XVI.

But why not more than merely that? I used at one time to have frequent

discussions on art and life with a certain poor friend of mine, who

should have found sweetness in both, giving both sweetness in return,

but, alas, did neither. We were sitting in the fields where the

frost-bitten green was just beginning to soften into minute starlike

buds and mosses, and the birds were learning to sing in the leafless

lilac hedgerows, the sunshine, as it does in spring, seeming to hold

the world rather than merely to pour on to it. "You see," said my

friend, "you see, there is a fundamental difference between us. You

are satisfied with what you call _happiness_; but I want _rapture and

excess_."

Alas, a few years later, the chance of happiness had gone. That door

was opened, of which Epictetus wrote that we might always pass through

it; in this case not because "the room was too full of smoke," but,

what is sadder by far, because the room was merely whitewashed and

cleanly swept.

But those words "rapture and excess," spoken in such childlike

simplicity of spirit, have always remained in my mind. Should we not

teach our children, among whom there may be such as that one was, that

the best thing life can give is just that despised thing _happiness_?

Laurus Nobilis: Chapters on Art and Life · 第 69 / 131 题