CHAPTER I

Transcribed from the 1902 Edition by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org

[Picture: Kinglake in the late Fifties]

A. W. KINGLAKE

A BIOGRAPHICAL AND

LITERARY STUDY

BY

REV. W. TUCKWELL

AUTHOR OF “TONGUES IN TREES,” “WINCHESTER FIFTY

YEARS AGO,” “REMINISCENCES OF OXFORD,” ETC.

* * * * *

ἁμέραι δ᾿ ἐπίλοιποι μάρτυρες σοφώτατρο

[Picture: Decorative graphic]

LONDON

GEORGE BELL AND SONS,

1902

* * * * *

CHISWICK PRESS: CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO.

TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON.

* * * * *

PREFACE

It is just eleven years since Kinglake passed away, and his life has not

yet been separately memorialized. A few years more, and the personal

side of him would be irrecoverable, though by personality, no less than

by authorship, he made his contemporary mark. When a tomb has been

closed for centuries, the effaced lineaments of its tenant can be

re-coloured only by the idealizing hand of genius, as Scott drew

Claverhouse, and Carlyle drew Cromwell. But, to the biographer of the

lately dead, men have a right to say, as Saul said to the Witch of Endor,

“Call up Samuel!” In your study of a life so recent as Kinglake’s, give

us, if you choose, some critical synopsis of his monumental writings,

some salvage from his ephemeral and scattered papers; trace so much of

his youthful training as shaped the development of his character; depict,

with wise restraint, his political and public life: but also, and above

all, re-clothe him “in his habit as he lived,” as friends and associates

knew him; recover his traits of voice and manner, his conversational wit

or wisdom, epigram or paradox, his explosions of sarcasm and his

eccentricities of reserve, his words of winningness and acts of kindness:

and, since one half of his life was social, introduce us to the

companions who shared his lighter hour and evoked his finer fancies; take

us to the Athenæum “Corner,” or to Holland House, and flash on us at

least a glimpse of the brilliant men and women who formed the setting to

his sparkle; “_dic in amicitiam coeant et foedera jungant_.”

This I have endeavoured to do, with such aid as I could command from his

few remaining contemporaries. His letters to his family were destroyed

by his own desire; on those written to Madame Novikoff no such embargo

was laid, nor does she believe that it was intended. I have used these

sparingly, and all extracts from them have been subjected to her

censorship. If the result is not Attic in salt, it is at any rate Roman

in brevity. I send it forth with John Bunyan’s homely aspiration:

And may its buyer have no cause to say,

His money is but lost or thrown away.

CONTENTS

CHAP. PAGE

I. EARLY YEARS 1

II. “EOTHEN” 20

III. LITERARY AND PARLIAMENTARY LIFE 33

IV. “THE INVASION OF THE CRIMEA” 56

V. MADAME NOVIKOFF 90

VI. LATER DAYS, AND DEATH 111

INDEX 149

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

KINGLAKE IN THE LATE FIFTIES _Frontispiece_

ELIOT WARBURTON 14

LORD RAGLAN 40

MADAME NOVIKOFF 92

KINGLAKE IN THE EARLY SEVENTIES 128

CHAPTER I

EARLY YEARS

THE fourth decade of the deceased century dawned on a procession of

Oriental pilgrims, variously qualified or disqualified to hold the

gorgeous East in fee, who, with _bakshîsh_ in their purses, a theory in

their brains, an unfilled diary-book in their portmanteaus, sought out

the Holy Land, the Sinai peninsula, the valley of the Nile, sometimes

even Armenia and the Monte Santo, and returned home to emit their

illustrated and mapped octavos. We have the type delineated admiringly

in Miss Yonge’s “Heartsease,” {1} bitterly in Miss Skene’s “Use and

Abuse,” facetiously in the Clarence Bulbul of “Our Street.” “Hang it!

has not everybody written an Eastern book? I should like to meet anybody

in society now who has not been up to the Second Cataract. My Lord

Castleroyal has done one—an honest one; my Lord Youngent another—an

amusing one; my Lord Woolsey another—a pious one; there is the ‘Cutlet

and the Cabob’—a sentimental one; Timbuctoothen—a humorous one.” Lord

Carlisle’s honesty, Lord Nugent’s fun, Lord Lindsay’s piety, failed to

float their books. Miss Martineau, clear, frank, unemotional Curzon,

fuddling the Levantine monks with rosoglio that he might fleece them of

their treasured hereditary manuscripts, even Eliot Warburton’s power,

colouring, play of fancy, have yielded to the mobility of Time. Two

alone out of the gallant company maintain their vogue to-day: Stanley’s

“Sinai and Palestine,” as a Fifth Gospel, an inspired Scripture

Gazetteer; and “Eothen,” as a literary gem of purest ray serene.

In 1898 a reprint of the first edition was given to the public, prefaced

by a brief eulogium of the book and a slight notice of the author. It

brought to the writer of the “Introduction” not only kind and indulgent

criticism, but valuable corrections, fresh facts, clues to further

knowledge. These last have been carefully followed out. The unwary

statement that Kinglake never spoke after his first failure in the House

has been atoned by a careful study of all his speeches in and out of

Parliament. His reviews in the “Quarterly” and elsewhere have been

noted; impressions of his manner and appearance at different periods of

his life have been recovered from coæval acquaintances; his friend

Hayward’s Letters, the numerous allusions in Lord Houghton’s Life, Mrs.

Crosse’s lively chapters in “Red Letter Days of my Life,” Lady Gregory’s

interesting recollections of the Athenæum Club in Blackwood of December,

1895, the somewhat slender notice in the “Dictionary of National

Biography,” have all been carefully digested. From these, and, as will

be seen, from other sources, the present Memoir has been compiled; an

endeavour—_sera tamen_—to lay before the countless readers and admirers

of his books a fairly adequate appreciation, hitherto unattempted, of

their author.

I have to acknowledge the great kindness of Canon William Warburton, who

examined his brother Eliot’s diaries on my behalf, obtained information

from Dean Boyle and Sir M. Grant Duff, cleared up for me not a few

obscure allusions in the “Eothen” pages. My highly valued friend, Mrs.

Hamilton Kinglake, of Taunton, his sister-in-law, last surviving relative

of his own generation, has helped me with facts which no one else could

have recalled. To Mr. Estcott, his old acquaintance and Somersetshire

neighbour, I am indebted for recollections manifold and interesting; but

above all I tender thanks to Madame Novikoff, his intimate associate and

correspondent during the last twenty years of his life, who has

supplemented her brilliant sketch of him in “La Nouvelle Revue” of 1896

by oral and written information lavish in quantity and of paramount

biographical value. Kinglake’s external life, his literary and political

career, his speeches, and the more fugitive productions of his pen, were

recoverable from public sources; but his personal and private side, as it

showed itself to the few close intimates who still survive, must have

remained to myself and others meagre, superficial, disappointing, without

Madame Novikoff’s unreserved and sympathetic confidence.

* * * * *

Alexander William Kinglake was descended from an old Scottish stock, the

Kinlochs, who migrated to England with King James, and whose name was

Anglicized into Kinglake. Later on we find them settled on a

considerable estate of their own at Saltmoor, near Borobridge, whence

towards the close of the eighteenth century two brothers, moving

southward, made their home in Taunton—Robert as a physician, William as a

solicitor and banker. Both were of high repute, both begat famous sons.

From Robert sprang the eminent Parliamentary lawyer, Serjeant John

Kinglake, at one time a contemporary with Cockburn and Crowder on the

Western Circuit, and William Chapman Kinglake, who while at Trinity,

Cambridge, won the Latin verse prize, “Salix Babylonica,” the English

verse prizes on “Byzantium” and the “Taking of Jerusalem,” in 1830 and

1832. Of William’s sons the eldest was Alexander William, author of

“Eothen,” the youngest Hamilton, for many years one of the most

distinguished physicians in the West of England. “Eothen,” as he came to

be called, was born at Taunton on the 5th August, 1809, at a house called

“The Lawn.” His father, a sturdy Whig, died at the age of ninety through

injuries received in the hustings crowd of a contested election. His

mother belonged to an old Somersetshire family, the Woodfordes of Castle

Cary. She, too, lived to a great age; a slight, neat figure in dainty

dress, full of antique charm and grace. As a girl she had known Lady

Hester Stanhope, who lived with her grandmother, Lady Chatham, at Burton

Pynsent, her own father, Dr. Thomas Woodforde, being Lady Chatham’s

medical attendant. {6} The future prophetess of the Lebanon was then a

wild girl, scouring the countryside on bare-backed horses; she showed

great kindness to Mary Woodforde, afterwards Kinglake’s mother. It was

as his mother’s son that she received him long afterwards at Djoun. To

his mother Kinglake was passionately attached; owed to her, as he tells

us in “Eothen,” his home in the saddle and his love for Homer. A

tradition is preserved in the family that on the day of her funeral, at a

churchyard five miles away, he was missed from the household group

reassembled in the mourning home; he was found to have ordered his horse,

and galloped back in the darkness to his mother’s grave. Forty years

later he writes to Alexander Knox: “The death of a mother has an almost

magical power of recalling the home of one’s childhood, and the almost

separate world that rests upon affection.” Of his two sisters, one was

well read and agreeably talkative, noted by Thackeray as the cleverest

woman he had ever met; the other, Mrs. Acton, was a delightful old

_esprit fort_, as I knew her in the sixties, “pagan, I regret to say,”

but not a little resembling her brother in the point and manner of her

wit. The family moved in his infancy to an old-fashioned handsome

“Wilton House,” adjoining closely to the town, but standing amid spacious

park-like grounds, and inhabited in after years by Kinglake’s younger

brother Hamilton, who succeeded his uncle in the medical profession, and

passed away, amid deep and universal regret, in 1898. Here during the

thirties Sydney Smith was a frequent and a welcome visitor; it was in

answer to old Mrs. Kinglake that he uttered his audacious _mot_ on being

asked if he would object, as a neighbouring clergyman had done, to bury a

Dissenter: “Not bury Dissenters? I should like to be burying them all

day!”

Taunton was an innutrient foster-mother, _arida nutrix_, for such young

lions as the Kinglake brood. Two hundred years before it had been a

prosperous and famous place, its woollen and kersey trades, with the

population they supported, ranking it as eighth in order among English

towns. Its inhabitants were then a gallant race, republican in politics,

Puritan in creed. Twice besieged by Goring and Lumford, it had twice

repelled the Royalists with loss. It was the centre of Monmouth’s

rebellion and of Jeffrey’s vengeance; the suburb of Tangier, hard by its

ancient castle, still recalls the time when Colonel Kirke and his

regiment of “Lambs” were quartered in the town. But long before the

advent of the Kinglakes its glory had departed; its manufactures had died

out, its society become Philistine and bourgeois—“little men who walk in

narrow ways”—while from pre-eminence in electoral venality among English

boroughs it was saved only by the near proximity of Bridgewater. A noted

statesman who, at a later period, represented it in Parliament, used to

say that by only one family besides Dr. Hamilton Kinglake’s could he be

received with any sense of social or intellectual equality.

Not much, however, of Kinglake’s time was given to his native town: he

was early sent to the Grammar School at Ottery St. Mary’s, the

“Clavering” of “Pendennis,” whose Dr. Wapshot was George Coleridge,

brother of the poet. He was wont in after life to speak of this time

with bitterness; a delicate child, he was starved on insufficient diet;

and an eloquent passage in “Eothen” depicts his intellectual fall from

the varied interests and expanding enthusiasm of liberal home teaching to

the regulation gerund-grinding and Procrustean discipline of school.

“The dismal change is ordained, and then—thin meagre Latin with small

shreds and patches of Greek, is thrown like a pauper’s pall over all your

early lore; instead of sweet knowledge, vile, monkish, doggerel grammars

and graduses, dictionaries and lexicons, and horrible odds and ends of

dead languages are given you for your portion, and down you fall, from

Roman story to a three-inch scrap of ‘Scriptores Romani,’—from Greek

poetry, down, down to the cold rations of ‘Poetæ Græci,’ cut up by

commentators, and served out by school-masters!”

At Eton—under Keate, as all readers of “Eothen” know—he was contemporary

with Gladstone, Sir F. Hanmer, Lords Canning and Dalhousie, Selwyn,

Shadwell. He wrote in the “Etonian,” created and edited by Mackworth

Praed; and is mentioned in Praed’s poem on Surly Hall as

“Kinglake, dear to poetry,

And dear to all his friends.”

Dr. Gatty remembers his “determined pale face”; thinks that he made his

mark on the river rather than in the playing fields, being a good oar and

swimmer. His great friend at school was Savile, the “Methley” of his

travels, who became successively Lord Pollington and Earl of Mexborough.

The Homeric lore which Methley exhibited in the Troad, is curiously

illustrated by an Eton story, that in a pugilistic encounter with

Hoseason, afterwards an Indian Cavalry officer, while the latter sate

between the rounds upon his second’s knee, Savile strutted about the

ring, spouting Homer.

Kinglake entered at Trinity, Cambridge, in 1828, among an exceptionally

brilliant set—Tennyson, Arthur Hallam, John Sterling, Trench, Spedding,

Spring Rice, Charles Buller, Maurice, Monckton Milnes, J. M. Kemble,

Brookfield, Thompson. With none of them does he seem in his

undergraduate days to have been intimate. Probably then, as afterwards,

he shrank from _camaraderie_, shared Byron’s distaste for “enthusymusy”;

naturally cynical and self-contained, was repelled by the spiritual

fervour, incessant logical collision, aggressive tilting at abuses of

those young “Apostles,” already

“Yearning for the large excitement that the coming years would yield,

Eager-hearted as a boy when first he leaves his father’s field,”

waxing ever daily, as Sterling exhorted, “in religion and radicalism.”

He saw life differently; more practically, if more selfishly; to one

rhapsodizing about the “plain living and high thinking” of Wordsworth’s

sonnet, he answered: “You know that you prefer dining with people who

have good glass and china and plenty of servants.” For Tennyson’s poetry

he even then felt admiration; quotes, nay, misquotes, in “Eothen,” from

the little known “Timbuctoo”; {12a} and from “Locksley Hall”; and

supplied long afterwards an incident adopted by Tennyson in “Enoch

Arden,”

“Once likewise in the ringing of his ears

Though faintly, merrily—far and far away—

He heard the pealing of his parish bells,” {12b}

from his own experience in the desert, when on a Sunday, amid

overpowering heat and stillness, he heard the Marlen bells of Taunton

peal for morning church. {13}

In whatever set he may have lived he made his mark at Cambridge. Lord

Houghton remembered him as an orator at the Union; and speaking to

Cambridge undergraduates fifty years later, after enumerating the giants

of his student days, Macaulay, Praed, Buller, Sterling, Merivale, he goes

on to say: “there, too, were Kemble and Kinglake, the historian of our

earliest civilization and of our latest war; Kemble as interesting an

individual as ever was portrayed by the dramatic genius of his own race;

Kinglake, as bold a man-at-arms in literature as ever confronted public

opinion.” We know, too, that not many years after leaving Cambridge he

received, and refused, a solicitation to stand as Liberal representative

of the University in Parliament. He was, in fact, as far as any of his

contemporaries from acquiescing in social conventionalisms and shams. To

the end of his life he chafed at such restraint: “when pressed to stay in

country houses,” he writes in 1872, “I have had the frankness to say that

I have not discipline enough.” Repeatedly he speaks with loathing of the

“stale civilization,” the “utter respectability,” of European life; {14a}

longed with all his soul for the excitement and stir of soldiership, from

which his shortsightedness debarred him; {14b} rushed off again and again

into foreign travel; set out immediately on leaving Cambridge, in 1834,

for his first Eastern tour, “to fortify himself for the business of

life.” Methley joined him at Hamburg, and they travelled by Berlin,

Dresden, Prague, Vienna, to Semlin, where his book begins. Lord

Pollington’s health broke down, and he remained to winter at Corfu, while

Kinglake pursued his way alone, returning to England in October, 1835.

{14c} On his return he read for the Chancery Bar along with his friend

Eliot Warburton, under Bryan Procter, a Commissioner of Lunacy, better

known by his poet-name, Barry Cornwall; his acquaintance with both

husband and wife ripening into life-long friendship. Mrs. Procter is the

“Lady of Bitterness,” cited in the “Eothen” Preface. As Anne Skepper,

before her marriage, she was much admired by Carlyle; “a brisk witty

prettyish clear eyed sharp tongued young lady”; and was the intimate,

among many, especially of Thackeray and Browning. In epigrammatic power

she resembled Kinglake; but while his acrid sayings were emitted with

gentlest aspect and with softest speech; while, like Byron’s Lambro:

“he was the mildest mannered man

That ever scuttled ship or cut a throat,

With such true breeding of a gentleman,

You never could divine his real thought,”

her sarcasms rang out with a resonant clearness that enforced and

aggravated their severity. That two persons so strongly resembling each

other in capacity for rival exhibition, or for mutual exasperation,

should have maintained so firm a friendship, often surprised their

acquaintance; she explained it by saying that she and Kinglake sharpened

one another like two knives; that, in the words of Petruchio,

“Where two raging fires meet together,

They do consume the thing that feeds their fury.”

[Picture: Eliot Warburton. From a water-colour drawing in the possession

of Canon Warburton]

Crabb Robinson, stung by her in a tender place, his boastful iterative

monologues on Weimar and on Goethe, said that of all men Procter ought to

escape purgatory after death, having tasted its fulness here through

living so many years with Mrs. Procter; “the husbands of the talkative

have great reward hereafter,” said Rudyard Kipling’s Lama. And I have

been told by those who knew the pair that there was truth as well as

irritation in the taunt. “A graceful Preface to ‘Eothen,’” wrote to me a

now famous lady who as a girl had known Mrs. Procter well, “made friendly

company yesterday to a lonely meal, and brought back memories of Mr.

Kinglake’s kind spoiling of a raw young woman, and of the wit, the

egregious vanity, the coarseness, the kindness, of that hard old

worldling our Lady of Bitterness.” In the presence of one man, Tennyson,

she laid aside her shrewishness: “talking with Alfred Tennyson lifts me

out of the earth earthy; a visit to Farringford is like a retreat to the

religious.” A celebrity in London for fifty years, she died, witty and

vigorous to the last, in 1888. “You and I and Mr. Kinglake,” she says to

Lord Houghton, “are all that are left of the goodly band that used to

come to St. John’s Wood; Eliot Warburton, Motley, Adelaide, Count de

Verg, Chorley, Sir Edwin Landseer, my husband.” “I never could write a

book,” she tells him in another letter, “and one strong reason for not

doing so was the idea of some few seeing how poor it was. Venables was

one of the few; I need not say that you were one, and Kinglake.”

Kinglake was called to the Chancery Bar, and practised apparently with no

great success. He believed that his reputation as a writer stood in his

way. When, in 1845, poor Hood’s friends were helping him by gratuitous

articles in his magazine, “Hood’s Own,” Kinglake wrote to Monckton Milnes

refusing to contribute. He will send £10 to buy an article from some

competent writer, but will not himself write. “It would be seriously

injurious to me if the author of ‘Eothen’ were _affichéd_ as contributing

to a magazine. My frailty in publishing a book has, I fear, already hurt

me in my profession, and a small sin of this kind would bring on me still

deeper disgrace with the solicitors.”

Twice at least in these early years he travelled. “Mr. Kinglake,” writes

Mrs. Procter in 1843, “is in Switzerland, reading Rousseau.” And in the

following year we hear of him in Algeria, accompanying St. Arnaud in his

campaign against the Arabs. The mingled interest and horror inspired in

him by this extra-ordinary man finds expression in his “Invasion of the

Crimea” (ii. 157). A few, a very few survivors, still remember his

appearance and manners in the forties. The eminent husband of a lady,

now passed away, who in her lifetime gave Sunday dinners at which

Kinglake was always present, speaks of him as _sensitive_, quiet in the

presence of noisy people, of Brookfield and the overpowering Bernal

Osborne; liking their company, but never saying anything worthy of

remembrance. A popular old statesman, still active in the House of

Commons, recalls meeting him at Palmerston, Lord Harrington’s seat, where

was assembled a party in honour of Madame Guiccioli and her second

husband, the Marquis de Boissy, and tells me that he attached himself to

ladies, not to gentlemen, nor ever joined in general tattle. Like many

other famous men, he passed through a period of shyness, which yielded to

women’s tactfulness only. From the first they appreciated him; “if you

were as gentle as your friend Kinglake,” writes Mrs. Norton reproachfully

to Hayward in the sulks. Another coæval of those days calls him

handsome—an epithet I should hardly apply to him later—slight, not tall,

sharp featured, with dark hair well tended, always modishly dressed after

the fashion of the thirties, the fashion of Bulwer’s exquisites, or of H.

K. Browne’s “Nicholas Nickleby” illustrations; leaving on all who saw him

an impression of great personal distinction, yet with an air of youthful

_abandon_ which never quite left him: “He was pale, small, and delicate

in appearance,” says Mrs. Simpson, Nassau Senior’s daughter, who knew him

to the end of his life; while Mrs. Andrew Crosse, his friend in the

Crimean decade, cites his finely chiselled features and intellectual

brow, “a complexion bloodless with the pallor not of ill-health, but of

an old Greek bust.”

A. W. Kinglake: A Biographical and Literary Study · 第 1 / 6 章