2. Former dominance of the Abhiras.

The Abhiras appear to have been one of the immigrant tribes from

Central Asia who entered India shortly before or about the commencement

of the Christian era. In the Puranas and Mahabharata they are spoken

of as Dasyu or robbers, and Mlechchhas or foreigners, in the story

which says that Arjuna, after he had burned the dead bodies of

Krishna and Balaram at Dwarka, was proceeding with the widows of the

Yadava princes to Mathura through the Punjab when he was waylaid by

the Abhiras and deprived of his treasures and beautiful women. [15]

An inscription of the Saka era 102, or A.D. 180, speaks of a grant

made by the Senapati or commander-in-chief of the state, who is

called an Abhira, the locality being Sunda in Kathiawar. Another

inscription found in Nasik and assigned by Mr. Enthoven to the fourth

century speaks of an Abhira king, and the Puranas say that after the

Andhrabhrityas the Deccan was held by the Abhiras, the west coast

tract from the Tapti to Deogarh being called by their name. [16]

In the time of Samudragupta in the middle of the fourth century

the Abhiras were settled in Eastern Rajputana and Malwa. [17] When

the Kathis arrived in Gujarat in the eighth century, they found the

greater part of the country in the possession of the Ahirs. [18] In the

Mirzapur District of the United Provinces a tract known as Ahraura is

considered to be named after the tribe; and near Jhansi another piece

of country is called Ahirwar. [19] Elliot states that Ahirs were also

Rajas of Nepal about the commencement of our era. [20] In Khandesh,

Mr. Enthoven states, the settlements of the Ahirs were important. In

many castes there is a separate division of Ahirs, such as the Ahir

Sunars, Sutars, Lohars, Shimpis, Salis, Guraos and Kolis. The fort

of Asirgarh in Nimar bordering on Khandesh is supposed to have been

founded by one Asa Ahir, who lived in the beginning of the fifteenth

century. It is said that his ancestors had held land here for seven

hundred years, and he had 10,000 cattle, 20,000 sheep and 1000 mares,

with 2000 followers; but was still known to the people, to whom

his benevolence had endeared him, by the simple name of Asa. This

derivation of Asirgarh is clearly erroneous, as it was known as

Asir or Asirgarh, and held by the Tak and Chauhan Rajputs from the

eleventh century. But the story need not on that account, Mr. Grant

says, [21] be set down as wholly a fable. Firishta, who records it,

has usually a good credit, and more probably the real existence of

a line of Ahir chieftains in the Tapti valley suggested a convenient

ethnology for the fortress. Other traditions of the past domination

of the pastoral tribes remain in the Central Provinces. Deogarh on

the Chhindwara plateau was, according to the legend, the last seat

of Gaoli power prior to its subversion by the Gonds in the sixteenth

century. Jatba, the founder of the Deogarh Gond dynasty, is said to

have entered the service of the Gaoli rulers, Mansur and Gansur, and

subsequently with the aid of the goddess Devi to have slain them and

usurped their kingdom. But a Gaoli chief still retained possession of

the fort of Narnala for a few years longer, when he also was slain by

the Muhammadans. Similarly the fort of Gawilgarh on the southern crest

of the Satpuras is said to be named after a Gaoli chief who founded

it. The Saugor traditions bring down the Gaoli supremacy to a much

later date, as the tracts of Etawa and Khurai are held to have been

governed by their chieftains till the close of the seventeenth century.

The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 2 · 第 28 / 579 题