CHAPTER III (p. 041)

THE UNIVERSITIES OF MASTERS

The Guild or Universitas which grew up in the Studium Generale of

Paris was a Society of masters, not of students. The Studium Generale

was, in origin, connected with the Cathedral Schools, and recognition

as a Master was granted by the Chancellor of the Cathedral, whose duty

it was to confer it upon every competent scholar who asked for it. The

successful applicant was admitted by the existing masters into their

Society, and this admission or inception was the origin of degrees in

the University of Paris. The date of the growth of an organised Guild

is uncertain; Dr Rashdall, after a survey of the evidence, concludes

that "it is a fairly safe inference that the period 1150-1170--probably

the latter years of that period--saw the birth of the University of

Paris." Such organisation as existed in the twelfth century was slight

and customary, depending, as the student-universities of Bologna and

in other medieval guilds, upon no external authority. The successors

of these early masters, writing in the middle of the thirteenth

century, relate how their predecessors, men reverend in character (p. 042)

and famous for learning, decided, as the number of their pupils

increased, that they could do their work better if they became a

united body, and that they therefore formed themselves into a College

or University, on which Church and State conferred many privileges.

The bond of union they describe as a "jus speciale" ("si quodam essent

juris specialis vinculo sociati"), and this conception explains the

appearance of their earliest code of statutes in the first decade of

the thirteenth century. The Guild of masters, at Paris, like the Guild

of students at Bologna, could use with advantage the threat of a

migration, and, after a violent quarrel with the town in the year

1200, they received special privileges from Philip Augustus. Some

years later, Pope Innocent III. permitted the "scholars of Paris" to

elect a procurator or proctor to represent their interests in law-suits

at Rome. Litigation at Rome was connected with disputes with the

Chancellor of the Cathedral. Already the scholars of Paris had

complained to the Pope about the tyranny of the Chancellor, and

Innocent had supported their cause, remarking that when he himself

studied at Paris he had never heard of scholars being treated in this

fashion. It moved and astonished the Pope not a little that the

Chancellor should attempt to exact an oath of obedience and payment

of money from the masters, and, in the end, that official was (p. 043)

compelled to give up his claim to demand fees or oaths of fealty or

obedience for a licence to teach, and to relax any oaths that had

already been taken. The masters, as Dr Rashdall points out, already

possessed the weapon of boycotting, and ordering their students to

boycott, a teacher upon whom the Chancellor conferred a licence

against the wish of their guild, but they could not at first compel

him to grant a licence to anyone whom they desired to admit. After the

Papal intervention of 1212, the Chancellor was bound to licence a

candidate recommended by the masters.

In the account of their own history, from which we have already

quoted, the Parisian masters speak of their venerable "gignasium

litterarum" as divided into four faculties, Theology, Law, Medicine,

and Philosophy, and they compare the four streams of learning to the

four rivers of Paradise. The largest and most important was the

Faculty of Arts, and the masters of that Faculty were the protagonists

in the struggle with the Chancellor, a struggle which continued long

after the intervention of Innocent III. In the course of this long and

successful conflict, the Faculty of Arts developed an internal

organisation, consisting of four nations, distinguished as the French,

the Normans, the Picards, and the English. Each nation elected a

proctor, and the four proctors or other representatives of the (p. 044)

nations elected a Rector, who was the Head of the Faculty of Arts.

The division into nations and the title of Rector may have been copied

from Bologna, but the organisation at Paris was essentially different.

The Parisian nations were governed by masters, not by students, and

whereas, at Bologna, the artists were an insignificant minority, at

Paris, the Rector became, by the end of the thirteenth century, the

most powerful official of the University, and, by the middle of the

fourteenth, was recognised as its Head. The superior Faculties of

Theology, Canon Law, and Medicine, though they possessed independent

constitutions under their own Deans, consisted largely of men who had

taken a Master's or a Bachelor's degree in Arts, and, from the middle

of the thirteenth century, they took an oath to the Rector, which was

held to be binding even after they became doctors. The non-artist

members of these Faculties were not likely to be able to resist an

authority whose existence was generally welcomed as the centre of the

opposition to the Chancellor. Ultimately, the whole University passed

under the sway of the Rector, and the power of the Chancellor was

restricted to granting the _jus ubique docendi_ as the representative

of the Pope. Even this was little more than a formality, for the

Chancellor "ceased," says Dr Rashdall, "to have any real control over

the grant or refusal of Licences, except in so far as he retained (p. 045)

the nomination of the Examiners in Arts."

At Oxford, the University was also a Guild of masters, but Oxford was

not a cathedral city, and there was no conflict with the Bishop or the

Chancellor. In the end of the twelfth or the beginning of the

thirteenth century, the masters of the Studium probably elected a

Rector or Head in imitation of the Parisian Chancellor. After the

quarrel with the citizens, which led to the migration to Cambridge,

and when King John had submitted to the Pope, the masters were able to

obtain an ordinance from the Papal legate determining the punishment

of the offenders, and providing against the recurrence of such

incidents. The legate ordered that if the citizens should seize the

person of a clerk, his surrender might be demanded by "the Bishop of

Lincoln, or the Archdeacon of the place or his Official, or the

Chancellor, or whomsoever the Bishop of Lincoln shall depute to this

office." The clause lays stress upon the authority of the Bishop of

Lincoln, which must in no way be diminished by any action of the

townsmen. The ecclesiastical authority of the Bishop was welcomed by

the University as a protection against the town, and the Chancellor

was too far away from Lincoln to press the privileges of the Diocese

or the Cathedral against the clerks who were under his special (p. 046)

care. The Oxford Chancellor was a master of the Studium, and, though

he was the representative of the Bishop, he was also the Head of the

masters guild, and from very early times was elected by the masters.

Thus he came to identify himself with the University, and his office

increased in importance as privileges were conferred upon the

University by kings and popes. No Rectorship grew up as a rival to the

Chancellorship, though some of the functions of the Parisian Rector

were performed at Oxford by the Proctors. There were only two "Nations"

at Oxford, for the Oxford masters were, as a rule, Englishmen; men

from north of the Trent formed the Northern Nation, and the rest of

England the Southern Nation. Scotsmen were classed as Northerners, and

Welshmen and Irishmen as Southerners. The division into Nations was

short-lived, and the two Rectors or Proctors, though still

distinguished as Northern and Southern, soon became representatives

elected by the whole Faculty of Arts. As at Paris, the Faculty of Arts

was the moving spirit in the University, and Theology, Law, and

Medicine never developed at Oxford any independent organisation. The

proctors, as Dr Rashdall has shown, thus became the Executive of the

University as a whole, and not merely of the Faculty of Arts.

An essential difference between Bologna and its two great northern (p. 047)

sisters lies in the fact that, at Paris and at Oxford, masters and

scholars alike were all clerks, possessing the tonsure and wearing the

clerical garb, though not necessarily even in minor orders. They could

thus claim the privileges of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and at

Oxford this jurisdiction was exercised by the Chancellor, who also,

along with the proctors, was responsible for academic discipline and

could settle disputes between members of the University. In this, the

University of Oxford had a position of independence which Paris never

achieved, for though the Parisian Rector's court dealt with cases of

discipline and with internal disputes, criminal jurisdiction remained

the prerogative of the Bishop. In the middle of the fourteenth

century, royal grants of privileges to the University of Oxford

culminated in the subjection of the city, and from the middle of the

fifteenth "the burghers lived in their own town almost as the helots

or subjects of a conquering people." (_Cf._ Rashdall, vol. ii. chap.

12, sec. 3). The constitution of Oxford was closely imitated at

Cambridge, where the Head of the University was also the Chancellor,

and the executive consisted of two rectors or proctors. In the

fifteenth century the University freed itself from the ecclesiastical

jurisdiction of the Bishop of Ely.

Germany possessed no universities before the fourteenth century. (p. 048)

Prague was founded in 1347-8, and was followed before 1400 by Vienna,

Erfurt, Heidelberg, and Cologne, and in the first quarter of the next

century by Würzburg, Leipsic, Rostock, and in the Low Countries by

Louvain. The first Scottish University dates from the early years of

the fifteenth century. While the provincial universities of France

tended to follow Bologna rather than Paris as their model, the German

universities approximated to the Parisian type, and although the

founders of the Scottish universities were impressed by some of the

conditions of the student-universities, and provided for them a

theoretical place in their constitutions, yet the three medieval

Scottish universities of Scotland, in their actual working, more

nearly resembled the master type.

Life in the Medieval University · 第 3 / 8 章