CHAPTER XXV

THE ARRAY OF NATIONS[40]

[Footnote 40: References as before, to which add Lehmann:

Scharnhorst, Vol. II.]

Estrangement of France and Russia -- Premonitions of War --

Alexander's Secret Policy -- The Various Factors in the Situation

-- Bernadotte -- The Eve of a General Conflagration -- England

and Prussia -- Austria and Prussia -- Alliance between Sweden and

Russia -- England and the United States -- The Confederation of

the Rhine -- The State of France.

[Sidenote: 1811-12]

Meanwhile Metternich, confident that in the partition of Turkey better

terms could be obtained for Austria from Napoleon than from Alexander,

was doing his utmost to embitter the relations of France and Russia. A

strong Russian party in Vienna was in close touch with the numerous

Poles in Warsaw who looked to Alexander for the restoration of their

country's integrity. In both places there was much talk of the

restoration of Poland, in Warsaw especially, and the phrase was

constantly in the newspapers. Alexander's ambassador in Paris made

urgent representations concerning "a persistent rumor that the Emperor

intends to restore Poland." Napoleon retorted in fury, and threatened

war, but immediately wrote a soothing assurance that he was still true

to the engagements of Tilsit, and as to the treaty itself he would

agree to changes, but would never brand his own memory with dishonor.

On July first, while the lines were in the copyist's hands, there

occurred the incident which many thought at the time changed the

course of history. During a magnificent festival given by the Austrian

ambassador, the decorations in an open court took fire, and the

conflagration spread, enveloping the entire embassy. All the important

guests escaped unhurt except Kourakine, the Russian ambassador, who

was so injured that he could no longer perform his official duties. It

appeared to throw a strong light on Napoleon's character as a man that

almost immediately his humor seemed to change; his personal

obligations to the much-abused but well-bred envoy could not now be

wiped out by a gentle reply to the master; hence, apparently, he

curtly dismissed the Russian charge d'affaires, and ended the

negotiation. It was when this news reached St. Petersburg that

Alexander a second time offered Norway to Sweden.

The real cause of Napoleon's abrupt manner was the news communicated

by Metternich that the Russian army had advanced successfully to the

Danube. On July seventeenth Francis despatched an envoy requesting his

new son-in-law to join him in a protest against the aggressions of the

Czar; in other words, to throw the agreements of Tilsit and Erfurt to

the winds. Napoleon returned an unhesitating and honorable refusal,

but said significantly to Metternich: "If Russia quarrels with us she

will lose Finland, Moldavia, and Wallachia," adding that if the Czar,

contrary to his engagement of 1808, should seize anything south of the

Danube, then he himself would intervene on Austria's behalf. But all

Europe seemed convinced that war was inevitable. In all the

watering-places the talk was of nothing else. The Russian party in

Vienna grew bolder; Pozzo di Borgo, Napoleon's life-long foe, who had

been temporarily under a cloud in Russia, appeared in Vienna in his

Russian uniform, courted and oracular. A French interpreter on his way

to Persia was stopped by him, and bribed to enter the Russian service.

In a terse personal note written by his own hand, Napoleon called

Alexander's attention to the facts, but without awaiting the reply he

went further. Kourakine, partly recovered, was leaving Paris for home.

Through him the Emperor poured into his ally's ear a long exposure of

the situation, saying in substance that war was to be avoided, that he

had not the slightest intention of restoring Poland, and that if the

Czar would write what was desired as a guarantee in the form of a

newspaper article, the words should be inserted unchanged in the

"Moniteur." At the same time orders were sent commanding Caulaincourt

to end all negotiation, and the Poles were peremptorily enjoined to

silence. Simultaneously schemes for a new naval campaign were

gradually being perfected, so that they might be realized the

following year.

Something of Alexander's secret diplomacy must have leaked out, but he

appeared unmoved. He was steadily preparing for war, strengthening his

fortresses, and locating fortified camps in the district between the

Dwina and the Dnieper. But his chief concern was with Poland. Relying

on the Jesuit influence at Warsaw for support against the jailer of

the Pope, he again took up his old scheme of restoring the country as

an appanage of the Russian crown, and wrote to Czartoryski. The plan

was dazzling: a national army, a national administration, and a

liberal constitution. But that nobleman, after a long residence in his

native land, had learned how strong was the conviction of his

countrymen that Napoleon would give them a more complete autonomy than

the Czar, and sent back what must have been a discouraging reply,

although it has never been found. Alexander on its receipt determined

that the coming war should be defensive on his part, and immediately

opened communications with England and Sweden concerning the

Continental System. Finally, in the closing days of the year, he

issued a ukase excluding wines, silks, and similar luxuries from

France, but facilitating the entry of the colonial wares in which

England dealt. This was an act of open hostility to his old ally, a

declaration of commercial war. Prussia immediately made semi-official

advances to the Czar, but they were repelled.

It is not easy to estimate Napoleon's responsibility for what had

happened and was about to happen. He was persistently domineering,

contemptuous of national feeling and dynastic politics, over-confident

in the unswerving devotion of France, inflexible in his policy of

territorial aggrandizement, ruthless in applying his peculiar

conceptions of finance and political economy, and pitiless in his own

self-seeking. On the other hand, Alexander, having received Prussia's

autonomy as his part, had proved an untrustworthy ally from the

outset. Having seized Finland, he would not pay the price, but first

evaded the Continental System, then rejected it, and finally declared

commercial war on France; in the latest conflict between France and

Austria he had actually wooed the latter's favor. Procrastinating in

the marriage affair, he was furious when the suppliant turned

elsewhere, and at once displayed an insulting mistrust concerning

Poland; finally, he declared diplomatic war by his overtures to

England and his secret machinations in Vienna; there was but a final

step in the evolution of complete hostility, the declaration of

military war. Austria, too, had done her utmost to bring on a

conflict, hoping to find her account in the dissensions of the two

empires. Her policy demanded her territorial aggrandizement at the

expense of Turkey; in a war between France and Russia she was sure to

find her account, and there was nothing in Metternich's dealings

with Napoleon which tended to preserve the peace of Europe.

Sweden, under Bernadotte, was manifestly anxious to find a cause of

offense, being defiant in temper, and ready to do anything for the

purpose of strengthening the hands of Alexander and escaping from

French protection. So feeble was the titular King of Sweden that the

adoptive crown prince speedily became the real ruler, and his personal

desires were soon the public policy. It was a strange transformation

which took place in the man. He had been generous and kindly in the

difficult positions he held as a French general. Avowedly a

revolutionary democrat of the most radical stripe, he was nevertheless

a true Gascon and failed to display his great abilities wherever his

heart was not engaged. He had, moreover, basked in the sunshine of

imperial favor, and in an age of atheism had remained in the fold of

the Roman Church. Having himself schemed against Napoleon under the

promptings of personal ambition, he often gave aid and comfort to the

Emperor's enemies. When adopted into the royal family of Sweden it

cost him little effort to profess Lutheranism; his republican

sympathies were quenched, and he developed into a beneficent despot

anxious to put Sweden in line with Russia. He never was able to win

the affections of his people, and when before the close of his life

they demanded a liberal constitution, this democratic sovereign,

brought up under the illumination of French revolutionary doctrines,

held back until the paper had to be wrung from him. The phases of

Napoleon's life are scarcely more startling than those of this rather

commonplace actor on a stage which was provincial when compared with

the cosmopolitan scene of the Emperor's life-drama.

In the spring of 1811 all Europe knew that war was inevitable. "It

will occur," wrote Napoleon on April second of that year, "in spite of

me, in spite of the Emperor Alexander, in spite of the interests of

France and those of Russia. I have already so often seen this that it

is my experience of the past which unveils to me the future.... It is

all a scene in an opera, and the English control the machinery." A

week later he notified Alexander that he was aware of the movement of

Russian troops toward Poland, and declared that he himself was

likewise preparing. Lauriston was sent to replace the too pacific

Caulaincourt at St. Petersburg, and Champagny was removed from the

Foreign Office to make way for the fiery Maret. There was much to be

done before the actual outbreak of hostilities. England's history is

the story of her struggles for nationality, for religious, civil, and

political liberty, and for mercantile ascendancy. Her inborn longings

for the highest civilization were not inconsistent with her grim

determination to resist a system that stood on the Continent for

progress, but which she had come to believe meant national ruin for

her. Prussia, with a new vigor born of self-denial, education, and

passionate patriotism; Sweden, restless and uneasy under the yoke of

Napoleonic supremacy; Denmark, friendly, but independent in her

quasi-autonomy; the United States, chafing under the restrictions of

her commerce; Turkey, sick to death, but then as now pivotal in all

European politics--the relation of all these powers to the coming

conflict was still a question, and during a year much might be done in

a diplomatic way to determine it. The whole civilized world was to be

in array, although the life-and-death struggle was to be between two

insatiate despotisms, one Western and modern, the other Oriental and

theocratic. Napoleon grasped the tendency of his own career but dimly.

Goethe said of him, "He lives entirely in the ideal, but can never

consciously grasp it." Unconsciously, too, Alexander the Great had

fought for the extension of Greek culture; Caesar, to destroy the

stifling institutions of a worn-out system; Charles the Great, to

realize the "city of God" on earth; Napoleon, for nationality,

individual liberty, popular sovereignty. What was personal and petty

in the work of these Titans, being ephemeral, disappeared in the death

of each; what was human and large has endured and will endure. The

creative ideas of the revolutionary era with which Napoleon's name is

so closely connected are no longer called in question; his own career

was now verging to its decline, but in his fall the fundamental

conceptions of the epoch were firmly established.

In January, 1812, Wellington, as has been mentioned, stormed Ciudad

Rodrigo; on April sixth Badajoz fell. On April eighteenth Napoleon

offered terms of peace, Spain to be kept intact under Joseph, Portugal

to be restored to the house of Braganza, Sicily to remain under

Ferdinand, and Naples under Murat. Considering all the circumstances,

the offer was worthy of consideration; but the English cabinet refused

it. The possibility of peace with Great Britain being thus

extinguished, Napoleon considered what course he should pursue toward

the other great Protestant land, which also felt itself to be

struggling for life. Some well-informed persons asserted that at first

the Emperor contemplated destroying the Hohenzollern power utterly. If

so, he quickly dismissed the idea as involving unnecessary risk. With

the reforms of Stein and Hardenberg successfully accomplished, with

her educational system completed and her army reorganized, with her

people electrified at last into true patriotism, Prussia was again a

redoubtable power. Her influence permeated all Germany, and the

secret associations which ramified everywhere labored for German

unity, their members already dreaming of the Jura, Vosges, and

Ardennes as the western frontier of their fatherland. At first

Frederick William made overtures to the Czar, offering an army of a

hundred thousand men. Alexander, desiring a purely defensive war, was

cold; but late in 1811 he agreed, in case of an attack on Prussia, to

advance as far as the Vistula, "if possible."

Meantime Austria had at first contemplated neutrality, but she

abandoned the policy when convinced that, whichever side should be

victorious, Prussia would be dismembered. Francis saw Alexander's

continued successes on the Danube with growing anxiety, and, learning

that Napoleon would put four hundred thousand men into the field, made

up his mind that France must win. Accordingly, in March, 1812, a

treaty was executed which put thirty thousand Austrian troops under

Napoleon's personal command, and stipulated for Austria's enlargement

by Galicia, Illyria, and even Silesia, in certain contingencies.

During these negotiations Frederick William had learned how stupendous

Napoleon's preparations were, and, with some hesitancy, he finally

sent Scharnhorst to sound Austria. The result was determinative, and

on February twenty-fourth, 1812, a treaty between France and Prussia

was signed, which gave Prussia nothing, but exacted from her twenty

thousand men for active service, with forty-two thousand for garrison

duty, and afforded the French armies free course through her

territories, with the right to charge up such requisitions as were

made against the war indemnity. To this pass Alexander's narrowness

had brought the proud, regenerated nation; its temper can be imagined.

French diplomacy, triumphant elsewhere, was utterly unsuccessful

with Sweden. Alexander offered Norway as the price of alliance, with

hints of the crown of France for Bernadotte somewhere in the dim

future. Napoleon temptingly offered Finland for forty thousand Swedish

soldiers. But the new crown prince was seemingly coy, and dallied with

both. This temporizing was brought to a sudden end in January, 1812,

when Davout occupied Swedish Pomerania. On April twelfth the alliance

between Sweden and Russia was sealed. It carried with it an armistice

between Russia and Great Britain. This was essential to the Czar, for

he would be compelled to withdraw his troops from the Danube for

service in the North, and to that end must make some arrangement with

Turkey. He offered the most favorable terms; Napoleon, on the other

hand, demanded a hundred thousand men if he were to restore to the

Sublime Porte all it had lost. England threatened to bombard

Constantinople if there should be too much hesitancy, and on May

twenty-eighth, 1812, the Sultan closed a bargain with Russia which

gave him the Pruth as a frontier.

In spite of Turkey's submission, Great Britain was not to be left

passive. The neutrality of the United States had, on the whole, been

successfully maintained, but their commerce suffered. On May first,

1810, Congress enacted that trade with Great Britain should be

forbidden if France revoked her decrees, and vice versa. Madison and

the Republicans believed that this would relieve the strain under

which farmers as well as merchants were now suffering. This enabled

Napoleon, in those days of slow communication, to make a pretense of

relaxing the Berlin and Milan decrees, while continuing to seize

American ships as before. England was not for a moment deceived, and

enforced the orders in council with added indignities. This conduct so

exasperated the American people that they demanded war with the

oppressor, and on June nineteenth the war of 1812 began. Napoleon's

diplomatic juggling had been entirely successful.

A year earlier the princes of the Rhenish Confederation had received

their orders. Their peoples were unresponsive, but the zeal of the

rulers overcame all opposition. The King of Saxony was grateful in a

lively sense of favors to come, and his grand duchy of Warsaw became

an armed camp, the Poles themselves expecting their national

resurrection. The prince primate's realm was erected into a grand

duchy for Eugene, whose viceroyalty was destined for the little King

of Rome, and under the stimulus of a fresh nationality the people gave

more than was demanded. Wuertemberg and Baden learned that Napoleon

"preferred enemies to uncertain friends," and both found means to

supply their respective quotas. Jerome, true to the fraternal

instincts of the Bonapartes, hesitated; but his queen was a woman of

sound sense, and both were alive to the uncertainties of tenure in

royal office, so that, receiving a peremptory summons, Westphalia fell

into line. Bavaria and Switzerland furnished their contingents as a

matter of course. Among the Germans, some hated Napoleon for his

dealings with the papacy, some as the destroyer of their petty

nationalities; some devout Protestants even thought him the

antichrist. But the great majority were in a state of expectancy, many

realizing that even the dynastic politics of Europe had been vitalized

by his advent; others, liberals like Goethe, Wieland, and Dalberg,

hoped for the complete extinction of feudalism and dynasticism before

his march.

This had already been accomplished in France, and for that reason the

peasantry and the townsfolk upheld the Empire. In Paris the upper

classes had never forgotten the Terror, and were ready for monarchy

in any form if only it brought a settled order and peace. There were

still a few radicals and many royalists, but the masses cared only for

two things, glory and security. They enjoyed the temporary repose

under a rule which protected the family, property, and in a certain

sense even religion. Family life at the Tuileries was a model, the

Emperor finding his greatest pleasure in domestic amusements, playing

billiards, riding, driving, and even romping, with his young wife,

while his tenderness for the babe was phenomenal. Still he was no

puritan, and the lapsed classes could indulge themselves in vice if

only they paid; from their purses fabulous sums were turned into the

Emperor's secret funds. Under the Continental System industry was at a

standstill, and every household felt the privation of abstaining from

the free use of sugar and other colonial wares. There was, however,

general confidence in speedy relief, and there were worse things than

waiting. The peasantry were weary of seeing their soldier sons return

from hard campaigning with neither glory nor booty, and began to

resent the conscription law, which tore the rising generation from

home while yet boys. Desertions became so frequent that a terrible law

was passed, making, first the family, then the commune, and lastly the

district, responsible for the missing men. It was enforced mercilessly

by bodies of riders known as "flying columns." Finally, every

able-bodied male was enrolled for military service in three

classes--ban, second ban, and rear ban, the last including all between

forty and sixty. Nevertheless, and in spite of all other hardships,

there was much enthusiasm at the prospect of a speedy change for the

better. In March, 1812, Napoleon could count not far from four hundred

and seventy-five thousand men ready for the field. Berthier was

retained as chief of staff. In the guard were forty-seven thousand

picked men, the old guard under Lefebvre, the young guard under

Bessieres. Davout's corps numbered seventy-two thousand, all French;

Oudinot's thirty-seven thousand, French and Swiss; Ney's thirty-nine

thousand, French and Wuertembergers; Prince Eugene's forty-five

thousand, French and Italians; Poniatowski's thirty-six thousand, all

Poles; Gouvion Saint-Cyr's twenty-five thousand, all Bavarians;

Regnier's seventeen thousand, all Saxons; Vandamme's eighteen

thousand, Hessians and Westphalians; Macdonald's thirty-two thousand,

Prussians and Poles. Murat commanded the cavalry reserve of four corps

under Nansouty, Montbrun, Grouchy, and Latour-Maubourg respectively,

and numbering in all forty thousand. In addition to this majestic

array there were thirty thousand Austrians under Schwarzenberg, and

the ninth corps of thirty-three thousand French and Germans under

Victor was to follow. "I have never made greater preparations," the

Emperor wrote to Davout.

The Life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Vol. 3 (of 4) · 第 25 / 34 章