GERMANY.

Besides a dozen or more earlier histories of forestry in Germany,

some of which date back to the beginning of the 19th century, there

are two excellent modern compilations, namely:

_Geschichte des Waldeigenthums, der Waldwirtschaft und

Forstwissenschaft in Deutschland_, by AUGUST BERNHARDT, 1872-75, 3

Vols., 1062 pp., a classic, which treats especially extensively of

political and economic questions having a bearing on the development

of forestry; and

_Handbuch der Forst- und Jagdgeschichte Deutschlands_, by ADAM

SCHWAPPACH, 1886, 2 Vols., 892 pp., which appeared as a second

edition of Bernhardt’s history, abridging the political history and

expanding the forestry part. This volume has been mainly followed in

the following presentation of the subject. In condensed form this

history is also to be found in LOREY’S _Handbuch der

Forstwissenschaft_, 1888, Vol. I, pp. 143-210.

In Schwappach’s history a full list of original sources is

enumerated. These are, for the oldest period, Roman writings, which

are unreliable; the laws of the various German tribes; the laws of

kings (_Capitularia_); the laws of villages and other territorial

districts; “Weisthümer” (judgments); inventories of properties

(especially of churches and cloisters); documents of business

transactions and chronicles. For the time after the Middle ages the

most important source is found in the Forest Ordinances of princes

and other forest owners; forest laws; police orders; business

documents, and finally special literature.

It is generally conceded that both the science and art of forestry are

most thoroughly developed and most intensively applied throughout

Germany. It must, however, not be understood that perfection has been

reached anywhere in the practical application of the art, or that the

science, which like that of medicine has been largely a growth of

empiricism, is in all parts safely based; nor are definitely settled

forest policies so entrenched, that they have become immutable. On the

contrary, there are still mismanaged and unmanaged woods to be found,

mainly those in the hands of farmers and other private owners; there are

still even in well managed forests practices pursued which are known

not to conform to theoretical ideals, and others which lack a sure

scientific foundation; and while the general policy of conservative

management and of State interest in the same is thoroughly established,

the methods of attaining the result are neither uniform throughout the

various States which form the German Federation, nor positively settled

anywhere. In other words, the history of forestry is still, even in this

most advanced country, in the stage of lively development.

For the student of forestry the history of its development in Germany is

of greatest interest not only because his art has reached here the

highest and most intensive application, but because all the phases of

development through which other countries have passed or else will

eventually have to pass are here exemplified, and many if not most of

the other countries of the world have more or less followed German

example or have been at least influenced by German precedent. There is

hardly a policy or practice that has not at some time in some part been

employed in the fatherland of forestry.

One reason for this rich historical background is the fact, that Germany

has never been a unit, that from its earliest history it was broken up

into many independent and, until modern times, only loosely associated

units, which developed differently in social, political and economic

direction. This accounts also for the great variety of conditions

existing even to-day in the 26 principalities which form the German

empire.

Politically, it may be mentioned that out of the very many independent

principalities into which the German territory had been divided,

variable in number from time to time, the 26 which had preserved their

autonomy formed in 1871 the federation of States, known as the German

Empire. Each of these has its own representative government including

the forest administration, very much like the state governments of the

United States; only the army and navy, tariff, posts, telegraphs,

criminal law and foreign policy, and a few other matters are under the

direct jurisdiction of the empire, represented in the Reichstag, the

Bundesrath, and the Emperor.

The 208,830 square miles of territory,[2] which supports a population of

about 60 million people, still contain a forest area of around 35

million acres (26% of the land area) or .61 acre per capita, which

although largely under conservative management has long ago ceased to

supply by its annual increment (somewhat over 50 cubic feet per acre)

the needs of the population; the imports during the last 50 years since

1862, when Germany began to show excess of imports over exports, having

grown in volume at the average rate of 10% to now round 380 million

cubic feet (45 million dollars) or nearly 15% of the consumption.

[2] The statistics in this book do not pretend to be more than

approximations.

The larger part of Germany, two thirds of the territory and population

is controlled by modern Prussia, with a total forest area of 20 million

acres; Bavaria comes next with one seventh of the land area and 6

million acres of forest; the five larger states of Wurttemberg, Baden,

Saxony, Mecklenburg and Hesse, occupying together another seventh of

the territory with 5 million acres of forest. The balance of the area

is divided among the other 19 states.

Fifty per cent. of Germany roughly speaking, is plains country, the

larger part in the northern and eastern territory of Prussia; 25% is

hill country, mostly in West and Middle Germany; and 25% is mountain

country, the larger portion in the southern states.

There are at best only five species of timber of high economic general

importance, the (Scotch) pine which covers large areas in the northern

sandy plain and the lighter soils in the south; the (Norway) spruce and

(Silver) fir which form forests in the southwestern and other mountain

regions and represent, in mixture with broadleaf forest, a goodly

proportion in the northeastern lowlands; the (English) oak, of which

botanically two species are recognized; and the beech. The last two are

the most important hardwoods found throughout the empire, but especially

highly developed in the west and southwest. In addition, there are half

a dozen species of minor or more local importance, but the five

mentioned form the basis of the forestry systems.

* * * * *

The history of the development of forestry in Germany may be divided

into periods variously. Bernhardt recognizes six periods; Schwappach

makes four divisions, namely, the first, from the earliest times to the

end of the Carlovingians (911), which is occupied mainly with the

development of forest property conditions; the second, to the end of the

Middle Ages (1500), during which the necessity of forest management

begins to be sporadically recognized; the third, to the end of the 18th

century, during which the foundation for the development of all branches

of forestry is laid; the fourth, the modern period, accomplishing the

complete establishment of forestry methods in all parts of Germany. For

the later historian it would be proper to recognize a fifth period from

about 1863, when, by the establishment of experiment stations, a

breaking away from the merely empiric basis to a more scientific

foundation of forestry practice was begun.

For our purposes we shall be satisfied with a division into three

periods, namely: first, to the end of the middle ages, when, with the

discoveries of America and other new countries, an enlargement of the

world’s horizon gave rise to a change of economic conditions; second, to

the end of the eighteenth century, when change of political and economic

thought altered the relation of peoples and countries; third, the modern

period, which exhibits the practical fruition of these changes.

A Brief History of Forestry. In Europe, the United States and Other Countries · 第 32 / 157 题