The missionaries who, according to the confessions, had encouraged the

conspirators were not placed on trial. The prisoners urged that they should

be allowed to call them and others as witnesses, and they were eager to

come. The request was refused. Under Japanese law, the judges have an

absolute right to decide what witnesses shall, or shall not be called. The

prosecuting counsel denied the charge of torture, and declared that all of

the men had been physically examined and not one of them had even a sign of

having been subjected to such ill-treatment Thereupon prisoners rose up and

asked to be allowed to show the marks still on them. "I was bound up for

about a month and subjected to torture," said one. "I have still marks of

it upon my body." But when he asked permission to display the marks to the

Court, "the Court," according to the newspaper reports, "sternly refused to

allow this to be done."

The trial closed on August 30th, and judgment was delivered on September

21st. Six prisoners, including Yun Chi-ho and Yang Ki-tak, were sentenced

to ten years' penal servitude; eighteen to seven years' penal servitude;

forty to six years; forty-two to five years; and seventeen discharged.

The trial was widely reported, and there was a wave of indignation,

particularly in America. The case was brought before the Court of Appeal,

and Judge Suzuki, who heard the appeal, was given orders by the

Government-General that he was to act in conciliatory fashion. The whole

atmosphere of the Court of Appeal was different. There was no bullying, no

browbeating. The prisoners were listened to indulgently, and were allowed

considerable latitude in developing their defence. Let me add that both in

the first and in subsequent trials, prominent Japanese counsel appeared for

the prisoners, and defended them in a manner in accordance with the best

traditions of the law.

The prisoners were now permitted in the Appeal Court to relate in detail

how their "confessions" had been extracted from them by torture. Here are

some typical passages from the evidence.

Chi Sang-chu was a Presbyterian, and a clerk by calling. He denied that he

was guilty.

"All my confession was made under torture. I did not make these statements

of my own accord. The police said they must know what information they

wanted. They stripped me naked, tied my hands behind my back, and hung me

up in a doorway, removing the bench on which I stood. They swung me, making

me bump against a door, like a crane dancing. When I lost consciousness, I

was taken down and given water, and tortured again when I came to.

"A policeman covered my mouth with my hand, and poured water into my nose.

Again my thumbs were tied behind my back, one arm over and one under, and I

was hung up by the cord tying them. A lighted cigarette was pressed against

my body, and I was struck in my private parts. Thus I was tortured for

three or four days. One evening, just after the meal, I was hung up again,

and was told that I would be released if I confessed, but if not I would be

tortured till I died. They were determined to make me say whatever they

wanted. Leaving me hanging, the policemen went to sleep, and I fainted from

the torture of hanging there.

"When I came to, I found myself lying on the floor, the police giving me

water. They showed me a paper, which they said was the order of release for

Yi Keun-tak and O Hak-su, who had confessed. If I wanted to be set at

liberty I must do the same. Then they beat me again. I saw the paper and

managed with difficulty to read it. It was to the effect that they did

confess and promised never to do such things again.

"I was then introduced to Yi Keun-tak, who, they said, had confessed and

been acquitted, and they urged me to follow Yi's example. I urged them to

treat me as they had treated Yi. They told me what to confess, but as I had

never heard of such things I refused, and they said they had better kill

me.

"They resumed their tortures, and after two or three months, being unable

to bear it any longer, I confessed all that is required."

Paik Yong-sok, a milk seller and a Presbyterian, with eleven in his family,

said he had been a Christian for fifteen years and had determined only to

follow the teachings of the Bible; he had never thought of assassination or

considered establishing the independence of the country. Having to support

a family of eleven, he had no time for such things.

He had made the confession recited by the Court, but it was under

compulsion and false. "For a number of days I was tortured twice by day and

twice by night. I was blindfolded, hung up, beaten. Often I fainted, being

unable to breathe. I thought I was dying and asked the police to shoot me,

so intolerable were my tortures. Driven beyond the bounds of endurance by

hunger, thirst and pain, I said I would say whatever they wanted.

"The police told me that I was of no account among the twenty million

Koreans, and they could kill or acquit me as they pleased.... Meanwhile

five or six police dropped in and said, 'Have you repented? Did you take

part in the assassination plots?' It was too much for me to say 'Yes' to

this question, so I replied 'No.' Immediately they slapped my cheeks,

stripped me, struck, beat and tormented me. It is quite beyond my power to

describe the difficulty of enduring such pain."

The man paused and pointed to a Japanese, Watanabe by name, sitting behind

the judges, "That interpreter knows all about it," he said, "He was one of

the men who struck me." Watanabe was pointed out by other prisoners as a

man who had been prominent in tormenting them.

Im Do-myong, a barber and a Presbyterian, also fell into the hands of

experts at the game.

"At the police headquarters, I was hung up, beaten with an iron rod and

tortured twice a day. Then I was taken into the presence of superiors, the

interpreter (pointing out Watanabe, who was sitting: behind the judges)

being present, and tortured again.

"My thumbs were tied together at my back, the right arm being put back over

the shoulder and the left arm turned up from underneath. Then I was hung up

by the cord that bound my thumbs. The agony was unendurable. I fainted, was

taken down, was given torture, and when I came to was tortured again."

By the Court: "It would be impossible to hang you by your thumbs."

Prisoner: "My great toes scarcely touched the ground. Under such

circumstances I was told to say the same thing at the Public Procurator's

Office, and as I feared that I should be tortured there, too, I said 'Yes'

to all questions."

Some variety was introduced into the treatment of Cho Tok-chan, a

Presbyterian pastor, at Chong-ju.

"The police asked me how many men took part in the attempt at Sun-chon,

saying that as I was a pastor I must know all about it. They hung, beat and

struck me, saying that I had taken part in the plot and was a member of the

New People's Society. At last I fainted, and afterwards was unable to eat

for a number of days.

"A policeman in uniform, with one stripe, twisted my fingers with a wire,

so that they were badly swollen for a long time after. Then a man with two

white stripes tortured me, declaring that I had taken part in the Sun-chon

affair. I said that I was too busy with Christmas preparations to go

anywhere, on which the policeman severely twisted my fingers with an iron

rod."

Again came one of the dramatic pauses, while the prisoner pointed out a

Japanese official sitting behind the judges, Tanaka by name. "The man who

interpreted at that time is sitting behind you," he declared. "He knows it

very well."

They extracted his confession. But it was some time before he had been able

to sign it; his fingers were hurt too severely.

It was necessary, after the police examination, for prisoners to repeat

their stories or confirm them before the procurator. This might originally

have been intended as a protection for the prisoners. In Korea police and

procurators worked together. However, steps were taken to prevent any

retraction at that point.

"When I was taken to the Public Procurator's Office," continued the

Presbyterian pastor, "I did not know the nature of the place, and being put

in a separate room, I feared that it might be an even more dreadful place

than the police headquarters. Generally, when examined at the police

headquarters, my hands were free, but here I was brought up for

cross-examination with my hands and arms pinioned very firmly, so I thought

it must be a harder place. Moreover, an official pulled me very hard by the

cords which bound my hands, which gave me excruciating pain, seeing how

they had already been treated by the police."

The next prisoner, Yi Mong-yong, a Presbyterian money lender, also pointed

out the proud Tanaka. He had been describing how the police kicked and

struck him to make him say what they wanted. "One of them is behind you

now," said he to the judges, pointing to Tanaka.

Some of the prisoners broke down while giving their evidence. Unimas

described how he had been hung, beaten, stripped and tortured by the

police, and again tortured in the office of the Public Procurator. "Having

got so far," the reports continue, "the prisoner began to weep and make a

loud outcry, saying that he had a mother who was eighty years old at home.

With this pitiful scene, the hearing ended for the day."

Yi Tai-kyong was a teacher. The police reminded him that the murderer of

Prince Ito was a Christian; he was a Christian, therefore--

"They hung, beat and otherwise tormented me, until I was compelled to

acknowledge all the false fabrication about the plot. The following day I

was again taken into Mr. Yamana's room and again tortured with an iron rod

from the stove and other things, until I had acknowledged all the false

statements.

"When asked what was the party's signal, I remained silent, as I knew

nothing about it. But I was tortured again, and said, 'the church bell,'

that being the only thing I could think of at the time."

"I confessed to the whole prosecution story, but only as the result of

torture, to which I was submitted nine times, fainting on two occasions,

and being tortured again on revival," said Pak Chou-hyong. "I made my false

confession under a threat that I and my whole family would be killed. I

reiterated it at the Public Procurator's Office, where I was conducted by

two policemen, one of them a man with a gold tooth, who boxed my ears so

hard that I still feel the pain, and who told me not to vary my story.

"Fearing that my whole family would be tortured, I agreed. But when I

arrived before the Public Procurator, I forgot what I had been taught to

say, and wept, asking the officials to read what I had to confess. This

they did, and I said, 'Yes, yes.'"

Choi Che-kiu, a petty trader, repudiated his confession of having gone with

a party to Sun-chon.

"Had such a large party attempted to go to the station," he said, "they

must infallibly have been arrested on the first day. Were I guilty I would

be ready to die at once. The whole story was invented by officials, and I

was obliged to acquiesce in it by severe torture. One night I was taken to

Nanzan hill by two policemen, suspended from a pine tree and a sharp sword

put to my throat. Thinking I was going to be killed, I consented to say

'Yes' to any question put to me."

"No force can make you tell such a story as this, unless you consent

voluntarily," interposed the Court.

"You may well say that," replied the prisoner, grimly. "But with the blade

of a sword in my face and a lighted cigarette pressed against my body, I

preferred acquiescence in a story, which they told me that Kim Syong had

already confessed, to death."

The prisoner paused, and the Judge looked at him with his head on one side.

Suddenly the prisoner burst into a passion of weeping, with loud,

incoherent cries.

In the previous trial one of the prisoners, Kim Ik-kyo, was asked why he

admitted all the facts at his preliminary examination. "If the police were

to go down Chong-no (one of the busiest streets in Seoul)," he replied,

"and indiscriminately arrest a number of passers-by, and then examine them

by putting them to torture, I am sure they would soon confess to having

taken part in a plot."

The same thing was put in another way by a prisoner, Kim Eung-pong. He

related a long story of torture by binding, hanging, beating and burning,

continued for fifteen days, during which he was often threatened with

death. Then he was taken to the "supreme enquiry" office of the police

headquarters, where he was stripped naked and beaten with an iron bar from

the stove. This office, he understood, had control and power of life or

death over the whole peninsula, so he was compelled to confess all that

they wanted. "I even would have said that I killed my father, if they put

it to me," he added.

Hear the tale of An Sei-whan. As An was called up in the Appeal Court, a

wave of pity passed over the white men there, for An was a miserable

object, pale and emaciated. He was a consumptive and afflicted with other

ills. He had been in the Christian Hospital at Pyeng-yang most of the

winter, and had nearly died there. He had been walking a little for a few

days, when he was arrested at the hospital in April. He had been vomiting

blood.

"In this condition I was taken to the police headquarters and tortured. My

thumbs were hung together and I was hung up, with my toes barely touching

the ground. I was taken down nearly dead, and made to stand for hours under

a chest nearly as high as my chest. Next day, when I was put under the

shelf again my hair was fastened to the board, and my left leg doubled at

the knee and tied. Blood came up from my lung, but fearful of the police I

swallowed it. Now, I think it would have been better if I had vomited it.

Then they might have had pity on me; but I did not think so then.

"Again I was hung up by the thumbs, clear of the floor this time. At the

end of five minutes I was nearly dead. I asked if it would do to assent to

their questions, and they took me down and took me before some superiors.

When I said anything unsatisfactory I was beaten, and in this way learned

what was wanted. I had no wish to deny or admit anything, only to escape

further pain."

He asked that some of the missionaries who knew him might be called, to

show that he was too ill to take part in any conspiracy.

One old man, Yi Chang-sik, a Presbyterian for sixteen years, had refused

even under the torture to confess, and had tried to escape by suicide. "I

thought that I had better commit suicide than be killed by their cruel

tortures," he said. "They asked me if I had joined the conspiracy at the

suggestion of Mr. McCune. I would not consent to this, so they tortured me

harder. I was nearly naked, and so cold water was poured upon me. I was

also beaten. Sometimes I would be tortured till the early hours of the

morning.

"I longed for death to deliver me. Thanks to heaven, I found a knife one

night in my room. The warder was not very careful with me. I took it

secretly, intending to cut my throat--but my hand had become too weak. So I

stuck it erect in the floor, and tried to cut my throat that way. Alas! At

this moment the warder surprised me. When I had endured torture for over

forty days, I asked them to make me guilty or innocent as quickly as

possible. When I was taken to the Public Procurator's, I had pains in my

ears, body and limbs. I could not stand the torture and wanted to die."

"Having got so far," wrote a spectator, "the old man broke down and began

to weep, crying louder and louder. He said something as he wept, but the

interpreter could not make out what it was. The Court evidently pitied him

and told him to stand down. He withdrew, sobbing."

A Presbyterian student from Sun-chon, Cha Heui-syon, was arrested and kept

for four months in the gendarmes office, becoming very weak. Then he was

taken to the police headquarters.

"First I was hung up by my thumbs, then my hands and legs were tied, and I

was made to crouch under a shelf about as high as my chest, which was

intensely painful, as I could neither sit nor stand. Something was put in

my mouth. I vomited blood, yet I was beaten. I was stood up on a bench and

tied up so that when it was removed, I was left hanging. The interpreter

who has often been in this court (Watanabe) tortured me. My arms stiffened

so that I could not stretch them. As I hung I was beaten with bamboos three

or four feet long and with an iron rod, which on one occasion made the hand

of the official who was wielding it bleed."

At last he gave in. He was too weak to speak. They took him down and

massaged his arms, which were useless. He could only nod now to the

statements that they put to him. Later on they took him to the Public

Procurator. Here he attempted to deny his confession. "The Public

Procurator was very angry," he said. "He struck the table, getting up and

sitting down again. He jerked the cord by which my hands were tied, hurting

me very severely."

The case of Baron Yun Chi-ho excited special interest. The Baron being a

noble of high family, the police used more care in extracting his

confession. He was examined day after day for ten days, the same questions

being asked and denied day after day. One day when his nerves were in

shreds, they tortured another prisoner in front of his eyes, and the

examiner told him that if he would not confess, he was likely to share the

same fate. They told him that the others had confessed and been punished; a

hundred men had admitted the facts. He did not know then that the charge

against him was conspiracy to murder. He determined to make a false

confession, to escape torture. He was worn out with the ceaseless

questioning, and he was afraid.

The rehearing in the Court of Appeal lasted fifty-one days. In the last

days many of the prisoners were allowed to speak for themselves. They made

a very favourable impression. Judgment was delivered on March 20th. The

original judgment was quashed in every case, and the cases reconsidered.

Ninety-nine of the prisoners were found not guilty. Baron Yun Chi-ho, Yang

Ki-tak and four others were convicted. Five of them were sentenced to six

years' penal servitude, and one to five years. Two other appeals were made,

but the only result was to increase the sentence of the sixth man to six

years. Three of the men finally convicted had been members of the staff of

the _Dai Han Mai Il Shinpo_. The Japanese do not forget or forgive readily.

They had an old score to pay against the staff of that paper.

I have never yet met a man, English, American or Japanese, acquainted with

the case, or who followed the circumstances, who believed that there had

been any plot at all. The whole thing, from first to last, was entirely a

police-created charge. The Japanese authorities showed later that they

themselves did not believe it. On the coronation of the Japanese Emperor,

in February, 1915, the six prisoners were released as a sign of "Imperial

clemency." Baron Yun Chi-ho was appointed Secretary of the Y.M.C.A, at

Seoul on his release, and Count Terauchi (whom he was supposed to have

plotted to murder) thereupon gave a liberal subscription to the Y. funds.

There was one sequel to the case. The Secretary of the Korean Y.M.C.A., Mr.

Gillett, having satisfied himself of the innocence of Baron Yun and his

associates, while the trial was pending, sent a letter to prominent people

abroad, telling the facts. The letter, by the indiscretion of one man who

received it, was published in newspapers. The Japanese authorities, in

consequence, succeeded in driving Mr. Gillett out of Korea. Before driving

him out, they tried to get him to come over on their side. Mr. Komatsu,

Director of the Bureau for Foreign Affairs, asked him and Mr. Gerdine, the

President, to call on him. "The Government has met the demands of the

missionary body and released ninety-nine out of the hundred and five

prisoners who stood trial at the Appeal Court," said Mr. Komatsu. "It is to

be expected that the missionary body will in return do something to put the

Government in a strong and favourable light before the people of Japan."

Mr. Komatsu added that Judge Suzuki's action was in reality the action of

the Government-General, a quaint illustration of the independence of the

judiciary in Korea.

The Administration made a feeble attempt to deny the tortures. Its argument

was that since torture was forbidden by law, it could not take place. Let

we quote the official statement:

"A word should be added in reference to the absurd rumours spread abroad

concerning it (the conspiracy case) such as that the measures taken by the

authorities aimed at 'wiping out the Christian movement in Korea,' since

the majority of the accused were Christian converts, and that most of the

accused made 'false confessions against their will,' as they were subject

to 'unendurable ill-treatment or torture.' As if such imputations could be

sustained for one minute, when the modern regime ruling Japan is

considered!... As to torture, several provisions of the Korean criminal

code indirectly recognized it, but the law was revised and those provisions

were rescinded when the former Korean law courts were reformed, by

appointing to them Japanese judicial staffs, in August, 1908.... According

to the new criminal law (judges, procurators or police) officials are

liable, if they treat accused prisoners with violence or torture, to penal

servitude or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three years. In

reply to the memorial presented to the Governor-General by certain

missionaries in Korea, in January, 1912, he said, 'I assure you that the

entire examination of the suspected persons or witnesses is being conducted

in strict compliance with the provisions of the law, and the slightest

divergence from the lawful process will under no circumstances be

permitted.' How then could any one imagine that it was possible for

officials under him to act under any other way than in accordance with the

provisions of the law."

Unfortunately for the noble indignation of the writer, the torture left its

marks, and many men are living as I write still bearing them. Others only

escaped from the hell of the Japanese prison in Seoul to die. They were so

broken that they never recovered.

XIV

THE INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT

The people of Korea never assented to the annexation of their country. The

Japanese control of means of communication prevented their protests from

being fully known by the outside world.

It was explained that the movement against the Japanese was due to the work

of Koreans living outside of the land and to foreign agitators. The

Japanese blamed the missionaries. They blamed foreign publicists. I

understand that I was and am esteemed a special malignant. They never

thought to blame themselves. As a matter of fact, missionaries and the rest

of us had nothing to do with it. The real origin of the movement was among

the people themselves, and it was fostered, not by outsiders, but by the

iron and unjust rule of Japan.

At the same time, the Koreans living in freedom were naturally concerned

over conditions at home. The large Korean communities in Manchuria and

Siberia, estimated to number in all two millions, the flourishing colony in

the United States and Hawaii, the Koreans in Mexico and China heard with

indignation of what was happening. Young students and political prisoners

released after torture, who escaped to America, fanned the flame to white

heat. The Koreans living outside Korea formed a National Association, with

headquarters in San Francisco, under the Presidency of Dr. David Lee, which

in 1919 claimed a million and a half adherents.

The steps taken by the Japanese to suppress and prevent discontent often

created and fostered it. This was specially illustrated in the schools. The

new educational system, with its constant inculcation of loyalty to the

Mikado, made even the little girls violently Nationalist. School children

were spied upon for incipient treason as though the lisping of childish

lips might overthrow the throne. The speeches of boys and girls in junior

schools, at their school exercises, were carefully noted, and the child who

said anything that might be construed by the Censor as "dangerous thought"

would be arrested, examined and punished.

The effect of this was what might have been expected. "They compel us to

learn Japanese," said one little miss, sagely. "That does not matter. We

are now able to understand what they say. They cannot understand what we

say. All the better for us when the hour comes." On Independence Day the

children, particularly in the Government schools, were found to be banded

together and organized against Japan. They had no fear in expressing their

views and sought martyrdom. Some of them won it.

Korea's Fight for Freedom · 第 13 / 18 段