LIBRARIES AS LEAVEN

This address was delivered at the inauguration of the Free

Public Library, Madison, Wis., by Prof. James D. Butler.

James Davie Butler was born in Rutland, Vt., March 15, 1815,

and was graduated at Middlebury College, Vt., in 1836. He

entered the Congregational ministry, and held the chairs of

ancient languages in Wabash College, 1854-58 and the

University of Wisconsin, 1858-67, after which he devoted

himself to lecturing and writing until his death in Madison

in 1905.

My subject is "Libraries as Leaven," or the relation of libraries to the

increased diffusion of knowledge.

What is a Library? It is the knowledge of all brought within the reach

of each one. It is an expanded encyclopædia, or the books which are, or

ought to be, consulted in compiling a perfect encyclopædia.

Human knowledge--and hence the books in which it is treasured up--is

divided by some authors into forty departments. I have their names here

all written down--but I dare not read them. You would give no more

quarter to such a catalogue than the lover gave to the mercantile

inventory of his sweetheart's charms, when itemized as "two lips

indifferent red," "two gray eyes with lids to them," and so on.

But all these forty classes of knowledge ought to be represented in a

library, and the more largely the better. They should also mingle there

in due proportion, "parts into parts reciprocally shot, and all so

forming a harmonious whole." "If the whole body were an eye, where were

the hearing?"

I once lived in a town of a thousand families, where, through a legacy,

one copy of some single author was annually presented to each family.

But, with the same money, a thousand different works might have been

every year purchased, and all kept accessible by all the families. The

result would have been a feast as appetizing to all palates as the

miraculous manna which the rabbins tell us tasted to each Jew like that

particular dainty which he loved best.

It is no objection to a library that no man will ever read it through.

No man will read through his dictionary, and time is not long enough for

a man to read all the words in the daily _Tribune_. Nor will any

customer exhaust a store. Yet he demands an assortment from which to

select the little that he needs. In every library most authors, bound up

in congenial calf, sleep soundly in their own sheets. Yet the dust of

dead men's bones, at the touch of genius, comes forth in a new life. How

much that is best in Macaulay and in Buckle is extracted from

bibliothecal rubbish--or reading which had never been read. Hence even

Samson could not say to the jaw-bone of an ass: "I have no need of you."

The wise thank God for fools. They get their living out of them, and

mostly out of the greatest fools. In truth, no library is large enough.

Guizot and Michelet complain of inability to consult certain books, even

in that Parisian library, where books are as plenty as water in the

deluge, and the shelves would reach from here to Milwaukee.

A library should be a cosmos; but it is a chaos till arrangement,

catalogues and librarians bring us at once the volume we desire, and

which, without them, would be as hard to fish up as the Atlantic cable

lost in mid-ocean.

"Thus warlike arms in magazines we place,

All ranged in order and disposed with grace:

Not thus alone the curious eye to please,

But to be _found_, when need requires, with ease."

In some libraries, however, books are arranged on a system which seems

borrowed from Spanish hospitals, where patients are arranged according

to religious creeds, rather than bodily complaints. Every library has

more volumes than I can master; but no library though it be the conflux

of all civilizations, has so many volumes as I may need to consult.

Chief Justice Story used to assert that no American could test the

accuracy of Gibbon without crossing the Atlantic. Such an assertion

would now, perhaps, be extravagant, yet many of Gibbon's references are

still hard to trace in America. One instance may be worth notice. Our

approaching national centenary leads us to curiosity in reference to the

secular feasts of the Romans. In Gibbon's account of the most famous

among them, a thousand years from the founding of Rome, the main

authority quoted is Zosimus. But the history of Zosimus you will seek in

vain throughout Madison libraries. You will not find his name in the

public collections of Chicago, or Cincinnati, or St. Louis, or San

Francisco. It is unlikely that any single copy of Zosimus has yet

penetrated west of our Atlantic slope.

But how dare I thus speak about Zosimus? How is it possible for me to

know whether his history can, or cannot, be discovered, either on the

Pacific shore, or in the Mississippi valley? I know it, thanks to the

Library of Our Historical Society, and specifically to its goodly array

of bibliothecal catalogues.

Why will not our Centenary Women's Club buy our Free Library a Zosimus?

Free libraries, especially those maintained by public taxation, were

scarcely known before the last half of the nineteenth century. If in an

antiquarian mood, I could indeed bring forth curious details concerning

half a hundred in continental Europe, some of them running back several

centuries, but I forbear. The earliest British library law, similar to

ours in Wisconsin, dates from 1850. The earliest in Massachusetts--and I

suppose in America--was approved May 24, 1851. The first library opened

in consequence of this law was in New Bedford, March 3, 1853. The

grandest triumph under the Massachusetts law is in Boston. The free

library there stands to-day surpassed in volumes by only three or four

American libraries--say the Astor, Congress, and Harvard--while in

arrangement, architecture, and equipment it is pronounced by the most

enlightened foreigners unsurpassed by any library in the world.

Our legislature in 1872 empowered the mayors and councils in towns and

cities to lay an annual tax of one mill on a dollar of the assessed

valuation, for establishing and maintaining free libraries. This law

will bear good fruit. Yet it is a step backward from the act of 1859.

That act created a library fund by setting apart for that purpose

one-tenth of the school-fund income, and imposing a tax of one-tenth of

a mill on all property. The sum of $88,784.78 had been thus accumulated

when the war of 1861 broke out,--and the money was used for military

purposes. It ought to be refunded by the State, or United States, and

expended for its original object. The great superiority of the law of

1859 lies in its extending to rural districts,--and so leaving no hamlet

unvisited--while the maxim of the present law is, "Coals to Newcastle,

owls to Athens, apples to Alcinous. He that hath--to him shall be

given." It gives a library to Madison, where 40,000 volumes were already

within reach, but nothing at all to five and twenty other places in Dane

County, whose need of books is ten times greater. But libraries bring

forth after their kind, and free libraries, we may hope, will become

co-extensive with free schools.

Madison, to-day, in opening to all her sons and daughters a Free

Library, has outstripped every other municipality in the State. It is a

noble preëminence, and will do her honor to the end of the world.

The Madison Free Library, it may be reasonably hoped, will approximate

to the bibliothecal ideal. It starts with an inheritance of 3,308

volumes, accumulated during a score of years by the Madison Institute.

Its revenue is considerable, and it will grow in even pace with the

growth of the city. Nothing but Adam and Minerva was ever born of full

stature. The tax now assessed for it would impoverish no man till after

the lapse of thrice three thousand years. It was limited to less than a

third of what the law allows because we make the entering edge of a

wedge thin, and would learn wisdom from Satan who never makes his

temptations so bad at the beginning as at the end. Is is only the first

step that costs. The Free Library will be ready for windfalls, and so

surely as history repeats itself, they will pour cornucopias into its

lap. Of the million volumes in the British Museum, two out of every five

were gifts. No wonder. Book-gatherers abhor the breaking up of their

collections as we do the dissolution of the Union, or as abolitionists

did the snapping of family ties by slave-traders. Lest what they have

joined together shall be put asunder, they rejoice to lay up their

treasures in an institution which shall never die. Accordingly, in

tracing the origin of one hundred and eighty libraries in continental

Europe, it has been discovered that all of them, except sixteen, were

presented to the municipalities by book-lovers.

Experience this side the Atlantic is thus far equally encouraging. I

will notice a single specimen. The Boston Free Library is mainly

contributed by individuals. One thousand volumes were given by Everett;

2,300 by Bowditch; 11,360 by Theodore Parker; 26,000 by Joshua Bates;

11,899 by the Old South Church, and those of greater rarity than any

other equal number of volumes. Then Ticknor and Prescott bestowed the

best Spanish library ever gathered by private men, and Wheelwright one

scarcely inferior, relating to South America. Of pecuniary benefactions,

I will only mention $10,000 from Lawrence, $30,000 from Phillips, and

$50,000 from Bates. But legacies to the Free Library have become so

common that we may confidently expect that, if any Bostonian shall die

and bequeath it nothing, the courts will decide the neglect of the

Library to be conclusive proof of insanity, and so will nullify his

will! On the whole, we cannot be too sanguine concerning the prospective

progress of our book-feast for the million.

But a library, however perfect, and though freely open to all the world,

may be a light shining in a darkness which comprehendeth it not. Many

years ago, I was a student in such a library at Rome. It was larger than

any one in America at that time, and offered the best of all its stores

daily to everybody, and that without charge. Yet it was well-nigh a

solitude. The reason was obvious. My walk thither was through a gauntlet

of beggar-boys, and I once took with me an Italian primer, and cried out

that I would give something to any boy who could read. I held it up

before nineteen in succession, but no one could spell out a line. They

had eschewed not only writing as tempting to forgery, but reading also

as a black art. Had they been giants they could,--like the barbarians

who sacked Rome,--ruin, but not relish, the nectared sweets of books. To

them the collective wisdom of the world was as sunshine to the blind, or

as smoke in the nursery riddle,--"roomful, houseful, can't catch a

handful!"

"Or like gospel pearls which pigs neglect

When pigs have that opportunity."

But in regard to _our_ Free Library, I have better hopes, and beg your

leave to show _what use_, in my judgment, will be made of it. It will be

resorted to for _amusement_. Some will flit through it in the spirit of

the Viennese, who turn their central cathedral into a thoroughfare on

promenades and business walks. But such visitors will learn something in

glancing at the backs of books. Books, as well as men, have a

physiognomy. Here, as elsewhere, the admirers of Shakespeare will take

out his plays, return them with the leaves uncut, and then insist that

booksellers be instructed if Mr. Shakespeare writes any new book, to

forward it without further orders. Many will have no eyes except for the

volumes of _fiction_, and sometimes will rather run through these than

read them. Novels are a sort of cake, which, if eaten alone, is prone to

make mental dyspeptics. Yet most novel-readers will gain some profit

from our library. Some of them will here acquire a facility in reading

which for lack of practice has hitherto been unknown to them. No one has

really learned to read, until he has read to learn. Their interest in

stories will beguile the toil of becoming _ready_ readers, and their

range of reading will naturally widen. But if it does not, they may

learn much. Every good fiction is _true_, if not to particular fact yet

to general principles, to natural scenery, to human nature, to the ways

of human life, manners, customs, the very age and body of the time. Even

Tom Moore declares that "his chief work of fiction is founded on a long

and labourious collection of facts." Again, when worn out by work, when

care-crazed, and nerves are unstrung, who has not found in fiction--the

balm of hurt minds--a recreation, a city of refuge, a restorative.

"Cups that cheer but not inebriate?"

In this way our free library will be a new pleasure, and the founder of

it deserves the reward offered by the Sicilian tyrant, for such an

invention. Work was never so monotonous as now; accordingly, play ought

to be more than ever amusing. The Kilkenny cats, who devoured each other

all but the tails, left one orphan kitten which began to eat up itself,

but catching sight of a mouse was diverted from suicide. There is among

us more than one disconsolate kitten now destroying himself, who will in

our free feast of fiction espy a mouse which will reconcile him to life,

and save him from himself. The rationale of this solace is indicated

after a forcible, though rather a homely fashion, in the Chinese saying:

"A dog chasing game does not mind the fleas which he _barks_ at while he

lies in his kennel." "The labour we delight in physics pain."

Again, in all great works of fiction the purpose is, while not

o'erstepping the modesty of nature, to show virtue her own feature, and

scorn her own image. Who can count the admirers of Scott and Dickens

that have learned from their portraitures moral lessons so well as never

to forget them;--to loathe the mean and aspire to the noble;--to shun

evil and cleave to good--in spite of temptations to one and from the

other?

But, after all, our book-treasury will only now and then bestow its best

gifts on those who resort to it merely for pleasure. To most visitors of

this class it must remain no more than a telescope to a child, something

to play with rather than to look through. Accordingly, they no more

exhaust the capacities of books than the Irish made full proof of

potatoes while they cooked only the balls and left the tubers to rot in

the ground.

But the Free Library will be resorted to for _instruction_. Few will

always hold the amusing button so close to their eyes that it will hide

the instructive sun. From the start it will be superior to every private

collection in the city, and its superiority will increase. Accordingly,

professional men will come thither to inform themselves either each in

his own specialty, or sallying on excursions from their home fields.

Besides the time-honoured and traditional three professions, editors and

teachers will be there, learning how to answer the hard questions of

pupils and subscribers. Each of these professionals will more or less

make known what he learns. The bibliothecal odor will be as plain upon

them as a certain other odor is upon those who emerge from the

smoking-car or saloon. "Dispensing native perfumes they whisper whence

they stole those balmy spoils." But the bibliothecal leaven will leaven

the community more _directly_.

God has set geniuses as great lights in the firmament to give light and

delight as well on the earth. The circuit of such suns is unto the ends

of the heaven, and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof. More and

more pervasive is their influence, like the spring-time, which leaves no

corner of the land untouched. In a library every man will recognize some

supreme author transfiguring whatever he touches,--crystallizing into

diamonds by wit, turning to gold with poetry, and glorifying as with

tongues of angels by eloquence, and whom he hence worships as Scotchmen

do Burns and as all the world does Shakespeare. Less and less do men

entertain angels unawares, more and more are they ashamed to know the

world's books only by name. Nobody now asks concerning Paradise Lost,

"What does it prove?"

Moreover, the Free Library will be patronized by the people in quest of

answers to multitudinous questions. Newspapers, whether in its

reading-room or out of it, will rouse in many directions a curiosity

they cannot satisfy, and so will urge to the library. There is a story

that an Englishman in a London library, after looking through an atlas,

said to a friend, "Help me find _Umbrage_ on the map! I read in my

gazette that the French have taken _Umbrage_. What a good-for-nothing

minister is ours--to leave _Umbrage_ so poorly defended that the French

could take it." That John Bull discovered in the library either

_umbrage_, or what was better for him--his own ignorance and the way to

remove it, "taking umbrage" against himself. His gazette probably

brought the same earnest inquirer to the library for _history_ as well

as for geography. A daily paper, which is the history of the world for

one day, leads backward, as a stream carries our thoughts to its

fountain. Whoever repairs to a library with one historical query will be

likely to repeat his visit, since newspapers, in the light of history,

will become more significant as the last chapter in a novel is more

interesting to those who have read the previous chapters, and so often

leads one back to them. Again, discussions are always arising, not

merely in formal debates, but as we sit in the house and walk by the

way. Some carry them on by assertions and counter-assertions--a strong

will and a strong won't--equally positive and ignorant, discussing and

sometimes leaving off the _dis_, till like Milton's devils they find no

end, in wandering mazes lost. Too often "It comes to pass that a

terrible oath, with a swaggering accent twanged off, gives an opinion

more approbation than ever proof itself would have earned it." Others

back up their opinions by _wagers_, in spite of a lurking feeling that

"Bets are the blockhead's argument,--

The only logic he can vent,

His minor and his major.--

'Tis to confess your head a worse

Investigator than your purse,

To reason with a wager."

But where standard books are at hand, investigation will often either

take the place of disputation, or bring strife to a speedy end.

Let us hope those here seeking props for their arguments will never be

those jealous lovers of books who cannot use them without using them up,

or who spirit them away for themselves alone. Such abductors have

sometimes infested the libraries in the Capitol. Their thefts can be

justified only by that casuistry which holds stealing the relics of

saints for a pious fraud. But in truth the more holy the saint, the more

heinous the sacrilege of what Hood calls _Book_-aneering.

Moreover, every _lecture_ delivered in the city will send some

investigators to the library, that they may confute, or confirm, or

amplify its teachings. A lecture that pops will not be as surely

_popular_ as formerly, if the library shall evince that what is true in

it is not new, and that what is new is not true, or that the speaker

draws on imaginations for facts and on facts for imaginations.

Every meeting of our Women's Centennial Club will start inquiries which

cannot be answered without recourse to the library.

It is certain that books of _travel_ will here be largely consulted.

Some of us purpose to go abroad. Such will read beforehand in order to

add a precious seeing to their eyes. They would dislike to have their

experiences those of a lady who when asked what she saw in Rome answered

"dirt," or of the London barber who at the coronation of Napoleon

remembered nothing except that the Emperor was well shaved, or of the

Bostonian fresh from the West who, when called on for his opinion of

Madison, said it would be a pretty fair Massachusetts village if it were

not spoiled by so many fresh water ponds around it. Others among us have

travelled already, and we shall be studious in the library that we may

ascertain what we ought to have seen--but did not, or the meaning of

what we did see, but which was Greek to us. The Shah of Persia noted in

his journal that of all the fine things in Europe the finest to his mind

was a show of wax work. His library would teach him better, and would

not laugh at him, as we do. A Vermont friend of mine, after his trip to

London, when asked whether he saw Westminster Abbey, confessed that he

did not, but added that Westminster Abbey was out of town at the time of

his visit. If he had free course in our library he would hardly excuse

himself in that way again. Soon after crossing the Mississippi at

Burlington, I heard a New York merchant, bound for California,

remarking: "How much geography one learns in travelling. Here is

Burlington. I always thought it in Illinois, but now I find it is in

Missouri." Library-reading may by this time have added insight to his

sight, and convicted him of the blunder which I suffered to pass

uncorrected, though we chatted 100 miles together. There are others of

us who, on hearing a traveller's tales, are curious to examine how far

we, like the old prophet, should count the way-faring man a fool, and

how far he uses his license to lie. Hence they will read that they may

make up their minds whether all MARK TWAIN'S caricatures have the ring

of truth.

A German table d'hote of twenty courses will surfeit a careless diner

before it is half over, and yet fail to afford him either what he likes

best or what he should like best. Hence it compels guests to a careful

choice what they will partake of and what refuse of the blessing there

is no room to receive in its fulness. A similar influence will be

exerted by the free library where we fall into the embarassment of

riches. We shall be driven to select from its bill of fare, that is the

catalogue, that fraction which we can enjoy most and which will profit

us most.

"Taste after taste upheld by kindliest change."

Some persons, when they survey a library and perceive that they can

never read the hundredth part of its volumes, will be attracted to those

works which teach "what to read," or open a panoramic outlook on the

diversified regions of the bookish world.

"Of all the best of man's best knowledges,

The contents, indexes and title-pages,

Through all past, present, and succeeding ages."

Unless we thus liberalize our views we are likely to vegetate, like the

rhubarb pie plant, under a barrel, and see the world only through its

bunghole. Ignorant of bibliographical guides and hence at a loss how to

estimate books, the steward of a British nobleman sold as rubbish all

volumes in the library which lacked _covers_. One of those thus disposed

of, and bought by a pedlar for nine pence, proved to be the very

earliest issue of the British press, snapped up by the British museum

for £80, and could not now be bought for ten times that sum. In regard

to the _intrinsic_ value of books blunders more egregious are daily

made. Libraries were never so needful as now, for libraries and life

never lay so close to one another as now. Our familiar sights lead to

interest in recondite knowledge. Photography, gas, the locomotive,

kerosene, yes, every match that lights it, provokes questions in

chemistry, or philosophy, which not every library can answer. No one can

gaze at the dome of our Capitol without naturally falling into

architectural inquiries which draw him through a world of books that

expose the nakedness of his ignorance, yet never put him to open shame.

But the truth is too palpable to dwell on that in our day life touches

libraries at every point.

In all libraries there are readers whose emblem is dead fish who follow

the stream, but thanks to various accidents, some of this class, ceasing

to be passive recipients, begin to investigate as active seekers. They

at once rise to a higher mental plane. The contrast between active

seekers and passive recipients is analogous to that between the

mountaineers and the maritime aborigines of California. The mountaineers

lived on grizzly bears--food which it was impossible to seize without

tasking their energies to the utmost. But tasking trains. The maritimes

lived on salmon, which were so abundant and so tame that they could be

caught by fishers who lay basking in the sun. But basking enervates.

Naturally enough no Indians are superior to the mountaineers who are

active seekers, nor yet inferior to the maritimes, who are passive

recipients. What investigators seek they will not find at once; they may

never find it. But they are sure to discover something better, so that

they will say with LESSING, in the library at Wolfenbuttel, "Were God to

hold truth in one hand and search in the other, and give me my choice, I

would say: Give me seeking without finding, rather than finding without

seeking!"

"All things that are,

Are with more spirit chased than enjoyed."

Courtship once over, the novel ends.

In the library where LESSING was made librarian--not that he might serve

the library, but that the library might serve him--I took in my hand

with reverence the inkstand out of which he distilled the essence of a

thousand books, and reformed German literature as radically as LUTHER

had reformed German religion.

All truths being inter-dependent, every road will lead to the end of the

world, and so while studying one subject a man becomes interested in

others, and his range of inquiry expands. When he kindles one dry stick,

many green ones will catch, and his brightest blazes are lit up by

unexpected sparks. One quickly learns to love hunting, and before

working up many topics, he forms an investigating habit which will

perpetuate itself. Thus while seeking an oyster, he finds a pearl, like

SAUL who sought asses and found a kingdom. Henceforth he reads more by

subjects, each a cord to string pearls on, than by volumes, for he feels

that,

"Unless to some particular end designed,

Reading is but a specious trifling of the mind,

And then, like ill-digested food,

To humors turns and not to blood."

But less and less of that sort is his reading, though it range through

all time, and tax all the world. Such an inquirer will live longer than

METHUSELAH, for he will have more thoughts, yet he will wish each of his

minutes was a millenary. He will read with an appetite growing as long

as he lives; indeed reading will help him to live longer. A thousand

such readers feel what one has spoken out, saying:

"In a library I was thrown, instead of worse society, into the company

of poets, philosophers and sages--to me good angels and ministers of

grace. From these silent instructors who often do more than fathers for

our interests, from these delightful associates I learned something of

the divine and more of the human religion. They were my interpreters in

the House Beautiful of God, and my guides among the Delectable Mountains

of Nature,

Blessing be with them and eternal praise,

Who gave me nobler loves and nobler cares."

Pre-eminently to the _young_ will the myriad-minded library be an oracle

in perplexities. They have been better trained in public schools than we

of the last generation were. They have broken ground in more various

studies, and their curiosity has been stimulated concerning more

questions. Each question, each study puts in their hand a new _key_ to

the locks which shut up libraries. Singers love to sing, and it is joy

for the just to do justice, so will our youth rejoice to use in the

library the skill they have acquired in school as naturally as when they

get jack knives they take to whittling. The public schools then find in

free libraries their fitting supplement, and complement. Schools without

libraries feed a prisoner with salted viands and then tantalize his

thirst with pitchers and bottles, all empty. The free school and the

free library will join hands like husband and wife in a well-matched

marriage.

"He is the half-part of a blessed man,

Left to be finished by such as she;

And she a fair divided excellence,

Whose fulness of perfection lies in him;

But two such silver currents when they join,

Do glorify the banks that bind them in.

Each befits the other, as ALEXANDER said concerning the finest poem and

the most costly casket in the world when he enshrined the Iliad in the

Persian box of gold and gems. Both are lotteries where tickets cost

nothing and everybody may draw all the prizes.

In addition to this, the free library will be to some nothing less than

an _inspiration_. _To some_--I wish I could say _to all_, but alas, it

is only an "elect few" whom the library can inspire. Spectacles are

invaluable,--but only to those who have eyes. One Sultan never wore a

shirt that had not every word of the Koran written on it yet absorbed

little piety. AARON'S excuse for making only a golden calf was, that the

Jews did not bring him gold enough to make an ox. The cherubim who know

most can never equal the seraphim who love most. An ugly and stupid man,

walking with a lady on each arm, boasts that he is between wit and

beauty, but may not imbibe one particle of either.

To some, however, a free library will make up for the lack of a liberal

education. More than that. It will furnish such an education every jot

and tittle of it, and that, in some sense, better than was ever bestowed

in a college, because acquired in the face of greater difficulties.

Libraries have often vouchsafed this priceless boon. That in Salem did

to BOWDITCH, the mathematician, in the last century, and to WHIPPLE, the

essayist, in this. The Edinburgh library made HUME an historian. Another

was inspiration to COBBETT. So was that of the Erfurt convent to LUTHER.

"It had purchased," says his biographer, "at heavy cost, several Latin

Bibles just printed for the first time in the neighboring city of Mainz.

When he first opened one of these tomes his eyes fell on the story of

HANNAH and SAMUEL. "O, God," he murmured, "could I have one of these

books I would seek no other worldly treasure." A great revolution then

took place in his soul. His happiest hours were in the library.

Concerning such a scholar--

"We cannot say: ''Tis pity

He lacks instructions,' for he seems a master

To most that teach."

The influence of ancient Libraries on classical writers is manifest from

their quotations. PLUTARCH'S have been traced to 250 authors. PLINY'S to

2,000 works. Classical Libraries preserved in Constantinople, so long as

studied, made there a Goshen of light in the Dark Ages, and when carried

to Italy proved a Promethean spark to kindle occidental culture anew. It

is well known that inventions are oftenest struck out in the Patent

Office, the grand store-house of inventions. In the world of mind, as

well as of matter, new ideas are suggested where old ideas most

congregate, or are most communed with. According to CHAUCER,

"Out of old fields, as man saith,

Cometh all the new corn from year to year,

And out of old books, in good faith,

Cometh all the new science that men lear."

The idea of writing the "Life of COLUMBUS" first darted into the mind

of IRVING, when, in Madrid, he found himself surrounded by an unrivaled

magazine of materials made ready to his hand, and for which the world

had been ransacked. Thus the sight of means to make good books makes

good books made.

Not only those volumes which compose the body of literature, but those

finer essences which form its soul,--the literature of power,--stamped

in Nature's mint of ecstasy--are marked all over with proofs of

familiarity with the best that had been achieved,--each in its own

department. Nobody has hesitated thus to affirm concerning VIRGIL,

DANTE, TASSO, MILTON. But it is commonly said that SHAKESPEARE was

_ignorant_. The truth is that no ignorant man, no ordinary, scholar can

understand his allusions, historical, romantic, classical, or those to

art, science, nationalities, customs--or even his words. He could get

more from a Library in a day than most men in a life-time, but he needed

it still.

In speaking of SHAKESPEARE, I mean the man who wrote the Plays reputed

his, no matter whether that author was BACON, or JOHN SMITH, or even our

townsman GEORGE B.

We ought to say that SHAKESPEARE was a universal man,--because he was

heir of all ages,--and his was universal knowledge, a knowledge which

neither can we fathom nor could he find without a library.

His peculiarity was ability to discern the immortal part of books, or to

stamp what were otherwise perishable with his own immortality. Whoever

can do much without tools, can do more with them. Accordingly men do

their broken weapons rather use than their bare hands. Whoever can do

much without a library, can do more with a library. DAVID did much with

a sling, but more with better arms, and builded an armory on which there

hung a thousand bucklers, all shields of mighty men.

If then there be among us any one person endued with any spark of

Shakespearian or other genius he will find it kindling to a flame

through contact in this library with similar celestial fires. To such a

"meeting soul!" as MILTON calls it,--the library will prove a better

bonanza than has been prospected in our States of silver and gold.

Though having nothing he shall possess all things,--infinite riches in a

little room.

Thus our Free Library will amuse, and instruct, and inspire. Over its

entrance I seem to read as on the front of the oldest in the world, the

inscription, "The healing of the soul," or the words of FRANKLIN to his

namesake town, "I give you books instead of a bell, sense rather than

sound." Let it have free course for a generation, calling to culture as

ceaselessly as a standing army calls to war, and this community will say

with SENECA, "Leisure without books and letters is mental death and

burial."

The first public library in Ohio--just two years younger than the

State--was founded in Ames. It was bought by hunters who threw together

a lot of raccoon skins, sent them in a sleigh by one of their number to

Boston and there bartered them for books. They soon hunted Greek as

zealously as game, and while Ames remained a hamlet ten of them, or

their children, were among the early graduates of the State University.

The influences of a library are _cumulative_, and sometimes become

manifest only after a long lapse of ages. The cuniform library of

Assyrian bricks, dating from pre-historic periods, burned up, buried and

forgotten just now emerges from its grave speaking in a voice heard

round the world, and no less authoritative than a second book of

Genesis. From its shelves more centuries look down upon us than upon

NAPOLEON at the Pyramids.

Libraries are hemmed in by no lines of State, nation, race, language,

religion or century. Their field is the world. But ours is the

cosmopolitan age, and we are pre-eminently the cosmopolitan people. More

than any other people, then must we feel the need of libraries, which

are, of all institutions, the most cosmopolitan. Hence they will benefit

us most.

Considerations like these demonstrate that free libraries tend to

_equality_ and _fraternity_. They are free lunches, crying to all: "Cut,

and come again!" As we all have equal rights at the polls and in court,

so have we in the free library. In church we each secure a blessing in

proportion to our capacity; so can we in the library. In both blessed

are they who hunger and thirst, for they shall be filled. In public

schools all can enjoy the best of teaching without money and without

price; so can they in the free library. Free libraries will create an

aristocracy--one open to talent and toil, but to nothing else; the

aristocracy of knowledge. Where street cars have been introduced, half

the private carriages are soon given up, so the establishment of free

libraries will lead many to refrain from large domestic collections as

superfluous, and to the transfer of many a private library to the public

shelves, where they will not only do more good, but will be better cared

for, better arranged, and more accessible than they now are even to

their owners. One millionaire as we walked into his library, said with a

sigh: "See how many gaps there are in my shelves! Five hundred of my

books are missing, lent and lost." "Lost!" cried I, half in joke, "say

rather found! lost to you, but found each by some one who will make the

most of them. Would to heaven these 5,000 were lost in the same way,

lost by you who have no time nor care for them, found by those who have

both. Nobody could steal them from you, but at most only from moths and

worms, dust and mould." Rich men who have bought libraries as luxuries

will learn that the way to save them is to lose them, and that their

books serve them best when deposited in free libraries.

Many varieties of _sham_ equality result from outside pressure. In

Venetian gondolas all awnings are required to be black that no one may

outshine his neighbor. Under the first republic the French proscribed

all titles but citizen, and citizeness, which they gave to everybody.

Communists would make all men's shares in property equal. Endeavors of

this sort not only fail, but prove suicidal like the impetuous Irishman,

insisting that one man is as good as another, and _a great dey better

too_. The influence of Free Libraries, however is toward genuine and not

merely visible equality. Thanks to them the most expensive luxury of the

rich becomes the daily food of the poor, and the tree of knowledge no

more bears forbidden fruit. A volume which I can draw out of a library

at will is worth as much to me as if I owned it. In fact, though my

private library is not small, the books I read are more often borrowed

than my own.

If I take out books from a library, I am doubly spurred to to make their

contents my own, because those books must be returned more promptly than

to the friend who neither exacts fines nor yet even notes in a book what

book we borrow.

FRANKLIN tells us that "he often sat up reading, the greater part of

the night, when a book borrowed (he means _stolen_) from booksellers in

the evening, was to be returned in the morning lest it should be found

missing." In proportion as men make full proof of books, they become

alike _inside_, in real communion with great authors, in information,

taste, mental capacity, mastery of speech,--accomplishments which cannot

be lost, and which render each one more equal and congenial with his

fellows. Men will still differ by God, not by man. What then is the Free

Library less than the key stone in our Republican arch?

When we would show attention to strangers, it has been a Madison custom

to take them into our cemetery. That grave yard is well worth showing.

But in time to come I trust we shall rather exhibit our Libraries, and

say; "These are our jewels." Not tombs, but living shrines that on the

living still work miracles,--the shrines where all the relics of the

saints full of true virtue are preserved, where the dead live and the

dumb speak--the dead sceptered sovereigns who still rule our spirits

from their urns. This sun of our intellectual worlds is

"Made porous to receive

And drink the liquid light, firm to retain

Its gathered beams, great palace now of light,

Hither as to a fountain countless stars

Repairing in their golden urns draw light."

Let us rejoice in it all glorious within, even as our Capitol and

University parks are without.

A library,--the assembled souls of all men deem most wise, the only men

who speak loud enough for posterity to hear;--reminds me of that fresco

by RAPHAEL, which I admired most of all his Vatican masterpieces,

popularly styled "The School of Athens," and which I hope to see hung up

as the genius of our library hall, as I have seen it in many. In some

one of the fifty-two figures glowing with life in that picture, every

variety of culture has a representative. You see there the practical

man, like FRANKLIN'S Poor Richard, in Diogenes rough and ready by his

tub. Archimedes is drawing a diagram in the sand. On the broad steps of

a temple stand Ptolemy, with the terrestrial and Hipparchus with the

celestial globe. No sage is without a docile retinue. SOCRATES, with sly

humor, is humbling the self-sufficient ALCIBIADES that he may rouse him

to loftier aspirations. PYTHAGORAS is writing among disciples, one of

whom holds his musical scale, while above all, and in the midst of the

temple, appear ARISTOTLE, father of natural philosophy, pointing down to

the earth, and PLATO, the father of spiritual philosophy with hand

uplifted toward heaven, man as it were feeling for God. The culture

proffered in such a School of Athens, as RAPHAEL painted--and as an

ideal free library is to my mind, has its fittest emblem in the miracle

of architecture, the dome,--which is well said to unite clustered arches

and pillars and radiate in equal expansion towards every quarter of the

earth, while with every convergent curve it soars heavenward, buried in

air, and looking to the stars.

"Simple, erect, severe, austere, sublime."

The Library and Society: Reprints of Papers and Addresses · 第 41 / 92 题