PRUSSIAN LEGATION, _May 15, 1850._

By return of post thanks and greetings to my dear M. Your proposal as to

Schütz is excellent. Let me know if I am to write to Humboldt. I draw a

totally different lesson from your news of the loss of the Veda MS. Wait

till a good copy arrives, and in the mean time pursue your philological

studies in some other direction, and get on with your Introduction. You

can work more in one day in Europe than in a week in India, unless you

wish to kill yourself, which I could not allow. So come with bag and

baggage here, to 9 Carlton Terrace, to one who longs to see you.

F. must have gone mad, or have been far more so politically than I

imagined. The “Leader,” edited by him and N., is (as Mills says) _red and

raw!_ and, in addition, badly written. It is a pity for prophets and poets

to meddle with realities, instead of devoting themselves to futurity and

poetry. George is happy in the intellectual wealth of Paris life, and

quite perplexed at the perverseness and follies of the political cliques.

He promises to write about the acquaintance of Lamenais and George Sand. I

am well, but fully use the right of a convalescent, and hardly go

anywhere.

Friend Stockmar sends a report from Erfurt, where the Parliament meets on

the 26th to receive the oaths of the Directory and the Ministers of the

Union. Usedom, Pertz, and Co. are quite mad in their enthusiasm for the

Black and White, as I have openly written to them.

[9.]

Chips from a German Workshop, Volume 3 Essays on Literature, Biography, and Antiquities · 第 138 / 222 题