CHAPTER XXXIII.

THE TWO TYPES OF RELIGION IN ROME.

[Sidenote: The Cappuccini Cemetery.]

Only three or four blocks from our hotel stands the Church of the

Cappuccini, which contains one of the most gruesome sights in Rome,

the celebrated cemetery of the Cappuccini monks, the soil of which was

brought from Jerusalem. All Roman Catholic cemeteries have a peculiarly

melancholy aspect. They have none of that gentle beauty which is so

characteristic of our cemeteries, where the grass grows green under the

open sky or great trees cast their peaceful shade over "God's acre."

But this is the most weird and ghastly of them all. There are four

recesses or chapels underneath the church, the pillars and pilasters

of which are made of thigh-bones and skulls, the architectural

ornaments being represented by the joints of the spine, and the more

delicate tracery by the smaller bones of the human frame. "The summits

of the arches are adorned with entire skeletons, looking as if they

were wrought most skillfully in bas-relief. There is no possibility

of describing how ugly and grotesque is the effect.... On some of

the skulls there are inscriptions, purporting that such a monk, who

formerly made use of that particular head-piece, died on such a day

and year; but vastly the greater number are piled up undistinguishably

into the architectural design.... In the side walls of the vaults are

niches where skeleton monks sit or stand, clad in the brown habits that

they wore in life.... Yet let us give the cemetery the praise that it

deserves. There is no disagreeable scent, such as might have been

expected from the decay of so many holy persons, in whatever odor of

sanctity they may have taken their departure. The same number of living

monks would not smell half so unexceptionably." So Hawthorne says, and

I have spared my readers the most disagreeable parts of his description.

The allusion in his last sentence is one which is justified by the

olfactory organs of every visitor to Rome. The vices which were

encouraged in the magnificent baths of the emperors, and which

have given the word _bagnio_ an evil signification the world over,

"found their reaction in the impression of the early Christians that

uncleanliness was a virtue, an impression which is retained by several

of the monastic orders to the present day." We sometimes weary of

the superabundant advertisements of the different kinds of soap in

the advertising pages of our monthly magazines. But what a wholesome

sign it is! And what a difference it marks between us and the average

Italian! And what a field for their business would be opened to

Mr. Pears and the rest if only the monks would adopt the view that

"cleanliness is next to godliness," and that, therefore, soap might be

regarded as a sort of means of grace!

[Sidenote: Some Differences between America and Italy.]

Mark Twain once described what he would say, if he were a native of

Italy, and had been on a visit to the United States, and had come back

to the Campagna for the purpose of telling his Italian countrymen

what he had seen in America: "One hardly ever sees a minister of the

gospel going around there in his bare feet, with a basket, begging for

subsistence. In that country the preachers are not like our mendicant

orders of friars--they have two or three suits of clothing, _and they

wash sometimes_."... "I saw common men and common women who could

read; I even saw small children of common country people reading

from books; if I dared think you would believe it, I would say they

could write, also.... I saw real glass windows in the houses of even

the commonest people. Some of the houses are not of stone, nor yet

of bricks; I solemnly swear they are made of wood. Houses there will

take fire and burn, sometimes--actually burn entirely down, and not

leave a single vestige behind. I could state that for a truth upon my

death-bed. And, as a proof that the circumstance is not rare, I aver

that they have a thing which they call a fire-engine, which vomits

forth great streams of water, and is kept always in readiness, by night

and by day, to rush to houses that are burning. You would think one

engine would be sufficient, but some great cities have a hundred; they

keep men hired, and pay them by the month to do nothing but put out

fires.[20]... In that singular country if a rich man dies a sinner,

he is damned; he cannot buy salvation with money for masses. There is

really not much use in being rich there. Not much use as far as the

other world is concerned, but much, very much, use as concerns this;

because there, if a man be rich, he is very greatly honored, and can

become a legislator, a governor, a general, a senator, no matter how

ignorant an ass he is--just as in our beloved Italy the nobles hold all

the great places, even though sometimes they are born noble idiots.

There, if a man be rich, they give him costly presents, they ask him

to feasts, they invite him to drink complicated beverages; but if he

be poor and in debt, they require him to do that which they term to

'settle.'... In that country you might fall from a third-story window

three several times and not mash either a soldier or a priest.... Jews

there are treated just like human beings, instead of dogs.... They

never have had to run races naked through the public streets against

jackasses to please the people in carnival time; there they never have

been driven by the soldiers into a church every Sunday for hundreds of

years to hear themselves and their religion especially and particularly

cursed."[21]

[Sidenote: The Playful Inquisition.]

While I have Mark Twain in hand, I will make two more quotations from

him, and then dismiss him for good. Looking from the dome of St.

Peter's upon the building which was once the Inquisition, he says: "How

times are changed, between the older ages and the new! Some seventeen

or eighteen centuries ago, the ignorant men of Rome were wont to put

Christians in the arena of the Coliseum yonder, and turn the wild

beasts in upon them for a show. It was for a lesson as well. It was

to teach the people to abhor and fear the new doctrine the followers

of Christ were teaching. The beasts tore the victims limb from limb,

and made poor mangled corpses of them in the twinkling of an eye. But

when the Christians came into power, when the holy Mother Church became

mistress of the barbarians, she taught them the error of their ways

by no such means. No, she put them in this pleasant Inquisition, and

pointed to the blessed Redeemer, who was so gentle and so merciful

toward all men, and they urged the barbarians to love him; and they

did all they could to persuade them to love and honor him--first by

twisting their thumbs out of joint with a screw; then by nipping their

flesh with pincers--red-hot ones, because they are the most comfortable

in cold weather; then by skinning them alive a little, and finally by

roasting them in public. They always convinced those barbarians. The

true religion, properly administered, as the good Mother Church used to

administer it, is very, very soothing. It is wonderfully persuasive,

also. There is a great difference between feeding parties to wild

beasts and stirring up their finer feelings in an Inquisition. One is

the system of degraded barbarians, the other of enlightened, civilized

people. It is a great pity the playful Inquisition is no more."

[Sidenote: The Relative Rank of the Deities Worshipped in Rome.]

Speaking of a mosaic group at the side of the Scala Santa which

represents the Saviour, St. Peter, Pope Leo, St. Silvester, Constantine

and Charlemagne, he says: "Peter is giving the _pallium_ to the Pope,

and a standard to Charlemagne. The Saviour is giving the keys to St.

Silvester, and a standard to Constantine. No prayer is offered to the

Saviour, who seems to be of little importance anywhere in Rome; but

an inscription below says, '_Blessed Peter, give life to Pope Leo

and victory to King Charles_.' It does not say, '_Intercede for us_,

through the Saviour, with the Father, for this boon,' but 'Blessed

Peter, _give it_ us.'

"In all seriousness--without meaning to be frivolous, without

meaning to be irreverent, and, more than all, without meaning to be

blasphemous--I state, as my simple deduction from the things I have

seen and the things I have heard, that the Holy Personages rank thus in

Rome:

"_First._ 'The Mother of God'--otherwise the Virgin Mary.

"_Second._ The Deity.

"_Third._ Peter.

"_Fourth._ Some twelve or fifteen canonized popes and martyrs.

"_Fifth._ Jesus Christ the Saviour (but always an infant in arms).

"I may be wrong in this--my judgment errs often, just as is the case

with other men's--but it _is_ my judgment, be it good or bad.

"Just here I will mention something that seems curious to me. There are

no 'Christ's Churches' in Rome, and no 'Churches of the Holy Ghost,'

that I can discover. There are some four hundred churches, but about a

fourth of them seem to be named for the Madonna and St. Peter. There

are so many named for Mary that they have to be distinguished by all

sorts of affixes, if I understand the matter rightly. Then we have

churches of St. Louis, St. Augustine, St. Agnes, St. Calixtus, St.

Lorenzo in Lucina, St. Lorenzo in Damaso, St. Cecilia, St. Athanasius,

St. Philip Neri, St. Catherine, St. Dominico, and a multitude of lesser

saints whose names are not familiar in the world--and away down, clear

out of the list of the churches, comes a couple of hospitals; one of

them is named for the Saviour and the other for the Holy Ghost!"

[Sidenote: The Fee of the Visitor more Important than the Soul of the

Worshipper.]

But we have allowed this clean, shrewd, racy American with his biting

satire and his outspoken common sense, to lead us far away from our

subject. Let us come back to the Church of the Cappuccini. For, besides

its horrible cemetery, it contains another object of great interest,

though of a very different character, viz., Guido's great picture of

the Archangel Michael trampling upon the devil. The devil's face is

said to be a portrait of Pope Innocent X., against whom the painter had

a spite. It is not for the purpose of describing the picture that I

refer to it, for I am not competent to do that, but for the purpose of

quoting the animadversions of another American writer upon the custom

of concealing this picture and others of special interest in Romish

churches with closely drawn curtains, requiring the presence of an

attendant to unveil them and the bestowment of a fee by the visitor.

"The churchmen of Italy make no scruple of sacrificing the very purpose

for which a work of sacred art has been created, that of opening

the way for religious sentiment through the quick medium of sight,

by bringing angels, saints and martyrs down visibly upon earth--of

sacrificing this high purpose, and, for aught they know, the welfare of

many souls along with it, to the hope of a paltry fee. Every work by

an artist of celebrity is hidden behind a veil, and seldom revealed,

except to Protestants, who scorn it as an object of devotion, and value

it only for its artistic merit."

[Sidenote: Sensuality versus Spirituality in Art.]

The same author (Hawthorne), speaking of the terrible lack of variety

in the subjects of the great Italian masters, says a quarter part,

probably, of any large collection of pictures consists of Virgins and

infant Christs.... Half of the other pictures are Magdalens, Flights

into Egypt, Crucifixions, etc. "The remainder of the gallery comprises

mythological subjects, such as nude Venuses, Ledas, Graces, and, in

short, a general apotheosis of nudity.... These impure pictures are

from the same illustrious and impious hands that adventured to call

before us the august forms of apostles and saints, the Blessed Mother

of the Redeemer, and her Son, at his death, and in his glory, and even

the awfulness of him to whom the martyrs, dead a thousand years ago,

have not dared to raise their eyes. They seem to take up one task or

the other--the disrobed woman whom they call Venus, or the type of

highest and tenderest womanhood in the mother of the Saviour--with

equal readiness, but to achieve the former with far more satisfactory

success. If an artist sometimes produced a picture of the Virgin

possessing warmth enough to excite devotional feelings, it was probably

the object of his earthly love, to whom he thus paid the stupendous

and fearful homage of setting up her portrait to be worshipped, not

figuratively as a mortal, but by religious souls in their earnest

aspirations towards divinity. And who can trust the religious sentiment

of Raphael, or receive any of his Virgins as heaven-descended

likenesses, after seeing, for example, the "Fornarina" of the Barberini

Palace, and feeling how sensual the artist must have been to paint

such a brazen trollop of his own accord, and lovingly? Would the

Blessed Mary reveal herself to his spiritual vision, and favor him

with sittings alternately with that type of glowing earthliness, the

Fornarina?"

[Sidenote: The Kind of Character Produced.]

True, Hawthorne proceeds at once to weaken the force of this criticism

somewhat by referring to the throng of spiritual faces, innocent

cherubs, serene angels, pure-eyed madonnas, and "that divinest

countenance in the Transfiguration"--all of which we owe to Raphael's

marvellous brush. But the criticism above quoted is sound. And that

Hawthorne himself saw how little such "sacred art" had availed to lift

the representatives of this kind of worship out of gross sensualism,

let the following passage witness: "Here was a priesthood, pampered,

sensual, with red and bloated cheeks, and carnal eyes. With apparently

a grosser development of animal life than most men, they were placed

in an unnatural relation with woman, and thereby lost the healthy,

human conscience that pertains to other human beings, who own the sweet

household ties connecting them with wife and daughter. And here was an

indolent nobility, with no high aims or opportunities, but cultivating

a vicious way of life, as if it were an art, and the only one which

they cared to learn. Here was a population, high and low, that had no

genuine belief in virtue; and if they recognized any act as criminal,

they might throw off all care, remorse and memory of it, by kneeling

a little while at the confessional, and rising unburdened, active,

elastic and incited by fresh appetite for the next ensuing sin."

Of course all the priests are not such as above described, as Eugene

Sue has endeavored to show in the character of Gabriel in _The

Wandering Jew_, and Victor Hugo in the character of the good bishop

in _Les Miserables_, and Marie Corelli in the character of the good

Cardinal Bonpre in _The Master Christian_. Hawthorne simply describes

the prevailing type. Let it be observed, too, that he is speaking of

the priests in Italy, not of those in America, among whom we are glad

to believe there is a much larger proportion of good men. Moreover, it

should not be forgotten that the present Premier of Italy has himself

stated publicly, in a passage which I have quoted in Chapter XXIX.,

that there has been some improvement, at least in the outward conduct

of the clergy, since the overthrow of the papal government, and that

the immorality of the priests and cardinals is not so shamelessly

flaunted in Rome as it used to be under the popes.

[Sidenote: The Other Type.]

On the 20th of September, 1870, the Italian army entered Rome,

after a slight resistance. This event, which marked the downfall of

the temporal power of the papacy, the unification of Italy, and

the establishment of religious liberty under the enlightened and

progressive government of Victor Emmanuel, is properly commemorated

in the name of a handsome street, Via Venti Settembre, which extends

from the Porta Pia, where the army entered, to the Quirinal Palace,

where the King resides. Appropriately placed on a street which thus

commemorates the establishment of civil and religious freedom in Italy,

are several of the Protestant churches, which for the last thirty years

have caused a pure river of water of life to flow once more through

Rome as in the days when the great Apostle of the Gentiles preached

there the kingdom of God, and taught the things concerning the Lord

Jesus Christ with all boldness, none forbidding him.

At No. 7 on this high and pleasant street we find a tall, clean,

handsome building, standing well back from the street, with a spacious,

green yard in front, the whole occupying a portion of what were once

the gardens of the Barberini Palace. A neat notice-board on the high

iron picket fence informs us that this attractive building is the

Presbyterian Church, and that the pastor is the Rev. J. Gordon Gray, D.

D.

[Sidenote: An Apostolic Preacher in Rome.]

When you enter the church on Sunday morning, a few minutes before

eleven o'clock, you find it filled with a congregation of exceptionally

intelligent people, mostly English-speaking residents in Rome and

English-speaking visitors from every part of the world, including

many Christians of other denominations besides our own--for it does

not take visitors in Rome long to find out how strong and wholesome

is the spiritual nourishment here furnished, how broad-minded and

large-hearted the minister is, and how surely he declares the whole

counsel of God, without ever a syllable that can offend any of those

who love our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity. If you return in the

afternoon, as you will do if you are wise, and as everybody does, in

fact, after hearing him once, you will find the house full again,

and, while you will see no splendid pageant, no rows of bishops and

archbishops in purple and lace and furs, no robing and disrobing, no

intoned service in Latin, no choral responses from high and gilded

choir loft, no clouds of incense filling the air--you will hear the

old sweet gospel in all its pristine purity--you will see the great

apostle and his friends before you, instinct with life and love and

zeal, as the minister lectures, with astonishing fullness and accuracy

of information and sympathetic understanding, on Roman Sites which

can be identified with St. Paul's Sojourn Here, The Saints of Cæsar's

Household in the light of the Columbaria, The Site and probable

incidents of Paul's Roman Trial, The First Martyrdoms and the probable

Site of Nero's Circus, Paul's Two Years in his Hired House, Paul's

Travels and Labors between his First and Second Roman Imprisonments,

The Closing Years of Paul's Ministry, The Jews in Rome in Paul's

Time--and you will hear things that make for the peace of your soul and

for your upbuilding on your most holy faith as he expounds The Chief

Elements of Paul's Teaching; Christ in Early Christian Art as found

in the Roman Catacombs; The State after Death, Prayers to the Dead,

and Prayers for the Dead, in the light of the testimony of the Roman

Catacombs; The Place and Efficacy of the Sacraments in the light of the

testimony of the Roman Catacombs; and The Ministry in the Early Church

of the Catacombs.

[Sidenote: A Wise and Loving Pastor.]

Surely never was Christian workman better adapted to his work than Dr.

Gray. The sturdy frame, the massive head, the clear eye, the kindly

voice, the genial manner, the transparent sincerity, and the ready

sympathy of the man, invite one's confidence from the first, and the

longer you know him the more you value him for his rare combination of

strength and tenderness, and for his wisdom, piety and learning. We

had the good fortune to hear his sermon on the eighteenth anniversary

of the formation of his pastorate in Rome, in which he reviewed the

history of his church during those eighteen years, and the years

immediately preceding, and the growth of Protestantism in Rome since

the downfall of the papacy--and a deeply interesting discourse it was.

It lifted one's hopes for the future of Italy. Undoubtedly the day is

breaking over the darkness which has so long lain like a pall over this

lovely land.

A good man is known by his prayers. There is a fullness, propriety

and fervor about Dr. Gray's public prayers that are seldom equalled.

The homesick stranger, with the wide ocean between him and his native

land--the professional man wavering in health and doubtful as to the

future--the stricken widow, who has lost her husband by the sudden

stroke of death--as well as those who bear the usual burdens of the

human heart, find themselves strangely comforted and cheered, strangely

relieved of their toils and cares and anxieties and fears, strangely

upborne and strengthened, as this man of God pours from a sympathetic

heart the needs of his people into the ear of him who careth for us.

Among the usual petitions on Sunday morning there is invariably one

for the King of England and the royal family, the President of the

United States, and the King and Queen of Italy. We had two reminders

on the 22nd of February that it was Washington's birthday: one was the

flags hanging out at the American Embassy, and the other was Dr. Gray's

prayer of thanksgiving for the character and services of Washington. He

never forgets anything.

Yet his activities are multifarious. His resourcefulness, adequacy

and strength have long since made him the real dean of the fine force

of Protestant ministers in Rome. His advice is sought by them, and

by all manner of visitors to Rome, on all manner of subjects. He is

deeply interested in the matter of excavating the house of Priscilla

and Aquila, the Apostle Paul's friends, on the Aventine, and hopes

to raise the necessary funds and have that done--a valuable service

to archæological and biblical learning. He ought by all means to

be allowed to find time to publish a volume on The Apostle Paul in

Rome. Dr. Gray is another of the many good gifts of Scotland to the

world, and, like Dr. Alexander Whyte, of Edinburgh, and other eminent

Scotchmen, is an Aberdeen man. They are some of the Aberdonians who

almost tempt us at times to agree with the Aberdeen man of whom our

good Scotch physician in Rome told me the other day, who said, "Tak'

awa' Aberdeen and sax miles around it, and what would you have left?"

FOOTNOTES:

[20] Few things struck our boys so much as the non-occurrence of fires

in Rome, and the absence of all apparatus for extinguishing them, and

on our return to America few things seemed so strange to us at first

as the frame houses in the New Jersey towns along the Pennsylvania

railroad.

[21] This custom of compelling Jews to listen to Christian sermons

was only abolished in 1848, under Pius IX., through influence of

Michelangelo Caëtani, Duke of Sermoneta.

A Year in Europe · 第 33 / 35 章