BP. BURNET.

Still Mr. Somers, I see, is on the desponding side: and with better

reason than before; since, if the difficulty be half so great as is

pretended, this change of the speaker is little favourable to the

removal of it. However, I do not despair, whether these surmises of

difficulty be real or dissembled, to clear up the whole matter to

both your satisfactions. The stress of it lies here: That, whereas

a mixed and limited government is supposed to have been the ancient

constitution in this country, the appearances, in fact, for a couple

of centuries, have been so repugnant to this notion, that either the

supposition must be given up as too hastily formed, or sufficient

reasons must be assigned for these contradictory appearances. I embrace

the latter part of this alternative without hesitation or reserve; and

pretend to lay before you such unanswerable arguments for the cause

I have undertaken, as, in better hands, might amount to a perfect

vindication of ENGLISH LIBERTY.

I take my rise from the period which my Lord Commissioner has

prescribed to me; that is, from the accession of the TUDOR family.

We have henceforth, indeed, a succession of high despotic princes, who

were politic and daring enough to improve every advantage against the

people’s liberties. And their peculiar characters were well suited to

the places in which we find them. HENRY VII. was wise and provident;

jealous of his authority as well as title; and fruitful in expedients

to secure both. His son and successor, who had a spirit of the largest

size, and, as one says[6], _feared nothing but the falling of the

heavens_, was admirably formed to sustain and establish that power,

which the other had assumed. And after two short reigns, which afforded

the people no opportunity of recovering their lost ground, the crown

settled on the head of a princess, who, with the united qualifications

of her father and grandfather, surpassed them both in the arts of

a winning and gracious popularity. And thus, in the compass of a

century, the prerogative was now wound up to a height, that was very

flattering to the views and inclinations of the STUART family.

It may be further observed, that the condition of the times was such

as wonderfully conspired with the designs and dispositions of these

princes.

A long and bloody war, that had well nigh exhausted the strength and

vitals of this country, was, at length, composed by the fortunate

successes of _Bosworth-field_. All men were desirous to breathe a

little from the rage of civil wars. And the enormous tyranny of the

prince, whose death had made way for the exaltation of the earl of

RICHMOND, was a sort of foil to the new government, and made the

rigours of it appear but moderate when set against the cruelties of the

preceding reign.

The great change that followed, in the deliverance of the nation from

papal tyranny, and the suppression of religious houses, was a new

pretence for the extension of the royal prerogative; and the people

submitted to it with pleasure, as they saw no other way to support and

accomplish that important enterprise.

And, lastly, the regal power, which had gained so immensely by the

rejection of the papal dominion, was carried still higher by the great

work of reformation; which being conducted by a wise and able princess,

was easily improved, on every occasion, to the advantage of the crown.

And thus, whether we consider the characters of the persons, or the

circumstances of the times, every thing concurred to exalt the princes

of the house of TUDOR to a height of power and prerogative, which

had hitherto been unknown in _England_, and became, in the end, so

dangerous to the constitution itself.

But you expect me, I suppose, to point to the very examples of

usurpation, I have in view, and the means by which it took effect in

the hands of these and the succeeding princes.

The works of Richard Hurd, volume 4 (of 8) · 第 40 / 243 题