At the start two streams of influence upon American pronunciation may

be noted, the one an inheritance from the English of the colonists and

the other arising spontaneously within the country, and apparently

much colored by immigration. The first influence, it goes without

saying, is gradually dying out. Consider, for example, the

pronunciation of the diphthong /oi/. In Middle English it was as in

/boy/, but during the early Modern English period it was assimilated

with that of the /i/ in /wine/, and this usage prevailed at the time

of the settlement of America. The colonists thus brought it with them,

and at the same time it lodged in Ireland, where it still prevails.

But in England, during the pedantic eighteenth century, this /i/-sound

was displaced by the original /oi/-sound, not by historical research

but by mere deduction from the spelling, and the new pronunciation

soon extended to the polite speech of America. In the common speech,

however, the /i/-sound persisted, and down to the time of [Pg236] the

Civil War it was constantly heard in such words as /boil/, /hoist/,

/oil/, /join/, /poison/ and /roil/, which thus became /bile/, /hist/,

/ile/, /jine/, /pisen/ and /rile/. Since then the school-marm has

combatted it with such vigor that it has begun to disappear, and such

forms as /pisen/, /jine/, /bile/ and /ile/ are now very seldom heard,

save as dialectic variations. But in certain other words, perhaps

supported by Irish influence, the /i/-sound still persists. Chief

among them are /hoist/ and /roil/. An unlearned American, wishing to

say that he was enraged, never says that he was /roiled/, but always

that he was /riled/. Desiring to examine the hoof of his horse, he

never orders the animal to /hoist/ but always to /hist/. In the form

of /booze-hister/, the latter is almost in good usage. I have seen

/booze-hister/ thus spelled and obviously to be thus pronounced, in an

editorial article in the /American Issue/, organ of the Anti-Saloon

League of America.[81]

Various similar misplaced vowels were brought from England by the

colonists and have persisted in America, while dying out of good

England usage. There is, for example, short /i/ in place of long /e/,

as in /critter/ for /creature/. /Critter/ is common to almost all the

dialects of English, but American has embedded the vowel in a word

that is met with nowhere else and has thus become characteristic, to

wit, /crick/ for /creek/. Nor does any other dialect make such

extensive use of /slick/ for /sleek/. Again, there is the substitution

of the flat /a/ for the broad /a/ in /sauce/. England has gone back to

the broad /a/, but in America the flat /a/ persists, and many

Americans who use /sassy/ every day would scarcely recognize /saucy/

if they heard it. Yet again, there is /quoit/. Originally, the English

pronounced it /quate/, but now they pronounce the diphthong as in

/doily/. In the United States the /quate/ pronunciation remains.

Finally, there is /deaf/. Its proper pronunciation, in the England

that the colonists left, was /deef/, but it now rhymes with /Jeff/.

That new pronunciation has been adopted by polite American, despite

the protests of Noah Webster, but in the common speech the word is

still always /deef/.

However, a good many of the vowels of the early days have [Pg237]

succumbed to pedagogy. The American proletarian may still use /skeer/

for /scare/, but in most of the other words of that class he now uses

the vowel approved by correct English usage. Thus he seldom permits

himself such old forms as /dreen/ for /drain/, /keer/ for /care/,

/skeerce/ for /scarce/ or even /cheer/ for /chair/. The Irish

influence supported them for a while, but now they are fast going out.

So, too, are /kivver/ for /cover/, /crap/ for /crop/, and /chist/ for

/chest/. But /kittle/ for /kettle/ still shows a certain vitality,

/rench/ is still used in place of /rinse/, and /squinch/ in place of

/squint/, and a flat /a/ continues to displace various /e/-sounds in

such words as /rare/ for /rear/ (/e. g./, as a horse) and /wrassle/

for /wrestle/. Contrariwise, /e/ displaces /a/ in /catch/ and

/radish/, which are commonly pronounced /ketch/ and /reddish/. This

/e/-sound was once accepted in standard English; when it got into

spoken American it was perfectly sound; one still hears it from the

most pedantic lips in /any/.[82] There are also certain other ancients

that show equally unbroken vitality among us, for example, /stomp/ for

/stamp/,[83] /snoot/ for /snout/, /guardeen/ for /guardian/, and

/champeen/ for /champion/.

But all these vowels, whether approved or disapproved, have been under

the pressure, for the past century, of a movement toward a general

vowel neutralization, and in the long run it promises to dispose of

many of them. The same movement also affects standard English, as

appears by Robert Bridges' "Tract on the Present State of English

Pronunciation," but I believe that it is stronger in America, and will

go farther, at least with the common speech, if only because of our

unparalleled immigration. Standard English has 19 separate vowel

sounds. No other living tongue of Europe, save Portuguese, has so

many; most of the others have a good many less; Modern Greek has but

five. The immigrant, facing all these vowels, finds some of them quite

impossible; the Russian Jew, as we have seen, cannot manage /ur/. As a

result, he tends to employ a neutralized [Pg238] vowel in all the

situations which present difficulties, and this neutralized vowel,

supported by the slip-shod speech-habits of the native proletariat,

makes steady progress. It appears in many of the forms that we have

been examining--in the final /a/ of /would'a/, vaguely before the /n/

in /this'n/ and /off'n/, in place of the original /d/ in /use' to/,

and in the common pronunciation of such words as /been/, /come/ and

/have/, particularly when they are sacrificed to sentence exigencies,

as in "I /b'n/ thinking," "/c'm 'ere/," and "he would /'ve/ saw you."

Here we are upon a wearing down process that shows many other

symptoms. One finds, not only vowels disorganized, but also

consonants. Some are displaced by other consonants, measurably more

facile; others are dropped altogether. /D/ becomes /t/, as in /holt/,

or is dropped, as in /tole/, /han'kerchief/, /bran-new/ and /fine/

(for /find/). In /ast/ (for /ask/) /t/ replaces /k/: when the same

word is used in place of /asked/, as often happens, /e. g./, in "I

/ast/ him his name," it shoulders out /ked/. It is itself lopped off

in /bankrup/, /quan'ity/, /crep/, /slep/, /wep/, /kep/, /gris'-mill/

and /les/ (=/let's/ = /let us/), and is replaced by /d/ in

/kindergarden/ and /pardner/. /L/ disappears, as in /a'ready/ and

/gent'man/. /S/ becomes /tsh/, as in /pincers/. The same /tsh/

replaces /c/, as in /pitcher/ for /picture/, and /t/, as in

/amachoor/. /G/ disappears from the ends of words, and sometimes, too,

in the middle, as in /stren'th/ and /reco'nize/. /R/, though it is

better preserved in American than in English, is also under pressure,

as appears by /bust/, /stuck on/ (for /struck on/), /cuss/ (for

/curse/), /yestiddy/, /sa's'parella/, /pa'tridge/, /ca'tridge/, /they

is/ (for /there is/) and /Sadd'y/ (for /Saturday/). An excrescent /t/

survives in a number of words, /e. g./, /onc't/, /twic't/, /clos't/,

/wisht/ (for /wish/) and /chanc't/; it is an heirloom from the English

of two centuries ago. So is the final /h/ in /heighth/. An excrescent

/b/, as in /chimbley/ and /fambly/, seems to be native. Whole

syllables are dropped out of words, paralleling the English butchery

of /extraordinary/; for example, in /bound'ry/, /hist'ry/, /lib'ry/

and /prob'ly/. /Ordinary/, like /extraordinary/, is commonly

enunciated clearly, but it has bred a degenerated form, /onry/ or

/onery/, differentiated in meaning. Consonants are misplaced by

metathesis, as in /prespiration/, /hunderd/, [Pg239] /brethern/,

/childern/, /interduce/, /apern/, /calvary/, /govrenment/, /modren/

and /wosterd/ (for /worsted/). /Ow/ is changed to /er/, as in

/feller/, /swaller/, /yeller/, /beller/, /umbreller/ and /holler/;

/ice/ is changed to /ers/ in /jaunders/. Words are given new

syllables, as in /ellum/, /mischievious/ and /municipial/.

In the complete sentence, assimilation makes this disorganization much

more obvious. Mearns, in a brief article[84] gives many examples of

the extent to which it is carried. He hears "wah zee say?" for "what

does he say?" "ware zee?" for "where is he?" "ast 'er in" for "ask her

in," "itt'm owd" for "hit them out," "sry" for "that is right," and

"c'meer" for "come here." He believes that /t/ is gradually succumbing

to /d/, and cites "ass bedder" (for "that's better"), "wen juh ged

din?" (for "when did you get in?"), and "siddup" (for "sit up"). One

hears countless other such decayed forms on the street every day.

/Have to/ is almost invariably made /hafta/, with the neutral vowel

where I have put the second /a/. /Let's/, already noticed, is /le'

's/. The neutral vowel replaces the /oo/ of /good/ in /g'by/. "What

did you say" reduces itself to "wuz ay?" /Maybe/ is /mebby/, /perhaps/

is /p'raps/, /so long/ is /s'long/, /excuse me/ is /skus me/; the

common salutation, "How are you?" is so dismembered that it finally

emerges as a word almost indistinguishable from /high/. Here there is

room for inquiry, and that inquiry deserves the best effort of

American phonologists, for the language is undergoing rapid changes

under their very eyes, or, perhaps more accurately, under their very

ears, and a study of those changes should yield a great deal of

interesting matter. How did the word /stint/, on American lips, first

convert itself into /stent/ and then into /stunt/? By what process was

/baulk/ changed into /buck/? Both /stunt/ and /buck/ are among the

commonest words in the everyday American vocabulary, and yet no one,

so far, has investigated them scientifically.

A by-way that is yet to be so much as entered is that of naturalized

loan-words in the common speech. A very characteristic word of that

sort is /sashay/. Its relationship to the French /chassé/ seems to be

plain, and yet it has acquired meanings in [Pg240] American that

differ very widely from the meaning of /chassé/. How widely it is

dispersed may be seen by the fact that it is reported in popular use,

as a verb signifying to prance or to walk consciously, in Southeastern

Missouri, Nebraska, Northwestern Arkansas, Eastern Alabama and Western

Indiana, and, with slightly different meaning, on Cape Cod. The

travels of /café/ in America would repay investigation; particularly

its variations in pronunciation. I believe that it is fast becoming

/kaif/. /Plaza/, /boulevard/, /vaudeville/, /menu/ and /rathskeller/

have entered into the common speech of the land, and are pronounced as

American words. Such words, when they come in verbally, by actual

contact with immigrants, commonly retain some measure of their correct

native pronunciation. /Spiel/, /kosher/, /ganof/ and /matzoh/ are

examples; their vowels remain un-American. But words that come in

visually, say through street-signs and the newspapers, are immediately

overhauled and have thoroughly Americanized vowels and consonants

thereafter. School-teachers have been trying to establish various

pseudo-French pronunciations of /vase/ for fifty years past, but it

still rhymes with /face/ in the vulgate. /Vaudeville/ is /vawd-vill/;

/boulevard/ has a hard /d/ at the end; /plaza/ has two flat /a/'s; the

first syllable of /menu/ rhymes with /bee/; the first of /rathskeller/

with /cats/; /fiancée/ is /fy-ancé-y/; /née/ rhymes with /see/;

/décolleté/ is /de-coll-ty/; /hofbräu/ is /huffbrow/; the German /w/

has lost its /v/-sound and becomes an American /w/. I have, in my day,

heard /proteege/ for /protégé/, /habichoo/ for /habitué/, /connisoor/

for /connisseur/, /shirtso/ for /scherzo/, /premeer/ for /première/,

/eetood/ for /étude/ and /prelood/ for /prelude/. /Divorcée/ is

/divorcey/, and has all the rakishness of the adjectives in /-y/. The

first syllable of /mayonnaise/ rhymes with /hay/. /Crème de menthe/ is

/cream de mint/. /Schweizer/ is /swite-ser/. /Rochefort/ is

/roke-fort/. I have heard /début/ with the last syllable rhyming with

/nut/. I have heard /minoot/ for /minuet/. I have heard /tchef doover/

for /chef d'œuvre/. And who doesn't remember

As I walked along the /Boys Boo-long/

With an independent air

and [Pg241]

Say /aw re-vore/,

But not good-by!

Charles James Fox, it is said, called the red wine of France /Bordox/

to the end of his days. He had an American heart; his great speeches

for the revolting colonies were more than mere oratory.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Sweet, perhaps the abbot of the order, makes almost indecent haste

to sin. See the second paragraph on the very first page of vol. i of

his New English Grammar.

[2] /Yale Review/, April, 1918, p. 548.

[3] /Yale Review/, /op. cit./, p. 560.

[4] The Difficulties Created by Grammarians Are to be Ignored, by W.

H. Wilcox, /Atlantic Educational Journal/, Nov., 1912, p. 8. The title

of this article is quoted from ministerial instructions of 1909 to the

teachers of French /lyceés/.

[5] /Op cit./ p. 7. Mr. Wilcox is an instructor in the Maryland State

Normal School.

[6] See especially chapters ix and x of Words and Their Uses and

chapters xvii, xviii and xix of Every-Day English; also the preface to

the latter, p. xi /et seq./ The study of other languages has been made

difficult by the same attempt to force the characters of Greek and

Latin grammar upon them. One finds a protest against the process, for

example, in E. H. Palmer's Grammar of Hindustani, Persian and Arabic;

London, 1906. In all ages, indeed, grammarians appear to have been

fatuous. The learned will remember Aristophanes' ridicule of them in

The Clouds, 660-690.

[7] The case is well summarized in Simpler English Grammar, by

Patterson Wardlaw, /Bull. of the University of S. Carolina/, No. 38,

pt. iii, July, 1914.

[8] Cincinnati, 1868; rev. ed., 1878.

[9] New York, 1903; rev. ed., 1915.

[10] Even Sweet, though he bases his New English Grammar upon the

spoken language and thus sets the purists at defiance, quickly

succumbs to the labelling mania. Thus his classification of tenses

includes such fabulous monsters as these: continuous, recurrent,

neutral, definite, indefinite, secondary, incomplete, inchoate, short

and long.

[11] By W. F. Webster and Alice Woodworth Cooley; Boston, 1903; rev.

eds., 1905 and 1909. The authors are Minneapolis teachers.

[12] /Op. cit./ p. 8.

[13] Bulletin No. 2; Washington, 1917.

[14] The Middle American, /American Magazine/, March, 1907.

[15] /Cf./ White: Every-Day English, p. 367 /et seq./

[16] /Cf./ Sweet: New English Grammar, vol. i, p. 5.

[17] Dr. Charters' report appears as Vol. XVI, No. 2, /University of

Missouri Bulletin/, Education Series No. 9, Jan., 1915. He was aided

in his inquiry by Edith Miller, teacher of English in one of the St.

Louis high-schools.

[18] You Know Me Al: New York, 1916.

[19] /Saturday Evening Post/, July 11, 1914.

[20] /Bin/ is the correct American pronunciation. /Bean/, as we have

seen, is the English. But I have often found /ben/, rhyming with

/pen/, in such phrases as "I /ben/ there."

[21] See p. 209.

[22] Seldom used. /Get/ is used in the place of it, as in "I am

/getting/ old" and "he /got/ sick."

[23] /Burned/, with a distinct /d/-sound, is almost unknown in

American. See p. 201.

[24] Not used.

[25] /Cotched/ is heard only in the South, and mainly among the

negroes. /Catch/, of course, is always pronounced /ketch/.

[26] But "I /drew/ three jacks," in poker.

[27] /Fotch/ is also heard, but it is not general.

[28] /Fit/ and /fitten/, unless my observation errs, are heard only in

dialect. /Fit/ is archaic English. /Cf./ Thornton, vol. i, p. 322.

[29] /Glode/ once enjoyed a certain respectability in America. It

occurs in the /Knickerbocker Magazine/ for April, 1856.

[30] /Hanged/ is never heard.

[31] /Het/ is incomplete without the addition of /up/. "He was /het

up/" is always heard, not "he was /het/."

[32] Always so pronounced. See p. 236.

[33] See pp. 57 and 202.

[34] Always used in place of /rinse/.

[35] Always used in place of /roil/.

[36] /Sot/ is heard as a localism only.

[37] See /set/, which is used almost invariably in place of /sit/.

[38] /Thunk/ is never used seriously; it always shows humorous intent.

[39] See pp. 201 and 211.

[40] /Cf./ Lounsbury: History of the English Language, pp. 309-10.

[41] English As We Speak It In Ireland, p. 77.

[42] The Science of Language, vol. i, p. 166.

[43] The last stand of the distinct /-ed/ was made in Addison's day.

He was in favor of retaining it, and in the /Spectator/ for Aug. 4,

1711, he protested against obliterating the syllable in the

termination "of our praeter perfect tense, as in these words,

/drown'd/, /walk'd/, /arriv'd/, for /drowned/, /walked/, /arrived/,

which has very much disfigured the tongue, and turned a tenth part of

our smoothest words into so many clusters of consonants."

[44] A New English Grammar, pt. i, p. 380.

[45] History of the English Language, p. 398.

[46] And still more often as an adjective, as in "it was a /boughten/

dress."

[47] You Know Me Al, p. 180; see also p. 122.

[48] /Cf./ Lounsbury: History of the English Language, pp. 393 /et

seq./

[49] Remark of a policeman talking to another. What he actually said

was "before the Elks was /c'm 'ere/." /Come/ and /here/ were one word,

approximately /cmear/. The context showed that he meant to use the

past perfect tense.

[50] These examples are from Lardner's story, A New Busher Breaks In,

in You Know Me Al, pp. 122 /et seq./

[51] You Know Me Al, /op. cit./, p. 124.

[52] The Making of English, p. 53.

[53] /Cf./ /Dialect Notes/, vol. iii, pt. i, p. 59; /ibid./, vol. III,

pt. iv, p. 283.

[54] Henry Bradley, in The Making of English, pp. 54-5: "In the parts

of England which were largely inhabited by Danes the native pronouns

(/i. e./, /heo/, /his/, /heom/ and /heora/) were supplanted by the

Scandinavian pronouns which are represented by the modern /she/,

/they/, /them/ and /their/." This substitution, at first dialectical,

gradually spread to the whole language.

[55] /Cf./ Sweet: A New English Grammar, pt. i, p. 344, par. 1096.

[56] Before a noun beginning with a vowel /thine/ and /mine/ are

commonly substituted for /thy/ and /my/, as in "/thine/ eyes" and

"/mine/ infirmity." But this is solely for the sake of euphony. There

is no compensatory use of /my/ and /thy/ in the absolute.

[57] The Making of English, p. 58.

[58] /Cf./ The Dialect of Southeastern Missouri, by D. S. Crumb,

/Dialect Notes/, vol. ii, pt. iv, 1903, p. 337.

[59] It occurs, too, of course, in other dialects of English, though

by no means in all. The Irish influence probably had something to do

with its prosperity in vulgar American. At all events, the Irish use

it in the American manner. Joyce, in English As We Speak It in

Ireland, pp. 34-5, argues that this usage was suggested by Gaelic. In

Gaelic the accusative pronouns, /e/, /i/ and /iad/ (=/him/, /her/ and

/them/) are often used in place of the nominatives, /sé/, /si/ and

/siad/ (=/he/, /she/ and /they/), as in "is /iad/ sin na

buachaillidhe" (=/them/ are the boys). This is "good grammar" in

Gaelic, and the Irish, when they began to learn English, translated

the locution literally. The familiar Irish "John is dead and /him/

always so hearty" shows the same influence.

[60] Pp. 144-50.

[61] Modern English, p. 300.

[62] A New English Grammar, pt. i, p. 339.

[63] History of the English Language, pp. 274-5.

[64] Modern English, p. 288-9.

[65] /Cf./ p. 145n.

[66] A New English Grammar, pt. i, p. 341.

[67] It may be worth noting here that the misuse of /me/ for /my/, as

in "I lit /me/ pipe" is quite unknown in American, either standard or

vulgar. Even "/me/ own" is seldom heard. This boggling of the cases is

very common in spoken English.

[68] A New English Grammar, pt. i, p. 341.

[69] The King's English, p. 63.

[70] "Hon." Edward E. Browne, of Wisconsin, in the House of

Representatives, July 18, 1918, p. 9965.

[71] /Cf./ Vogue Affixes in Present-Day Word-Coinage, by Louise Pound,

/Dialect Notes/, vol. v, pt. i, 1918.

[72] The Speech of a Child Two Years of Age, /Dialect Notes/, vol. iv,

pt. ii, 1914.

[73] A New English Grammar, pt. i, pp. 437-8.

[74] The King's English, p. 322. See especially the quotation from

Frederick Greenwood, the distinguished English journalist.

[75] Report of Edward J. Brundage, attorney-general of Illinois, on

the East St. Louis massacre, /Congressional Record/, Jan. 7, 1918, p.

661.

[76] The King's English, /op. cit./

[77] Oct. 1, 1864.

[78] /At all/, by the way, is often displaced by /any/ or /none/, as

in "he don't lover her /any/" and "it didn't hurt me /none/."

[79] See the bibliography for the publication of Drs. Read and Pound.

[80] The only book that I can find definitely devoted to American

sounds is A Handbook of American Speech, by Calvin L. Lewis; Chicago,

1916. It has many demerits. For example, the author gives a /z/-sound

to the /s/ in /venison/ (p. 52). This is surely not American.

[81] Maryland edition, July 18, 1914, p. 1.

[82] /Cf./ Lounsbury: The Standard of Pronunciation in English, p. 172

/et seq./

[83] /Stomp/ is used only in the sense of to stamp with the foot. One

always /stamps/ a letter. An analogue of /stomp/, accepted in correct

English, is /strop/ (/e. g./, /razor-strop/), from /strap/.

[84] Our Own, Our Native Speech, /McClure's Magazine/, Oct., 1916.

[Pg242]

VII

Differences in Spelling

§ 1

/Typical Forms/--Some of the salient differences between American and

English spelling are shown in the following list of common words:

/American/ /English/

Anemia anaemia

aneurism aneurysm

annex (noun) annexe

arbor arbour

armor armour

asphalt asphalte

ataxia ataxy

ax axe

balk (verb) baulk

baritone barytone

bark (ship) barque

behavior behaviour

behoove behove

buncombe bunkum

burden (ship's) burthen

cachexia cachexy

caliber calibre

candor candour

center centre

check (bank) cheque

checkered chequered

cider cyder

clamor clamour

clangor clangour

cloture closure[1]

color colour

connection connexion

councilor councillor

counselor counsellor

cozy cosy

curb kerb

cyclopedia cyclopaedia

defense defence

demeanor demeanour

diarrhea diarrhoea

draft (ship's) draught

dreadnaught dreadnought

dryly drily

ecology oecology

ecumenical oecumenical

edema oedema

encyclopedia encyclopaedia

endeavor endeavour

eon aeon

epaulet epaulette

esophagus oesophagus

fagot faggot

favor favour

favorite favourite

fervor fervour

flavor flavour

font (printer's) fount

foregather forgather

forego forgo

form (printer's) forme

fuse fuze

gantlet (to run the--) gauntlet

glamor glamour

good-by good-bye

gram gramme

gray grey

harbor harbour

honor honour

hostler ostler

humor humour

inclose enclose

indorse endorse

inflection inflexion

inquiry enquiry

jail gaol

jewelry jewellery

jimmy (burglar's) jemmy

labor labour

laborer labourer

liter litre

maneuver manoeuvre

medieval mediaeval

meter metre

misdemeanor misdemeanour

mold mould

mollusk mollusc

molt moult

mustache moustache

neighbor neighbour

neighborhood neighbourhood

net (adj.) nett

odor odour

offense offence

pajamas pyjamas

parlor parlour

peas (plu. of pea) pease

picket (military) piquet

plow plough

pretense pretence

program programme

pudgy podgy

pygmy pigmy

rancor rancour

rigor rigour

rumor rumour

savory savoury

scimitar scimetar

septicemia septicaemia

show (verb) shew

siphon syphon

siren syren

skeptic sceptic

slug (verb) slog

slush slosh

splendor splendour

stanch staunch

story (of a house) storey

succor succour

taffy toffy

tire (noun) tyre

toilet toilette

traveler traveller

tumor tumour

valor valour

vapor vapour

veranda verandah

vial phial

vigor vigour

vise (a tool) vice

wagon waggon

woolen woollen

§ 2

/General Tendencies/--This list is by no means exhaustive. According

to a recent writer upon the subject, "there are 812 words in which the

prevailing American spelling differs from the English."[2] But enough

examples are given to reveal a number of definite tendencies.

American, in general, moves toward simplified forms of spelling more

rapidly than English, and has got much further along the road.

Redundant and unnecessary letters have been dropped from whole groups

of words--the /u/ from the group of nouns in /-our/, with the sole

exception of /Saviour/, and from such words as /mould/ and /baulk/;

the /e/ from /annexe/, /asphalte/, /axe/, /forme/, /pease/, /storey/,

etc.; the duplicate consonant from /waggon/, /nett/, /faggot/,

/woollen/, /jeweller/, /councillor/, etc., and the silent foreign

suffixes from /toilette/, /epaulette/, /programme/, /verandah/, etc.

In addition, simple vowels have been substituted for degenerated

diphthongs in such words as /anaemia/, [Pg246] /oesophagus/,

/diarrhoea/ and /mediaeval/, most of them from the Greek.

The American Language A Preliminary Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States · 第 22 / 36 段