OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

I am sorry that I cannot now be the first to call _King Albert's Book_

(HODDER AND STOUGHTON) The Golden Book. But, since this term has already

been applied, I can only applaud it. I suppose never in the history of

books has such a one as this been put together, just as never in the

line of kings has monarch received, under such circumstances, so rare a

tribute. If in the Belgian heart, from ruler to refugee, there is room

for more pride than should of right be there already, surely these

pages, voicing the homage of all that counts in the world to-day, will

bring it. We are all KING ALBERT'S men now, and in this book we have a

welcome chance of proving our fealty. You will observe that I say

nothing about the volume as commercial value for the three shillings

that it costs to buy. One glance at the list of those who contribute (a

kind of international supplement to _Who's Who_) is all that is needed

to satisfy you on this point. _The Daily Telegraph_ is primarily

responsible for gathering together a greater assembly of the names that

matter than was ever collected between covers. To the proprietors, to

Mr. HALL CAINE, who edits the book, and to the printers (especially for

the illustrations in colour, which are triumphs of reproduction) I can

only offer my thanks and congratulatory good wishes. Certainly, _The

Daily Telegraph_ Belgian Fund, to which will go the entire proceeds of

the sale, deserves well the shillings that this splendid effort will

bring to it. _King Albert's Book_ is indeed a noble tribute to

nobility--one that for every sake will become an historic souvenir of

the Great Days. And (if I may confess the secret wickedness of my heart

as I read) how I should love to see the Berlin Press notices!

* * *

When Mr. THEODORE ROOSEVELT stated on page 25 of _Through the Brazilian

Wilderness_ (MURRAY) that his was not a hunting-trip, but a scientific

expedition, I winked solemnly, so often have I read books in which

science is used as an excuse for a slaughter that to the unbloodthirsty

seems to be more than a little indiscriminate. Now, however, there is

nothing to do but to withdraw that wink and to say that Mr. ROOSEVELT

and his companions killed only for the sake of food and specimens,

though on one very exciting occasion a man called JULIO displayed a most

unwholesome desire to slay anybody or anything. This renegade's lust for

murder was merely a side-show, but it serves vividly to illustrate the

dangers and risks that the travellers took as they fought their way

along the River of Doubt. No escape is possible from the buoyancy of Mr.

ROOSEVELT'S style; as frankly as any schoolboy enjoying a holiday he

revelled in the ups and downs of his adventures; and if his enthusiasm

for the important work that he was helping to accomplish occasionally

leads him to relate trivialities, and also prevents him from advancing a

few kilometres without adding up the total number he has travelled, the

essential fact remains that his tale of exploit and exploration is told

with a _joie de vivre_ that carries everything before it. Among the many

discoveries that he made is one from which time has taken away any cause

for surprise. "There was," he says, "a German lieutenant with the

Paraguayan officers--one of several German officers who are now engaged

in helping the Paraguayans with their army." _Through the Brazilian

Wilderness_ is packed with wonderfully good photographs, two of which

introduce us to a game played by the Parecis Indians, of which the

initial rule requires the "kicker-off" to lie flat on the ground and

butt the ball with his head. One wonders if Brazil's future battles will

be won in the playing fields of the Parecis.

* * *

The opening lines of the Preface to Sir CHARLES VILLIERS STANFORD'S book

of reminiscences contain so good a story that I cannot forbear to quote

them. The tale concerns the famous conductor HANS VON BUELOW, who (says

Sir CHARLES) was once taking the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra through a

rehearsal at which some ladies had been invited to be present. They

indulged in whisperings and chatterings which greatly disturbed the

players. BUELOW turned round and said, "Ladies, we are not here to save

the Capitol, but to make music." Pretty neat that for a Prussian! It is

an example of the many excellent tales to be found in _Pages from an

Unwritten Diary_ (ARNOLD). Some of the best of them concern this same

BUELOW, and have done much to disprove my personal belief in the

non-existence of German humour. But throughout his book Sir CHARLES is

the best of good company. Whether he is chatting about Royalty--there is

a rather moving little anecdote of QUEEN VICTORIA and TENNYSON that was

new to me--or telling again the often-told history of the Cambridge

Greek Plays and the A.D.C., he has a happy pen for a point, and even the

chestnuts inevitable in such a collection are served with a flavour of

originality. I must be allowed to quote one more of VON BUELOW'S good

things. A gushing lady at a musical party begged for an introduction to

the great man. Which being given, "_Oh, Monsieur von Buelow_," she said,

"_vous connaissez Monsieur Wagner, n'est-ce pas?_" Bowing, and without a

shade of surprise, BUELOW answered at once, "_Mais oui, Madame; c'est le

mari de ma femme!_" A great man!

* * *

I am quite prepared to accept Mr. LINDSAY BASHFORD'S _Cupid in the Car_

(CHAPMAN AND HALL) as a nice unpretentious diary of a motor-tour on and

about the Franco-German Frontier, ingeniously done into novel form and

wholesomely seasoned with adventure and the arrangement of marriages

shortly to take place. And I distinctly like his taciturn paragon of a

chauffeur, _Eugene_--a nephew of _Enery Straker_ the voluble, as I

should judge from a certain family resemblance and, by the way, much too

intelligent to murder his French phrases in the hopeless manner which

the author, none too scrupulous in these little touches, suggests. But

whether Mr. BASHFORD hasn't spoilt an enthusiastic travel book without

producing quite a plausible novel--a defect of tactics rather than of

capacity--and whether the book doesn't show too many signs of the hustle

and vibration of the car are questions that intrude themselves; and

certainly one has a right to jib at the Preface, which seems to suggest

that the novel, written before war broke out, was to enlighten the

public, by a sugar-coated method, as to the general terrain of the

conflict inevitable at some future date, so that we might "better

picture the work our loved ones were doing at the Front." If this were

indeed so, then it was distinctly untactful that the only British

officer who appears should be a tosh-talking General obviously too fond

of his food. The fact is that the topical preface is being overdone

these days.

* * *

My only complaint against _The Flute of Arcady_ (STANLEY PAUL) is that

Miss KATE HORN, who wrote it, seems somewhat to have disregarded the

classic advice of _Mr. Curdle_ to _Nicholas Nickleby_ in the matter of

observing the unities. It struck me, indeed, that she had begun it as a

Cinderella-tale and then found that there wasn't enough of this to go

round. Thus the early chapters roused my sympathetic interest for

_Charlotte Clairvaux_ (the bullied companion of the hateful cat, _Mrs.

Menzies_) and her admiring suitor, _Dr. Shuckford_. I felt deeply for

poor _Charlotte_, and longed for the moment when the doctor, who was

eminently desirable, would fold her in his manly arms. But this moment

came confusingly early, in the third chapter, and left us with

three-quarters of the book to fill up. So _Charlotte_, for no

reason--that I could see--but this of space, refuses her _Shuckford_,

and off go she and _Mrs. Menzies_ to Versailles, where they meet a good

number of pleasantly-drawn people, and encounter a variety of

adventures, some amusing, some merely farcical. Without doubt Miss HORN

has a pretty wit, but I admired its exercise far more in character than

incident. There is, for example, a delightful new version of _Mrs.

Malaprop_ in the lady whose ambition it was "to live in a mayonnaise in

a good part of London." I loved her, and the terrible French infant, and

the nuns, and the old countess and the other Versailles folk. But of the

incidents, fantastic adventures with elephants and such, one sometimes

feels that their humour is, as the author says of _M. de Lafontaine's_

smile, a thing that seemed to be jerked out by machinery. Yet I am bound

to confess that it made me laugh. So why grumble?

* * * * *

Illustration: THE WILHELM MISTLETOE.

A CARD OF TEUTONIC ORIGIN NOT LIKELY TO HAVE A BIG SALE OVER HERE THIS

SEASON.

* * * * *

_The Times_, describing the attempted escape of a German officer in the

disguise of 'Safety Matches,' says: "There was nothing in the box to

excite suspicion." Except, of course, the officer.

* * * * *

"Never again will one rigid form of civilisation prevail.... The

world has grown too big to rest content with one standard."

_Evening Standard._

Hence _The Evening Standard_.

* * * * *

Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 147, December 23, 1914 · 第 57 / 57 题