A. QUAM, Secretary of the Association.]

[Footnote 20: Protocol of the Second Chamber, No 33, April 28th, 1883.]

[Footnote 21: See on the dealing with the question in Parliament,

"Riksdagstrycket" 1883. Motion in the Second Chamber, No. 97, pp. 1-8;

First Chamber, protocol No. 33, pp. 3-4, etc., etc.]

[Footnote 22: Mr. Arnoldson's speech ran thus:--

"The second speaker on the Right propounded certain difficulties,

amongst others, one referring to Sweden's union with Norway. Since

Sweden and Norway have the same foreign policy, and the initiative

in this question comes from Sweden, the Union King ought certainly

to be able to act freely in the common interest of the two kingdoms.

In any case, it is probable, as Mr. Hedlund remarked, that if the

Riksdag takes the first step it will not be long before the Storting

comes to meet us. It was chiefly on the ground of courtesy that I did

not undertake to speak for Norway too in the Riksdag. We know that

the Norse--and it does them honour--are tenacious of their right of

deciding for themselves. I do not think it would be seemly for the

mover of such a resolution as this to make himself their spokesman

in the Swedish Riksdag--not to mention the positive incorrectness

of the proceeding. This is why I limited the matter to Sweden in my

proposition."]

[Footnote 23: "Revue de droit international et de Legislation

comparée," 1888, 2.]

[Footnote 24: The most important provisions of the treaty are the

following:--

Article 1. The Suez Canal shall always be free and open whether in time

of war or peace, for both merchant and war-ships, whatever flag they

carry. The treaty-powers therefore decide that the use of this canal

shall not be limited either in time of peace or war. The canal can

never be blockaded.

Article 4. No fortifications which can be used for military operations

against the Suez Canal, may be erected at any point which would command

or menace it. No points which command or menace its entrance or course

may be occupied in a military sense.

Article 5 provides that, although the Suez Canal shall be open in

war-time, no belligerent action shall take place in its vicinity or

in its harbours, or within a distance from its area which shall be

determined by the international committee that watches over the canal.

Article 6 is a continuation of the foregoing and runs thus: In time of

war none of the belligerent powers are permitted to land, or to take on

board, ammunition or other war material, either in the canal or in its

harbours.

Article 8. The powers are not allowed to keep any warship in the waters

of the canal. But they may lay up war-ships in the harbours of Port

Said and Suez to a number not exceeding two of any nation.

Article 9. The representatives in Egypt of the powers who signed the

treaty shall be charged with seeing to its fulfilment. In all cases

where free passage through the canal may be menaced, they shall meet

upon the summons of the senior member to investigate the facts. They

shall acquaint the Khedive's Government with the danger anticipated,

that it may take the measures needful to secure the safety and

unimpeded use of the canal. They shall meet regularly once a year

to ascertain that the treaty is properly observed. They shall most

especially require the deposition of all works and dispersion of all

collections of troops which on any part of the area of the canal might

either design or cause a menace to the free passage or to the security

thereof.

Article 10 treats of the obligations of the Egyptian Government and

runs thus:--

The Egyptian Government shall, so far as its power by firman goes, take

the measures necessary for enforcing the treaty. In case the Egyptian

Government has not adequate means it shall apply to the Sublime Porte,

which will then consult with the other signatories of the London

treaty of March 17, and with them make provision in response to that

application.

Article 14 sets forth: Beyond the duties expressed and stipulated for

in the paragraphs of this treaty, the sovereign rights of his Imperial

Majesty the Sultan are in no way curtailed, nor are the privileges and

rights of his Highness the Khedive as defined by the firman.]

[Footnote 25: Nationaloekonomisk Tidsskrift, xxii. pp. 139-155. See

also _Politiken_, 1890, March 31. Article "Oeresunds Fred," signed,

Defensor Patriæ.]

[Footnote 26: The word "guaranteed" was inserted in the motion contrary

to the opinion of the committee]

Pax mundi · 第 36 / 48 题