PREFACE.

No one can say that our Motives are unworthy, for our object is to

instruct. But there are some who may object to our Methods, and it is to

such that we offer, not an apology, but an explanation.

A very large section of the Public cling to the belief that Law must be

as dry as Dust, and Accounting as tedious as the Treadmill.

The truth is, it is not the Practice of Law or of Accounting that is

uninteresting, but rather is it the Theory which is often rendered so by

Teachers whom Providence never ordained to teach.

If, therefore, the employment of unorthodox methods helps to interest

the Student in his subject, and to stimulate him to further effort, any

apology would be out of place.

ERNEST EVAN SPICER.

ERNEST C. PEGLER.

60, Watling Street,

London, E.C.

January, 1914.

De Mortuis Nil Nisi Bona Being a Series of Problems in Executorship Law and Accounts · 第 14 / 30 题