List of Paragraphs

1. _Historical notice. The Agnikula clans and the slaughter of

the Kshatriyas by Parasurama_.

2. _The legend of Parasurama_.

3. _The Panwar dynasty of Dhar and Ujjain_.

4. _Diffusion of the Panwars over India_.

5. _The Nagpur Panwars_.

6. _Subdivisions_.

7. _Marriage customs_.

8. _Widow-marriage_.

9. _Religion_.

10. _Worship of the spirits of those dying a violent death_.

11. _Funeral rites_.

12. _Caste discipline_.

13. _Social customs_.

1. Historical notice. The Agnikula clans and the slaughter of the

Kshatriyas by Parasurama

_Panwar_, [370] _Puar_, _Ponwar_, _Pramara Rajput_.--The Panwar or

Pramara is one of the most ancient and famous of the Rajput clans. It

was the first of the four Agnikulas, who were created from the fire-pit

on the summit of Mount Abu after the Kshatriyas had been exterminated

by Parasurama the Brahman. "The fire-fountain was lustrated with

the waters of the Ganges; [371] expiatory rites were performed,

and after a protracted debate among the gods it was resolved that

Indra should initiate the work of recreation. Having formed an image

of _duba_ grass he sprinkled it with the water of life and threw it

into the fire-fountain. Thence on pronouncing the _sajivan mantra_

(incantation to give life) a figure slowly emerged from the flame,

bearing in the right hand a mace and exclaiming, '_Mar, Mar!_' (Slay,

slay). He was called Pramar; and Abu, Dhar, and Ujjain were assigned

to him as a territory."

The four clans known as Agnikula, or born from the fire-pit,

were the Panwar, the Chauhan, the Parihar and the Chalukya or

Solanki. Mr. D.R. Bhandarkar adduces evidence in support of the

opinion that all these were of foreign origin, derived from the

Gujars or other Scythian or Hun tribes. [372] And it seems therefore

not unlikely that the legend of the fire-pit may commemorate the

reconstitution of the Kshatriya aristocracy by the admission of these

tribes to Hinduism after its partial extinction during their wars of

invasion; the latter event having perhaps been euphemised into the

slaughter of the Kshatriyas by Parasurama the Brahman. A great number

of Indian castes date their origin from the traditional massacre

of the Kshatriyas by Parasurama, saying that their ancestors were

Rajputs who escaped and took to various occupations; and it would

appear that an event which bulks so largely in popular tradition

must have some historical basis. It is noticeable also that Buddhism,

which for some five centuries since the time of Asoka Maurya had been

the official and principal religion of northern India, had recently

entered on its decline. "The restoration of the Brahmanical religion

to popular favour and the associated revival of the Sanskrit language

first became noticeable in the second century, were fostered by the

satraps of Gujarat and Surashtra during the third, and made a success

by the Gupta emperors in the fourth century. [373] The decline of

Buddhism and the diffusion of Sanskrit proceeded side by side with

the result that by the end of the Gupta period the force of Buddhism

on Indian soil had been nearly spent; and India with certain local

exceptions had again become the land of the Brahman. [374] The Gupta

dynasty as an important power ended about A.D. 490 and was overthrown

by the Huns, whose leader Toramana was established at Malwa in Central

India prior to A.D. 500." [375] The revival of Brahmanism and the Hun

supremacy were therefore nearly contemporaneous. Moreover one of the

Hun leaders, Mihiragula, was a strong supporter of Brahmanism and an

opponent of the Buddhists. Mr. V.A. Smith writes: "The savage invader,

who worshipped as his patron deity Siva, the god of destruction,

exhibited ferocious hostility against the peaceful Buddhist cult,

and remorselessly overthrew the _stupas_ and monasteries, which he

plundered of their treasures." [376] This warrior might therefore

well be venerated by the Brahmans as the great restorer of their

faith and would easily obtain divine honours. The Huns also subdued

Rajputana and Central India and were dominant here for a time until

their extreme cruelty and oppression led to a concerted rising of the

Indian princes by whom they were defeated. The discovery of the Hun

or Scythian origin of several of the existing Rajput clans fits in

well with the legend. The stories told by many Indian castes of their

first ancestors having been Rajputs who escaped from the massacre

of Parasurama would then have some historical value as indicating

that the existing occupational grouping of castes dates from the

period of the revival of the Brahman cult after a long interval of

Buddhist supremacy. It is however an objection to the identification

of Parasurama with the Huns that he is the sixth incarnation of

Vishnu, coming before Rama and being mentioned in the Mahabharata,

and thus if he was in any way historical his proper date should be

long before their time. As to this it may be said that he might have

been interpolated or put back in date, as the Brahmans had a strong

interest in demonstrating the continuity of the Kshatriya caste from

Vedic times and suppressing the Hun episode, which indeed they have

succeeded in doing so well that the foreign origin of several of the

most prominent Rajput clans has only been established quite recently

by modern historical and archaeological research. The name Parasurama

signifies 'Rama with the axe' and seems to indicate that this hero came

after the original Rama. And the list of the incarnations of Vishnu

is not always the same, as in one list the incarnations are nearly

all of the animal type and neither Parasurama, Rama nor Krishna appear.

The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 4 · 第 340 / 607 题