CHAPTER 4.

Exile of M. de Montmorency and Madame Recamier--New persecutions.

This continual chicanery upon my most trifling actions, rendered my

life odious to me, and I could not divert myself by occupation;

for the recollection of the fate of my last work, and the certainty

of never being able to publish any thing in future, operated as a

complete damper to my mind, which requires emulation to be capable

of labor. Notwithstanding, I could not yet resolve to quit for ever

the borders of France, the abode of my father, and the friends who

remained faithful to me. Every day I thought of departing, and every

day I found in my own mind some reason for remaining, until the last

blow was aimed at my soul; God knows what I have suffered from it.

M. de Montmorency came to pass several days with me at Coppet, and

the wickedness of detail in the master of so great an empire is so

well calculated, that by the return of the courier who announced his

arrival at Coppet, my friend received his letter of exile. The

emperor would not have been satisfied if this order had not been

signified to him at my house, and if there had not been in the

letter itself of the minister of police, a word to signify that I

was the cause of this exile. M. de Montmorency endeavoured, in every

possible way, to soften the news to me, but, I tell it to Bonaparte,

that he may applaud himself on the success of his scheme, I shrieked

with agony on learning the calamity which I had drawn on the head of

my generous friend; and never was my heart, tried as it had been for

so many years, nearer to despair. I knew not how to lull the rending

thoughts which succeeded each other in my bosom, and had recourse to

opium to suspend for some hours the anguish which I felt. M. do

Montmorency, calm and religious, invited me to follow his example;

the consciousness of the devotedness to me which he had condescended

to show, supported him: but for me, I reproached myself for the

bitter consequences of this devotedness, which now separated him

from his family and friends. I prayed to the Almighty without

ceasing, but grief would not quit its hold of me for a moment, and

life became a burden to me.

While I was in this state, I received a letter from Madame Recamier,

that beautiful person who has received the admiration of the whole

of Europe, and who has never abandoned an unfortunate friend. She

informed me, that on her road to the waters of Aix in Savoy, to

which she was proceeding, she intended stopping at my house, and

would be there in two days. I trembled lest the lot of M. de

Montmorency should also become hers. However improbable it was, I

was ordained to fear every thing from hatred so barbarous and

minute, and I therefore sent a courier to meet Madame Recamier, to

beseech her not to come to Coppet. To know that she who had never

failed to console me with the most amiable attention was only a few

leagues distant from me; to know that she was there, so near to my

habitation, and that I was not allowed to see her again, perhaps for

the last time! all this I was obliged to bear. I conjured her not to

stop at Coppet; she would not yield to my entreaties; she could not

pass under my windows without remaining some hours with me, and it

was with convulsions of tears that I saw her enter this chateau, in

which her arrival had always been a fete. She left me the next day,

and repaired instantly to one of her relations at fifty leagues

distance from Switzerland. It was in vain; the fatal blow of exile

smote her also; she had had the intention of seeing me, and that was

enough; for the generous compassion which had inspired her, she must

be punished. The reverses of fortune which she had met with made the

destruction of her natural establishment extremely painful to her.

Separated from all her friends, she has passed whole months in a

little provincial town, a prey to the extremes of every feeling of

insipid and melancholy solitude. Such was the lot to which I was

the cause of condemning the most brilliant female of her time; and

thus regardless did the chief of the French, that people so renowned

for their gallantry, show himself towards the most beautiful woman

in Paris. In one day he smote virtue and distinguished birth in M.

de Montmorency; beauty in Madame Recamier, and if I dare say it, the

reputation of high talents in myself. Perhaps he also flattered

himself with attacking the memory of my father in his daughter, in

order that it might be truly said that in this world, under his

reign, the dead and the living, piety, beauty, wit, and celebrity,

all were as nothing. Persons made themselves culpable by being found

wanting in the delicate shades of flattery towards him, in refusing

to abandon any one who had been visited by his disgrace. He

recognises but two classes of human creatures, those who serve him,

and those, who without injuring, wish to have an existence

independent of him. He is unwilling that in the whole universe, from

the details of housekeeping to the direction of empires, a single

will should act without reference to his.

"Madam de Stael," said the prefect of Geneva, "has contrived to make

herself a very pleasant life at Coppet; her friends and foreigners

come to see her: the emperor will not allow that." And why did he

torment me in this manner? that I might print an eulogium upon him:

and of what consequence was this eulogium to him, among the millions

of phrases which fear and hope were constantly offering at his

shrine? Bonaparte once said: "If I had the choice, either of doing a

noble action myself, or of inducing my adversary to do a mean one, I

would not hesitate to prefer the debasement of my enemy." In this

sentence you have the explanation of the particular pains which he

took to torment my existence. He knew that I was attached to my

friends, to France, to my works, to my tastes, to society; in taking

from me every thing which composed my happiness, his wish was to

trouble me sufficiently to make me write some piece of insipid

flattery, in the hope that it would obtain me my recall. In refusing

to lend myself to his wishes, I ought to say it, I have not had the

merit of making a sacrifice; the emperor wished me to commit a

meanness, but a meanness entirely useless; for at a time when

success was in a manner deified, the ridicule would not have been

complete, if I had succeeded in returning to Paris, by whatever

means I had effected it. To satisfy our master, whose skill in

degrading whatever remains of lofty mind is unquestionable, it was

necessary that I should dishonor myself in order to obtain my return

to France,--that he should turn into mockery my zeal in praise of

him, who had never ceased to persecute me,--and that this zeal

should not be of the least service to me. I have denied him this

truly refined satisfaction; it is all the merit I have had in the

long contest which has subsisted between his omnipotence and my

weakness.

M. de Montmorency's family, in despair at his exile, were anxious,

as was natural, that he should separate himself from the sad cause

of this calamity, and I saw that friend depart without knowing if he

would ever again honor with his presence my residence on this earth.

On the 31st of August, 1811, I broke the first and last of the ties

which bound me to my native country; I broke them, at least so far

as regards human connections, which can no longer exist between us;

but I never lift my eyes towards heaven without thinking of my

excellent friend, and I venture to believe also, that in his prayers

he answers me. Beyond this, fate has denied me all other

correspondence with him.

When the exile of my two friends became known, I was assailed by a

whole host of chagrins of every kind; but a great misfortune renders

us in a manner insensible to fresh troubles. It was reported that

the minister of police had declared that he would have a soldier's

guard mounted at the bottom of the avenue of Coppet, to arrest

whoever came to see me. The prefect of Geneva, who was instructed,

by order of the emperor he said, to annul me (that was his

expression), never missed an opportunity of insinuating, or even

declaring publicly, that no one who had any thing either to hope or

fear from the government ought to venture near me. M. de

Saint-Priest, formerly minister of Louis XVI. and the colleague of

my father, honored me with his affection; his daughters who dreaded,

and with reason, that he might be sent from Geneva, united their

entreaties with mine that he would abstain from visiting me.

Notwithstanding, in the middle of winter, at the age of

seventy-eight, he was banished not only from Geneva, but from

Switzerland; for it is fully admitted, as has been seen in my own

case, that the emperor can banish from Switzerland as well as from

France; and when any objections are made to the French agents, on

the score of being in a foreign country, whose independence is

recognised, they shrug up their shoulders, as if you were wearying

them with Metaphysical quibbles. And really it is a perfect quibble

to wish to distinguish in Europe anything but prefect-kings, and

prefects receiving their orders directly from the emperor of France.

If there is any difference between the soi-disant allied countries

and the French provinces, it is that the first are rather worse

treated. There remains in France a certain recollection of having

been called the great nation, which sometimes obliges the emperor to

be measured in his proceedings; it was so at least, but every day

even that becomes less necessary. The motive assigned for the

banishment of M. de Saint-Priest was, that he had not induced his

sons to abandon the service of Russia. His sons had, during the

emigration, met with the most generous reception in Russia; they had

there been promoted, their intrepid courage had there been properly

rewarded; they were covered with wounds, they were distinguished

among the first for their military talents; the eldest was now more

than thirty years of age. How was it possible for a father to ask

that the existence of his sons, thus established, should be

sacrificed to the honor of coming to place themselves en

surveillance on the French territory? for that was the enviable lot

which was reserved for them. It was a source of melancholy

satisfaction to me, that I had not seen M. de Saint-Priest for four

months previous to his banishment; had it not been for that, no one

would have doubted that it was I who had infected him with the

contagion of my disgrace.

Not only Frenchmen, but foreigners, were apprised that they must not

go to my house. The prefect kept upon the watch to prevent even old

friends from seeing me. One day, among others, he deprived me, by

his official vigilance, of the society of a German gentleman, whose

conversation was extremely agreeable to me, and I could not help

telling him, on this occasion, that he might have spared himself

this extraordinary degree of persecution. "How!" replied he, "it was

to do you a service that I acted in this manner; I made your friend

sensible that he would compromise you by going to see you." I could

not refrain from a smile at this ingenious argument. "Yes,"

continued he with the most perfect gravity, "the emperor, seeing you

preferred to himself, would be displeased with you for it." "So

that" I replied, "the emperor expects that my private friends, and

shortly, perhaps, my own children, should forsake me to please him;

that seems to me rather too much. Besides, I do not well see how a

person in my situation can be compromised; and what you say reminds

me of a revolutionist who was applied to, in the times of terror, to

use his endeavours to save one of his friends from the scaffold. I

am afraid, said he, that my speaking in his favor would only injure

him." The prefect smiled at my quotation, but continued that train

of reasoning, which, backed as it is with four hundred thousand

bayonets, always appears the soundest. A man at Geneva said to me,

"Do not you think that the prefect declares his opinion with a great

deal of frankness?" "Yes," I replied, "he says with sincerity that

he is devoted to the man of power; he says with courage that he is

of the strongest side; I am not exactly sensible of the merit of

such an avowal."

Several independent ladies at Geneva continued to show me marks of

the greatest kindness, of which I shall always retain a deep

recollection. But even to the clerks in the custom houses, regarded

themselves as in a state of diplomacy with me; and from prefects to

sub-prefects, and from the cousins of one and the other, a profound

terror would have seized them all, if I had not spared them, as much

as was in my power, the anxiety of paying or not paying a visit.

Every courier brought reports of other friends of mine being exiled

from Paris, for having kept up connections with me; it became a

matter of strict duty for me to avoid seeing a single Frenchman of

the least note; and very often I was even apprehensive of injuring

persons in the country where I was living, whose courageous

friendship never failed itself towards me. I felt two opposite

sensations, and both, I believe, equally natural; melancholy at

being forsaken, and cruel anxiety for those who showed attachment to

me. It is difficult to conceive a situation in life more painful at

every moment; for the space of nearly two years that I endured it, I

may say truly that I never once saw the day return without a feeling

of desolation at having to support the existence which that day

renewed. But why should not you leave it then? will be said, and was

said incessantly to me from all quarters. A man whom I ought not to

name*, but who I trust knows how much I esteem the elevation of his

character and conduct, said to me: "If you remain, he will treat you

as Elizabeth did Mary Stuart:--nineteen years of misery, and the

catastrophe at last." Another person, witty but unguarded in his

expressions, wrote to me, that it was dishonorable to remain after

so much ill-treatment. I had no need of these recommendations to

wish, passionately wish, to depart; from the moment that I could no

longer see my friends, that I was only a burden to my children's

existence, was it not time to determine? The prefect, however,

repeated in every possible way, that if I went off, I should be

seized; that at Vienna, as well as at Berlin, I should be reclaimed;

and that I could not make the least preparation for departure

without his being informed of it; for he knew, he said, every thing

that passed in my house. In that respect he was a boaster, and, as

the event has proved, exhibited mere fatuity in matters of

espionnage. But who would not have been terrified at the tone of

assurance with which he told all my friends that I could not move a

step without being seized by the gendarmes!

* Count Elzearn de Sabran.

Ten Years' Exile Memoirs of That Interesting Period of the Life of the Baroness De Stael-Holstein, Written by Herself, during the Years 1810, 1811, 1812, and 1813, and Now First Published from the Original Manuscript, by Her Son. · 第 4 / 20 章