CHAPTER IX.

THE ROMANTIC SCHOOL.

A convenient classification of the great German composers of the

nineteenth century is to be found in "Famous Composers and their

Works," a classification which will be followed in these chapters.

It consists of three general groups: "The Romantic School," "The

Classical Romanticists," and "The New Movement." As has been already

stated, the basis of the Romantic School was simply a further

development of Beethoven's descriptive writing, which created a

powerful impression upon the so-called founders of the school, Spohr

and Weber; they in turn were followed by Schubert, Mendelssohn,

Schumann, and their disciples. The Classical Romanticists accepted

the substance of romanticism in music, but remained more or less true

to classical form. Raff stands at the head of this classification,

Brahms as its chief exponent. The New Movement dates from the

tumultuous upheavals in the musical world caused by the innovations

of Berlioz in France, Liszt and Wagner in Germany. The evolution of

these three movements will now be reviewed in logical sequence; but

it should be borne in mind that this evolution had already begun

during the later development of French and Italian opera as discussed

in the previous chapter.

I.

SPOHR (1784-1859). The fruits of Spohr's activity as a

composer present a rather peculiar mixture of progressive zeal and

conventional mannerism. He was not alive to the true greatness

of Beethoven's genius, neither can he be compared with Weber as

a dramatic writer. On the other hand, Spohr was instrumental in

awakening a keener interest for the supernatural, and he aimed to

illustrate certain definite ideas by means of musical expression.

This trait is especially conspicuous in his symphonies; and these

entitle him to be regarded as one of the founders of programmatic

orchestral music. Again, Spohr was one of the greatest violinists

of his day, and as the natural result, his writing for strings was

highly effective. Consequently his double string quartets, his

octets, nonets, etc., are especially valued in musical literature.

Spohr contributed to the evolution of orchestration proper but

little that was actually new. But here again the development of

violin technique stimulated at least a freer and more elaborate

manner of employing the strings. Prout suggests that his

orchestration resembles to some extent that of Mendelssohn, in that

the equilibrium is admirably adjusted; and the general color-scheme

is further enriched by frequent use of soft harmonies for the brass.

In minor details of instrumentation, Spohr made some interesting

experiments similar to those of Berlioz, such as the introduction of

a number of kettle-drums into the orchestra. Prout also refers to

the earthquake chorus in "Calvary" where six drums are played upon

by two performers, and rolls in seconds, thirds, and fifths for two

drums together are to be found. But as a whole, his reputation is due

chiefly to his great achievements as a violinist and to the incentive

he gave to romanticism in music.

II.

WEBER[37] (1786-1826). Spohr's efforts in behalf of

programmatic music are by no means to be undervalued; at the same

time it must be borne in mind that even his finest works are eclipsed

by those of Weber by virtue of the latter's marvellous imagination,

unerring judgment in the choice of appropriate means of expression,

and huge technique in orchestration. Weber began his career during

what might be called the transition period in modern art. It would be

here out of place to enlarge upon the general conditions attendant

upon the awakening of the so-called "storm and stress" agitation in

Germany. Weber's artistic development was, however, so inseparably

allied with this movement that at least a brief review thereof would

appear indispensable before proceeding to an examination of his

orchestral works.

[Footnote 37: See Appendix of Musical Illustrations, Examples 36 to

47.]

Langhans sums up the mental and emotional conditions of this

transition period by saying that "in place of the general

subject-matter with which the lyric poetry of the preceding century

had been satisfied, the subjective feelings of the poet now came to

the front, and the essential nature of lyric poetry, a boundless

submersion into the innermost life of the soul, could under these

circumstances attain full prominence." Germany was at this time

greatly interested in the writings of Byron and of Jean Paul Richter.

Romantic poetry in turn began to influence both dramatic and lyric

music. Indications of departure from the elevated and reflective

style of the great classical composers were apparent. Time-honored

rules and traditions began to be neglected. Individualism asserted

itself. The general tendency of the epoch embodied a certain mystical

element--a return to the chivalrous atmosphere of mediæval romance.

And this tendency was in harmony with the very nature of Weber's

imaginative trend. In turn, this unfettered realm of imagination,

peopled with sylphs, nymphs, fairies, contained latent and most

propitious possibilities for progressive orchestration. Weber's

instrumentation was founded upon that of Beethoven, but it was none

the less distinctive and original. It was above all dramatic. His

true greatness lay in the power of orchestral portrayal in the more

vivid scenes of his operas, and in his operatic overtures. His two

symphonies are comparatively weak. Though deficient in artistic

education, Weber's romantic disposition and rare appreciation for

instrumental effects enabled him to become one of the greatest

modern orchestral writers, and his scoring is a model for all later

composers. He stands at the head of modern instrumentation, for with

him a new period began. Moreover, he was the creator of modern German

romantic opera. As Kapellmeister at Dresden he was instrumental in

counteracting the influence of Italian music which was still in vogue

at the Court, and he helped to mould the tastes of the public in

favor of native dramatic and orchestral music. "Der Freischütz" is

the representative of ideal national opera. Here the orchestration is

admirably adapted to depict and intensify the scenes and situations.

It abounds in striking contrasts that are ever consistent with the

demands of what has been called the "local" coloring. Episodes

requiring sombre and mysterious tonal tints are again offset by

the purest of lyrics and by powerful dramatic climaxes. "Oberon,"

on the other hand, abounds in more peaceful melodic and harmonic

fancies, poetic revery, and dainty scoring. Though the effectiveness

of "Euryanthe" is marred by reason of its insipid libretto, it is

nevertheless the most important of Weber's operas, considered from

a musical standpoint. Its continuous music and the interweaving

of recitative and melody directly point the way to Wagner. Weber

displayed superb power in the development of his overtures. In the

second volume of his "Music and Musicians," Wagner declared that

Weber might be said to have originated a novel form of overture or

"dramatic fantasy," of which Wagner considered the "Oberon" overture

to be the best example.

In turning to the details of Weber's instrumentation it is found that

no new instruments were introduced. Beauty and novelty were attained

rather by inherent regard for suitable application of tonal color and

by the discovery of new combinations. Although Weber, like Spohr, did

not venerate Beethoven as he should have done, it was not possible

for him to improve upon the great master's string writing. Of course

certain novel effects are to be found, such as the subdivision of

the violins _soli_ into numerous parts, the viola accompaniment to

Annette's ballad,[38] and the use of the same instrument as bass to

"Leise, leise"[39] in "Der Freischütz."

[Footnote 38: Ex. 47.]

[Footnote 39: Ex. 43.]

But perhaps no other composer contributed more to the independence of

the wood-wind.[40] Weber was exceedingly modern in the use of small

combinations. In order to obtain a rare and fairy-like effect in

"Oberon," the first flute and first clarinet give out the melody; the

second flute plays arpeggios as does likewise the second clarinet,

though in contrary motion; a solo horn is employed as bass. The

opening bars of Annette's song in "Der Freischütz" may be cited as

containing a good example for the oboe as does also the accompaniment

to Kilian's song for the bassoon. But it was quite particularly the

clarinet for which Weber showed especial predilection. Beautiful

phrases for the clarinet are to be found in the Allegro of the

overture to "Der Freischütz"[41] as well as in the overture to

"Oberon"; and the characteristics of the instrument in its entire

range are effectively displayed in the introduction to Adolar's

aria in the second act of "Euryanthe." Moreover, he was the first

to discover the tragic possibilities of the chalumeau range,[42] as

exemplified by the held notes in the lowest part of the instrument

accompanying the entries of Zamiel in "Der Freischütz."

[Footnote 40: Ex. 39, 41.]

[Footnote 41: Ex. 37.]

[Footnote 42: Ex. 40, 44, 46.]

Next to the clarinet, the horns[43] received especial consideration

from Weber, and acquired greater freedom and individuality, being

brought into requisition not alone for mellow _cantilene_ and

sustained harmonies, but also as the exponents of jubilant outbursts

or of gloomy whisperings. Many admirable illustrations will

readily be recalled, such as the passages for horns _soli_ in the

introduction of the "Freischütz" overture,[44] the trio for horns

in the Romance in "Preciosa," and the horn accompaniment to the

Mermaid's Song in "Oberon." With Weber, the use of four horns and

three trombones became the rule, whereas with Beethoven it had been

the exception.

[Footnote 43: Ex. 42, 45.]

[Footnote 44: Ex. 36.]

All things considered, it is evident that modern opera and modern

orchestration are immensely indebted to Weber, and his influence has

made itself more or less felt upon the writings of all subsequent

dramatic and orchestral composers.

III.

Two contemporaries of Weber who followed in his footsteps as

composers of romantic opera were Konradin Kreutzer (1780) and

Marschner (1795). Kreutzer's "Nachtlager von Granada" has become

widely known, but of the two men, Marschner is by far the more

important. He is popularly known as the heir of Weber, and has

been called the connecting link between Weber and Wagner. Himself

stimulated and influenced by his friend, Weber, he in turn helped to

mould the earlier works of Wagner. His masterpiece, "Hans Heiling,"

abounds in natural melodic expression, truthful interpretation and

dramatic energy. Neither Kreutzer nor Marschner can be cited as

having contributed anything substantially new to instrumentation,

but they at least helped to strengthen the foundations of modern

orchestration as initiated by Weber.

IV.

The two greatest representatives of the early Romantic School were

Weber and SCHUBERT (1797-1828), indeed, the latter is to

be regarded as the ideal exponent of the romantic poets. He was the

first to raise the Lied from comparative obscurity to such prominence

as to bring the lyric element on a par with that of the dramatic and

epic. His nature was contemplative rather than dramatic. Nevertheless

some of his greatest masterpieces, such as the "Erlkönig," embody not

only dramatic but epic characterization as well. He was above all the

master of exquisite melody, and both his songs and his instrumental

works are further conspicuous for their daring harmonies, animated

and varied rhythm. He opened up a new pathway in the field of

accompaniment which acquired not only greater importance in

intensifying emotional expression, but came also to be the faithful

ally of the vocal part as interpreter of the poem. The use of little

motives in the accompaniment to his songs might be looked upon as an

anticipation in the miniature of Wagner's thematic treatment of his

"Leit-motiven."

Schubert's mode of life was in some respects similar to that of

Beethoven in that he lived apart from the public. Spurred on by

the example of Beethoven, he added to his series of youthful

symphonies two masterpieces which are next in importance to those

of his illustrious model. Both the C major and the unfinished B

minor symphonies display rare skill in the handling of orchestral

instruments, whether in solo passages or in combination. An intimate

acquaintance with their respective characteristics was afforded him

during his early training, and every bar reveals the hand of a master

who without hesitation knew what effects he desired and how to obtain

them. Although his orchestral works lack that depth of conception

that only Beethoven possessed, Schubert nevertheless supplied the

deficiency by means of beautiful melody, tender expression, forceful

harmonic progressions, and, as just intimated, a perfect command

of orchestral resources. Schubert enlarged the scope of practical

instrumentation by discovering two exceedingly valuable and effective

modes of expression that were entirely new so far as manner of

treatment is concerned. No composer before him had elicited from the

trombones such impressive utterance as is to be found, for instance,

in the first movement of the symphony in C where the trombones

_pianissimo_ intone the melody. The first innovation consisted,

therefore, of employing the trombones freely as solo instruments, or

again as independent factors in three-part harmony, _pianissimo_, or

in unison, _forte_. The second innovation was the felicitous manner

in which he contrasted solo instruments of the wood-wind group, or

what Prout calls "a kind of dialogue between them." As an admirable

illustration well-known to all, he calls attention to the charming

dialogue between the flute, oboe, and clarinet in the two Ballet airs

and in the Entr'-act in B flat of the music to "Rosamunde." Many

other interesting details of instrumentation could be cited such as

the effective use of the trumpet in the slow movement of the symphony

in G; his chamber music, also, furnishes admirable examples of string

writing. Among the most prominent are the trio in E flat, the quartet

in D minor, and the quintet in C.

Only in recent years has the influence of Schubert's orchestral

works made itself prominently felt, for until the middle of the

last century most of them had remained in manuscript. Moreover as

recently as fifty odd years ago one of his symphonies was considered

excessively difficult by the principal orchestra of Vienna. Grove

says that "though the whole work was announced, such had been the

difficulties at rehearsal that only the first two movements were

given, and they were carried off by an interpolation of an air from

'Lucia' between them."

V.

MENDELSSOHN[45] (1809-1847). Concurrent with the advent of

Mendelssohn and Schumann, the fascination that Rossini had exercised

in Germany lost its hold, and the public learned to appreciate

more and more the sterling qualities of its own native music. But

not only did the efforts of the German composers of the nineteenth

century begin to win due recognition, but also there was rekindled a

veneration for the creations of the great classicists. This was in

a large manner due to Mendelssohn's untiring efforts. Possessed of

broad culture, wealth, and attractive personality, he combined the

spirit of romanticism with the structural forms of classicism; this

conservatism helped to balance the restless tendencies that were at

that time dominating music and poetry. His compositions are imbued

with beauty and sweetness of melody, with varied harmonies, buoyant

orchestration; his choral writing is the most fluent since Bach's

and surpasses in this respect that of Händel. Melody is emphasized;

tragic depth is lacking. He excelled as a writer of "representative"

music, but even here his refined sense for euphony never deserted

him. He was successful in all forms excepting opera. "St. Paul" and

"Elijah" are the most important oratorios since those of Haydn;

his violin concerto comes next to Beethoven's as a favorite; his

symphonies are characteristic, romantic, and abound in "local"

coloring. His style may be divided into two distinct classes: the

lyric, as typified in the "Songs without Words," and the fantastic

and imaginative as exposed in the Scherzo of the "Midsummer Night's

Dream."

[Footnote 45: See Appendix of Musical Illustrations, Examples 58 to

66.]

Mendelssohn's contributions to the details of instrumentation were

both original and varied. Already in "Midsummer Night's Dream," of

which the Overture was written when he was but seventeen years old,

are to be found marvellous effects that are indeed fairy-like in

their daintiness.[46] In fact it might be justly claimed that this

is Mendelssohn's best orchestral work, taking into consideration its

polished form, transparent and perfectly balanced instrumentation.

Noteworthy for their novelty are the rapid staccato passages for

the wood-wind in the Scherzo.[47] In none other of his works has

the flute been treated in a more charming manner.[48] Familiar to

all is the romantic and extended employment of the horns in the

Notturno,[49] as well as the ludicrous utterances of the opheicleide

in the Overture.

[Footnote 46: Ex. 58, 62.]

[Footnote 47: Ex. 59.]

[Footnote 48: Ex. 60, 66.]

[Footnote 49: Ex. 65.]

As a composer of oratorio, Mendelssohn's choruses, recitatives and

German chorale melodies plainly show the influence of Bach's "Passion

Music." This is particularly noticeable in "St. Paul." Mendelssohn's

mightiest creation is undoubtedly "Elijah." It satisfies every demand

by reason of its expressive recitative, its dramatic and descriptive

choruses, its beauty of lyric episodes and the appropriateness of

its structural form. The orchestral score of "Elijah" is one of

Mendelssohn's best. Among minor details, the violas are brought

into prominence as in the accompaniment to "Lord God of Abraham"

where they are given the highest part. A well-known phrase is the

'cello accompaniment in thirds to the baritone solo. The brass is

again reënforced by an opheicleide. The opening of the chorus, "O

be gracious, ye immortals," in "St. Paul" is accompanied by divided

violas and 'cellos, and parts for the serpent are to be found in the

same work.

Both the subject-matter and the orchestration of Mendelssohn's

symphonies show exceptional originality, and the "Scotch," No. 2

in A minor, as well as the "Italian," No. 3 in A major, are worthy

companions to the "Midsummer Night's Dream." His symphonies are full

of freshness and vigor. Though classic purity of form is strictly

adhered to, Beethoven's polyphony and Weber's picturesque portrayal

are skilfully combined. Like Beethoven, he embodied in his symphonies

certain dramatic characteristics. Rapid passages for the wood-wind,

similar to those in the "Midsummer Night's Dream," are again to be

met with in the Scherzo of the "Scotch" symphony. Mendelssohn was

conservative in employing the brass; of all the early romanticists

he remained the most faithful to traditional usage of the third

group, although trombones were now incorporated as habitual members

thereof. Among other novel combinations, divided violas, reënforced

by clarinets, intone the second subject in the first movement of

the "Lobgesang" symphony. In connection with Mendelssohn it is

interesting to recall the fact that as late as 1829 the pianoforte

was still sometimes employed as a means for conducting, since in

that year he directed his C minor symphony in that way in London.

Mendelssohn's overtures are more pronounced in their modern romantic

tendencies than his symphonies. They are distinctly programmatic,

even though in structure they are moulded on classic forms. From

them dates the development of the modern romantic concert overture.

Mendelssohn's merits and defects have led to much violent discussion,

but the suavity of his melody, the purity of his form and the

delicacy of his orchestration have been excelled by none.

VI.

The most prominent associates and disciples of Mendelssohn were F.

Hiller, Rietz, the Englishman, Bennett, and the Dane, Gade.

Ferdinand Hiller (1811) was a celebrated and prolific composer,

being in his day considered the most notable musician in West

Germany. It was his rare privilege to be personally acquainted with

no less than seven of the greatest composers the world has ever

produced--Cherubini, Beethoven, Meyerbeer, Rossini, Berlioz, Chopin

and Liszt. He was, moreover, a fine pianist and conductor, and was

particularly happy as an interpreter of Beethoven. His compositions

are pleasing and well-rounded in form; but they were modelled

after those of Mendelssohn and are now comparatively forgotten in

consequence of their lack of individuality.

Julius Rietz (1812) was closely associated with Mendelssohn whom he

eventually succeeded as conductor of the Gewandhaus Concerts. He is

primarily to be remembered for having edited Beethoven's symphonies

as well as the entire works of Mendelssohn.

Sterndale Bennett (1816) was one of England's greatest composers,

the most gifted, in fact, after Purcell. He was a friend both of

Mendelssohn and of Schumann, and their enthusiasm encouraged and

stimulated him to further develop his own talents. Although the

influence more particularly of Mendelssohn is plainly to be found

in his works, he retained his individuality and displayed numerous

traits that are undeniably original. His most important works are

an oratorio "The Woman of Samaria"; a cantata "The May Queen"; a

symphony in G minor; four overtures, and four pianoforte concertos.

He has been called the founder of a new "English School."

Since the substance of Gade's music is nominally Scandinavian in

character, it will again be referred to later on in connection with

the Northern countries.

VII.

SCHUMANN (1810-1856). In spite of the depth of thought and

feeling, the brilliancy of ideas, and the programmatic tendencies

that signalize Schumann's monumental productions, he unfortunately

holds the unique position of being one of the few great masters who

did not excel in orchestration. Nevertheless, such is the importance

of his orchestral works that they have won for themselves an exalted

and permanent place in musical literature. Schumann's relation to

the Romantic Movement may be tersely stated as in one of Dickinson's

condensed reviews: "The romantic ideal attains self-consciousness in

Schumann. Weber and Schubert never called themselves romanticists

and were not wholly aware of the tendencies of their work. Schumann,

a critical thinker and self-analyst, not only moulded and colored

his music in accord with certain definite poetic conceptions imbibed

from the romantic writers, but also became the literary champion of

romanticism in music, and aimed directly at fixed radical principles

in the critical and creative thought of his time. He, therefore, not

only marks the beginning of a new era in musical art, but is also

the type of the modern liberally cultured and reflective musician."

With Schumann, the subject-matter and treatment of design are of all

importance. His compositions contain the quintessence of the poetic

and romantic. Every little melody is a miniature poem in tones,

tinged by a certain melancholy and even gloomy coloring. He was, like

Mendelssohn, an ardent disciple of Bach, but his harmonies are freer

and bolder than Mendelssohn's, and his pianoforte compositions show

the influence more especially of Chopin. The chief characteristics

of these works are _cantabile_ expression, intricacy, and the

predominance of harmony and rhythm over melody. A multitude of ideas

are frequently crowded into the space of a few bars. As a song writer

Schumann rivalled and perhaps even excelled Schubert. The songs of

these two peers, together with those of Franz (1815), represent

the highest ideal of the German Lied, for the exquisite taste and

sentiment of Franz appeal strongly to the cultivated musician.

Although Schubert's influence upon Schumann's songs is plainly to

be seen, Schumann enhanced the functions of the accompaniment and

frequently assigned but a secondary rôle to the vocal part. Novelty

of form and style characterize his works for soli, chorus and

orchestra; portions of "Scenes from Faust," "Paradise and the Peri,"

"Manfred," represent his highest attainment and contain also some

effective scoring. The instrumentation of his chamber music betrays

more regard for sonority than for classic counterpoint. Of surpassing

beauty are the quartets in A and in A minor, and the greatest of all,

the quintet in E flat.

Schumann's four symphonies rank next in importance to those of

Beethoven and Schubert, and in depth of sentiment and emotional

power he proved himself a worthy successor to Beethoven. His

symphonies are stamped with distinctive individuality, traditional

form being subjected to certain modifications that were in keeping

with the progressive tendencies of his nature. Thus the D minor

symphony is intended to be played entire without a pause, and

subject-matter from one movement reasserts itself in another. It

would be a waste of time to analyze Schumann's instrumentation

too closely. He followed but could not equal that of Mendelssohn.

Artistic feeling for orchestral effects and occasional good scoring

are to be found, but much of the latter is thick and heavy. He was

apt to follow Rossini's more or less trivial methods of employing

the third enlarged orchestral group. Even Schubert was not entirely

exempt from this mannerism. Such incongruities as the employment of

a bassoon as a bass to trombones could also be cited. Of material

advantage, however, was his introduction into German orchestras of

valve-horns and valve-trumpets. But in a word, it is the substantial

worth of the music itself, not the instrumentation, that has made

Schumann's orchestral works immortal.

VIII.

Among the prominent associates and disciples of Schumann should be

mentioned Volkmann, Reinecke, Bargiel, and Jensen.

The compositions of Volkmann (1815) show affinity to Schumann's.

His pianoforte works bear fanciful titles, and his symphonies and

quartets are massive and musicianly. But like most satellites, he

was not possessed of sufficient spontaneity to acquire wide-spread

or enduring recognition. The compositions of Carl Reinecke (1824),

who held the honorable position of director of the Gewandhaus

Concerts from 1860 until 1895, show the influence more especially

of Schumann, although that of Mendelssohn as well as of Wagner and

Brahms is also apparent. He owes his reputation as a composer largely

to his smaller works, in which the tastes of a refined pianist are

much in evidence. Few could be compared with him as an interpreter

of Mozart, and his activity not alone as a composer of merit but

also as a prominent pianist and distinguished conductor has won him

universal fame. Bargiel (1828) was one of the foremost disciples of

Schumann whose principles he zealously disseminated, both in his

capacity as a fine teacher and as composer. His symphonies, chamber

music and quite especially his psalms for chorus and orchestra show

considerable originality and fine musicianship. Likewise Jensen

(1837) took Schumann unreservedly as his model in spite of being in

sympathetic accord with Gade. His songs and pianoforte pieces in the

lyric _genre_ are imbued with true feeling and rare sensuous charm.

IX.

In a general sense, all modern composers belong to the Romantic

School, but for the sake of consistency in this general

classification, Lachner, Jadassohn and Moszkowski should be mentioned

as direct followers of both Mendelssohn and Schumann.

Franz Lachner (1803) was prominently connected with the musical

life of Munich prior to the rise of Wagner worship in 1865. In

spite of his untiring activity as a conductor, he was one of the

most prolific and at the same time most popular composers of South

Germany. His style betrays the mind of a learned man. The harmonies

are modern, but his works are none the less imbued with a certain

tinge of classicism. Lachner wrote several operas and oratorios,

eight symphonies, and much chamber and church music; but of greatest

importance are the suites for grand orchestra of which he wrote

eight. They are magnificent specimens of contrapuntal knowledge. Some

condemn his writings as being "Kapellmeistermusik" and as containing

nothing truly original or great. Riemann's views are radically

different:--"Lachner is at his best in his orchestral suites, which,

as a kind of modern continuation of Bach-Händel orchestral movements,

occupy a distinctive place in musical literature. Sovereign command

of contrapuntal devices combined with nobility of invention will

secure for them in the future greater appreciation than is accorded

them at the present day."

Jadassohn (1831) holds an important position in the history of

instrumentation, not so much, perhaps, as a result of his own

composition as for the excellence of his teaching and of his

theoretical works, which include the valuable "Lehrbuch der

Instrumentation." A prominent feature of many of his works is the

facility with which canonic writing is applied. Among the best-known

and most popular of his orchestral compositions is the Serenade, opus

35.

Moszkowski (1854) is one of the younger composers whose writings are

imbued with the spirit of Mendelssohn and Schumann rather than with

the local coloring of Poland as might have been expected since his

father was a native of that country. The most popular of his works

are the "Spanische Tänze" for pianoforte, whereas the most important

in orchestral form is the symphonic poem "Jeanne d'Arc." The style is

dignified and musicianly, but lacks the true greatness of originality.

The list of faithful adherents to the pure romanticism of the early

school is herewith properly concluded. Only an imaginary line,

however, separates Spohr and Weber from Raff and Brahms; so the

following chapter is nothing more than a continuation of the present

discussion.

(Summary on page 175.)

The Evolution of Modern Orchestration · 第 2 / 6 章