A Japanese disavowal and explanation will be found below:—

To the Editor of the _Japan Mail_.

SIR,—In September last, for the purpose of studying the

practical application of International Law, I joined the fleet,

and embarked in a man-of-war of the Imperial Japanese

Navy. I am now staying in Port Arthur, after witnessing

several battles. Being a subscriber to your paper, I saw in

the issue of the 21st January some singular statements by Mr.

Creelman, to which you refer. It being impossible for an

eye-witness like me to pass over such a matter in silence, I

enclose an explanation of this affair, in the hope that you will

kindly have it translated at your office, and published through

the columns of your valuable paper. What I write is an

accurate and faithful description of the things that actually

happened, and I vouch for their truth in the sight of Heaven.

Convinced that the contents of my letter are of value to the

public at large, I venture to trouble you, especially since my

facts may furnish material to strengthen the position you take

in the matter. Harassed by official business of various kinds,

I cannot find leisure to write at greater length, and must

crave your kind indulgence.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,

TAKAHASHI SAKUYE,

_Hogakushi_,

Professor at the Naval University, and Ex-legal Adviser to

the Commander-in-Chief of the Regular Imperial Fleet.

The Imperial Japanese Navy · 第 48 / 174 题