A. ULCERS ON THE MALE GENITAL ORGANS.

It is invariably the case that forms of ulceration affecting the male

genitals are the most familiar and best known, and this was equally

true in Antiquity. Whatever information the Ancient physicians deemed

it necessary to record on the subject is found as early as _Celsus_

laid down with something approaching to completeness in his writings

(VI. 18.).

a. _Ulcers of the Prepuce._

According to Leonidas[374] fissures and cracks in the prepuce

frequently occurred, in all cases of the latter being too tight and

being forcibly drawn back. On these supervened pain and phlegmonous

inflammation; and then if a cure were not speedily effected, the

edges assumed a condition of callosity, necessitating the use of the

knife for its removal. However, more often than not the wound broke

out again, because as was noted as early as by _Hippocrates_,[375]

wounds of the prepuce are as a rule obstinate in healing. To meet this

eventuality _Galen_[376] provides an entirely suitable procedure. While

ulcers of the glans penis demand desiccative remedies, those of the

prepuce rather call for _epilotics_,[377] especially anise. Supposing

the prepuce to become gangrenous, it must be cut away circularly,

and the bleeding stopped by cauterization; if this treatment is not

needful, a mixture of verdigris with honey, or pomegranate and vetch is

applied.[378] Ulcers on the inner fold of the prepuce, as also on the

skin of the penis generally, are mentioned by _Celsus_ (VI. 18.), the

latter likewise by _Galen_.[379] Such ulcers on the inner fold of the

prepuce, Celsus states, not unfrequently give occasion to the setting

up of phimosis and paraphimosis; and yet another consequence, a morbid

growing together of glans and prepuce was observed by _Oribasius_ (loco

citato, 5.) and _Paulus Aegineta_ (VI. 56.), for which these authors

prescribe appropriate medical and surgical treatment. Under the name of

_cancer_ (eating ulcer) of the prepuce Celsus, it would seem, describes

the νομὴ (spreading ulcer) of the Greek physicians, which commences by

the ulcer turning black. Occasionally too the ulcers developed out of

themselves morbid growths, excrescences or condylomata, particularly

the form known as _thymion_ (warty excrescence).

b. _Ulcers of the Glans Penis._

These are, as pointed out by _Celsus_ (VI. 18.), best described by

taking their pathological and therapeutic aspects together; but it

would serve no useful purpose to quote once more in this place the

passages dealing with this part of the subject, which have been so

often printed already. He makes a distinction, as does _Galen_,[380]

between dry and clean, moist and suppurative, ulcers, the latter of

which readily lead to phimosis and paraphimosis. The discharge is

sometimes thin and watery, sometimes purulent, and on occasion becomes

evil-smelling; the ulcerations both spread superficially and penetrate

inwards, and may actually destroy the glans underneath the prepuce,

so that it perishes altogether. When this happens, _Paulus Aegineta_

(VI. 57.) has a leaden pipette inserted in the orifice of the urethra,

to enable the patient to pass water. In other cases the prepuce grows

into one with the ulcerated glans penis (_Celsus_, _Paulus Aegineta_,

_Oribasius_). Ulcers _circa coronam glandis_ (round the crown of the

glans penis) are mentioned by _Aëtius_.[381]

A special kind is the _cancer colis_ (eating ulcer of the member),

probably the same as the νομὴ (spreading ulcer) of the Greeks, which

Aëtius[382] delineates as a spreading, flaccid ulcer, which on pressure

emits a thin bloody discharge, that subsequently becomes feculent.

Hemorrhage is apt to supervene according to Celsus on the shedding of

a cicatrix artificially produced by operation or the cauterizing iron.

Another species of _cancer_ is the φαγέδαινα (phagedenic, eating

ulcer) of the Greeks, which extends rapidly and penetrates to the

bladder. It appears to be identical with ἄνθραξ (malignant pustule),

though Celsus mentions the _carbunculus colis_ (carbuncle of the

member) in a special category; for the description he gives, bk. V.

ch. 28., of carbuncle is equally applicable to the phagedaena.[383]

Ἄνθραξ (malignant pustule) begins with itching, later on a pustule,

or else a number of little bladders or blebs resembling millet-seeds

appear, which burst in much the same way as a blister due to burning

does, leaving behind an _ulcus crustaceum_ (scab-encrusted ulcer),

resembling the cicatrix of a burn; this is firmly adherent and black

in colour. The surrounding tissue is likewise black and violently

inflamed, the inflammation not unfrequently having an erysipelas-like

character. _Galen_[384] designates the process ἀνθράκωσις, and declares

that buboes are an accompanying feature. He holds the ulcers of the

genitals occurring under the special climatic conditions laid down by

Hippocrates above to have been partly ἄνθραξ,[385] the disease to which

Hero succumbed.

Another kind of ulcer affecting the male genitals is mentioned by

_Pollux_[386] under the name of θηρίωμα (malignant sore), which

_Celsus_ (V. 28.) likewise speaks of, but without particularizing its

situation. The same fact applies to ulcers of the glans penis as to

those of the prepuce, viz. that many forms of morbid outgrowths arise

from them; in other instances callosities on the edges of the ulcers

are built up, leaving behind a callous protuberance, which the Greeks

appear to have called ἥλος (a nail), the Romans _clavus_ (a nail).[387]

The proper treatment to be followed in each of these special cases is

given by Celsus and the Writers he cites.

The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2) Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity · 第 38 / 77 题