CHAPTER V.

THE INQUEST.

Just a week before the baronet came of age, and a fortnight

from the present time, an awful and mysterious event had happened at the

Hall: the old house-keeper, Mrs. Quarles, had been found dead in her

bed, under circumstances, to say the very least, of a black and

suspicious appearance. The county coroner had got a jury of the

neighbours impanelled together; who, after sitting patiently on the

inquest, and hearing, as well as seeing, the following evidence, could

arrive at no verdict more specific than the obvious fact, that the poor

old creature had been "found dead." The great question lay between

apoplexy and murder; and the evidence tended to a well-matched conflict

of opinions.

First, there lay the body, quietly in bed, tucked in tidily and

undisturbed, with no marks of struggling, none whatever--the clothes lay

smooth, and the chamber orderly: yet the corpse's face was of a purple

hue, the tongue swollen, the eyes starting from their sockets: it might,

indeed, possibly have been an apoplectic seizure, which took her in her

sleep, and killed her as she lay; _but_ that the gripe of clutching

fingers had left their livid seals upon the throat, and countenanced

the dreadful thought of strangulation!

Secondly, a surgeon (one Mr. Eager, the Union doctor, a very young

personage, wrong withal and radical) maintained that this actual

strangulation might have been effected by the hands of the deceased

herself, in the paroxysm of a rush of blood to the brain; and he

fortified his wise position by the instance of a late statesman, who, he

averred, cut his throat with a pen-knife, to relieve himself of pressure

on the temples: while another surgeon--Stephen Cramp, he was farrier as

well, and had been, until lately, time out of mind, the village

Æsculapius, who looked with scorn on his pert rival, and opposed him

tooth and nail on all occasions--insisted that it was not only

physically impossible for poor Mrs. Quarles so to have strangled

herself, but more particularly that, if she had done so, she certainly

could not have laid herself out so decently afterwards; therefore, that

as some one else had kindly done the latter office for her, why not the

former too?

Thirdly, Sarah Stack, the still-room maid, deposed, that Mrs. Quarles

always locked her door before she went to bed, but that when she

(deponent) went to call her as usual on the fatal morning, the door was

just ajar; and so she found her dead: while parallel with this, tending

to implicate some domestic criminal, was to be placed the equally

uncommon fact, that the other door of Mrs. Quarles's room, leading to

the lawn, was open too:--be it known that Mrs. Quarles was a stout

woman, who could'nt abide to sleep up-stairs, for fear of fire;

moreover, that she was a nervous woman, who took extraordinary

precautions for her safety, in case of thieves. Thus, unaccountably

enough, the murderer, if there was any, was as likely to have come from

the outside, as from the in.

Fourthly, the murderer in this way is commonly a thief, and does the

deed for mammon-sake; but the new house-keeper, lately installed, made

her deposition, that, by inventories duly kept and entered--for her

honoured predecessor, rest her soul! had been a pattern of

regularity--all Mrs. Quarles's goods and personal chattels were found to

be safe and right in her room--some silver spoons among them too--ay,

and a silver tea-pot; while, as to other property in the house, with

every room full of valuables, nothing whatever was missing from the

lists, except, indeed, what was scarce worth mention (unless one must be

very exact), sundry crocks and gallipots of honey, not forthcoming;

these, however, it appeared probable that Mrs. Quarles had herself

consumed in a certain mixture she nightly was accustomed too, of rum,

horehound, and other matters sweetened up with honey, for her

hoarseness. It seemed therefore clear she was not murdered for her

property, nor by any one intending to have robbed the house.

Against this it was contended, and really with some show of reason, that

as Mrs. Quarles was thought to have a hoard, always set her face against

banks, railway shares, speculations, and investments, and seemed to have

left nothing behind her but her clothes and so forth, it was still

possible that the murderer who took the life, might have also been the

thief to take the money.

Fifthly, Simon Jennings--butler in doors, bailiff out of doors, and

general factotum every where to the Vincent interest--for he had managed

to monopolize every place worth having, from the agent's book to the

cellar-man's key--the said Simon deposed, that on the night in question,

he heard the house-dog barking furiously, and went out to quiet him; but

found no thieves, nor knew any reason why the dog should have barked so

much.

Now, the awkward matter in this deposition (if Mr. Jennings had not been

entirely above suspicion--the idea was quite absurd--not to mention that

he was nephew to the deceased, a great favourite with her, and a man

altogether of the very strictest character), the awkward matters were

these: the nearest way out to the dog, indeed the only way but casement

windows on that side of the house, was through Mrs. Quarles's room: she

had had the dog placed there for her special safety, as she slept on the

ground floor; and it was not to be thought that Mr. Jennings could do so

incorrect a thing as to pass through her room after bed-time, locked or

unlocked--indeed, when the question was delicately hinted to him, he was

quite shocked at it--quite shocked. But if he did not go that way, which

way did he go? He deposed, indeed, and his testimony was no ways to be

doubted, that he went through the front door, and so round; which, under

the circumstances, was at once a very brave and a very foolish thing to

do; for it is, first, little wisdom to go round two sides of a square to

quiet a dog, when one might have easily called to him from the

men-servants' window; and secondly, albeit Mr. Jennings was a strict

man, an upright man, shrewd withal, and calculating, no one had ever

thought him capable of that Roman virtue, courage. Still, he had

reluctantly confessed to this one heroic act, and it was a bold one, so

let him take the credit of it--mainly because--

Sixthly, Jonathan Floyd, footman, after having heard the dog bark at

intervals, surely for more than a couple of hours, thought he might as

well turn out of his snug berth for a minute, just to see what ailed

the dog, or how many thieves were really breaking in. Well, as he

looked, he fancied he saw a boat moving on the lake, but as there was no

moon, he might have been mistaken.

_By a Juryman._ It might be a punt.

_By another._ He did'nt know how many boats there were on the

lake-side: they had a boat-house at the Hall, by the water's edge, and

therefore he concluded something in it; really did'nt know; might be a

boat, might be a punt, might be both--or neither.

_By the Coroner._ Could not swear which way it was moving; and, really,

if put upon his Bible oath, wouldn't be positive about a boat at all, it

was so dark, and he was so sleepy.

Not long afterwards, as the dog got still more violent, he turned his

eyes from straining after shadows on the lake, to look at home, and then

all at once noticed Mr. Jennings trying to quiet the noisy animal with

the usual blandishments of "Good dog, good dog--quiet, Don, quiet--down,

good dog--down, Don, down!"

_By a Juryman._ He would swear to the words.

But Don would not hear of being quiet. After that, knowing all must be

right if Mr. Jennings was about, he (deponent) turned in again, went to

sleep, and thought no more of it till he heard of Mrs. Quarles's death

in the morning. If he may be so bold as to speak his mind, he thinks the

house-keeper, being fat, died o' the 'plexy in a nateral way, and that

the dog barking so, just as she was a-going off, is proof positive of

it. He'd often heard of dogs doing so; they saw the sperit gliding away,

and barked at it; his (deponent's) own grandmother--

At this juncture--for the court was getting fidgetty--the coroner cut

short the opinions of Jonathan Floyd: and when Mr. Crown, summing up,

presented in one focus all this evidence to the misty minds of the

assembled jurymen, it puzzled them entirely; they could not see their

way, fairly addled, did not know at all what to make of it. On the

threshold, there was no proof it was a murder--the Union doctor was loud

and staunch on this; and next, there seemed to be no motive for the

deed, and no one to suspect of it: so they left the matter open, found

her simply "Dead," and troubled their heads no more about the business.

Good Mr. Evans, the vicar, preached her funeral sermon, only as last

Sunday, amplifying the idea that she "was cut off in the midst of her

days:" and thereby encouraging many of the simpler folks, who knew that

Mrs. Quarles had long passed seventy, in the luminous notion that

house-keepers in great establishments are privileged, among other

undoubted perquisites, to live to a hundred and forty, unless cut off by

apoplexy or murder.

Mr. Simon Jennings, as nephew and next of kin, followed the body to its

last home in the capacity of chief mourner; to do him justice, he was a

real mourner, bewailed her loudly, and had never been the same man

since. Moreover, although aforetime not much given to indiscriminate

charity, he had now gained no small credit by distributing his aunt's

wardrobe among the poorer families at Hurstley. It was really very kind

of him, and the more so, as being altogether unexpected: he got great

praise for this, did Mr. Jennings; specially, too, because he had gained

nothing whatever from his aunt's death, though her heir and probable

legatee, and clearly was a disappointed man.

The Complete Prose Works of Martin Farquhar Tupper · 第 5 / 61 章