CHAPTER III

STATESMEN MUST FIRST BE BORN AND THEN MADE

Some fundamental qualifications for statesmanship. Integrity

and wisdom compared.

How are lawyers obtained? Admission to the bar does not always produce

even an attorney. And there is a very marked difference between an

attorney and a lawyer. But when a young man is admitted to the bar who

has aptitude for the law, without which no man can be a lawyer,

industry in the law, without which no man ever was a lawyer, then with

some years of appropriate environment—the court room and the law

library—a lawyer will be produced into whose hands you may safely

commit your case.

How are law makers obtained? Many seem to think it only necessary to

deliver a certificate of election, and, behold, a constructive

statesman, of either gender. I would like to ask whether, in your

judgment, it requires any less aptitude, any less industry, or a less

period of appropriate environment to produce a constructive law maker,

than to develop a safe law practitioner.

I will carry the illustration one step further. Do you realize that it

would be far safer to place the man of ordinary intelligence upon the

bench, with authority to interpret and enforce the laws as he finds

them written in the book, than to give him pen and ink and let him

draft new laws? We all recognize that it requires a man of legal

aptitude and experience to interpret laws, but some seem to assume

neither aptitude nor experience is necessary in a law-maker. If

legislators in state and nation are to be abjectly obedient to the wish

of their constituents, what use can they make of knowledge and

judgment? They will prove embarrassments, will they not?

To interpret the laws requires aptitude improved by experience; it

demands special knowledge, both of the general law and of the

particular case under discussion. It takes a specialist.

I would rather have the ordinary man stand over my dentist and tell him

how to crown my tooth than to have him stand over my congressman and

tell him how to vote. He knows, in a general way, how a tooth should be

crowned, and further than that I refuse to carry the illustration.

Then, I can stand a bad tooth better than I can a bad law. No man ever

lost his job because of a bad tooth. But millions have stood in the

bread line, and other millions will suffer in like manner because of

unfortunate and ill-considered legislation.

INTEGRITY VERSUS WISDOM

We all demand integrity in office, but integrity is the most common

attribute of man. I can go on the street and buy integrity for a dollar

a day, if it does not require any work; but aptitude, experience and

wisdom are high-priced. If I had to choose between men of probity but

wanting in aptitude and experience, and men of aptitude and experience

known to be dishonest, I should unhesitatingly choose the crook rather

than the fool; either for bank president or congressman. Banks seldom

fail because of dishonesty. Banks fail because of bad management. The

thief may steal a little of the cream but the careless and the

inexperienced spill the milk.

Thus far in our history no man has ever walked the street in vain for

work, no man has gone home to find his wife in rags and his children

crying for bread, because of dishonesty in public office. The United

States can stand extravagance, it can stand graft, it has stood and is

standing the most reckless abandon in all its financial expenditures.

The worst this nation has yet encountered—and may the good Lord save

us from anything more dreadful—is incompetency in the halls of

legislation. Extravagance and graft stalk forth at noonday when

incompetency occupies the seats intended for statesmen.

None but bolsheviki would consider subjecting an army to democratic

command. The personnel of an army may possess equal patriotism without

possessing equal aptitude for war. Recent experiences have only

emphasized what was said more than a thousand years ago: “An army of

asses commanded by a lion will overthrow an army of lions commanded by

an ass.”

Strange, is it not, that every one should recognize this principle when

applied to an army and to business, and an overwhelming majority

overlook it when applied to governmental matters?

Vanishing Landmarks: The Trend Toward Bolshevism · 第 3 / 30 章