CHAPTER II

Was Independence Promised?

It has long been the fashion in certain quarters to allege, or to

insinuate, that American consuls and naval officers promised the

Insurgent leaders that the independence of the Philippines would be

recognized by the United States. It has been claimed by some that

the coöperation of the Insurgents in the military operations against

Manila was sought for and secured. Others say that they were at least

_de facto_ allies of the United States, and that they were in the

end shamelessly betrayed and wantonly attacked.

These are very serious charges. I shall prove, chiefly by the Insurgent

records, that each of them is false. I ask the forbearance of my

readers if, in the three chapters which I devote to these matters,

I quote documentary evidence at length. When original documents

or extracts from them tell a clear and reasonably concise story,

I sometimes insert them bodily in the text. In other cases I give my

own version of the facts which they set forth, but give the full text

in foot-notes. In nearly all instances references are given to sources

of documentary information. I greatly regret that Taylor's narrative,

with its very numerous supporting documents, is not readily accessible

to the student of history. It ought to have been published, but never

got beyond the galley-proof stage. In referring to it, I am therefore

obliged to use the word Taylor followed by the letters and figures

designating the page of this galley proof on which the passage referred

to is found. Whenever possible I give the War Department numbers [6]

of Insurgent documents, but in a few cases can give only the exhibit

numbers assigned by Taylor in printing the documents.

As his exhibits are serially arranged it is easy to find any one of

them. Copies of his work may be found in the War Department and in

the office of the Chief of the Philippine Constabulary.

Referring to the charge that the Insurgents were deceived, even had

deceit been practised as claimed, Aguinaldo would have had no just

ground for complaint, for he himself not only frankly advocated its

use, but deliberately employed it in his dealings with the Americans,

as clearly appears in records hereinafter cited. [7] However, most

Americans hold to a standard very different from his. Was it departed

from in this instance?

Aguinaldo has specifically and repeatedly charged that Pratt and Dewey

promised him the recognition of the independence of the Philippines

by the United States. [8]

Judge Blount has referred to the "_de facto_ alliance between the

Americans and Aguinaldo," and has dwelt at length on "promises,

both expressed and implied," which were subsequently repudiated

by Consul Pratt, Admiral Dewey and Generals Anderson and Merritt,

constantly suggesting, even when he does not specifically charge,

bad faith on the part of these officers of the United States. [9]

On analyzing his statements we find that he is discreetly non-committal

as to exactly what were the expressed promises, nor does he make it so

plain as might be desired what legitimate inferences were deducible

from the acts of the Americans in question. He quotes an alleged

statement of General Anderson to the effect that:--

"Whether Admiral Dewey and Consuls Pratt, Wildman, [10] and

Williams [11] did or did not give Aguinaldo assurances that a

Philippino government would be recognized, the Phillippinos

certainly thought so, judging from their acts rather than

from their words. Admiral Dewey gave them arms and ammunition,

as I did subsequently at his request." [12]

Before discussing these charges I will briefly review certain

historical facts, knowledge of which will be useful in considering

them.

In August, 1896, an insurrection against Spain had broken out in the

Philippines under the leadership of Emilio Aguinaldo, a resident of

Cavite Viejo, who had been a school teacher, and was, at that time,

_gobernadorcillo_ [13] of his town.

It had been terminated by the so-called "Treaty of Biacnabató,"

signed in Manila on December 15, 1897.

This document provided for the surrender of "Don Emilio Aguinaldo,

Supreme Chief of the Insurgents in arms," and Don Marciano Llanera

and Don Baldomero Aguinaldo, his subordinates, together with their

soldiers and arms.

"The Excellent Señor General in Chief" of the Spanish forces was to

"provide the necessary means for supporting the lives" of those who

surrendered before a certain fixed date.

In actual practice what was done was to agree to pay them $800,000

[14] in three instalments, the first of $400,000, the second and

third of $200,000 each.

Aguinaldo and certain other leaders were to take up their residence

outside the islands. Their deportation was duly provided for, and

Aguinaldo and twenty-six of his companions were taken to Hongkong,

on the Spanish steamer _Uranus_; arriving there on December 31, 1897.

On January 2, 1898, $400,000 were deposited in the Hongkong Bank,

to the credit of Aguinaldo and Co.

The Insurgent leaders remaining at Biacnabató had a meeting under the

presidency of Isabelo Artacho, an Ilocano [15] who was the ranking

officer in the absence of Aguinaldo, and requested that the second

instalment, of $200,000, be paid to them. The Spanish governor-general,

Primo de Rivera, acceded to their request, and they divided the money,

although Aguinaldo denied their right to do so, claiming that it

should have been sent to Hongkong.

The third payment of $200,000 was apparently never made. Primo de

Rivera says that he turned over a check for $200,000 to his successor,

General Augustin, in April, 1898; giving as his reason for refusing to

pay it to the Insurgents that there seemed to him to be no prospect of

its being equitably divided among those who were entitled to receive

it under the agreement.

Aguinaldo and his associates claimed that certain reforms were promised

by the Spanish government at the time the treaty of Biacnabató

was negotiated, and as these measures were not put into effect,

they organized a junta or revolutionary committee at Hongkong. It

included in its membership a number of Filipino political exiles,

then residing at that place.

The men who composed this organization soon fell to quarrelling and

it became necessary to come to a definite understanding as to its

aims. Under the arrangement finally reached, the junta, as a whole,

was charged with the work of propaganda outside of the archipelago;

with all diplomatic negotiations with foreign governments; and

with the preparation and shipment of such articles as were needed

to carry on the revolution in the Philippines. It was to be allowed

voice by Aguinaldo's government in any serious question which might

arise abroad, and would aid that government in bringing the civil

administration of the Philippines to the level of that of the most

advanced nations.

Trouble soon arose among the former Insurgent leaders over the division

of the funds deposited at Hongkong.

Taylor gives a trustworthy and concise account of the events of this

period, and as it is of historic interest, and makes clear just

how Aguinaldo came to go to Singapore, meet Pratt, and enter into

negotiations with him, I quote extensive extracts from it. [16]

"From January 4 to April 4, Aguinaldo withdrew from the

banks 5786.46 pesos in part interest on the money he had

deposited. This was used to pay the expenses of himself and his

companions in Hongkong. These expenses were kept at a minimum;

the money was drawn and spent by him. If one of the men with

him needed a new pair of shoes, Aguinaldo paid for them;

if another wanted a new coat, Aguinaldo bought it. Minute

accounts were kept, which are on file among his papers,

and it is seen from them that his expenses were exceeding

his income, which could only be 12,000 pesos a year, while he

was living at the rate of 22,000, with constant demands being

made upon him by men who came from the Philippines. Life was

not easy under these conditions. Aguinaldo's companions were

entirely dependent upon him. Their most trivial expenses had

to be approved by him, and he held them down with a strong

hand. They were men living in a strange land, among a people

whose language they did not speak, having nothing to do but

quarrel among themselves, exiles waiting for a chance to

return to their own country, which they watched with weary

eyes while they guarded the embers by which they hoped to

light the fires of a new insurrection.

"The men who had accompanied Aguinaldo to Hongkong were

not the only Filipinos domiciled there; a number of men had

taken refuge in that British colony after the events of 1872,

and some of them at least had prospered. Some of them, like

the members of the Cortes family, seem to have had almost

no relations with the followers of Aguinaldo; some, like

J. M. Basa, knew them and took part in some of the meetings of

the governing groups, but were probably not admitted to their

full confidence, as Aguinaldo and his immediate following

wanted and were working for independence and independence

alone, while the Filipinos who had long lived in Hongkong

wanted to see the archipelago lost to Spain, but had no

confidence in the ability of the country to stand alone or

in the fitness of Aguinaldo and his following to direct the

councils of a state. The character of the new refugees did

not inspire confidence in these older men, who hoped for a

protectorate by or annexation to the United States.

"On May 6, 1898, the consul-general of the United States there

informed the State Department that D. Cortés, M. Cortés,

A. Rosario, Gracio Gonzaga, and José Maria Basa (50), all

very wealthy land-owners, bankers, and lawyers of Manila,

desired to tender their allegiance and the allegiance of

their powerful families in Manila to the United States,

and that they had instructed all their connections to render

every aid to the United States forces in Manila. On May 14 he

forwarded statements of other Filipinos domiciled in Hongkong,

not members of the junta, that they desired to submit their

allegiance and the allegiance of their families in the

Philippine Islands to the United States. One of Aguinaldo's

followers, writing somewhat later, spoke with bitterness

of the rich old men who went about calling their companions

'beggarly rebels,' but these men were rich, and their names and

their apparent adhesion to the cause represented by Aguinaldo

would inspire confidence in him among men of property in

the Philippines. They were, accordingly, not to be lightly

alienated; therefore, at first, at least, no open break took

place with them, but their attitude toward the leaders of

the insurrection is shown by the fact that after the early

summer of 1898 they took no, or very little, part in the

insurgent movement, although they were living in Hongkong,

the seat of the junta, which conducted the propaganda for

the insurgent government of the Philippines.

* * * * *

"But, in fact, Aguinaldo had no just conception of the

conditions and of the opportunities which were about to open

before the Hongkong junta, for although war between Spain and

the United States was imminent and a United States squadron

was in Hongkong threatening Manila, Aguinaldo was chiefly

concerned in finding how to avoid losing the money which

had been received from the Spanish government as the price

of his surrender. The importance of his presence near the

Philippines in case of war did not occur to him, or if it did

occur to him anything which he could obtain there from the

aid of the United States probably seemed for the moment of

little consequence compared with escaping from his wrangling

companions with enough money to live on in Paris.

"Artacho, who had received 5000 pesos as his share of the

second payment, arrived in Hongkong and on April 5 demanded

200,000 pesos of the insurgent funds, probably under the

agreement that he should establish a company in Hongkong

for the benefit of the former leaders and not merely of

those who had accompanied Aguinaldo. But the leaders in

Hongkong had denounced that agreement, and refused to pay. He

then entered suit before the supreme court of Hongkong,

calling upon Aguinaldo for an accounting of the trust funds

deposited in his hands for the benefit of Artacho and others,

and asked for an injunction restraining Aguinaldo or any

member of the junta from handling or disposing of any part

of said funds. He filed as evidence copies of the Biacnabató

agreement and of the agreement made by the leaders on December

19. This suit was brought not merely in the name of Artacho,

but in that of all the exiles who were described as living

in exile in Hongkong in accordance with an agreement made

with the Spanish Government. Artacho probably had adherents

among these men, some at least of whom were utterly weary

of waiting in Hongkong and of living upon what was doled out

to them. Some at least saw no chance of any other fate than

indefinite exile spent in dependence upon the inner group

for even the means of existence.

"The suit was in equity, and called for an accounting for the

trust funds which the complainant recognized were legally

in the hands of Aguinaldo. It could be carried on only

with great difficulty without his presence and without his

account books. Meetings were held, and Artacho was denounced

as attempting to extort blackmail, but he refused to yield,

and Aguinaldo, rather than explain the inner workings of the

Hongkong junta before a British court, prepared for flight. A

summons was issued for his appearance before the supreme court

of Hongkong on April 13, 1898, but he was by that time beyond

its jurisdiction.

"He drew out the 50,000 pesos from the Chartered Bank,

which had become due according to the terms of the deposit,

and perhaps such other sums as could be drawn upon by check,

engaged passage for Europe by way of Singapore for G. H. del

Pilar, J. M. Leyba, and himself under assumed names, appointed

V. Belarmino to succeed to his functions, and gave him checks

signed in blank to draw the interest of the sums on deposit to

provide for the support of the exiles. He gave as his reason

for departure that he was going to remain under cover until

Artacho could be bought off, but he intended to go far afield

for this purpose, as he gave his destination as Europe and

the United States.

"Aguinaldo and his companions probably sailed from Hongkong

on April 8, 1898, and arrived in Singapore on April 21, after

stopping in Saigon. War between the United States and Spain

had been rendered inevitable by the resolution of Congress

demanding that Spain should withdraw her forces from Cuba,

and was declared on April 21. Although Aguinaldo and his

followers did not appreciate the influence which conditions on

the other side of the world might have upon the future of the

Philippines, it happened that in Singapore at that time there

was an Englishman named Bray who did. He had been a member of

the civil service in India, and had lived for some years in the

Philippines, but he had fallen upon evil days and was engaged

in writing letters to the Singapore _Free Press_ upon the

Philippines, and in retailing such information as was in his

possession concerning them to the United States consul-general

in Singapore, Mr. E. Spencer Pratt, for transmittal to

Commodore Dewey. Bray heard of the arrival of Aguinaldo and

realized what could be done with him, and that if the matter

were well handled it might be to his own advantage. He went

at once to see Aguinaldo and informed him that the United

States consul-general was anxious to see him. He went to the

consul-general and informed him of the importance of Aguinaldo,

and that he was in Singapore. Aguinaldo had to be persuaded

to agree to a meeting. The consul-general was anxious for it,

and it took place, according to Aguinaldo, on the night of

April 22 (according to Pratt, on the morning of April 24). The

statement made by Aguinaldo is probably correct. According

to his account book, he paid $11 on April 23, 1898, for a

telegram to the Hongkong junta concerning the negotiations

'with America.'

"Aguinaldo knew but little English, Pratt knew no Spanish, so

in their interview Bray acted as interpreter. An interpreter

who is interested in the subject of the discussion may

be a dangerous man. It is impossible to say what he told

Aguinaldo. Certainly Pratt did not know; but whatever was

said during these conversations it is within the limits

of possibility that Pratt may have been made to say by the

interpreter more than he intended, and that his statements of

what would probably be granted by the United States Government

and his expression of good wishes for the cause of Filipino

independence may have been translated as assurances and as

promises. Bray, who, according to his Filipino former friends,

was apt to talk too much, may have talked too much on this

occasion, and so the myth of the formal agreement between

Aguinaldo on behalf of the Filipino insurgents and Pratt on

behalf of the United States grew up, a fiction which Bray

himself, with a natural desire to add to his own importance,

did his best to circulate.

"Bray did not ask for his reward at the time, but probably

reckoned upon making himself indispensable as an adviser,

so that later he could make his own terms. For a time he

wrote letters of advice to Aguinaldo, which may have had

some influence upon the line of conduct which he adopted, and

later was employed in furnishing from Hongkong news to various

newspapers of events and conditions in the Philippines. His

cablegrams shortly before the outbreak of hostilities between

the United States and the insurgents were more picturesque

than veracious, but they were apparently considered effective,

as Aguinaldo ordered that he should be given $5000. He wanted

more, but the Hongkong junta did not trust him, and he ceased

to be in their employment." [17]

As we shall see, Bray did not do all of the interpreting at Singapore,

and we shall be able to determine with some accuracy what actually

transpired there.

We can now consider understandingly the charges made against Pratt

and Dewey.

It has been claimed over and over again, that Pratt promised Aguinaldo

recognition of tile independence of the Philippines if he and his

people would cooperate with the United States forces against Spain.

Aguinaldo himself made the charge in his "Reseña Verídica" [18]

in the following words:--

"In this interview Consul Pratt told me that because the

Spaniards had not complied with the agreement of Biac-na-bató,

the Filipinos had a right to renew their interrupted revolution

and advised me to take up arms anew against Spain, assuring me

that America would give the Filipinos the greatest advantages

(mayores ventajas). Then I asked the Consul what advantages the

United States would concede to the Philippines, suggesting,

when I had the proper opening, the propriety of making an

agreement in writing, to which the Consul answered that he

would report, by telegraph, on the subject to Mr. Dewey,

who was the chief of the expedition against the Philippines,

and who had ample powers from President McKinley.

"On the following day, between 10 and 12 in the morning, we

again took up the matter, Consul Pratt saying that the admiral

had answered my inquiry by saying that the United States

would at least recognize the independence of the Philippine

government under a naval protectorate, but that there was no

necessity to put it in writing, as the words of the admiral

and the American consul were sacred and would be fulfilled,

not being like those of the Spaniards, and finally, that the

Government of North America was a very honourable Government,

a very just and very powerful one." [19]

On April 27, 1908, Pratt telegraphed the Secretary of State as

follows: --

"General Aguinaldo gone my instance Hongkong arrange with

Dewey coöperation insurgents Manila.

"_Pratt_."

On the 28th he wrote the Secretary, explaining how he had come to

meet Aguinaldo, and stating just what he had done. He said:--

"At this interview, after learning from General Aguinaldo

the state of an object sought to be obtained by the present

insurrectionary movement, which, though absent from the

Philippines, he was still directing, I took it upon myself,

whilst explaining that I had no authority to speak for the

Government, to point out the danger of continuing independent

action at this stage; and, having convinced him of the

expediency of cooperating with our fleet, then at Hongkong,

and obtained the assurance of his willingness to proceed

thither and confer with Commodore Dewey to that end, should

the latter so desire, I telegraphed the Commodore the same

day as follows, through our consul-general at Hongkong:--

"'Aguinaldo, insurgent leader, here. Will come Hongkong

arrange with Commodore for general cooperation insurgents

Manila if desired. Telegraph.

"'_Pratt_.'"

The Commodore's reply read thus:--

"'Tell Aguinaldo come soon as possible.

"'_Dewey_.'"

Pratt adds:--

"I received it late at night, and at once communicated to

General Aguinaldo, who, with his aide-de-camp and private

secretary, all under assumed names, I succeeded in getting

off by the British Steamer _Malacca_, which left here on

Tuesday the 26th.

"Just previous to his departure, I had a second and last

interview with General Aguinaldo, the particulars of which

I shall give you by next mail.

"The general impressed me as a man of intelligence, ability,

and courage, and worthy the confidence that had been placed

in him.

"I think that in arranging for his direct cooperation with the

commander of our forces, I have prevented possible conflict of

action and facilitated the work of occupying and administering

the Philippines.

"If this course of mine meets with the Government's approval,

as I trust it may, I shall be fully satisfied; to Mr. Bray,

however, I consider there is due some special recognition

for most valuable services rendered.

"How that recognition can best be made I leave to you to

decide.

"I have, etc." [20]

It will be noted that Pratt explained to Aguinaldo that he had no

authority to speak for the government; that there was no mention in

the cablegrams between Pratt and Dewey of independence or indeed of

any conditions on which Aguinaldo was to coöperate, these details

being left for future arrangement with Dewey; and that Pratt thought

that he had prevented possible conflict of action and facilitated

the work of occupying and administering the Philippines.

The particulars as to the second and last interview between Aguinaldo

and Pratt were embodied in the following letter:--

"No. 213. _Consulate-General of the United States._

"_Singapore_, April 30, 1898.

"_Sir_: Referring to my dispatch No. 212, of the 28th instant,

I have the honor to report that in the second and last

interview I had with Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo on the eve of his

departure for Hongkong, I enjoined upon him the necessity,

under Commodore Dewey's direction, of exerting absolute

control over his forces in the Philippines, as no excesses

on their part would be tolerated by the American Government,

the President having declared that the present hostilities

with Spain were to be carried on in strict accord with modern

principles of civilized warfare.

"To this General Aguinaldo fully assented, assuring me that

he intended and was perfectly able, once on the field, to

hold his followers, the insurgents, in check and lead them

as our commander should direct.

"The general stated that he hoped the United States would

assume protection of the Philippines for at least long enough

to allow the inhabitants to establish a government of their

own, in the organization of which he would desire American

advice and assistance.

"These questions I told him I had no authority to discuss.

"I have, etc.,

"_E. Spencer Pratt_,

"_United States Consul-General_."

In a subsequent communication written on July 28, 1898, Pratt made

the following statement:--

"I declined even to discuss with General Aguinaldo the

question of the future policy of the United States with

regard to the Philippines, that I held out no hopes to him

of any kind, committed the government in no way whatever,

and, in the course of our confidences, never acted upon

the assumption that the Government would cooperate with

him--General Aguinaldo--for the furtherance of any plans

of his own, nor that, in accepting his said cooperation,

it would consider itself pledged to recognize any political

claims which he might put forward." [21]

What reason if any is there for denying the truth of this allegation?

I will give in full Blount's statement as to what occurred at a

meeting held at Singapore, to celebrate the early successes of Dewey

and Aguinaldo, as it constitutes his nearest approach to a direct

claim, that any one at any time promised independence:--

"First there was music by the band. Then followed the formal

reading and presentation of the address by a Dr. Santos,

representing the Filipino community of Singapore. The address

pledged the 'eternal gratitude' of the Filipino people to

Admiral Dewey and the honored addressee; alluded to the glories

of independence, and to how Aguinaldo had been enabled; by the

arrangement so happily effected with Admiral Dewey by Consul

Pratt, to arouse eight millions of Filipinos to take up arms

'in defence of those principles of justice and liberty of

which your country is the foremost champion' and trusted

'that the United States... will efficaciously second the

programme arranged between you, sir, and General Aguinaldo

in this port of Singapore, and secure to us our independence

under the protection of the United States.'

"Mr. Pratt arose and 'proceeded, speaking in French,'

says the newspaper--it does not say Alabama French, but

that is doubtless what it was--'to state his belief that the

Filipinos would prove and were now proving themselves fit for

self-government.' The gentleman from Alabama then went on to

review the mighty events and developments of the preceding six

weeks, Dewey's victory of May 1st, 'the brilliant achievements

of your own distinguished leader, General Emilio Aguinaldo,

_cooperating on land with the Americans at sea_,' etc. 'You

have just reason to be proud of what has been and is being

accomplished by General Aguinaldo and your fellow-countrymen

under his command. When, six weeks ago, I learned that General

Aguinaldo had arrived _incognito_ in Singapore, I immediately

_sought him out_. An hour's interview convinced me that he

_was the man for the occasion_; and, having communicated

with Admiral Dewey, I accordingly arranged for him to join

the latter, which he did at Cavite. The rest you know.'" [22]

Now, it happens that Dr. Santos himself forwarded his speech, and

his version of Pratt's reply thereto, in a letter to Aguinaldo, dated

Singapore, June 9, 1898. As he served as interpreter, he, if any one,

should know what Pratt said. After describing the change in tone of

the Singapore _Free Press_, with which strained relations had formerly

existed, and the subsequent friendliness of the editor of this paper

and that of the _Straits Times_, he says that on the previous afternoon

he went with the other Filipinos to greet Pratt. He continues:--

"This occasion was unusually opportune by reason of ours having

been victorious and immediately after the cry of our worthy

chief which found an echo in this colony. For this purpose 30

or more Filipinos--9 of the higher class, 15 musicians and the

remainder of the middle class--went to greet Consul A., here,

and on the invitation of Mr. Bray we ascended. He received us

in his private office, and it was imposing to see that the only

decoration was the American flag which covered the desk, and in

its centre, a carved wooden frame holding the portrait of our

worthy chief. He shook hands with all of us, and I introduced

them all. We found there also, and were introduced to, the

Editor of the _Straits Times_ and the _Free Press_ of here,

and after being thus assembled, after a musical selection,

I read the following speech in French:--

"'_His Excellency, The Consul General of the United

States of America in Singapore_:

"'_Your Excellency_: The Filipinos of all social

classes residing in this port, have come to greet

Your Excellency as the genuine representative of

the great and powerful American Republic in order to

express to you our eternal gratitude for the moral

and material support given by Admiral Dewey to our

General Aguinaldo in his campaign for the liberty of

eight million Filipinos. The latter and we ourselves

hope that the United States, your nation, persevering

in its humanitarian policy, will without cessation and

(with) decided energy continue to support the programme

agreed upon in Singapore between Your Excellency and

General Aguinaldo, that is to say, the Independence

of the Philippine Islands, under an American

protectorate. Accept our cordial acknowledgments and

congratulations on being the first one in accepting

and supporting this idea which time and events have

well developed to the great satisfaction of our

nation. Finally, we request you, Most Excellent Sir,

to express to your worthy President and the American

Republic, our sincere acknowledgments and our fervent

wishes for their prosperity. I have concluded.'

"The Consul replied hereto in French, in more or less the

following terms:--

"'You have nothing to thank me for, because I have only

faithfully followed the instructions received from my

Government; the fact of the sudden departure of your General

will permit you to infer that I have done so. I shall in any

case inform my Government of your good wishes and I thank you

in its name. You know that your wishes are mine also, and for

this reason at the last interview I had with Mr. Aguinaldo,

I repeated to him that he should observe the greatest humanity

possible in the war, in order that our army, our soldiers,

our nation and all the other nations may see that you are

humane and not savages, as has erroneously been believed.'

"After this there was enthusiastic applause for the Consul;

he offered us all cigars, glasses of very fine sherry, and

lemonade for the musicians and the majority. The toasts were

offered with the sherry by your humble servant, Sres. Cannon,

Enríquez, Celio, Reyes, the Consul, the editors of the _Free

Press_, _Straits Times_ and Mr. Bray. We drank to America

and her humanitarian work of redemption; to the Philippines

with America; we gave thanks to the Consul, to Mr. Bray as an

important defender; we drank to the _Free Press_ for taking

such an interest in our affairs, and to the _Straits Times_

(sarcastically); but I was very careful not to propose a toast

to our general, which was done at the proper time by 'Flaco'

[23] when we gave three cheers; for the sake of courtesy we

cheered for England, which had been so hospitable to us, and

when everybody had become quiet, the Editor of the _Straits

Times_ took his glass in his hand and cried in a loud voice,

'The Philippine Republic,' to which we all responded. 'Flaco'

disappeared a moment, and when he returned he brought with

him the American flag, and formally presented it to us in

French, which I interpreted to all in Spanish, as follows:

'Gentlemen: The American Consul, with his deep affection for

us, presents us this flag as the greatest and most expressive

remembrance which he can give us. The red stripes stand for

the generous blood of her sons, shed to obtain her liberty;

the white stripes stand for her virginity and purity as our

country; the blue background indicates the sky and each star

represents a free and independent State; this is America, and

the Consul is desirous that we also should have so glorious

a history as hers and that it may be as brilliant as could

be wished, securing peace with respect, and may God be our

help and guide in securing liberty. Viva and with it our

most sincere thanks for so signal a courtesy.' Hereupon, to

the surprise of everybody as no one expected it, the Consul

requested that some Filipino airs be played which seemed to

please him very much. Finally, about 6.15, we left, very well

satisfied with the reception accorded us and the kindness

of the Consul. Mr. Bray asked me for the text of my speech,

which I insert above and I secured from the Consul his French

text, which I enclose in my letter to Naning. Without anything

further for the present, awaiting your reply and your opinion

as to the above, as also orders and instructions for the

future, I am,

"Yours, etc.

(Signed) "_Isidoro de los Santos_."

To this letter Major Taylor has appended the following note:--

"(_Note by Compiler._--In a letter written in Tagalog to

Aguinaldo on June 6 by Santos he describes the American consul

general as having cried out 'Hurrah for General Aguinaldo,

hurrah for the Republic of the Philippines' and then, having

apparently taken several drinks, he passed up and down the

room waving the American flag before giving it to the assembled

Filipinos (P.I.R., 406.7).)" [24]

This final statement does not present the representative of the United

States government at Singapore in a very favourable light, but I take

the facts as I find them. If now we compare the speech actually made

by Dr. Santos with Blount's version of it, we shall find that with

the exception of the words "eternal gratitude" the passages which

he encloses in quotation marks are not in the original at all. The

glories of independence are not alluded to, nor is there so much as

a suggestion that Aguinaldo had been enabled to arouse eight millions

of Filipinos to take up arms, which he certainly had not done.

Dr. Santos in his speech did resort to a stereotyped Filipino procedure

so very commonly employed that those of us who have dealt much with

his people have learned to meet it almost automatically. It consists

in referring to one's having said just exactly what one did not say,

and then if one fails to note the trap and avoid it, in claiming that

because one did not deny the allegation one has admitted its truth.

Aguinaldo himself later repeatedly resorted to this procedure in his

dealings with Dewey and others.

In the present instance Santos employed it rather cleverly when he

expressed the hope that the United States would "continue to support

the programme agreed upon in Singapore, between your Excellency and

General Aguinaldo, that is to say, the independence of the Philippine

Islands under an American protectorate."

Now if this was agreed to, Aguinaldo later constantly violated his

part of the agreement, for we shall see that he stated over and

over again, in correspondence with members of the junta and others,

that a protectorate would be considered only if absolute independence

finally proved unattainable, but there is no reason to believe that

any such agreement was made.

Dr. Santos read his speech to Mr. Pratt in French. Blount implies,

whether rightly or wrongly I do not know, that Pratt's knowledge

of French was poor. At all events Pratt in his reply made not the

slightest reference to the hope expressed by Santos that the United

States would continue to support the programme which Santos said

had been agreed upon between Pratt and Aguinaldo, and claim of a

promise of independence based on these speeches must obviously be

abandoned. There is no doubt that Pratt personally sympathized with

the ambitions of the Filipino leaders, and openly expressed his

sympathy on this and other occasions, but to do this was one thing

and to have attempted to compromise his government would have been

another and very different one. The shrewd Filipinos with whom he

was dealing understood this difference perfectly well.

It is a regrettable fact that there exists some reason to believe that

his sympathy was not purely disinterested. Aguinaldo claims that Pratt

wished to be appointed "representative of the Philippines in the United

States to promptly secure the official recognition of our independence"

and that he promised him "a high post in the customs service." [25]

It will be noted that several sentences and phrases in Blount's

statement are enclosed in quotation marks. From what were they

quoted? The next paragraph in his book tells us:--

"Says the newspaper clipping which has preserved the Pratt

oration: At the conclusion of Mr. Pratt's speech, refreshments

were served, and as the Filipinos, _being Christians,

drink alcohol_, there was no difficulty in arranging as to

refreshments." [26]

The use of this clipping from the Singapore _Free Press_ illustrates

admirably Blount's methods. The _Free Press_ had at first displayed

a marked coldness toward the insurgent cause, but its editor,

Mr. St. Clair, was opportunely "seen" by Bray, who reported that as a

result of his visit, both the editor and the paper would thereafter be

friendly, and they were. In other words, the _Free Press_ became the

Singapore organ of the insurrection, and its editor, according to Bray,

"a true and loyal friend" of Aguinaldo.

Blount claims to have made "an exhaustive examination of the records

of that period." [27] Why then did he use as evidence a newspaper

clipping from an Insurgent organ, instead of Santos's letter?

Blount endeavours to make capital out of the fact that Pratt forwarded

to the State Department a proclamation which he says was gotten up

by the Insurgent leaders at Hongkong and sent to the Philippines in

advance of Aguinaldo's coming. He says that it was headed "America's

Allies" and quotes from it as follows:--

"Compatriots: Divine Providence is about to place independence

within our reach.... The Americans, not from mercenary

motives, but for the sake of humanity and the lamentations

of so many persecuted people, have considered it opportune,

etc. [Here follows a reference to Cuba.] At the present

moment an American squadron is preparing to sail for the

Philippines.... The Americans will attack by sea and prevent

any reënforcements coming from Spain; ... we insurgents must

attack by land. Probably you will have more than sufficient

arms, because the Americans have arms and will find means

to assist us. _There where you see the American flag flying,

assemble in numbers; they are our redeemers!_" [28]

The translation that he used is that given in Senate Document No. 62,

L. 60, and is none too accurate. He allows it to be inferred that

this proclamation was actually issued. It was not. Its history is

as follows:--

On May 16, 1898, J. M. Basa, a Filipino, who had lived in Hongkong

since 1872, on account of his connection with the troubles of that

year, wrote letters [29] to a number of friends recommending the

widest possible circulation of a proclamation enclosed therewith, as

an aid to the American policy in the Philippines "in the war against

the tyrannical friars and the Spaniards."

With these letters there were sent two different proclamations,

each beginning with the words "Fellow Countrymen." The first, which

is the one referred to by Blount, continues:--

"Divine Providence places us in a position to secure our

independence, and this under the freest form to which all

individuals, all people, all countries, may aspire.

"The Americans, more for humanity than for self-interest,

attentive to the complaints of so many persecuted Filipinos,

find it opportune to extend to our Philippines their protective

mantle, now that they find themselves obliged to break their

friendship with the Spanish people, because of the tyranny

they have exercised in Cuba, causing all Americans, with whom

they have great commercial relations, enormous damages.

"At this moment an American fleet is prepared to go to the

Philippines.

"We, your fellow-countrymen, fear that you will make use of

your arms to fire upon the Americans. No, brothers; do not

make such a mistake; rather (shoot) kill yourselves than

treat our liberators as enemies.

"Do not pay attention to the decree of Primo de Rivera,

calling on you to enlist for the war, for that will cost

you your lives: rather die than act as ingrates toward our

redeemers, the Americans.

* * * * *

"Note well that the Americans have to attack by sea, at the

same time avoiding reinforcements which may come from Spain;

therefore the insurrection must attack by land. Perhaps you

will have more than sufficient arms, as the Americans have

arms, and will find the means to aid you.

"Whenever you see the American flag, bear in mind that they

are our redeemers." [30]

On the margin is written: "Viva, for America with the Philippines!"

Apparently what Basa here means by independence is independence from

Spain, for it is known that he was in favour of annexation to the

United States, and in the second proclamation we find the following:--

"This is the best opportunity which we have ever had for

contriving that our country (all the Philippine Archipelago)

may be counted as another Star in the Great Republic of

the United States, great because of its wisdom, its wealth,

and its constitutional laws.

"Now is the time to offer ourselves to that great nation. With

America we shall have development in the broadest sense

(of advancement) in civilization.

"With America we shall be rich, civilized and happy.

"Fellow patriots, add your signatures to those which have

already been given. Explain to all our fellow countrymen the

benefits of this change, which will be blessed by Heaven,

by men and by our children.

"Viva America with the Philippines!!!" [31]

The letters were undoubtedly given to Aguinaldo for delivery on his

arrival. They were never delivered, and it is reasonable to suppose,

especially as Basa, who was a man of importance and means, was a

member of the group who desired annexation to the United States, that

Aguinaldo took the letters along in order to avoid a rupture with him

and then quietly suppressed them. Obviously, however, he sent or gave

a copy of the first one to Pratt, presumably without the written words:

"Viva, for America with the Philippines!"

And now comes a bit of evidence as to what occurred at Singapore

which I consider incontrovertible.

Aguinaldo returned promptly to Hongkong and on May 4, 1898, a meeting

of the junta was held. The minutes of this meeting, [32] signed by

each of the several Filipinos present, form a part of the Insurgent

records which have come into the possession of the United States

Government. They state among other things that:--

"The temporary Secretary read the minutes of the preceding

meeting, which were approved. The temporary President reported

that D. Emilio Aguinaldo had just arrived from Singapore and

it became necessary for him to take possession of the office

to which he has been elected."

After the transaction of some further business Aguinaldo was summoned,

appeared at the meeting, and was duly installed as President. Then:--

"The President described the negotiations which took place

during his absence in Singapore with the American Consul of

that English colony. Both agreed that the President should

confer with the Admiral commanding the American squadron in

Mirs Bay, and if the latter should accept his propositions,

advantageous, in his judgment, to the Philippines, he would go

to said country in one of the cruisers which form the fleet

for the purpose of taking part in the present events. And

as he did not find the Admiral, he thought it well to have

an interview with the American Consul of this colony on the

day of his arrival, but was not satisfied with such interview.

"Considering the critical conditions in the Philippines at

present, he begged the committee to discuss the advisability of

his going to said islands with all the leaders of prominence

in the last rebellion residing in this colony, in case the

Admiral gave them an opportunity to do so."

Note that there is here absolutely not one word of any promise

of independence made to Aguinaldo by Pratt or any one else. Is it

conceivable that Aguinaldo in describing "the negotiations which

took place during his absence in Singapore with the American Consul

of the English Colony" would, by any chance, have failed to inform

his associates in Hongkong of such an extraordinary and fortunate

occurrence as the promising by Mr. Pratt and Admiral Dewey that the

United States would recognize Philippine independence?

Sandico [33] thought that Aguinaldo ought to go, for--

"From conferences which he had with the Admiral of the

American fleet and with the American Consul in this colony,

he believed that under present conditions it was absolutely

necessary for the President to go to the Philippines, since,

according to the American Consul, Manila had been taken by

said fleet, and a provisional government was now being formed

in that capital. The intervention of the President in the

formation of that government is undoubtedly essential, since

his prestige, which everybody recognizes, would evidently

prevent dissensions among the sons of the country, and it

would be possible thereby to obtain a perfect organization

both for the military and civil evolution of that country.

"Srs. Garchitorena [34] and Apacible [35] expressed themselves

in similar terms. Notwithstanding the previous remarks,

the President insisted that he considered it reckless for

him to go to the Philippines without first making a written

agreement with the Admiral, as it might happen, if he placed

himself at his orders, that he might make him subscribe to

or sign a document containing proposals highly prejudicial

to the interests of the country, from which might arise the

following two very grave contingencies:

"1st. If he should accept them, he would undoubtedly commit

an unpatriotic act, and his name would justly be eternally

cursed by the Filipinos.

"2d. If he should refuse, then the break between the two

would be evident.

"And to avoid this sad dilemma, he proposed to the committee

that the four parties (?) of the insurgents now here, under

charge of the competent chiefs authorized in writing by him,

should go to the Philippines to intervene, after a conference

with the Admiral, in these important questions; such means,

in his opinion, should be first employed to ascertain in an

authentic manner what the intentions of the United States

in regard to that country are; and if his intervention is

absolutely necessary, he would not object to go at once to

the Philippines, endeavouring by all the means in his power

to remedy the critical condition of the country, to which he

had offered, and always would willingly offer, to sacrifice

his life."

Why adopt means to learn from the admiral what the intentions of the

United States were in regard to the Philippines if both he and Pratt

had already promised recognition of independence?

"Srs. Sandico, Garchitorena, Gonzaga [36] and Apacible

replied that they were fully convinced the Admiral of the

American squadron would furnish the President all the arms

which he might desire, since the former was convinced that

the fleet could do nothing in the Philippines unless it were

used in conjunction with the insurgents in the development

of their plans of war against the Spanish government.... The

authority to treat which the President desired to give to the

other chiefs, without reflecting at all upon their personal

qualifications, they did not believe would be as efficacious

as his personal intervention which is necessary in grave

affairs, such as those the subject of discussion; there would

be no better occasion than that afforded them to insure the

landing of the expeditionary forces on those islands and to

arm themselves at the expense of the Americans and to assure

the situation of the Philippines in regard to our legitimate

aspirations against those very people. The Filipino people,

unprovided with arms, would be the victims of the demands

and exactions of the United States; but, provided with arms,

would be able to oppose themselves to them, struggling for

independence, in which consists the true happiness of the

Philippines. And they finished by saying that it made no

difference if the Spanish government did demand the return

of the P400,000, and if the demand were allowed in an action,

since the object of the sum would be obtained by the Admiral

furnishing the Filipinos the arms which they required for

the struggle for their legitimate aspirations."

Here, then, was a definite plan to obtain arms from the Americans to

be used if necessary "against those very people" later.

"The President, with his prestige in the Philippines, would be

able to arouse those masses to combat the demands of the United

States, if they colonized that country, and would drive them,

if circumstances rendered it necessary, to a Titanic struggle

for their independence, even if they should succumb in shaking

off the yoke of a new oppressor. If Washington proposed to

carry out the fundamental principles of its constitution,

there was no doubt that it would not attempt to colonize the

Philippines, or even to annex them. It was probable then that

it would give them independence and guarantee it; in such

case the presence of the President was necessary, as he would

prevent dissensions among the sons of the country who sought

office, who might cause the intervention of European powers, an

intervention which there was no reason to doubt would be highly

prejudicial to the interests of the country.... What injury

could come to the Philippines, even if we admitted that the

Admiral would not give arms to the President on account of his

refusal to sign a document prejudicial to the country, after

he had taken all means to provide for her defence? None. Such

an act of the President could not be censured, but, on the

other hand, would be most meritorious, because it would be

one proof more of his undoubted patriotism."

Not one word of any promise of independence do we find in this

remarkable document. On the contrary it furnishes conclusive proof

that no such promise had been made and that the future relations

between Filipinos and Americans were still completely uncertain.

And now comes some direct evidence. Bray and St. Clair, the latter

the editor of the Insurgent organ in Singapore, were present on

the occasion when independence was said to have been promised by

Pratt. Bray subsequently declared in the most positive terms that it

was promised. St. Clair wrote him a letter taking him roundly to task

for this claim, in the following very interesting terms:--

"I felt it to be my duty to let Pratt know that you still hold

that you and Santos have evidence that will controvert his,

(and) he was, of course, extremely disappointed, because he

(is) quite aware of what took place in Spanish, and as to

turning of his conversation into a pretense of agreement

he knows nothing. He says very truly: 'My own party, the

Democrats, will say if they read this book--If this man takes

it upon himself to be a Plenipotentiary without authority, we

had better not employ him any more--I frankly cannot understand

your action, as to its unwisdom I have no doubt at all.'

"Admiral Dewey goes home, it is believed, to advise the

President on Naval and Colonial Affairs, he knows exactly

what did take place and what did not, and I should know if

he had any ground to think that the slightest promise was

made by Pratt to Aguinaldo he would declare it unauthorized

and decline to sanction it. I am certain Pratt reported what

he supposed took place accurately; he had no surety on what

you might have said, naturally.

"And, curiously, you never mentioned to me anything of

the agreement as having taken place then, nor in the paper

you communicated to me was there any mention of one, nor

did Pratt know of any. It is only more recently that the

fiction took shape. 'The wish father to the thought,' or

the statement repeated till it has become believed by the--,

[37] this is common.

"Now I would like to urge you, from the practical point

of view, to drop any such foolishness. The vital thing,

and nothing else counts, is what Dewey said and did when

he at last met Aguinaldo. That, that, that, is the thing,

all else is empty wind.

"Supposing that Pratt and Wildman had covered inches of

paper with 'Clauses' and put on a ton of sealing wax as

consular seals, what, pray, to any common sense mind would

all that have been worth? Nothing!! Nothing!! And yet,

where is the agreement, where is the seal? Where are there

any signatures? And if you had them--waste paper--believe

me, that all this potter about Pratt and Wildman is energy

misdirected. The sole thing to have impressed upon the

public in America would be the chaining of Dewey and

Aguinaldo together as participants in common action; you

surely comprehend this means! Think and think again; it

means success as far as it is possible. The other work is

not only lost, but does not gain much sympathy, especially

this criticism of the conduct of American troops; things may

be true that are not expedient to say. Sink everything into

Dewey-Aguinaldo coöperation, that was on both sides honest

even if it did not imply any actual arrangement, which, of

course, Dewey himself could not make. That here you have the

facts,--undenied--incontrovertible." [38]

The following letter of Bray to Aguinaldo, dated January 12, 1899,

seems to me to throw much light on the question of how these claims

relative to the promised recognition of Filipino independence sometimes

originated and were bolstered up:--

"With regard to your proclamation, there is still a trump card

to be played. Did you not say that the basis of any negotiation

in Singapore was the Independence of the Philippines under an

American protectorate? This is what Consul Pratt telegraphed

and to which Dewey and Washington agreed; as I figured up

the 'price' of the telegram, I know very well what occurred,

and I am ready to state it and to swear to it when the proper

time comes. There are five of us against one in the event of

Consul Pratt receiving instructions to deny it. Furthermore,

Mr. St. Clair knows what happened and I am certain that he

also would testify. St. Clair still has the rough draft as

an historical relic, and St. Clair is a true and loyal friend

of yours, as is your humble servant." [39]

The utter unscrupulousness of Bray is shown by his claim that St. Clair

would confirm his false statements, made as it was after receiving

St. Clair's letter above quoted.

But Bray did not wait for Aguinaldo to play this trump card. He tried

to play it himself by cabling Senator Hoar, on the same day, that as

the man who introduced General Aguinaldo to the American government

through the consul at Singapore he was prepared to swear that the

conditions under which Aguinaldo promised to cooperate with Dewey

were independence under a protectorate. [40]

Let us now trace Aguinaldo's subsequent movements, and see what

promises, if any, were made to him by Wildman and Dewey. He had

returned to Hongkong with two companions, all travelling under assumed

names. Only his most trusted friends among the members of the junta

were at first allowed to know where he was living.

His situation was a difficult one. It was necessary for him to come

to some sort of a temporary arrangement with Artacho, if he was to

avoid legal difficulties, and to reëstablish himself with some of

his companions, who had accused him of deserting with the intention

of going to Europe to live on money which belonged to them. When

harmony had been temporarily restored through the good offices of

Sandico, Aguinaldo had an interview with Consul General Wildman. He

has since claimed that Wildman, too, promised him independence, but

the truth seems to be that he himself said he was anxious to become

an American citizen. This being impossible, he wanted to return to

the Philippines and place himself under Dewey's orders. He wanted to

help throw off the yoke of Spain, and this done, would abide by the

decision of the United States as to the fate of the Philippines. [41]

Any claim that Aguinaldo had been promised independence by Wildman, or,

indeed, that the latter had been allowed to know that the Filipinos

desired it, seems to me to be negatived, not only by Wildman's own

statements, but by a letter from Agoncillo to Aguinaldo written on

August 5, 1908, in which he says:--

"The American consul left my house to-day at 3 o'clock, as I

had requested an interview with him before his departure, and

I was unable to go to the Consulate on account of the swelling

of my feet. From our conversation I infer that independence

will be given to us. I did not, however, disclose to him

our true desires.... Said consul approved my telegram to

McKinley, which has been sent to-day through him, a copy of

which is herewith enclosed. If they accept our representative

in the commission, we may arrive at a friendly understanding,

and it will enable us to prepare for the fight in case they

refuse to listen to our request. On the other hand, if at

the very beginning they refuse to admit our representative,

we will at once be in a position to know what should be done,

_i.e._ to prepare for war." [42]

On May 4, 1898, the Hongkong junta voted that Aguinaldo ought to go

to the Philippines, and go he did. It would seem that he at first gave

up the idea of joining Dewey, for on May 11 he wrote a cipher letter,

giving minute directions for the preparation of signals to assist

his ship in making land, by day or by night, at Dingalan Bay on the

east coast of Luzon; directing the capture of the town of San Antonio,

just back of Capones Islands, in Zambales, and ending with the words:

"We will surely arrive at one of the two places above mentioned,

so you must be prepared."

Something led him again to change his mind, and he finally sailed on

the _McCulloch_.

In his "Reseña Verídica" written later for political purposes,

Aguinaldo has definitely claimed that Dewey promised him that

the United States would recognize the independence of the Filipino

people. I will let him tell his own story, confronting his statements

with those of the admiral.

"May 19, 1898.

"The _McCulloch_ started at eleven o'clock on the morning of

the 17th of May for the Philippines; we anchored, between

twelve and one o'clock on the afternoon of the 19th, in

the waters of Cavite, and immediately the launch of the

Admiral--with his aid and private secretary--came to convey

me to the _Olympia_, where I was received, with my aid,

Sr. Leyva, with the honors of a general, by a section of

marine guards." [43]

Relative to this matter, Admiral Dewey has testified: [44]

"_The Chairman_. You, of course, never saluted the flag?

_Admiral Dewey_. Certainly not; and I do not think I ever

called Aguinaldo anything but Don Emilio; I don't think I

ever called him 'General.'

_The Chairman_. And when he came on board ship was he received

with any special honors at the side?

_Admiral Dewey_. Never."

The "Reseña Verídica" continues:--

"The Admiral received me in a salon, and after greetings of

courtesy I asked him 'if all the telegrams relative to myself

which he had addressed to the Consul at Singapore, Mr. Pratt,

were true.' He replied in the affirmative, and added, 'that

the United States had come to the Philippines to protect its

natives and free them from the yoke of Spain.'

He said, moreover, that 'America was rich in territory and

money, and needed no colonies,' concluding by assuring me,

'to have no doubt whatever about the recognition of Philippine

independence by the United States.' Thereupon he asked me

if I could get the people to arise against the Spaniards and

carry on a rapid campaign." [45]

As we have seen, Dewey sent only one telegram to Pratt about

Aguinaldo. It merely directed that the latter be sent.

"I then expressed to him my profound acknowledgment for the

generous help which the United States was giving the Filipino

people, as well as my admiration for the magnificence and

goodness of the American people. I also stated to him that

'before leaving Hongkong, the Filipino Colony had held a

meeting, at which was discussed and considered the possibility

that--after defeating the Spaniards--the Filipinos might have a

war with the Americans, if they should refuse to recognize our

independence, who were sure to defeat us because they should

find us tired out, poor in ammunitions and worn out in the war

against the Spaniards,' requesting that he pardon my frankness.

"The Admiral replied that he 'was delighted at my sincerity,

and believed that both Filipinos and Americans should treat

each other as allies and friends, clearly explaining all

doubts for the better understanding between both parties,' and

added that, 'so he had been informed, the United States would

recognize the independence of the Filipino people, guaranteed

by the word of honor of the Americans,--more binding than

documents which may remain unfulfilled when it is desired

to fail in them as happened with the compacts signed by the

Spaniards, advising me to form at once a Filipino national

flag, offering in virtue thereof to recognize and protect

it before the other nations, which were represented by the

various squadrons then in the Bay; although he said we should

conquer the power from the Spaniards before floating said

flag, so that the act should be more honourable in the sight

of the whole world, and, above all, before the United States,

in order that when the Filipino ships with their national

flag would pass before the foreign squadrons they should

inspire respect and esteem.'

"Again I thanked the Admiral for his good advice and generous

offers, informing him that if the sacrifice of my life was

necessary to honor the Admiral before the United States,

I was then ready to sacrifice it.

"I added that under such conditions I could assure him that

all the Filipino people would unite in the revolution to

shake off the yoke of Spain; that it was not strange that

some few were not yet on his side on account of lack of arms

or because of personal expediency.

"Thus ended this first conference with Admiral Dewey, to whom

I announced that I would take up my residence at the Naval

Headquarters in the Cavite Arsenal." [46]

Further on, in the same document, Aguinaldo advances the claim that

on the occasion of the visit of General Anderson and Admiral Dewey

the latter again promised him independence.

He says:--

"In the same month of July, the Admiral, accompanied by General

Anderson, presented himself, and after greetings of courtesy

said to me: 'You have seen confirmed all of what I promised

and said to you. How pretty your flag is. It has a triangle,

and it looks like Cuba's. Will you give me one as a reminder

when I return to America?'

"I replied to him that I was convinced of his word of

honour and that there was no necessity whatever to draw up

in documentary form his agreements, and as for the flag,

that he could count on it, even at that very moment.

"Dewey continued: 'Documents are not complied with when

there is no honour, as has happened with your agreement

with the Spaniards, who have failed in what was written

and signed. Trust in my word for I hold myself responsible

that the United States will recognize the independence of

the country. But I recommend to you [plural.--TR.] to keep

everything which we have talked about and agreed upon with

a great deal of secrecy for the present. And, moreover,

I entreat you [plural.--TR.] to be patient if our soldiers

should insult some Filipino, because, as volunteers, they

are yet lacking in discipline.'" [47]

Admiral Dewey has testified as follows, concerning the recognition

of Philippine independence by him:--

"_The Chairman_. You remember the question of your recognizing

his republic was a good deal discussed and you wrote me a

letter, which I read in the senate. Of course, I am only

asking now about what you said in the letter. There was no

recognition of the republic?

"_Admiral Dewey_. Never. I did not think I had any authority to

do it and it never occurred to me to do it. There was a sort

of a reign of terror; there was no government. These people

had got power for the first time in their lives and they

were riding roughshod over the community. The acts of cruelty

which were brought to my notice were hardly credible. I sent

word to Aguinaldo that he must treat his prisoners kindly,

and he said he would."

He has further testified that he never as much as heard of independence

until the appearance of Aguinaldo's proclamation of June 15, 1898:--

"_Admiral Dewey_.... Then when I heard that our troops were

coming I asked him to withdraw his troops from Cavite and make

room for our men. He demurred at this, but finally withdrew

and established headquarters across the bay at a place called

Bacoor, from which place on the 15th of June he sent me a

proclamation declaring the independence of the Philippines.

"_The Chairman_. Was that the first?

"_Admiral Dewey_. That was the first intimation; the first

I had ever heard of independence of the Philippines.

"_The Chairman_. He had said something to you--

"_Admiral Dewey_. Not a word. He had done what I told him. He

was most obedient; whatever I told him to do he did. I attached

so little importance to this proclamation that I did not even

cable its contents to Washington, but forwarded it through

the mails. I never dreamed that they wanted independence."

Remembering that Admiral Dewey was not being interrogated as to the

statements of the "Reseña Veridica," it will be seen that he has,

nevertheless, covered them fully.

It was my good fortune to be long and intimately associated with

Admiral Dewey while serving on the first Philippine commission. He

always grew indignant when the subject of any promises relative to

independence said to have been made by him was so much as mentioned,

and gave to the commission in writing the following:--

"The statement of Emilio Aguinaldo, under date of Sept. 23,

published in the _Springfield Republican_, so far as it

relates to reported conversations with me, or actions of mine,

is a tissue of falsehood. I never, directly or indirectly,

promised the Filipinos independence. I never received Aguinaldo

with military honors, or recognized or saluted the so-called

Filipino flag. I never considered him as an ally, although

I did make use of him and the natives to assist me in my

operations against the Spaniards." [48]

As Dewey's allegations flatly contradict those of Aguinaldo, we

must choose between the two. While I have no doubt as to where

the choice will fall, I will now submit some additional matter of

interest. Let us first consider the history of the "Reseña Verídica"

in which Aguinaldo makes the charges above quoted. On September 12,

1899, Buencamino wrote of it to Apacible in Hongkong, saying:--

"This work is entitled 'Reseña Verídica de la Revolución

Filipina' in which Don Emilio relates in detail his acts with

Admiral Dewey. It has been distributed to the Consuls and

you are ordered to reprint it there translated into English

and send some copies to the United States, even though only

a thousand, if you deem it advisable. Send copies also to

Europe, Señor Agoncillo taking charge of the publication. If

the Agent you may have selected for the United States should

still be there, it would be advisable for him to take a copy

of the pamphlet with him for its publication.

"This is an order of the Government which I take pleasure in

transmitting to you for due execution." [49]

But there was a change of heart about giving the pamphlet to the

consuls, for under date of September 30 Buencamino wrote:--

"We have not distributed them here in order that Otis may

not counteract the effects that we desire to produce with

this publication, through his usual machinations. Nor do we

believe it advisable to make this pamphlet public in those

colonies before your arrival in the United States." [50]

To this letter he added in cipher the following postscript to Pablo

Ocampo, in charge of Aguinaldo's correspondence in Manila:--

"At last moment--Nota bene:

"Don't deliver any copy of the 'Reseña Verídica' to the

Consuls, even though it was so directed in the beginning of

the letter. All except one, which is for you, will be sent

to Hong-kong, Don Pedro de la Viña being bearer of the same,

as also of the other documents. The copy intended for you

is neither to be divulged nor published, for strict reserve

is required until those which are being sent arrive at their

destination." [51]

The reason for preserving such secrecy relative to this document

until it could reach its destination and work its harm is of course

obvious. Its statements were so outrageously false that they would

have been instantly and authoritatively contradicted had it been

issued seasonably at Manila.

The truth is that Aguinaldo's claim that he had been promised

independence was a gradual growth. Let us trace it.

On May 21, he wrote a circular letter to "My dear brother," inviting

the recipients and their companions to meet him at once, and arrange

the best way to entrap all the enemy in their homes.

In this he says that he has promised the American admiral that they

will "carry on modern war" and adds: "Even if a Spaniard surrenders,

he must be pardoned and treated well, and then you will see that

our reputation will be very good in all Europe, which will declare

for our independence; but if we do not conduct ourselves thus, the

Americans will decide to sell us or else divide up our territory. As

they will hold us incapable of governing our land, we shall not secure

our liberty, rather the contrary; our own soil will be delivered over

to other hands." [52]

In this letter, written on the very day of the interview at which he

subsequently claimed that Admiral Dewey had promised independence,

does he make any claim that this had occurred? No, he very distinctly

implies the contrary. Is it believable that if he could truly have

said "The United States, through its representatives Dewey and Pratt,

has promised to recognize our independence" he would have failed to

do so when this would instantly have secured him the vigorous support

which he was then uncertain of obtaining? I think not.

In this letter Aguinaldo specifically directs that deceit be employed

and that Spanish officers be treacherously attacked. The practising of

deceit was a carefully considered part of the insurgent policy. In a

letter from Hongkong dated July 21, 1898, Agoncillo writes as follows

to Mabini: [53]--

"the time will come when disguises must be set aside and

we will see who is deceiving whom. The statements made by

some of the commanders of the fleet here to Don Emilio and

myself were to the effect that the exclusive purpose of the

Government at Washington with regard to the Filipinos, is to

grant this country independence, without any conditions,

although I said to myself that such a purpose was too

philanthropical. Don Emilio knew what I thought then, and

I still think the same; that is to say that we are the ones

who must secure the independence of our country by means of

unheard of sacrifices and thus work out its happiness." [54]

Aguinaldo himself frankly advocated the use of deceit. He practised

what he preached. Simeon Villa, one of his companions on his

subsequent flight through Northern Luzon, before he finally took

refuge at Palanan, kept a diary, which constitutes an official record

of this long journey. In it he has inserted some bits of history of

other days, of which none is more interesting than his account of the

beginning of hostilities against the Spaniards, in August, 1896. From

it we learn that Aguinaldo, who was known to the friar of his town to

be both a mason and a chief of the Katipúnan, was in danger during

August, and on the night of the 29th of that month called a meeting

of all the compromised persons of the place, who agreed that on the

following day he should "make representations to the governor of the

province." Villa says that he was greatly beloved by the governor and

his wife. Early on the following morning, he "presented himself to the

governor, and in the name of the people of Cavite Viejo, offered him

their respects and their loyalty to Spain," at the same time asking

a garrison of a hundred men for his town, which the governor promised

to send at once if the captain-general approved.

That afternoon he reported the results of his efforts to his

fellow-conspirators, "and told them that then was the opportune moment

for rising against the Spaniards." He initiated the uprising himself

the next morning. [55]

Could deceit be more deliberately practised or treachery more frankly

employed?

I have indulged in this digression to show that Aguinaldo could

hardly have complained had the methods which he used against others

been employed against him. He was never deceived by the Americans,

but his claims relative to independence grew rapidly, and he was soon

deceiving his own people.

On May 24th, he issued no less than four proclamations. One of

these, doubtless intended to be seen by Americans, made no mention

of Independence, but said: [56]--

"The great powerful North American nation has offered its disinterested

protection to secure the liberty of this country."

In another proclamation, doubtless intended for a different use,

he made the statement that the great North American nation had come

to give decisive and disinterested protection, "considering us as

sufficiently civilized and capable of governing ourselves." [57]

On June 5, having practically gained control of Cavite Province, he

felt strong enough to announce that independence would be proclaimed

on June 12, and on that date he did proclaim it in a decree.

The Admiral of the American Squadron, with the commanders and officers

of his command, was invited to the ceremonies, but none of them

went. As it was important for Aguinaldo to have some one there to

pose as a representative of the United States, he utilized for this

purpose a certain "Colonel" Johnson, an ex-hotel keeper of Shanghai,

who was running a cinematograph show. He appeared as Aguinaldo's chief

of artillery and the representative of the North American nation. [58]

* * * * *

Even as late as October 3, 1898, Agoncillo in a memorandum addressed to

President McKinley did not claim that independence had been promised,

but said:--

"As soon as the Spanish-American war began, the American

representatives and officials in Singapore, Hongkong and

Manila, invited the natives of the Philippines to assist

the American arms, which they did gladly and loyally, as

allies, with the conviction that their personality would

be recognized, as well as their political, autonomous and

sovereign rights." [59]

In it he does, however, claim that the organization of a government

independent of America and Spain was accomplished with the tacit

consent of the admiral commanding the fleet and with that of the

general and military and political commanders of the United States

of North America in the Philippines.

"Who, knowing these facts, not only did not object but accepted

them as a consummated legal act, and maintained official

relations with the new organization, making use thereof in

its subsequent actions and for the subsequent development of

the campaign, which was consequently brought to such a happy

end." [60]

This is a second illustration of the stereotyped insurgent procedure

of announcing a policy and then claiming that failure to attack it

meant acquiescence in it. Admiral Dewey says that he did not even read

this proclamation. There was no reason why he should have done so,

as it did not deal with matters which he was authorized to settle. He

had no instructions relative to the recognition of new governments,

and he sent this document to Washington without comment, as he should

have done. [61]

Apropos of this claim that American officers tacitly recognized

the Insurgent government, certain passages from an unsigned

document in the handwriting of Mabini, prepared about July 15,

1898, are of interest. Mabini, speaking of the attitude of the

Americans, says, "Notwithstanding all this and in spite of their

protestations of friendship, they have always refused to recognize

that government." Also, "If they persist in refusing to recognize our

government, we shall see ourselves compelled to come to an agreement

with any other government that will consent to recognize us on friendly

terms." [62]

This statement is certainly sufficiently specific as to whether

Americans had recognized the Insurgent government on or before the

date when it was written.

Let us now consider the relations between Aguinaldo and General

Anderson.

Blount attempts to make much of a cablegram, sent by the latter, in

which, after describing the Filipinos, he adds, "The people expect

independence." Blount says:--

"That cablegram of July 22nd, above quoted, in which the

commanding general of our forces in the Philippines advises

the Washington Government, 'The people expect independence'

is the hardest thing in the public archives of our government

covering that momentous period for those who love the memory of

Mr. McKinley to get around. After the war with the Filipinos

broke out, McKinley said repeatedly in public speeches,

'I never dreamed they would turn against us.'" [63]

If there is nothing harder than this to get around the memory of

President McKinley will not suffer, as the important thing is not

what Aguinaldo had led his people to expect, but what the American

officials had promised him. The President was certainly not bound to

believe that the Filipinos would turn against us even if they did

then expect independence. Blount has seen fit to leave unmentioned

certain other facts which are very pertinent in this connection.

Apparently sometime during September, 1898, Sandico made the following

statement in a letter to Aguinaldo:--

"I also have to inform you that Señores Basa, Cortés and

Co. have congratulated the Government of the United States

upon the capture of Manila, stating at the same time that now

that Filipino soil had been soaked with American blood, the

Islands must remain American. I believe that a telegram should

be sent immediately, to counteract that sent by them." [64]

Probably Sandico did not know that on August 15, 1898, Agoncillo

had transmitted another telegram to President McKinley through

Consul-General Wildman, reading as follows:--

"Agoncillo, my Commissioner and Ambassador-Extraordinary,

representing the provisional government of the Philippine

Islands, in its name and the name of its President, Emilio

Aguinaldo, congratulates you on the successful termination of

the war, and commends the occupancy of Manila. I assure the

United States of the allegiance and unquestioning support

of our people, and petition that we be granted one or more

representatives on the commission that is to decide the future

of our Islands." [65]

It would appear, therefore, that the President had more information

on this subject than was transmitted by General Anderson!

Not only did the latter passively refrain from recognizing Aguinaldo's

pretensions, but on July 22, 1898, he wrote to him as follows:--

"I observe that your Excellency has announced yourself

Dictator and proclaimed martial law. As I am here simply in

a military capacity, I have no authority to recognize such

an assumption. I have no orders from my government on the

subject." [66]

The effort to keep Americans in ignorance of the true state of affairs

was kept up until further deception was useless. Consul Williams,

for instance, wrote on June 16, 1898:--

"For future advantage, I am maintaining cordial relations

with General Aguinaldo, having stipulated submissiveness to

our forces when treating for their return here. Last Sunday,

12th, they held a council to form provisional government. I

was urged to attend, but thought best to decline. A form of

government was adopted, but General Aguinaldo told me today

that his friends all hoped that the Philippines would be held

as a colony of the United States of America." [67]

Yet on Sunday, June 12, Aguinaldo had in reality proclaimed the

independence of the Philippines. Few Americans at this time knew any

Spanish and none understood Tagalog, so that it was comparatively

easy to deceive them. What Consul Williams reported was what Aguinaldo

considered it expedient to have him believe.

The following undated letter from Aguinaldo to Mabini, supposed to have

been sent at this time, is of especial interest in this connection:--

"My dear Brother: I do not want to go there [where the

addressee is] until after the visit of the American Consul,

because I do not wish the negotiations to end in an ultimatum,

and in order that you may tell him all that is favourable for

the cause of our Nation. I charge you with the task of giving

him a reply, and if he should ask about me tell him that

since the time of his last visit there I have not recovered

from my illness. If anything important should happen we can

communicate with each other by telegraph, using a code in

matters that require secrecy." [68]

In a letter supposed to have been written during November, 1898,

prepared for Aguinaldo's signature and addressed to Señor McKinley,

President of the Republic of the United States of North America, but

apparently never sent, Aguinaldo renews the charge [69] previously

made in his "Reseñia Verídica," that Pratt and Dewey promised

independence. It need not be further discussed.

The climax was finally reached in an official protest against the

Paris Treaty written by Agoncillo in Paris on the 12th of December,

1898, in which occurs the following:--

"The United States of America, on their part, cannot allege

a better right to constitute themselves as arbitrators as to

the future of the Philippines.

"On the contrary, the demands of honour and good faith impose

on them the explicit recognition of the political status of

the people, who, loyal to their conventions, were a devoted

ally of their forces in the moments of danger and strife. The

noble general Emilio Aguinaldo and the other Filipino chiefs

were solicited to place themselves at the head of the suffering

and heroic sons of that country, to fight against Spain and

to second the action of the brave and skilful Admiral Dewey.

"At the time of employing their armed coöperation, both the

Commander of the _Petrel_ and Captain Wood in Hongkong, before

the declaration of war, the American Consuls-General Mr. Pratt

in Singapore, Mr. Wildman, in Hongkong, and Mr. Williams in

Cavite, acting as international agents of the great American

nation, at a moment of great anxiety offered to recognize

the independence of the Filipino nation, as soon as triumph

was obtained.

"Under the faith of such promises, an American man-of-war,

the _McCulloch_ was placed at the disposal of the said leaders

and which took them to their native shores; and Admiral Dewey

himself, by sending the man-of-war; by not denying to General

Aguinaldo and his companions the exacting of his promises,

when they were presented to him on board his flag-ship in

the Bay of Manila; by receiving the said General Aguinaldo

before and after his victories and notable deeds of arms,

with the honours due the Commander-in-Chief of an allied

army, and chief of an independent state; by accepting the

efficacious coöperation of that Army and of those Generals;

by recognizing the Filipino flag, and permitting it to be

hoisted on sea and land, consenting that their ships should

sail with the said flag within the places which were blockaded;

by receiving a solemn notification of the formal proclamation

of the Philippine nation, without protesting against it,

nor opposing in any way its existence; by entering into

relations with those Generals and with the national Filipino

authorities recently established, recognized without question

the corporated body and autonomous sovereignty of the people

who had just succeeded in breaking their fetters and freeing

themselves by the impulse of their own force." [70]

It will be noted that the claim constantly grows. The commander of

the _Petrel_ Captain Wood, Consul Wildman and Consul Williams are

now included among those alleged to have promised independence, and

it is claimed that Aguinaldo was received with the honours due the

chief of an independent state when he visited Admiral Dewey, whereas

his own original claim was that he was received with the honours due

a general, which is quite a different matter.

As a matter of fact, American officers usually addressed and treated

Aguinaldo as a general. The extent to which they were able to use

his organization to further the ends of their government will be set

forth later.

In a letter to Wildman, dated August 7, 1898, Aguinaldo admits that

there is no agreement, but says that he cannot tell the peoples that

it does not exist, "fearing that I may not be able to restrain the

popular excitement." [71] He begs Wildman to use his influence on his

government so that it will realize the inadvisability of deciding the

fate of the people "without considering their will duly represented by

my government." Is it conceivable that, if there had been any ground

for claiming a promise of independence, Aguinaldo would have failed

to mention it at this time?

We may summarize the well-established facts as follows:--

Consul-General Pratt was, or professed to be, in hearty sympathy

with the ambition of the Filipino leaders to obtain independence, and

would personally have profited from such a result, but he refrained

from compromising his government and made no promises in its behalf.

Admiral Dewey never even discussed with Aguinaldo the possibility

of independence.

There is no reason to believe that any subordinate of the Admiral

ever discussed independence with any Filipino, much less made any

promise concerning it.

Neither Consul Wildman nor Consul Williams promised it, and both

were kept in ignorance of the fact that it was desired up to the last

possible moment.

It is not claimed that either General Anderson or General Merritt

made any promise concerning it.

The conclusion that no such promise was ever made by any of these

men is fully justified by well-established facts.

Aguinaldo himself carefully refrained at the outset from saying,

in any document which Americans could read, that independence

had been promised, and advanced this claim only when the growing

strength of his land force had given him confidence. He repeated it,

with increasing emphasis, as his army increased in size, ultimately

openly threatening war if his pretensions were not recognized. In

doing this, he was merely carrying out a carefully prearranged plan,

agreed upon by the Hongkong junta.

And now let us examine the claim that the insurgents were our "faithful

allies" and "coöperated" with us in the taking of Manila. We shall

find that this subject richly repays investigation.

The Philippines: Past and Present (Volume 1 of 2) · 第 2 / 15 章