READING OF THE YOUNG

Miss Hewins made a later report on the same subject [see the

previous article] in a paper presented before the World's Library

Congress in 1893. In this paper, given below, she has summarized

several of the early yearly reports made at the meetings of the

A. L. A., all of which are of great interest as a record of the

work of various libraries.

In the Government report on libraries, 1876, the relation of

public libraries and the young was treated by Mr. W. I. Fletcher,

who discussed age-restrictions, direction of reading, choice of

books, and incidentally the relation of libraries to schools,

referring to librarians and trustees as "the trainers of gymnasts

who seek to provide that which will be of greatest service to

their men." The report was suggestive, and called for several

radical changes in the usual management of libraries. No

statistics were given, for none had been called for, and the

number of libraries which were working in the modern spirit was

not large. Mr. Green, in his paper at the Philadelphia

conference of 1876 (L. j. 1: 74), gave some suggestions as to how

to teach school boys and girls the use of books, and in one or

two of the discussions the influence of a librarian on young

readers was noticed, but the American Library Association did not

give much time to the subject till the Boston conference of 1879,

when a whole session was devoted to schools, libraries, and

fiction (L. j. 4:319), the general expression of opinion being

similar to the formula expressed in the paper by Miss Mary A.

Bean, "Lessen the quantity and improve the quality." In 1881, Mr.

J. N. Larned, of the Buffalo Young Men's Library, issued his

pamphlet, "Books for young readers." The report on "Boys' and

girls' reading" which I had the honor of making at the Cincinnati

conference of 1882 has answers from some 25 librarians to the

question "What are you doing to encourage a love of good reading

in boys and girls?" (L. j. 7:182.) Several speak of special

catalogs or bulletins, most of personal interest in and

friendship with young readers. One writes, "Give a popular boy a

good book, and there is not much rest for that book. Librarians

should like children." It was in 1883 that, by the suggestion and

advice of our lamented friend, Frederick Leypoldt, I published a

little classified pamphlet, "Books for the young." In January of

the same year the Library Journal began a department of

"Literature for the young," which was transferred at the end of

the year to the Publishers' Weekly, where it still remains. The

report on the subject, made for the Buffalo conference by Miss

Bean, is on the same lines as the former one, with the addition

of the experience of some smaller libraries. She says, "I believe

the Lynn library has hit a fundamental truth, and applied the

sovereign remedy, so far as the question concerns public

libraries, in its 'one-book-a-week' rule for pupils of the

schools."

Miss Hannah P. James's report at the Lake George conference in

1885 (L. j. 10:278) sums up the information received from 75

sources in some suggestions for work in connection with school

and home, suggesting the publication of book lists in local

papers, supervision of children's reading if authority is given

by parents, and the limitation of school children's book to one

or two a week. At the St. Louis conference of 1889 Miss Mary

Sargent reported on "Reading for the young" (L. j. 14:226), One

librarian fears that lists of books prepared for boys and girls

will soon become lists to be avoided by them, on account of young

people's jealous suspicion of undue influence. Sargent's

"Reading for the young" was published just after the White

Mountain conference of 1890, and the subject was not discussed in

San Francisco in 1891 or at Lakewood in 1892 except in relation

to schools.

The Ladies' Commission on Sunday school books is at least five

years older than the American Library Association. It has done

good service in printing lists of books specially adapted to

Unitarian Sunday schools, others unfitted for them only by a few

doctrinal pages or sentences, and a third class recommended as

household friends on account of their interests, literary value,

and good tone. The Church Library Association stands in the same

relation to Episcopal Sunday schools, recommending in yearly

pamphlets:

Library Work with Children · 第 15 / 102 题