4. _Development of Forest Policy._

The impetus to introduce conservative features seems to have largely

come through the influence of the forestry movement in the United

States, and, although, voices of prominent Canadians, like that of

James and William Little, and Sir Henry Joly de Lotbinière had been

heard before in advocacy of a more far-seeing policy, the meeting of the

American Forestry Congress at Montreal in 1882, (see p. 480) may be set

as the date of the inception of this movement in Canada.

The definite result of that meeting was the inauguration of forest fire

legislation in the various provinces. In the Province of Ontario, the

Fire Act of 1878, which had until then remained a dead letter, was

improved, in 1885, by inaugurating a fire ranger system, in which limit

holders pay one-half the cost of the rangers. The force of fire

fighters, 37 in the first year was gradually increased until, in 1910,

nearly 1000 were employed at a cost of $300,000. In that year a change

was made, the whole service including inspection being charged against

the limit holder. In New Brunswick, a fire law was passed in 1885,

followed, in 1897, by the introduction of the Ontario ranger system. In

1883, Nova Scotia passed a forest fire law, which, like that of New

Brunswick, remained ineffective for lack of machinery; this was not

provided until 1904, and since then has worked most satisfactorily.

Recently a forest survey of this Province was made. Quebec also enacted

fire legislation in 1883, but did not provide means to carry it into

effect until 1889. Since at first only $5,000 annually was allowed for

its execution, and by 1901-2 not more than $7,226 was expended for fire

protection over an area of 40 million acres, its effectiveness may be

doubted. But in 1905, a special Forest-Protection Branch, with a

Superintendent and a ranger system after the Ontario pattern was

organized, and the service has become more effective.

The need for more organized effort and advice led to the establishment

of special bureaus of forestry. In Ontario, a Clerk of Forestry was

established in the Department of Agriculture in 1883, and, in 1895, he

was replaced by a Clerk in the Crown Lands Department, later named

Director of Forestry (Mr. Thomas Southworth). This office, later, was

changed to a Bureau of Forestry and Colonization, and a technically

educated man was appointed as Provincial Forester, with a view of

developing a forest management, at least in the Reserves. This movement,

however, soon collapsed for lack of appreciation; the office was

transferred back to the Department of Agriculture, which does not

control any timberlands, the Forester resigned, and the bureau was,

finally, in 1907, restricted to the colonization work, the forestry part

being deliberately abandoned.

Meanwhile the Province of Quebec pursued a more enlightened course. To

control the cut, a Culler’s office was established in 1842, which,

however, only checked the square timber, then the principal material. In

1873, after various futile attempts to secure better supervision, a

corps of forest rangers was created; but as they worked without

organization the results were only partial until, in 1889, they were

placed under seven chiefs or superintendents. In 1897, the number of

superintendents were reduced to one, but having to work with incompetent

men, political appointees, this improvement in headship did not produce

much result. In 1907, a re-organization took place by introducing two

professional foresters educated at government’s expense at American

colleges of forestry who upon their return were employed to supply the

technical supervision of cutting on licensed lands, and otherwise to

forward forestry reforms. In 1910, the logical sequence occurred by

placing the entire forest service except the protection against fire

under one of these technical men as chief, with the other one as his

assistant, and a corps of three civil engineers, 40 forest rangers and

six scalers, besides 20 student assistants--the first organized

provincial forest service in Canada, administered under the

Superintendent of Woods and Forests in the Department of Crownlands.[17]

[17] See Report of Canadian Forestry Convention, 1911.

In 1898, the Dominion government had also recognized the need of more

technical administration by instituting a Forestry Branch in the

Department of the Interior under a superintendent with a view of

developing improved methods. At first manned without technical advisers,

who were, indeed, not in existence, gradually the professional element

was introduced, and the scope of the Branch enlarged, the irrigation

interests of the country being added. Under the able guidance of the

present director--whose task under the political conditions surrounding

it is not an easy one--this department may in a few years also become

fully organized with technical men, of whom there are now seventeen

employed, besides student assistants.

These various government agencies and other propaganda produced at

least the important result of committing the governments to see the

propriety of setting aside permanent forest reserves.

The first movement in this direction was made in 1893, and in 1895, the

first Dominion reservations were made by Executive Order through the

Minister of the Interior. These, to be sure, were located in the thinly

timbered parts of the province of Manitoba, the Turtle Mountains and

Riding Mountain, mainly for the protection of water supply.

Several other similar reserves were set aside by the Minister, but to

give more stability to these reservations, an Act of Parliament was

passed in 1906, declaring their permanence and placing them, 3,380,000

acres, under the administration of the Superintendent of Forestry. There

are so far, some 26 Dominion Forest Reserves created, or in the act of

creation, comprising an area of over 25,000 square miles. The Forestry

Branch is making a brave beginning to survey and manage these reserves

under forestry principles.

Of the provinces, Ontario was the first to recognize the principle of

reservations in 1893, when a partially cut over, partially licensed

territory of over one million acres was set aside as the Algonquin

National Park in the Nipissing District, but the first definite

establishment of a forest reserve policy dates from the Forest Reserve

Act, passed in 1898, which authorizes the Executive, as in the United

States, to withdraw lands for reserves. Some eight reserves and two

parks have so far been established, and the reserved area amounts to

around 20,000 square miles.

Of management on forestry lines on these reserves there is so far little

to be heard, except an effort to keep fires out.

Quebec has followed this example of Ontario, first by setting aside the

Laurentides Park in the Saguenay region, (1,634,000 acres), which, like

Algonquin Park, was more in the nature of a game preserve. During

1906-7, however, under a law authorizing the Lieutenant Governor to set

aside forest reserves, over 100 million acres were placed in reserve.

Apparently, however, no administration of this preserve in the forestry

sense is as yet attempted.

British Columbia, which until lately was only concerned in disposing of

the well timbered crownlands, after having disposed of the best parts,

has placed under reservation the balance, and a forest commission of

inquiry has been constituted to devise further measures in the interest

of forestry. Its report, appearing in 1911, gives a very clear statement

of conditions in the province and the promise of active organization of

a better service.

Of other attempts to foster forestry interests may be mentioned a law in

Quebec, passed in 1882, providing a bonus of $12 per acre for tree

planting, which seems to have remained without effect; another,

providing for a diameter limit of 12 inches on the stump for pine and 9

inches for other kinds (these dimensions are now varied) inaugurated in

1888, may have preserved some young growth on the limits, although,

since pulpwood is now the main product, and supervision has been

inefficient, not much may be expected from such laws. Indeed, the chief

of the forest service reports that 60% of the regeneration is of the

inferior balsam fir.

In Ontario, a very competent Commission was created in 1897, with a

noted lumberman, Mr. Bertram as president, to formulate methods of

reform; but the able report remained barren of results.

The Dominion has been active in encouraging tree-planting in the

prairies. The Agricultural Experiment Station at Ottawa not only set out

object lessons by planting some 20 acres of sample plots, but for a

number of years distributed plant material to settlers. This work was

later taken over by the Forestry Branch and increased to a larger scale,

some 85 acres being in nursery, and the distribution having grown to

15,000,000 seedlings in 1910.

Ontario, under the direction of its Department of Agriculture and in

co-operation with the Agricultural College at Guelph, has lately

embarked in two movements of amelioration, namely, establishing a State

nursery from which plant material at cost, with advice as to its use, is

given to farmers, and purchasing and reforesting waste lands in the

agricultural section.

Tariff legislation is another means which is in the hands of the

Dominion government to be used for encouraging forest conservancy. It

has, however, so far not been used directly for such purpose, fiscal and

commercial policies being uppermost. But the provinces have in this

respect helped themselves by encouraging manufacture rather than export

of raw materials, Ontario leading in this matter by prohibiting export

of unmanufactured logs from Crownlands in 1898. Other provinces impose

an export duty on pulpwood cut on crownlands, as does also Ontario.

At present writing, a reciprocity agreement with the United States is

under contemplation, which would admit wood products from Canada free of

duty--an arrangement which whatever its commercial advantages bodes no

good for a conservative forest policy.

Meanwhile private limit holders, here and there, had begun to see the

need of conservative methods, and by 1908, at least two large Paper and

Pulp concerns had placed foresters in charge of their logging

operations.

A Brief History of Forestry. In Europe, the United States and Other Countries · 第 123 / 157 题