Yet we know that not withstanding these grave objections this dangerous

doctrine was at one time apparently proceeding to its final

establishment with fearful rapidity. The desire to embark the Federal

Government in works of internal improvement prevailed in the highest

degree during the first session of the first Congress that I had the

honor to meet in my present situation. When the bill authorizing a

subscription on the part of the United States for stock in the

Maysville and Lexington Turn Pike Company passed the two houses, there

had been reported by the Committees of Internal Improvements bills

containing appropriations for such objects, inclusive of those for the

Cumberland road and for harbors and light houses, to the amount of

$106,000,000. In this amount was included authority to the Secretary of

the Treasury to subscribe for the stock of different companies to a

great extent, and the residue was principally for the direct

construction of roads by this Government. In addition to these

projects, which had been presented to the two Houses under the sanction

and recommendation of their respective Committees on Internal

Improvements, there were then still pending before the committees, and

in memorials to Congress presented but not referred, different projects

for works of a similar character, the expense of which can not be

estimated with certainty, but must have exceeded $100,000,000.

Regarding the bill authorizing a subscription to the stock of the

Maysville and Lexington Turn Pike Company as the entering wedge of a

system which, however weak at first, might soon become strong enough to

rive the bands of the Union asunder, and believing that if its passage

was acquiesced in by the Executive and the people there would no longer

be any limitation upon the authority of the General Government in

respect to the appropriation of money for such objects, I deemed it an

imperative duty to withhold from it the Executive approval.

Although from the obviously local character of that work I might well

have contented myself with a refusal to approve the bill upon that

ground, yet sensible of the vital importance of the subject, and

anxious that my views and opinions in regard to the whole matter should

be fully understood by Congress and by my constituents, I felt it my

duty to go further. I therefore embraced that early occasion to apprise

Congress that in my opinion the Constitution did not confer upon it the

power to authorize the construction of ordinary roads and canals within

the limits of a State and to say, respectfully, that no bill admitting

such a power could receive my official sanction. I did so in the

confident expectation that the speedy settlement of the public mind

upon the whole subject would be greatly facilitated by the difference

between the two Houses and myself, and that the harmonious action of

the several departments of the Federal Government in regard to it would

be ultimately secured.

So far, at least, as it regards this branch of the subject, my best

hopes have been realized. Nearly four years have elapsed, and several

sessions of Congress have intervened, and no attempt within my

recollection has been made to induce Congress to exercise this power.

The applications for the construction of roads and canals which were

formerly multiplied upon your files are no longer presented, and we

have good reason to infer that the current public sentiment has become

so decided against the pretension as effectually to discourage its

reassertion. So thinking, I derive the greatest satisfaction from the

conviction that thus much at least has been secured upon this important

and embarrassing subject.

From attempts to appropriate the national funds to objects which are

confessedly of a local character we can not, I trust, have anything

further to apprehend. My views in regard to the expediency of making

appropriations for works which are claimed to be of a national

character and prosecuted under State authority--assuming that Congress

have the right to do so--were stated in my annual message to Congress

in 1830, and also in that containing my objections to the Maysville

road bill.

So thoroughly convinced am I that no such appropriations ought to be

made by Congress until a suitable constitutional provision is made upon

the subject, and so essential do I regard the point to the highest

interests of our country, that I could not consider myself as

discharging my duty to my constituents in giving the Executive sanction

to any bill containing such an appropriation. If the people of the

United States desire that the public Treasury shall be resorted to for

the means to prosecute such works, they will concur in an amendment of

the Constitution prescribing a rule by which the national character of

the works is to be tested, and by which the greatest practicable

equality of benefits may be secured to each member of the Confederacy.

The effects of such a regulation would be most salutary in preventing

unprofitable expenditures, in securing our legislation from the

pernicious consequences of a scramble for the favors of Government, and

in repressing the spirit of discontent which must inevitably arise from

an unequal distribution of treasures which belong alike to all.

There is another class of appropriations for what may be called,

without impropriety, internal improvements, which have always been

regarded as standing upon different grounds from those to which I have

referred. I allude to such as have for their object the improvement of

our harbors, the removal of partial and temporary obstructions in our

navigable rivers, for the facility and security of our foreign

commerce. The grounds upon which I distinguished appropriations of this

character from others have already been stated to Congress. I will now

only add that at the 1st session of Congress under the new Constitution

it was provided by law that all expenses which should accrue from and

after the 15th day of August, 1789, in the necessary support and

maintenance and repairs of all light houses, beacons, buoys, and public

piers erected, placed, or sunk before the passage of the act within any

bay, inlet, harbor, or port of the United States, for rendering the

navigation thereof easy and safe, should be defrayed out of the

Treasury of the United States, and, further, that it should be the duty

of the Secretary of the Treasury to provide by contracts, with the

approbation of the President, for rebuilding when necessary and keeping

in good repair the light houses, beacons, buoys, and public piers in

the several States, and for furnishing them with supplies.

Appropriations for similar objects have been continued from that time

to the present without interruption or dispute. As a natural

consequence of the increase and extension of our foreign commerce,

ports of entry and delivery have been multiplied and established, not

only upon our sea-board but in the interior of the country upon our

lakes and navigable rivers. The convenience and safety of this commerce

have led to the gradual extension of these expenditures; to the

erection of light houses, the placing, planting, and sinking of buoys,

beacons, and piers, and to the removal of partial and temporary

obstructions in our navigable rivers and in the harbors upon our Great

Lakes as well as on the sea-board.

Although I have expressed to Congress my apprehension that these

expenditures have some times been extravagant and disproportionate to

the advantages to be derived from them, I have not felt it to be my

duty to refuse my assent to bills containing them, and have contented

myself to follow in this respect in the foot-steps of all my

predecessors. Sensible, however, from experience and observation of the

great abuses to which the unrestricted exercise of this authority by

Congress was exposed, I have prescribed a limitation for the government

of my own conduct by which expenditures of this character are confined

to places below the ports of entry or delivery established by law. I am

very sensible that this restriction is not as satisfactory as could be

desired, and that much embarrassment may be caused to the executive

department in its execution by appropriations for remote and not

well-understood objects. But as neither my own reflections nor the

lights which I may properly derive from other sources have supplied me

with a better, I shall continue to apply my best exertions to a

faithful application of the rule upon which it is founded.

I sincerely regret that I could not give my assent to the bill

entitled: "An act to improve the navigation of the Wabash River"; but I

could not have done so without receding from the ground which I have,

upon the fullest consideration, taken upon this subject, and of which

Congress has been heretofore apprised, and without throwing the subject

again open to abuses which no good citizen entertaining my opinions

could desire.

I rely upon the intelligence and candor of my fellow citizens, in whose

liberal indulgence I have already so largely participated, for a

correct appreciation on my motives in interposing as I have done on

this and other occasions checks to a course of legislation which,

without in the slightest degree calling in question the motives of

others, I consider as sanctioning improper and unconstitutional

expenditures of public treasure.

I am not hostile to internal improvements, and wish to see them

extended to every part of the country. But I am fully persuaded, if

they are not commenced in a proper manner, confined to proper objects,

and conducted under an authority generally conceded to be rightful,

that a successful prosecution of them can not be reasonably expected.

The attempt will meet with resistance where it might otherwise receive

support, and instead of strengthening the bonds of our Confederacy it

will only multiply and aggravate the causes of disunion.

***

State of the Union Address

Andrew Jackson

December 7, 1835

Fellow Citizens of the Senate and of the House of Representatives:

In the discharge of my official duty the again devolves upon me of

communicating with a new Congress. The reflection that the

representation of the Union has been recently renewed, and that the

constitutional term of its service will expire with my own, heightens

the solicitude with which I shall attempt to lay before it the state of

our national concerns and the devout hope which I cherish that its

labors to improve them may be crowned with success.

You are assembled at a period of profound interest to the American

patriot. The unexampled growth and prosperity of our country having

given us a rank in the scale of nations which removes all apprehension

of danger to our integrity and independence from external foes, the

career of freedom is before us, with an earnest from the past that if

true to ourselves there can be no formidable obstacle in the future to

its peaceful and uninterrupted pursuit. Yet, in proportion to the

disappearance of those apprehensions which attended our weakness, as

once contrasted with the power of some of the States of the Old World,

should we now be solicitous as to those which belong to the conviction

that it is to our own conduct we must look for the preservation of

those causes on which depend the excellence and the duration of our

happy system of government.

In the example of other systems founded on the will of the people we

trace to internal dissension the influences which have so often blasted

the hopes of the friends of freedom. The social elements, which were

strong and successful when united against external danger, failed in

the more difficult task of properly adjusting their own internal

organization, and thus gave way the great principle of self-government.

Let us trust that this admonition will never be forgotten by the

Government or the people of the United States, and that the testimony

which our experience thus far holds out to the great human family of

the practicability and the blessings of free government will be

confirmed in all time to come.

We have but to look at the state of our agriculture, manufactures, and

commerce and the unexampled increase of our population to feel the

magnitude of the trust committed to us. Never in any former period of

our history have we had greater reason than we now have to be thankful

to Divine Providence for the blessings of health and general

prosperity. Every branch of labor we see crowned with the most abundant

rewards. In every element of national resources and wealth and of

individual comfort we witness the most rapid and solid improvements.

With no interruptions to this pleasing prospect at home which will not

yield to the spirit of harmony and good will that so strikingly

pervades the mass of the people in every quarter, amidst all the

diversity of interest and pursuits to which they are attached, and with

no cause of solicitude in regard to our external affairs which will

not, it is hoped, disappear before the principles of simple justice and

the forbearance that mark our intercourse with foreign powers, we have

every reason to feel proud of our beloved country.

The general state of our foreign relations has not materially changed

since my last annual message.

In the settlement of the question of the North Eastern boundary little

progress has been made. Great Britain has declined acceding to the

proposition of the United States, presented in accordance with the

resolution of the Senate, unless certain preliminary conditions were

admitted, which I deemed incompatible with a satisfactory and rightful

adjustment of the controversy. Waiting for some distinct proposal from

the Government of Great Britain, which has been invited, I can only

repeat the expression of my confidence that, with the strong mutual

disposition which I believe exists to make a just arrangement, this

perplexing question can be settled with a due regard to the

well-founded pretensions and pacific policy of all the parties to it.

Events are frequently occurring on the North Eastern frontier of a

character to impress upon all the necessity of a speedy and definitive

termination of the dispute. This consideration, added to the desire

common to both to relieve the liberal and friendly relations so happily

existing between the two countries from all embarrassment, will no

doubt have its just influence upon both.

Our diplomatic intercourse with Portugal has been renewed, and it is

expected that the claims of our citizens, partially paid, will be fully

satisfied as soon as the condition of the Queen's Government will

permit the proper attention to the subject of them. That Government

has, I am happy to inform you, manifested a determination to act upon

the liberal principles which have marked our commercial policy. The

happiest effects upon the future trade between the United States and

Portugal are anticipated from it, and the time is not thought to be

remote when a system of perfect reciprocity will be established.

The installments due under the convention with the King of the Two

Sicilies have been paid with that scrupulous fidelity by which his

whole conduct has been characterized, and the hope is indulged that the

adjustment of the vexed question of our claims will be followed by a

more extended and mutually beneficial intercourse between the two

countries.

The internal contest still continues in Spain. Distinguished as this

struggle has unhappily been by incidents of the most sanguinary

character, the obligations of the late treaty of indemnification with

us have been, never the less, faithfully executed by the Spanish

Government.

No provision having been made at the last session of Congress for the

ascertainment of the claims to be paid and the apportionment of the

funds under the convention made with Spain, I invite your early

attention to the subject. The public evidences of the debt have,

according to the terms of the convention and in the forms prescribed by

it, been placed in the possession of the United States, and the

interest as it fell due has been regularly paid upon them. Our

commercial intercourse with Cuba stands as regulated by the act of

Congress. No recent information has been received as to the disposition

of the Government of Madrid, and the lamented death of our recently

appointed minister on his way to Spain, with the pressure of their

affairs at home, renders it scarcely probable that any change is to be

looked for during the coming year.

Further portions of the Florida archives have been sent to the United

States, although the death of one of the commissioners at a critical

moment embarrassed the progress of the delivery of them. The higher

officers of the local government have recently shown an anxious desire,

in compliance with the orders from the parent Government, to facilitate

the selection and delivery of all we have a right to claim.

Negotiations have been opened at Madrid for the establishment of a

lasting peace between Spain and such of the Spanish American

Governments of this hemisphere as have availed themselves of the

intimation given to all of them of the disposition of Spain to treat

upon the basis of their entire independence. It is to be regretted that

simultaneous appointments by all of ministers to negotiate with Spain

had not been made. The negotiation itself would have been simplified,

and this long-standing dispute, spreading over a large portion of the

world, would have been brought to a more speedy conclusion.

Our political and commercial relations with Austria, Prussia, Sweden,

and Denmark stand on the usual favorable bases. One of the articles of

our treaty with Russia in relation to the trade on the North-West coast

of America having expired, instructions have been given to our minister

at St. Petersburg to negotiate a renewal of it. The long and unbroken

amity between the two Governments gives every reason for supposing the

article will be renewed, if stronger motives do not exist to prevent it

than with our view of the subject can be anticipated here. I ask your

attention to the message of my predecessor at the opening of the second

session of the 19th Congress, relative to our commercial intercourse

with Holland, and to the documents connected with that subject,

communicated to the House of Representatives on the 10th of January,

1825, and 18th of January, 1827.

Coinciding in the opinion of my predecessor that Holland is not, under

the regulations of her present system, entitled to have her vessels and

their cargoes received into the United States on the footing of

American vessels and cargoes as regards duties of tonnage and impost, a

respect for his reference of it to the Legislature has alone prevented

me from acting on the subject. I should still have waited without

comment for the action of Congress, but recently a claim has been made

by Belgian subjects to admission into our ports for their ships and

cargoes on the same footing as American, with the allegation we could

not dispute that our vessels received in their ports the identical

treatment shewn to them in the ports of Holland, upon whose vessels no

discrimination is made in the ports of the United States.

Given the same privileges the Belgians expected the same benefits--

benefits that were, in fact, enjoyed when Belgium and Holland were

united under one Government. Satisfied with the justice of their

pretension to be placed on the same footing with Holland, I could not,

never the less, without disregard to the principle of our laws, admit

their claim to be treated as Americans, and at the same time a respect

for Congress, to whom the subject had long since been referred, has

prevented me from producing a just equality by taking from the vessels

of Holland privileges conditionally granted by acts of Congress,

although the condition upon which the grant was made has, in my

judgment, failed since 1822. I recommend, therefore, a review of the

act of 1824, and such modification of it as will produce an equality on

such terms as Congress shall think best comports with our settled

policy and the obligations of justice to two friendly powers.

With the Sublime Porte and all the Governments on the coast of Barbary

our relations continue to be friendly. The proper steps have been taken

to renew our treaty with Morocco.

The Argentine Republic has again promised to send within the current

year a minister to the United States.

A convention with Mexico for extending the time for the appointment of

commissioners to run the boundary line has been concluded and will be

submitted to the Senate. Recent events in that country have awakened

the liveliest solicitude in the United States. Aware of the strong

temptations existing and powerful inducements held out to the citizens

of the United States to mingle in the dissensions of our immediate

neighbors, instructions have been given to the district attorneys of

the United States where indications warranted it to prosecute without

respect to persons all who might attempt to violate the obligations of

our neutrality, while at the same time it has been thought necessary to

apprise the Government of Mexico that we should require the integrity

of our territory to be scrupulously respected by both parties.

From our diplomatic agents in Brazil, Chile, Peru, Central America,

Venezuela, and New Granada constant assurances are received of the

continued good understanding with the Governments to which they are

severally accredited. With those Governments upon which our citizens

have valid and accumulating claims, scarcely an advance toward a

settlement of them is made, owing mainly to their distracted state or

to the pressure of imperative domestic questions. Our patience has been

and will probably be still further severely tried, but our fellow

citizens whose interests are involved may confide in the determination

of the Government to obtain for them eventually ample retribution.

Unfortunately, many of the nations of this hemisphere are still

self-tormented by domestic dissensions. Revolution succeeds revolution;

injuries are committed upon foreigners engaged in lawful pursuits; much

time elapses before a government sufficiently stable is erected to

justify expectation of redress; ministers are sent and received, and

before the discussions of past injuries are fairly begun fresh troubles

arise; but too frequently new injuries are added to the old, to be

discussed together with the existing government after it has proved its

ability to sustain the assaults made upon it, or with its successor if

overthrown. If this unhappy condition of things continues much longer,

other nations will be under the painful necessity of deciding whether

justice to their suffering citizens does not require a prompt redress

of injuries by their own power, without waiting for the establishment

of a government competent and enduring enough to discuss and to make

satisfaction for them.

Since the last session of Congress the validity of our claims upon

France, as liquidated by the treaty of 1831, has been acknowledged by

both branches of her legislature, and the money has been appropriated

for their discharge; but the payment is, I regret to inform you, still

withheld.

A brief recapitulation of the most important incidents in this

protracted controversy will shew how utterly untenable are the grounds

upon which this course is attempted to be justified.

State of the Union Addresses(#5016) · 第 15 / 21 段