PRETERIT.

172. Preterits which stress the ending throughout are called _weak_;

those which do not stress the ending throughout are called _strong_:

part_í_, part_íst_, part_í_, part_ím_, part_ítz_, part_íron_ is weak;

saup, saub_íst_, saup, saub_ém_, saub_étz_, sáub_ron_ is strong. Verbs

of the first and fourth conjugations regularly have weak preterits

(amęi, finí). Verbs of the second and third, with very few exceptions,

originally had strong preterits (_placuī_ > plac, _fēcī_ > fis): many

of them, however, developed weak preterits either in Vulgar Latin or in

Provençal (irasquęi, nasquęi, tessęi tesquęi, visquęi); some assumed a

weak form in -í in the 1st pers. sg. (dis dissí, pris prenguí, remas

remanguí, trais traguí: cf. §§ 173, 177); quęrre, on the other hand,

substituted a strong preterit (quis, etc.) for a weak one.

173. (1) Final _-ī_, in the first pers. sg., doubtless remained

through the earlier stages of Provençal (_habuī_ > águi, _dīxī_ >

díssi): cf. § 51, (2). Before it fell, it changed an accented ẹ in

the preceding syllable to i (_vēnī_ ✱_vēnuī_ > ✱vẹngui vinc): cf. §

27; occasionally, however, the ẹ was kept, through the analogy of

the other persons (pris prẹs). Sometimes, instead of falling, the -i

took the accent (following the analogy of the fourth conjugation) and

remained: águi > ac or aguí, díssi > dis or dissí (cf. § 177).

When the -i was immediately preceded by an accented vowel, it regularly

formed a diphthong with that vowel, and did not fall (_fuī_ > füi): cf.

§ 51, (3); but -íi was simplified to -i (_partīvī_ _partīī_ > partí).

Before enclitic l, -ei -iei were often reduced to -e -ie: cantiel.

(2) In the 2d pers. sg., _-stī_ became -st, a preceding ẹ being

changed to i (§ 27): _partīstī_ > partíst, _debuĭstī_ > deguíst;

sometimes, through the analogy of the 2d pers. pl., ẹ remains

(venguẹst: cf. § 27, 2). Occasionally the final -t disappears: anięst

anięs, fezíst fezís.

(3) The _-t_ of the 3d pers. sg. was lost in strong preterits:

_placuit_ > plac, _vīdit_ > vi. In weak preterits, it was retained by

most dialects after é, and by many after í: donęt donę, vendęt vendę;

partí partít. Cf. § 82, T.

(4) In the 1st pers. pl., _-mus_ _-mu’_ (see § 167) was reduced to -m:

_vīdĭmu’_ > vim.

(5) The _-stis_ of the 2d pers. pl. regularly became -tz (§ 78, 2),

later in many dialects -s (§ 64): _debuĭstis_ > deguẹtz deguẹs.

(6) The _-runt_ of the 3d pers. pl. regularly gave -ron or -ro (§ 83,

Nt): _partīrunt_ > partíron partíro, _vīdĕrunt_ > viron viro. In some

dialects -en is substituted for -on: _fŭĕrunt_ > fọron fọren (cf. §

169).

The _e_ before _-runt_, which in classic Latin was usually long, was

always short in Vulgar Latin when it was preserved at all: _amavĕrunt_

> _amārunt_, _fēcĕrunt_.

An Outline of the Phonology and Morphology of Old Provençal · 第 129 / 139 题