PART IV

BIOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL; AMBASSADOR TO HUMANITY

AMBASSADOR TO HUMANITY

After the loss of his father the greatest trouble which befell the

authorized successor was the attempt made independently by

Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel and the half-brother of Abdul Baha, Mirza Muḥammad

'Ali, to produce a schism in the community at Akka. Some little

success was obtained by the latter, who did not shrink from the

manipulation of written documents. Badi-'ullah, another half-brother,

was for a time seduced by these dishonest proceedings, but has since

made a full confession of his error (see _Star of the West_).

It is indeed difficult to imagine how an intimate of the saintly Abdul

Baha can have 'lifted up his foot' against him, the more so as Abdul

Baha would never defend himself, but walked straight forward on the

appointed path. That path must have differed somewhat as the years

advanced. His public addresses prove that through this or that

channel he had imbibed something of humanistic and even scientific

culture; he was a much more complete man than St. Francis of Assisi,

who despised human knowledge. It is true he interpreted any facts

which he gathered in the light of revealed religious truth. But he

distinctly recognized the right of scientific research, and must have

had some one to guide him in the tracks of modern inquiry.

The death of his father must have made a great difference to him In

the disposal of his time. It is to this second period in his life

that Mr. Phelps refers when he makes this statement:

'His general order for the day is prayers and tea at sunrise, and

dictating letters or "tablets," receiving visitors, and giving alms to

the poor until dinner in the middle of the day. After this meal he

takes a half-hour's siesta, spends the afternoon in making visits to

the sick and others whom he has occasion to see about the city, and

the evening in talking to the believers or in expounding, to any who

wish to hear him, the Ḳuran, on which, even among Muslims, he is

reputed to be one of the highest authorities, learned men of that

faith frequently coming from great distances to consult him with

regard to its interpretation.

'He then returns to his house and works until about one o'clock over

his correspondence. This is enormous, and would more than occupy his

entire time, did he read and reply to all his letters personally. As

he finds it impossible to do this, but is nevertheless determined that

they shall all receive careful and impartial attention, he has

recourse to the assistance of his daughter Ruha, upon whose

intelligence and conscientious devotion to the work he can rely.

During the day she reads and makes digests of letters received, which

she submits to him at night.'

In his charities he is absolutely impartial; his love is like the

divine love--it knows no bounds of nation or creed. Most of those who

benefit by his presence are of course Muslims; many true stories are

current among his family and intimate friends respecting them. Thus,

there is the story of the Afghan who for twenty-four years received

the bounty of the good Master, and greeted him with abusive

speeches. In the twenty-fifth year, however, his obstinacy broke.

Many American and English guests have been entertained in the Master's

house. Sometimes even he has devoted a part of his scanty leisure to

instructing them. We must remember, however, that of Bahaism as well

as of true Christianity it may be said that it is not a dogmatic

system, but a life. No one, so far as my observation reaches, has

lived the perfect life like Abdul Baha, and he tells us himself that

he is but the reflexion of Baha-'ullah. We need not, therefore,

trouble ourselves unduly about the opinions of God's heroes; both

father and son in the present case have consistently discouraged

metaphysics and theosophy, except (I presume) for such persons as have

had an innate turn for this subject.

Once more, the love of God and the love of humanity--which Abdul Baha

boldly says is the love of God--is the only thing that greatly

matters. And if he favours either half of humanity in preference to

the other, it is women folk. He has a great repugnance to the

institution of polygamy, and has persistently refused to take a second

wife himself, though he has only daughters. Baha-'ullah, as we have

seen, acted differently; apparently he did not consider that the

Islamic peoples were quite ripe for monogamy. But surely he did not

choose the better part, as the history of Bahaism sufficiently

shows. At any rate, the Centre of the Covenant has now spoken with no

uncertain sound.

As we have seen, the two schismatic enterprises affected the sensitive

nature of the true Centre of the Covenant most painfully; one thinks

of a well-known passage in a Hebrew psalm. But he was more than

compensated by several most encouraging events. The first was the

larger scale on which accessions took place to the body of believers;

from England to the United States, from India to California, in

surprising numbers, streams of enthusiastic adherents poured in. It

was, however, for Russia that the high honour was reserved of the

erection of the first Bahai temple. To this the Russian Government was

entirely favourable, because the Bahais were strictly forbidden by

Baha-'ullah and by Abdul Baha to take part in any revolutionary

enterprises. The temple took some years to build, but was finished at

last, and two Persian workmen deserve the chief praise for willing

self-sacrifice in the building. The example thus set will soon be

followed by our kinsfolk in the United States. A large and beautiful

site on the shores of Lake Michigan has been acquired, and the

construction will speedily be proceeded with.

It is, in fact, the outward sign of a new era. If Baha-'ullah be our

guide, all religions are essentially one and the same, and all human

societies are linked By a covenant of brotherhood. Of this the Bahai

temples--be they few, or be they many--are the symbols. No wonder that

Abdul Baha is encouraged and consoled thereby. And yet I, as a member

of a great world-wide historic church, cannot help feeling that our

(mostly) ancient and beautiful abbeys and cathedrals are finer symbols

of union in God than any which our modern builders can provide. Our

London people, without distinction of sect, find a spiritual home in

St. Paul's Cathedral, though this is no part of our ancient

inheritance.

Another comfort was the creation of a mausoleum (on the site of

Mt. Carmel above Haifa) to receive the sacred relics of the Bāb and

of Baha-'ullah, and in the appointed time also of Abdul Baha.

[Footnote: See the description given by Thornton Chase, _In Galilee_,

pp. 63 f.] This too must be not only a comfort to the Master, but an

attestation for all time of the continuous development of the Modern

Social Religion.

It is this sense of historical continuity in which the Bahais appear

to me somewhat deficient. They seem to want a calendar of saints in

the manner of the Positivist calendar. Bahai teaching will then escape

the danger of being not quite conscious enough of its debt to the

past. For we have to reconcile not only divergent races and

religions, but also antiquity and (if I may use the word) modernity. I

may mention that the beloved Master has deigned to call me by a new

name.[Footnote: 'Spiritual Philosopher.'] He will bear with me if I

venture to interpret that name in a sense favourable to the claims of

history.

The day is not far off when the details of Abdul Baha's missionary

journeys will be admitted to be of historical importance. How gentle

and wise he was, hundreds could testify from personal knowledge, and I

too could perhaps say something--I will only, however, give here the

outward framework of Abdul Baha's life, and of his apostolic journeys,

with the help of my friend Lotfullah. I may say that it is with

deference to this friend that in naming the Bahai leaders I use the

capital H (He, His, Him).

Abdul Baha was born on the same night in which His Holiness the Bāb

declared his mission, on May 23, A.D. 1844. The Master, however, eager

for the glory of the forerunner, wishes that that day (i.e. May

23) be kept sacred for the declaration of His Holiness the Bāb, and

has appointed another day to be kept by Bahais as the Feast of

Appointment of the CENTRE OF THE COVENANT--Nov. 26. It should be

mentioned that the great office and dignity of Centre of the Covenant

was conferred on Abdul Baha Abbas Effendi by His father.

It will be in the memory of most that the Master was retained a

prisoner under the Turkish Government at Akka until Sept. 1908, when

the doors of His prison were opened by the Young Turks. After this He

stayed in Akka and Haifa for some time, and then went to Egypt, where

He sojourned for about two years. He then began His great European

journey. He first visited London. On His way thither He spent some few

weeks in Geneva. [Footnote: Mr. H. Holley has given a classic

description of Abdul Baha, whom he met at Thonon on the shores of Lake

Leman, in his _Modern Social Religion_, Appendix I.] On Monday,

Sept. 3, 1911, He arrived in London; the great city was honoured by a

visit of twenty-six days. During His stay in London He made a visit

one afternoon to Vanners' in Byfleet on Sept. 9, where He spoke to a

number of working women.

He also made a week-end visit to Clifton (Bristol) from Sept. 23,

1911, to Sept. 25.

On Sept. 29, 1911, He started from London and went to Paris and stayed

there for about two months, and from there He went to Alexandria.

His second journey consumed much time, but the fragrance of God

accompanied Him. On March 25, 1912, He embarked from Alexandria for

America. He made a long tour in almost all the more important cities

of the United States and Canada.

On Saturday, Dec. 14, 1912, the Master--Abdul Baha--arrived in

Liverpool from New York. He stayed there for two days. On the

following Monday, Dec. 16, 1912, He arrived in London. There He stayed

till Jan. 21, 1913, when His Holiness went to Paris.

During His stay in London He visited Oxford (where He and His

party--of Persians mainly--were the guests of Professor and Mrs.

Cheyne), Edinburgh, Clifton, and Woking. It is fitting to notice here

that the audience at Oxford, though highly academic, seemed to be

deeply interested, and that Dr. Carpenter made an admirable speech.

On Jan. 6, 1913, Abdul Baha went to Edinburgh, and stayed at

Mrs. Alexander Whyte's. In the course of these three days He

addressed the Theosophical Society, the Esperanto Society, and many of

the students, including representatives of almost all parts of the

East. He also spoke to two or three other large meetings in the bleak

but receptive 'northern Athens.' It is pleasant to add that here, as

elsewhere, many seekers came and had private interviews with Him. It

was a fruitful season, and He then returned to London.

On Wednesday, Jan. 15, 1912, He paid another visit to Clifton, and in

the evening spoke to a large gathering at 8.30 P.M. at Clifton Guest

House. On the following day He returned to London.

On Friday, Jan. 17, Abdul Baha went to the Muhammadan Mosque at

Woking. There, in the Muhammadan Mosque He spoke to a large audience

of Muhammadans and Christians who gathered there from different parts

of the world.

On Jan. 21, 1913, this glorious time had an end. He started by express

train for Paris from Victoria Station. He stayed at the French capital

till the middle of June, addressing (by the help of His interpreter)

'all sorts and conditions of men.' Once more Paris proved how

thoroughly it deserved the title of 'city of ideas.' During this time

He visited Stuttgart, Budapest, and Vienna. At Budapest He had the

great pleasure of meeting Arminius Vambery, who had become virtually a

strong adherent of the cause.

Will the Master be able to visit India? He has said Himself that some

magnetic personality might draw Him. Will the Brahmaists be pleased to

see Him? At any rate, our beloved Master has the requisite tact. Could

Indians and English be really united except by the help of the Bahais?

The following Tablet (Epistle) was addressed by the Master to the

Bahais in London, who had sent Him a New Year's greeting on March 21,

1914:--

'HE IS GOD!

'O shining Bahais! Your New Year's greeting brought infinite joy and

fragrance, and became the cause of our daily rejoicing and gladness.

'Thanks be to God! that in that city which is often dark because of

cloud, mist, and smoke, such bright candles (as you) are glowing,

whose emanating light is God's guidance, and whose influencing warmth

is as the burning Fire of the Love of God.

'This your social gathering on the Great Feast is like unto a Mother

who will in future beget many Heavenly Feasts. So that all eyes may be

amazed as to what effulgence the true Sun of the East has shed on the

West.

'How It has changed the Occidentals into Orientals, and illumined the

Western Horizon with the Luminary of the East!

'Then, in thanksgiving for this great gift, favour, and grace, rejoice

ye and be exceeding glad, and engage ye in praising and sanctifying

the Lord of Hosts.

'Hearken to the song of the Highest Concourse, and by the melody of

Abha's Kingdom lift ye up the cry of "Ya Baha-'ul-Abha!"

'So that Abdul Baha and all the Eastern Bahais may give themselves to

praise of the Loving Lord, and cry aloud, "Most Pure and Holy is the

Lord, Who has changed the West into the East with lights of Guidance!"

'Upon you all be the Glory of the Most Glorious One!'

Alas! the brightness of the day has been darkened for the Bahai

Brotherhood all over the world. Words fail me for the adequate

expression of my sorrow at the adjournment of the hope of Peace. Yet

the idea has been expressed, and cannot return to the Thinker void of

results. The estrangement of races and religions is only the fruit of

ignorance, and their reconciliation is only a question of

time. _Sursum corda._

The Reconciliation of Races and Religions · 第 5 / 6 章