minnow | T | T | 3.4 | 12.1 | 1.4 | 2.6

Stoneroller | 27.7 | 17.4 | .6 | 5.8 | 3.5 | 5.1

Black Bullhead | 2.1 | T | 7.3 | T | 32.0 | .6

Yellow Bullhead | T | T | .... | T | 2.5 | T

Channel Catfish (j)[G] | 5.8 | 7.6 | 41.3 | T | 14.6 | 4.2

Channel Catfish (yy) | 9.5 | 7.0 | T | 4.3 | 3.9 | 2.5

Flathead (j) | .... | .8 | 2.1 | T | T | T

Flathead (yy) | 1.6 | T | .... | .... | .... | T

Stonecat | 10.3 | 1.4 | .... | .... | 1.4 | .7

Spotted Bass | .... | T | .6 | T | .8 | T

Largemouth | .... | .... | T | .... | T | T

Green Sunfish | 11.2 | 3.5 | 5.9 | 12.2 | 6.4 | 10.1

Long-eared Sunfish | 5.4 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 14.6 | 1.9 | 12.8

Orange-spotted Sunfish | T | T | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.5 | .5

Bluegill | .... | .... | 1.0 | .... | T | T

White Crappie | .... | .... | .... | .... | T | T

Logperch | T | T | T | T | .8 | T

Slender-headed Darter | T | 11.4 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 1.3

Orange-throated Darter | .8 | 1.8 | T | .5 | 2.5 | T

Freshwater Drum | .... | .... | T | .... | .... | T

Total number of fish | 242 | 484 | 727 | 924 | 513 |17,796

Area in square feet | 840 | 6324 |12500 |10000 | .... | ....

Volume | .... | .... | .... | .... | 1/3 |

| | | | |acre-foot |

------------------------+------+------+------+------+----------+------

[E] "T" designates species that comprised less than 0.5 per cent

of the population.

[F] (yy) signifies young-of-the-year.

[G] (j) signifies yearlings or two-year-olds.

Fish Populations, Following a Drought, in the Neosho and Marais des Cygnes Rivers of Kansas · 第 87 / 119 题