Rajput, Bundela

_Rajput, Bundela._--A well-known clan of Rajputs of somewhat

inferior position, who have given their name to Bundelkhand, or

the tract comprised principally in the Districts of Saugor, Damoh,

Jhansi, Hamirpur and Banda, and the Panna, Orchha, Datia and other

States. The Bundelas are held to be derived from the Gaharwar or

Gherwal Rajputs, and there is some reason for supposing that these

latter were originally an aristocratic section of the Bhar tribe with

some infusion of Rajput blood. But the Gaharwars now rank almost with

the highest clans. According to tradition one of the Gaharwar Rajas

offered a sacrifice of his own head to the Vindhya-basini Devi or

the goddess of the Vindhya hills, and out of the drops (_bund_) of

blood which fell on the altar a boy was born. He returned to Panna

and founded the clan which bears the name Bundela, from _bund_,

a drop. [504] It is probable that, as suggested by Captain Luard,

the name is really a corruption of Vindhya or Vindhyela, a dweller in

the Vindhya hills, where, according to their own tradition, the clan

had its birth. The Bundelas became prominent in the thirteenth or

fourteenth century, after the fall of the Chandels. "Orchha became

the chief of the numerous Bundela principalities; but its founder

drew upon himself everlasting infamy, by putting to death the wise

Abul Fazl, the historian and friend of the magnanimous Akbar, and the

encomiast and advocate of the Hindu race. From the period of Akbar

the Bundelas bore a distinguished part in all the grand conflicts,

to the very close of the monarchy." [505]

The Bundelas held the country up to the Nerbudda in the Central

Provinces, and, raiding continually into the Gond territories south

of the Nerbudda on the pretence of protecting the sacred cow which

the Gonds used for ploughing, they destroyed the castle on Chauragarh

in Narsinghpur on a crest of the Satpuras, and reduced the Nerbudda

valley to subjection. The most successful chieftain of the tribe was

Chhatarsal, the Raja of Panna, in the eighteenth century, who was

virtually ruler of all Bundelkhand; his dominions extending from Banda

in the north to Jubbulpore in the south, and from Rewah in the east

to the Betwa River in the west. But he had to call in the help of the

Peshwa to repel an invasion of the Mughal armies, and left a third

of his territory by will to the Marathas. Chhatarsal left twenty-two

legitimate and thirty illegitimate sons, and their descendants now

hold several small Bundela States, while the territories left to the

Peshwa subsequently became British. The chiefs of Panna, Orchha, Datia,

Chhatarpur and numerous other small states in the Bundelkhand agency

are Bundela Rajputs. [506] The Bundelas of Saugor do not intermarry

with the good Rajput clans, but with an inferior group of Panwars and

another clan called Dhundhele, perhaps an offshoot of the Panwars, who

are also residents of Saugor. Their character, as disclosed in a number

of proverbial sayings and stories current regarding them, somewhat

resembles that of the Scotch highlanders as depicted by Stevenson. They

are proud and penurious to the last degree, and quick to resent the

smallest slight. They make good _shikaris_ or sportsmen, but are

so impatient of discipline that they have never found a vocation by

enlisting in the Indian Army. Their characteristics are thus described

in a doggerel verse: "The Bundelas salute each other from miles apart,

their _pagris_ are cocked on the side of the head till they touch the

shoulders. A Bundela would dive into a well for the sake of a cowrie,

but would fight with the Sardars of Government." No Bania could go

past a Bundela's house riding on a pony or holding up an umbrella;

and all low-caste persons who passed his house must salute it with

the words, _Diwan ji ko Ram Ram_. Women must take their shoes off to

pass by. It is related that a few years ago a Bundela was brought up

before the Assistant Commissioner, charged with assaulting a tahsil

process-server, and threatening him with his sword. The Bundela, who

was very poor and wearing rags, was asked by the magistrate whether

he had threatened the man with his sword. He replied "Certainly not;

the sword is for gentlemen like you and me of equal position. To him,

if I had wished to beat him I would have taken my shoe." Another story

is that there was once a very overbearing Tahsildar, who had a shoe 2

1/2 feet long with which he used to collect the land revenue. One day

a Bundela malguzar appeared before him on some business. The Tahsildar

kept his seat. The Bundela walked quietly up to the table and said,

"Will the Sirkar step aside with me for a moment, as I have something

private to say." The Tahsildar got up and walked aside with him, on

which the Bundela said, 'That is sufficient, I only wished to tell you

that you should rise to receive me.' When the Bundelas are collected

at a feast they sit with their hands folded across their stomachs and

their eyes turned up, and remain impassive while food is being put on

their plates, and never say, 'Enough,' because they think that they

would show themselves to be feeble men if they refused to eat as much

as was put before them. Much of the food is thus ultimately wasted,

and given to the sweepers, and this leads to great extravagance at

marriages and other ceremonial occasions. The Bundelas were much

feared and were not popular landlords, but they are now losing their

old characteristics and settling down into respectable cultivators.

The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 4 · 第 444 / 607 题