OF PERMANENT EXTENSION, AND THE MEANS OF EFFECTING IT.

46. By what means then can this indication be effectually fulfilled? By

that which will perpetuate, throughout the whole treatment, the action

of those means by which reduction was effected; by that which, to the

ever active power of the muscles, will oppose a resistance constant in

its action; by that which, forming on the exterior of the thigh a kind

of artificial muscle, may become an antagonist to the natural muscles

of the part, and neutralize their efforts, by acting in a contrary

direction, and which, by pushing up the pelvis and retaining it there,

may prevent it from being pushed downward by the weight of the trunk

(14). But what other mean than that of permanent extension, unites

these advantages? Whatever form of apparatus may be employed to obtain

it, it is permanent extension alone that can prevent the displacement,

because it alone is founded on principles calculated to meet and

obviate the causes by which displacement is produced.

47. The ancients, though less informed than we are respecting the

nature of these causes, knew better how to appreciate their effects.

All their forms of apparatus made a permanent extension, a measure

which has been abandoned by most of the moderns, and regarded, even

at present, in France, by a great number of practitioners, as always

dangerous, and seldom useful. Let us set in opposition to the vain

fears which it inspires, a few thoughts, and much experience.

48. It is from the very object which is proposed to be attained, that

the first difficulties arise. What must we think of a limb in a state

of preternatural tension, where all the parts being overstretched must

experience an uneasiness not to be supported? I answer, that it is not

a preternatural elongation that extension produces; on the contrary,

being intended to prevent a preternatural shortening, it has for its

object to restore the parts to their ordinary state, and to give to the

muscles their habitual degree of tension, by opposing such contractions

in them as are not habitual: under this point of view, it performs,

in relation to the muscles, those very functions which are discharged

by the bone itself, when sound and unbroken, as is fully experienced

by all patients, when the apparatus is applied. Its use not only does

not increase pain, but is alone calculated to diminish it, because, by

bringing the fragments into apposition, it prevents the soft parts from

being irritated by the points of the bones.

49. Is the swelling of the limb to be dreaded, as some pretend? But

whence can this swelling arise? From the over-stretching of the parts?

I have already proved that they are not over-stretched. From the

pressure of the straps? Perhaps this cause might produce a swelling,

if, as formerly, it were applied above the knee; but, by placing it, as

Desault did, near to the ancle, by surrounding, with a thick compress,

the lower part of the leg, where the straps pass, and by securing the

foot with a tight bandage under the straps, if their action be dreaded,

this fear must be done away; and, besides, experience, which is the

only true test of the dangers of a process, by no means justifies the

apprehension. The venæ saphenæ and the absorbents that accompany them,

are free from the compression, which bears principally on the tendo

Achillis, and the malleoli.

50. What shall we say in reply to the censure thrown on the process of

permanent extension, in the memoirs of the academy, where it is charged

with having been oftentimes productive of ulceration and even gangrene,

in consequence of the pressure of the upper strap? What method can

escape censure, if it be unskilfully pursued? What process will not

be injurious, if mutilated and ill managed by ignorance or a want of

discretion? To represent the thing properly, let us suppose the worst:

a circular bandage, in consequence of being drawn too tight, produces

mortification in the subjacent parts; must circular bandages be on

this account entirely rejected? An unskilful hand, in an operation for

cancer, opens the axillary artery; must we therefore cease to search

under the arm-pit for schirrous glands?

51. Permanent extension is, say some, insufficient to overcome muscular

action; it is opposing to a power equal to 1000, a resistance equal to

only 100. But this force of the muscles, which is oftentimes so great

at the time of reduction, diminishes gradually, by the pressure of

the bandages, by the immobility of the limb, and, above all, by long

continued extension; for a continued effort equal to 10, will soon

perform what could not be effected by a temporary exertion of a force

equal to 100. Let us pass over the more minute objections made against

permanent extension, and search among the different modes of performing

it, that to which practitioners ought to give a preference.

52. We may throw into two classes the general modes proposed by

different authors for effecting permanent extension. Under the one are

included those modes requiring simple means, such as straps, splints,

&c. while the other embraces such as, from being complex, necessarily

call for the use of different machines.

A Treatise on Fractures, Luxations, and Other Affections of the Bones · 第 123 / 182 题