CHAPTER XVIII.

NICE WORDS FOR NASTY THINGS.

In the days of Queen Elizabeth there were in England certain writers

who were called "Euphuists." They got this name from the title of a

book, "Euphues," written by one of them, John Lyly. The chief

characteristic of the writings of these Euphuists was the grandiose

way in which they wrote of the simplest things. Their writings were

full of metaphors and figures of speech. The first Euphuists were

looked upon as "refiners of speech," and Queen Elizabeth and the

ladies at her court did their best to speak as much in the manner of

Euphues as they could.

But all men at all times are unconscious Euphuists, in so far as they

try to say ugly and unpleasant things in a way which will make them

sound pleasant. This tendency in speech is called "euphemism," a word

which is made from two Greek words meaning "to speak well." It is a

true description of what the word means if by "well" we understand "as

pleasantly as possible." The word _euphemeîte_, "speak fair," was

used as a warning to worshippers in Greek temples, in the belief that

the speaking of an unfortunate word might bring disaster instead of

blessing from the sacrifice.

Every day, and often in a day, we use euphemisms. How often do we hear

people say, "if anything should happen to him," meaning "if he died;"

and on tombstones the plain fact of a person's death is nearly always

stated in phrases such as "he passed away," "fell asleep," or

"departed this life." People often refer to a dead person as the

"deceased" or the "departed," or as the "_late_ so-and-so." The fact

is that, death being to most people the unpleasantest thing in the

world, there is a general tendency to mention it as little as

possible, and, when the subject cannot be avoided, to use vague and

less realistic phrases than the words _death_, _dead_, or _die_.

One reason for this avoidance of an unpleasant subject is the

superstitious feeling that mentioning a thing will bring it to pass.

Or, again, if a misfortune has happened, many people feel that it only

makes it worse to talk about it. While everybody avoids speaking on

the subject, we can half pretend to ourselves that it is not true.

We might imagine that this kind of "refinement of speech" (which when

carried to excess really becomes vulgar) was the result of modern

people being so "nervous." But this is not the case. Complete savages

have the same custom. If civilized people have a superstitious feeling

that to mention a misfortune may bring it to pass, savages firmly

believe that this is the case. Not only will they not mention the

subject of death in plain words, but some will not even mention the

name of a dead person or give that name to a new-born child, so that

in some tribes names die out in this way. Many civilized people have

this same idea that it is unlucky for a new-born child to be called by

the name of a brother or sister who has already died.

The subject of death has gathered more euphemisms around it than

almost any other. Some of them are ugly and almost vulgar, while

others, from the way in which they have been used, are almost

poetical. To speak of the "casualties" in a battle, meaning the number

of killed and wounded men, seems almost heartless; but to say a man

"fell in battle," though it means the same thing, is almost poetical,

because it suggests an idea of courage and sacrifice. The expression,

"Roll of Honour," is a euphemism, but poetical. It suggests the one

consoling thought which relieves the horror of the bald expression,

"list of casualties."

Another cause of the use of euphemisms, besides the superstitious fear

of bringing misfortune by mentioning it too plainly, is the fear of

being vulgar or indecent. Through this feeling words which are quite

proper at one time pass out of use among refined people. English

people do not freely use the word "stomach" in conversation, and are

often a little shocked when they hear French people describing their

ailments in this region of the body. In the same way, names of

articles of underclothing pass out of use. The old word for the

garment which is now generally called a "chemise" was _smock_; but

this in time became tinged with vulgarity, and the word _shift_ was

used. This in its turn fell out of use among refined people, who began

to use the French word _chemise_. Even this, and the word _drawers_,

which was also once a most refined expression, are falling into

disuse, and people talk vaguely of "underlinen" in speaking of these

garments. The shops which are always refined to the verge of vulgarity

only allow themselves to use the French word _lingerie_.

Again, the faults of our friends and acquaintances, and even the

graver offences of criminals, are matters with which we tend to deal

lightly. Such offences have gathered a whole throng of euphemisms

about them. When we do not like to say boldly that a person is a liar,

we say the same thing by means of the euphemism a "stranger to the

truth." Other lighter ways of saying that a person is lying is to say

that he is "romancing," or "drawing the long bow," or "drawing on the

imagination," or "telling a fairy tale." A thief will be described as

a "defaulter," and we may say of a man who has stolen his employer's

money as it passed through his hands that he is "short in his

accounts."

Especially among the poorer or less respectable people, to whom the

idea of crime becomes familiar, the use of slang euphemisms on this

subject grows up. A person for whom the police are searching is

"wanted." A man who is hanged "swings." These expressions may seem

very dreadful to more refined people, but their use really comes from

the same desire to be indulgent which leads more educated people to

use euphemisms to cover up as far as possible the faults of their

friends.

Again, misfortunes which come not from outside happenings but from

some defect in a person's mind and body are often the subject of

euphemisms. In Scotland a person who is quite an imbecile will be

described as an "innocent"--a milder way of saying the same thing.

_Insane_ and _crazy_ were originally euphemisms for _mad_, but now

have come to be equally unpleasant descriptions. So for _drunken_ the

euphemism _intemperate_ came to be used, but is now hardly a more

polite description. We would not willingly speak of a person being

"fat" in his presence. If it is necessary to touch on the subject, the

word "stout" is more favoured. In the absence of the fat person the

humorous euphemism may be used by which he or she is said to "have a

good deal of _embonpoint_."

Many words are euphemisms in themselves, just as many words are

complete metaphors in themselves. The word _ill_ means literally

"uncomfortable," but has come to have a much more serious meaning.

_Disease_ means literally "not being at ease," but the sense in which

we use it describes something much more serious than the literal

meaning. The word _ruin_ is literally merely a "falling."

One result of words being used euphemistically is that they often

cease to have their milder original meaning, and cease therefore to

seem euphemistic at all. _Vile_, which now means everything that is

bad, is in its literal and earlier use merely "cheap." _Base_, which

has the meaning of unutterable meanness, is literally merely "low."

_Mercenary_ is not exactly a complimentary description now. It means

that a person thinks far too much of money, but originally it merely

meant "serving for pay," a thing which most men are obliged to do.

_Transgression_ is generally used now to describe some rather serious

offence, but it literally means only a "stepping across." The "step"

which it describes being, however, in the wrong direction, the word

has come to have a more and more serious meaning. The study of

euphemisms can teach us much about men's thoughts and manners in the

past and the present.

Stories That Words Tell Us · 第 18 / 19 章