PRUSSIAN LEGATION, _February 19, 1853._

Please tell me at leisure how Amestris (Herod, ix. 109) is to be explained

as the wife of Xerxes? I am convinced that _Esther_ is hidden here, which

name, according to the testimony of the Book of Esther, was her _Persian_

name, as she was first called _Myrtle_, as her Jewish maiden name.

Therefore _Am_ must mean “queen,” “mistress,” “lady,” or what you may

discover. I find that the idea had occurred to one and the other even

about 100 years ago; but was given up, partly on account of its

“godlessness;” partly on account of the uncertainty whether Ahasuerus was

really Xerxes, as Scaliger declared. The Suabian simpletons (for they are

so in historical matters) are the only people who now doubt this, and that

the book is historical,—a book with a history on which depends the only

great Jewish feast established since the days of Moses (till the

Purification of the Temple, after the fall of Epiphanes). So, my dear M.,

send it to me. There can have been at that same time, in Persia, but one

woman so vindictive and clever as Esther is. The first volume of my

Prophets (from Abraham to Goethe) is ready, with a popular explanation of

the age of the so-called “Great Unknown” (Isaiah) of Daniel, and _all the

Psalms_, etc. I write _only German_ for this, but only _for the English_,

and yet without any reserve.

The most remarkable of the thirteen articles which I have seen on

Hippolytus, is by Taylor (a Unitarian in Manchester), in the “Prospective

Review” (February). He confesses that I have made the principle of the

Trinity, and the national blessing of the Episcopacy and the Liturgy,

clear to him. I have never seen him, but he seems to me a deep thinker. I

am again in correspondence with Bernays, who promises to work at Lucretius

with all diligence. I think he has more leisure, and his health is better.

To-morrow the new African expedition sets sail,—Dr. Vogel, the botanical

astronomer, and his army, two volunteers from the sappers and miners. I am

fully occupied with this; and but for my curiosity about Esther, you would

not have had a line from me before Monday.

[24.]

PRUSSIAN LEGATION, _Monday_.

My best thanks. All hail to the “Great Esther.” She was really called

Myrtle, for Hadascha is in Hebrew the myrtle—a name analogous to Susannah

(the lily). That Esther is ἁστῆρ has long been generally admitted, also

that Xerxes is Ahasverus. The analogy of Achasverosh and Kshayarsha has

also been proved. Finally, the chronology is equally decisive. The only

thing still wanting is _Amestris_. What it is still important to know, is,

whether _Ama_, “great,” was a common designation of exalted personages, or

specially of _queens_ (in opposition to the _Pallakai_), or whether the

name is to be considered as an adjective to _star, magna Stella_. The

first interpretation would make the Jewish statement more clear. I think

decidedly it is the most natural. It is conceivable that Uncle Otanes,

like l’oncle de Madame l’Impératrice, should have taken a distinguished

name, just as the Hebrew _myrtle_ had been changed into a Persian _star_.

But there is not the least hurry about all this.

I rejoice extremely over your extemporary lectures. You are now on the

open sea, and “will go on swimmingly.” Always keep the _young men_ well in

mind, and arrange your lectures entirely for them. I should think that the

history of Greek literature (with glances backwards and forwards) after O.

Müller’s “History of Greek Literature,” would be a fine subject. Mure’s

book gives many an impulse for further thought. In what concerns the Latin

inscriptions, you must rely on _Gruter’s_ “Thesaurus,” after him on

Morelli; of the more recent, only on Borghese and Sarti, and on the little

done by my dear Kellermann. There is nothing more rare than the power of

copying accurately.

Be patient with ——, if he has an honest mind. I can fancy that such a

mind, having been torn, wronged, and bothered, has become very

cross-grained. Only patience and love can overcome this.

Overweg has fallen a victim to his noble zeal; he lies buried in the Lake

of Tsad. Vogel is happily already on the way to Malta and Tripoli.

[25.]

Chips from a German Workshop, Volume 3 Essays on Literature, Biography, and Antiquities · 第 147 / 222 题