SINKING OF THE KING YUEN (p. 139).]

Opposite is a sketch by a Japanese officer of the sinking of the King

Yuen, which was a small Chinese ironclad. There is a great deal of

mystery in all the histories as to how that ship really did go down.

The Japanese account of it is that “she was on fire, and apparently the

fire could not be put out; she began to roll very much indeed—first

very heavily over one way and then very heavily over the other way; she

continued rolling like that, and one time she rolled and did not come

back.”

She had a sister ship, the Lai Yuen. This ship was set on fire at an

early stage of the action, and the Chinese apparently did not trouble

to put the fire out. The consequence was it got a large hold and burnt

every scrap of woodwork in the ship. But the extraordinary thing is

that her people managed to go on fighting. Of her deck nothing was left

but twisted beams. The ship was nearly white-hot, and a number of men

got roasted to death in her; but she was still in fighting condition

when the battle ended. Probably only Chinamen could have fought in such

conditions.

The Ching Yuen was set on fire, but not badly hit in any way.

There were two other Chinese ships lost, the Tchao Yung and the

Yang Wei. These were set on fire at a very early stage, and most of

the accounts that we hear of the danger of fire in action are based

upon these two particular ships. It appears that their captains were

economical men, who liked to make a little money; so when the ships

were painted they did not scrape off the old paint, and as the ships

were about twelve years old the paint got very thick. Moreover, as they

found kerosine cheaper than linseed oil, they mixed the paint always

with kerosine. The ships, therefore, were of a somewhat inflammable

nature. When they got hit, the men trying to put the fire out got hit

also, and the ships were then simply left to blaze away. That is the

true cause of most of the fire scares that happened just after Yalu.

The Chinese shell were very defective indeed. They had very few shell

with any charges; nearly all they had to fire with were solid shot or

cement shell, the very worst possible thing for firing at cruisers

with; and this fact that they had no good shell must, perhaps, account

for the survival of the Japanese fleet. For although just after Yalu

the Japanese said that their shooting was 15 per cent. and the Chinese

10 per cent., they have since stated that the Chinese hits were

something like 25 per cent. and their own about 12 per cent., and they

say that in the early stages of the battle the Chinese never missed a

single shot with their big guns—they hit every ship that they fired

at; and they describe them as being some of the best gunners in the

world—that these No. 1 Chinese gunners were born shots; but gradually,

as the battle went on, the Japanese 3-pounders and machine guns playing

on the Chinese ships took off the heads of those men, and they were

replaced by other men who were not such good shots, and this went on

until, towards the end of the battle, practically no hitting at all was

done by the Chinese. But in the early part of the fight their shooting

was very good indeed.

[Illustration: BATTLE OF YALU: FOURTH STAGE.]

The Japanese in their fleet had three enormous guns, each of 66 tons,

which would penetrate something like double the thickness of any

armour opposed to them. Only one of those guns seems to have been in

a condition to fire. In the excitement of the battle the Japanese got

something wrong with the gear, and had to manipulate them by hand;

and the consequence was that two of those guns fired about once each,

and the third once an hour. It is unfortunate that these guns did not

secure at least one fair and square hit—the data of it would have been

extremely valuable.

After the battle of Yalu the Chinese ships were patched up. The Tche

Yuen, which had already taken part in the battle of Asan, took part in

Yalu, but was then knocked about and ran away. Although she had been

so badly hit in the battle of Asan, when she was doing the strategical

movement at the rear, she only took eight days to patch up, and she was

then able to go out to sea again. After Yalu she was very quickly got

ready once more.

The first conclusion one is forced to is that penetration does not

seem to have done anything in this battle. Where a gun was matched

against some very inferior armour, it went through and smashed it up,

but wherever the armour that it ought to penetrate was anything like

equal to the gun, the result was failure.

The second point is the astonishing amount of hitting that all these

ships seem to have been able to stand. There are many cases of quite

little ships that in theory one single shell would finish, but it has

taken five or six shells to disable them at all, and in a week or two

they have been fit to go out fighting again. The Saikio-maru, and the

way she was hammered and still managed to go on fighting and remain in

a fairly good condition, is a particular case in point. Although the

upper works may be knocked about and splintered, and so on, it does not

seem much good splintering the upper works and making a mess of the

ship unless there is a gun near it, and somebody to be disabled. Now,

this conclusion is dead against the “moral effect” theory. It is almost

a gospel that if the upper works are shelled enough the crew somewhere

else will get demoralised. I do not believe it; they will not in a

modern war be aware of it. I think this point should be laid to heart

and thought over by those who have 6-in. guns to attack ships with. To

do harm, they must fire those guns with all the intelligence they can

bring to bear.

On the other hand, it is well to remember, as in the case of the King

Yuen and Chih Yuen, that hits in the upper works caused the loss of

these ships by affecting stability, so far as can be gathered in the

absence of the hulls now at the bottom of the Yellow Sea.

[Illustration: [_Official photo._

The Imperial Japanese Navy · 第 42 / 174 题