CHAPTER IX

FRONTENAC TO THE RESCUE

From the moment that Prince William of Orange, the one unconquerable foe

of Louis XIV, was called to the throne of England, war between England

and France was a foregone conclusion. It was not declared, however, in

France till the 25th June 1689. Frontenac sailed from Rochelle on the

5th August following, the very day of the Lachine massacre. The king in

an interview with him is reported to have said: "I am sending you back

to Canada, where I am sure that you will serve me as well as you did

before; I ask nothing more of you." His Majesty also intimated, we are

told, that he believed the charges made against him were without

foundation. During the intervals between his two terms of office,

Frontenac had been living for the most part at court, in rather reduced

circumstances. The king once at least came to his relief with a gratuity

of three thousand five hundred francs, and possibly other liberalities

may have flowed to him from the same royal source, though Mr. Ernest

Myrand, after careful research, has not been able to discover trace of

any.[33]

The mission which was tendered to the aged count--he was now in his

seventieth year--was one which a younger man might have felt some

hesitation in accepting. The last accounts from Canada showed the

country to be in a deplorable condition, equally unable to make an

enduring peace or to wage a successful war; and the worst was yet to be

told on the governor's arrival. The situation was rendered decidedly

more critical by the fact of the war with England. True, a treaty had

been made by Louis XIV with James II, providing that, should war break

out between France and England, it should not extend to their American

possessions; but Louis, who did not recognize William III as a

legitimate sovereign, probably felt under no obligation to observe a

treaty made with his predecessor. We know, at least, that a scheme for

the conquest of the English colonies was arranged before Frontenac's

departure. Callieres, Governor of Montreal, had been sent to France by

Denonville in the fall of 1688 to represent the perilous situation of

the colony, and to urge the king to adopt a system of reprisals against

the English for the misdeeds of the Iroquois. Callieres and Frontenac

had some friends in common, and were thus brought together at court, and

the plan that was adopted was probably one that they had jointly

suggested to the court. It was, briefly, that two or three war vessels

should accompany Frontenac to Canada; that the count should disembark at

some point on the coast of Acadia, and proceed by the first private

vessel he could secure to Quebec; that on arrival there he should

organize a force of sixteen hundred men, one thousand regulars, and six

hundred militia, to march on New York by way of Albany; and that when he

was ready to move, he should notify the commander of the squadron, so

that the latter might advance to New York, and be prepared to co-operate

in the capture and occupation of the place. Meantime, the naval force

was to employ itself in picking up any English trading vessels that

might fall in its way.

Not only were plans thus formed for invading and seizing the English

colonies, but the French king made complete arrangements as to the

treatment of the inhabitants when conquered. Those who either were

Catholics, or were prepared to embrace the Catholic faith, might be

allowed to remain in possession of their property and civil rights; the

citizens of means were to be imprisoned and held for ransom, the rest of

the population, numbering about eighteen thousand, were to forfeit

everything and be driven penniless out of the country. It was proposed

to deport them, in the first place, to New England, pending the ulterior

conquest of that region. M. Lorin truly observes that Louis XIV, having

just deprived his own subjects of religious liberty by the revocation of

the Edict of Nantes, could not possibly be expected to tolerate it in

any country of which he might acquire control.[34] A more ruthless

policy could scarcely have been devised, nor, it may be added, a more

senseless one. The deportation of so large a body of inhabitants, mainly

of Dutch origin, and all accustomed to the use of arms, was a task

ridiculously beyond the ability of the forces he was proposing to employ

for the purpose.

The plan was followed, so far as the sending out of a small squadron

with the new governor-general was concerned. Sailing, as already

mentioned, on the 5th August, Frontenac arrived at Chedabucto

(Guysborough), near the Straits of Canso, on the 12th September, and

there embarked in a small vessel, the _Francois Xavier_, for Quebec. On

the way he stopped at Perce, where the Recollet missionaries informed

him of the massacre of Lachine. His vessel must have been detained by

contrary winds, for it was the 12th October before he arrived at Quebec.

Here he was received by the citizens with the liveliest manifestations

of joy. The ecclesiastics associated themselves, _bon gre mal gre_, with

the popular feeling. The town was illuminated by night and hung with

banners by day; a _Te Deum_ was sung; and a Jesuit father delivered what

is recorded to have been a most pathetic discourse. On all hands the

count was acclaimed as the man the country needed to restore its fallen

fortunes and stay the hand of the destroyer. Denonville and Champigny

did not grace the rejoicings; they were at Montreal.

Quebec, however, was not the point of danger, nor that at which the

governor's services were most required. Still he remained there eight

days before proceeding to Montreal, where he arrived on the 27th

October. At that place he learnt from Denonville of the instructions he

had given for the abandonment and destruction of Fort Frontenac. The

indignation of the old warrior, to whom the fort called after his name

was a spot of peculiar predilection, can better be imagined than

described. He could hardly believe that a French governor could perform

so craven an act. If we may trust the Baron La Hontan, who does not in

this case tax very seriously our powers of belief, the interview between

the two dignitaries was a decidedly stormy one.[35] There was no time to

waste, however, in useless debate. Something possibly had happened to

delay or prevent the carrying out of the orders, and the fort might

perhaps yet be saved. An expedition was hastily organized to proceed to

the spot and ascertain the facts, but scarcely had it well started

before it encountered the entire garrison of the fort, minus six men,

whom they had lost in the rapids on the way down, returning to Montreal.

The deed had therefore been done. Valrennes, the commandant, told how he

had destroyed the stores, thrown such arms and ammunition as he could

not remove into the river, undermined the walls and fired the train, and

how, as they retreated, they had heard a dull explosion. Yes, the deed

had been done; but, as it turned out later, not with the full result

intended. The mines had exploded, but probably they had been hastily and

not over skilfully placed, and the injury to the walls was but slight.

Not long afterwards Frontenac was able to repair the damage and put the

fort once more in a condition of defence.

The season was now so far advanced that the project which had been

formed of raising a large force with which to invade English territory,

in conjunction with a naval attack on New York, had to be abandoned. La

Caffiniere, commander of the squadron, waited for two months for some

sign of the arrival of the Canadians, and then sailed back to France,

making a few prizes on the way. But, if the governor was unable to

organize an expedition on a large scale, he did not forego his intention

of attacking the English colonies. If he could not march with an army he

could make raids after the Indian fashion. His plan was to stand simply

on the defensive as regards the Iroquois, and to impress their minds by

the suddenness and vigour of his attacks on the English. Three raiding

parties were accordingly organized, one having its base at Montreal, the

second at Three Rivers, and the third at Quebec. The Montreal party

consisted of a little over two hundred men, of whom somewhat less than

half were mission Indians from Sault St. Louis--the present Caughnawaga

settlement--and the Montreal Mountain. The remainder of the party

consisted for the most part of _coureurs de bois_, formidable men for

border warfare, far steadier than the Indians, and just as wary. Their

destination was Albany and the neighbouring English settlements. The

leaders were men of skill and courage, Daillebout de Mantet, and Le

Moyne de Ste. Helene; the latter, a man greatly admired and beloved for

his brilliant soldierly qualities and gay, amiable disposition, but

nevertheless a keen and relentless fighter. With these were two of Ste.

Helene's brothers, formidable men all, Le Moyne d'Iberville, who had

already made fame for himself in Hudson's Bay, where still greater glory

yet awaited him, and Le Moyne de Bienville, together with several other

members of the Canadian _noblesse_. The Three Rivers party was under the

charge of Francois Hertel, a man of much experience in Indian warfare.

When quite a lad he had been carried off by the Iroquois, and had

endured some cruel treatment at their hands before making his

escape,[36] and since then he had been in constant contact with them

either in peace or in war. With him went three of his sons, twenty-four

Frenchmen, and twenty-five Indians, fifty-two men in all. The third

party, recruited at Quebec, consisted of fifty Frenchmen and sixty

Abenaquis Indians from the settlement at the falls of the Chaudiere,

under the command of M. de Portneuf, who had as lieutenant his cousin,

Repentigny, Sieur de Courtemanche. The Montreal expedition set out in

the beginning of February, those from Three Rivers and Quebec a few days

earlier; but before recounting their exploits, it may be well to glance

at the negotiations, which the governor was at this time carrying on

with a view to putting the relations of the colony with the Iroquois

tribes on a better basis.

The king, it has been mentioned, had consented to send back the Indians

who had been so treacherously captured and sent to France as galley

slaves. It would be doing his Majesty injustice to suppose that he ever

intended his representative in Canada to procure men for his galleys in

so disreputable a fashion. The Marquis of Denonville from the moment of

his arrival in Canada had breathed nothing but war; and the king

doubtless counted on a large number of prisoners as the result of his

martial prowess. It is significant that, even before encountering the

Senecas, Denonville should have written to the king explaining how very

difficult it was to capture Iroquois in battle. He did not say so, but

he doubtless thought that to trap them would be much easier. Out of

nearly forty Indians sent to France, thirteen only were alive when the

order for their restoration to their country was given; the rest had

died of hardship and homesickness. The survivors were sent out in the

same vessel with Frontenac, who did all in his power to make them forget

the wrongs they had suffered. The most important man in the band was a

Cayuga chief named Orehaoue, between whom and the count a sincere

friendship seems to have sprung up. During the whole voyage the count

treated him with the highest consideration, invited him to eat at his

table, and furnished him with a handsome uniform; so that, by the time

they landed at Quebec, the savage chief was completely won over to the

French side. The same treatment was continued after they landed.

Orehaoue was lodged in the Chateau St. Louis and went everywhere with

the governor. There was policy in this of course on Frontenac's part,

but there is no reason to doubt that on both sides there was a genuine

feeling of attachment.

After viewing the scene of desolation at Lachine, Frontenac reported to

the king that nine square leagues of territory had been laid waste. The

question was what to do. The best course seemed to be to send four of

the Indians who had been brought back from France to their Iroquois

kinsmen with a suitable message. They were despatched accordingly,

accompanied by an Indian named Gagniogoton who, a short time before, had

come to Montreal as a kind of ambassador, but whose tone had been more

insolent than conciliatory. The returned warriors were to invite their

people "to come and welcome their father whom they had so long missed,

and thank him for his goodness to them in restoring a chief whom they

had given up as lost,"[37] namely Orehaoue. The latter did not accompany

the mission, Frontenac considering that he would be more useful for the

present at Montreal. It does not appear exactly when the envoys set out,

but, after some delay, consequent upon prolonged deliberation on the

part of the tribes, they returned to Montreal on the 9th March. It was

evident the mission had not been a great success. The messengers came

laden with belts of wampum, each of which had its own special

significance, yet for several days they kept silence. Finally at the

urgent request of M. de Callieres--Frontenac had gone back to

Quebec--they disburdened themselves of the messages with which they were

charged. Belt number one was to explain that delay had been caused by

the arrival of an Ottawa delegation among the Senecas with overtures of

peace, as a pledge of which they had brought with them a number of

Iroquois prisoners whom they were prepared to restore. The second belt

was meant to express the joy of the whole Iroquois confederacy over the

return of Orehaoue, whom they spoke of as their general-in-chief. The

third demanded the return of Orehaoue and the other prisoners; and

mentioned the fact that all the surviving French prisoners were at the

chief town of the Onondagas, and that no disposition would be made of

them till they should hear the advice of Orehaoue on his return home.

The fourth congratulated Frontenac on his wish to plant again the tree

of peace; but the fifth was the most expressive of all. Referring to the

desire of Frontenac to bring them again to his fort, it said: "Know you

not that the fire of peace no longer burns in that fort; that it is

extinguished by the blood that has been spilt there; the place where the

council is held is all red; it has been desecrated by the treachery

perpetrated there." Fort Frontenac, it went on to say, was henceforth an

impossible place for peaceful gatherings: if the tree of peace was again

to be planted it must be in some other spot, nearer or more distant they

did not care--only not _there_. Then these words were added: "In fine,

Father Onontio, you have whipped your children most severely; your rods

were too cutting and too long; and after having used me thus you can

readily judge that I have some sense now." The sixth belt mentioned that

there were parties now out on the war-path, but that they were prepared

to spare their prisoners should they take any, if the French would agree

to do the same on their side. There was no lack of frankness in the

further information conveyed by this belt, which was to the effect that

the Onondagas had received eight prisoners as their share of the

prisoners taken at La Chesnaye, and had eaten four of them, and spared

the other four. This was intended to show their superiority in humanity

to the French, who, having taken three Seneca prisoners, had eaten them

all, that is to say, allowed their Indian allies to kill and eat them,

instead of sparing one or two. To what incident this refers is not

clear, as Denonville did not report any prisoners taken in his fight

with the Senecas.

Callieres sent the deputation down to Quebec to see the

governor-general; but the latter, according to the account here

followed, which was written by his own secretary, Monseignat, declined

to give them an audience, mainly on account of the objection he had to

their spokesman, Gagniogoton. Doubtless Callieres had informed him

sufficiently of the tenor of the communications they had to make. The

governor had much on his mind, but he was not a man to act in nervous

haste. Towards the close of the month of December, a man named Zachary

Jolliet arrived at Quebec from Michilimackinac, having been despatched

by La Durantaye to represent the perilous nature of the situation there

owing to the very unsatisfactory dispositions of the Lake tribes. The

massacre of Lachine with all its attendant circumstances had convinced

them that French power was at a very low ebb. As the narrative says:

"They saw nothing on our part but universal supineness; our houses

burnt; our people carried off; the finest portion of our country ruined;

and all done without any one being moved; or, at least, if any attempts

were made, the trifling effort recoiled to our shame." Yet what the

French, individually, were capable of may be judged by the fact that

this messenger, with only one companion, had come all the way from

Michilimackinac at a most inclement season of the year, partly in a

canoe and partly on the ice, reaching Quebec at the very end of

December. Surely some benumbing influence must have been at work upon

the colony. Was it the extreme mediaevalism of the Denonville regime

aided by an excessive use of intoxicating liquors? These at least were

_verae causae_, and might well have had no small share in creating the

situation described.

Something had to be done, and that speedily, to strengthen La

Durantaye's position, or the French of the Upper Lakes would virtually

find themselves hostages in the hands of disaffected tribes; if indeed

their lives were not sacrificed to cement the union which the Ottawas

were even then endeavouring to effect with the Iroquois. Frontenac

wanted to send Zachary Jolliet back at once with instructions; but it

was learnt that the route was infested by Iroquois; very unwillingly,

therefore, he deferred action till the breaking of the ice in the

spring. He then despatched M. de Louvigny, with a hundred and

forty-three Canadians and a small number of Indians, to strengthen the

garrison and relieve La Durantaye. With this contingent went a man well

known to all the region, and probably second to none in his ability to

influence the native mind, Nicolas Perrot. The count did not, however,

entrust Perrot with any merely verbal message, but placed in his hands a

written one, conceived in the style of which he had acquired so great a

mastery. "Children," said Onontio, "I am astonished to learn on arriving

that you have forgotten the protection I always afforded you. Remember

that I am your father, who adopted you, and who has loved you so

tenderly. I gave you your country; I drove the horrors of war far from

it, and introduced peace there. You had no home before that. You were

wandering about exposed to the Iroquois tempests. Hark, I speak to you

as a father. My body is big; it is strong and cannot die. Think you I am

going to remain in a state of inactivity such as prevailed during my

absence; and, if eight or ten hairs have been pulled from my children's

heads when I was absent, that I cannot put ten handfuls of hair in the

place of one that has been torn out? or that, for one piece of bark that

has been stripped from my cabin, I cannot put double the number in its

place? Children, know that I always am, that nothing but the Great

Spirit can destroy me, and that it is I who destroy all." The message

went on to refer to the Iroquois as a ravenous dog who formerly was

snapping and biting at every one, but whom Frontenac had tamed and tied

up, and whom he would discipline again if he did not mend his ways. The

blood shed at Montreal last summer, it said, was of no account; the

houses destroyed were only two or three rat holes. The English were not

people to have confidence in; they deceived and devoured their children.

"I am strong enough to kill the English, destroy the Iroquois, and whip

you if you fail in your duty to me." Finally there was a warning against

the use of English rum, which was killing in its effects, whereas French

brandy was health-giving.

What the effect of this allocution would have been, unsupported by

favouring circumstances, it is difficult to say. The Indian tribes all

had a remarkable gift of perspicacity. They had no need of Dr. Johnson's

advice to clear their minds of cant, for cant was something quite

foreign to their mental habits; it was not a product of forest life. It

happened, however, that Perrot was able to show them a number of

Iroquois scalps, and hand over to them an Iroquois prisoner that his

party had taken on their journey up the Ottawa. This looked like

business, and lent a weight which might otherwise have been lacking to

the somewhat fustian eloquence of Onontio. The affair of the capture had

happened in this wise. As the expedition neared the place now known as

Sand Point, on the river Ottawa, they discovered two Iroquois canoes

drawn up at the end of the point. Three canoes were detached to attack

the enemy, but were received with a heavy fire from an ambush on the

shore, by which four Frenchmen were killed. Perrot, who thought it much

more important to accomplish his mission among the Ottawas than to have

even a successful fight with the Iroquois, did not at first wish to push

the matter further; but his men were full of fight, and he finally

allowed a general attack to be made, which resulted most successfully.

More than thirty Iroquois, the narrative says, were killed, and many

more were wounded. Out of thirteen canoes only four escaped. Two

prisoners were taken. One of these was sent to Quebec and was used by

Frontenac to help out his negotiations with their nation; the other was

taken to Michilimackinac. His fate was not a pleasant one. Perrot gave

him to the Hurons, and by so doing made the Ottawas a little jealous.

Both Ottawas and Hurons were at the time meditating an alliance with the

Iroquois, and the Hurons thought they could make good use of their

prisoner as a peace-offering. The French, however, were not going to

have any nonsense of that kind. The commanders conferred with the

missionaries, and finally a hint was dropped to the Hurons that, if they

did not put their prisoner "into the kettle," he would be taken from

them and given to the Ottawas. That settled the question; the unhappy

prisoner was put to death with the customary tortures, and all chance of

peace between Hurons and Iroquois was thus destroyed. What the Ottawas

might do still remained uncertain. Frontenac's message had by no means

wholly won them over to the French alliance. They had heard of the

warfare Onontio was waging against the English, and thought they would

await developments.

That war had been going merrily on in its own fashion, and Perrot was

able to give an account of the success of the principal expedition--the

one directed against Albany--for it had returned to Montreal after doing

its bloody work nearly two months before he left for the Upper

Lakes.[38] The story of the three war parties must now be woven into our

narrative. The one just mentioned started from Montreal on one of the

first days in February (1690). The Indians of the party had not been

informed what their destination was. When they learned that the

intention was to attack Albany, they inquired with surprise how long it

was since the French had become so bold. Like the Indians of the West,

they had drawn their own conclusions from the events of the previous

year. They were not disposed to join in so hazardous an undertaking; and

it is allowable, perhaps, to doubt whether it was at any time seriously

contemplated to make Albany the point of attack. If it was, the leaders

changed their minds, for on coming to a point where the roads to that

place and to Corlaer or Schenectady diverged, they took the latter. The

difficulties of the march were extreme. Though it was yet midwinter,

more or less thaw prevailed, and during much of the journey the men had

to walk knee-deep in water. Then on the last day or two came a blast of

excessive cold. A few miles from Corlaer the expedition was halted, and

the chief man of the Christian Mohawks harangued his people. The

opportunity had now come, he said, for taking ample revenge for all the

injuries they had received from the heathen Iroquois at the instigation

of the English, and to wash them out in blood. This Indian known as the

Great Mohawk, or in French as the _Grand Agnie_, is described in the

official narrative as "the most considerable of his tribe, an honest

man, full of spirit, prudence, and generosity, and capable of the

greatest undertakings." The little army was in wretched plight, and

probably, had they been attacked at this point by even a small force of

men in good condition, they would have been completely routed. No such

attack, however, was made. Marching a little further, they found a

wigwam occupied only by four squaws. There was a fire in it, and,

benumbed with cold, they crowded round it in turns. At eleven o'clock at

night they were in sight of the town, but in order that they might take

the inhabitants in their deepest sleep, they deferred the attack for

three hours; then they burst in through an open gate in the palisade.

The official account says, in very simple words, that "the massacre

lasted two hours." This, be it remembered, was supposed to be regular

warfare, not between savage Indians, or between French and Indians, but

between French and English. War, as already stated, had been declared

between France and England, and this was Frontenac's method of carrying

on his part of it. When New England retaliated later in the year by the

attack on Quebec, we can hardly wonder that some of the inhabitants of

that city anticipated a general massacre should the English obtain

possession of the town. The special enormities alleged to have been

committed by the heathen Iroquois in the massacre at Lachine are, by

witnesses who made their statements within a few days after the event,

affirmed to have been perpetrated by the Christian Indians at

Schenectady. Sixty persons in all were killed, thirty-eight being men

and boys, ten women, and twelve children of tender age.[39] Many were

wounded, thirty were carried away captive. The chief magistrate of the

place, John Sanders Glen by name, lived outside the town in a palisaded

and fortified dwelling, which he was prepared to defend. He was known,

however, to the French commanders as a man who had always been

favourable to their people, having on several occasions rescued French

prisoners from the Mohawks, over whom he had great influence. On being

assured that his life and property would be spared, he surrendered. It

was also agreed to extend the same immunity to any of his relatives who

might have survived the massacre; and the number of persons claiming the

privilege was so great as to cause the Indians to express some surprise

and ill-humour at the wide range of his family connection.

The homeward march was begun a day or two later. It was by no means a

prosperous one. Early in the attack a man on horseback had escaped

through the eastern gate of the town, and, though shot at and wounded,

was able to make his way to Albany and give the alarm. Thence word was

sent on to the Mohawk towns, and the warriors, accompanied by a

detachment of fifty young men from Albany, started on the track of the

retreating foe. Two only on the French side had been killed in the

attack on Schenectady, but before the party reached Montreal, their

losses amounted to twenty-one, seventeen French, and four Indians. The

opinion of the Mohawk Indians on the character of the expedition was

expressed in a message of sympathy which they sent to the authorities at

Albany. "The French," they said, "did not act on this occasion like

brave men, but like thieves and robbers. Be not discouraged, we give

this belt to wipe away your tears. We do not think what the French have

done can be called a victory. It is only a further proof of their cruel

deceit."[40]

The expedition organized at Three Rivers left that place on the 28th

January; but it was not till after two months' wanderings in the

inhospitable wilderness that they were able to strike their first blow.

The New England frontier had for a year past been in a very disturbed

and precarious condition owing to a renewed outbreak of hostilities on

the part of the Abenaquis Indians. A long period of previous warfare

with these tribes had been closed by the Treaty of Casco in 1678, but

now the frontier was again aflame. The English settlers attributed the

trouble to the machinations of the French with whom the Abenaquis were

in close alliance; and certain it is that the Marquis of Denonville, in

a memorandum written after his return to France, takes credit to himself

for the mischief done. He speaks of the progress made in christianizing

the Abenaquis, and of the establishment near Quebec of two colonies of

them which he thought would prove useful. He then proceeds: "To the

close relations which I maintained with these savages through the

Jesuits, and particularly the two brothers Bigot, may be attributed the

success of the attacks which they made upon the English last summer when

they captured sixteen forts besides that of Pemaquid, where there were

twenty cannon, and killed two hundred men."[41] The ex-governor

exaggerates the number of cannon in the fort at Pemaquid, as there were

only seven or eight, and omits to mention the fact that, after that

place had surrendered on the promise that the lives of all in it should

be spared, a number were murdered by his Indians. That they were not

also tortured, Father Thury, who was with the attacking party,

attributes to the influence of his exhortations. M. Lorin, in giving an

account of the occurrence, says there is no doubt that the Abenaquis

were impelled by their missionary, the Abbe Thury. He quotes the

statement of Charlevoix that, before setting out, their first care had

been to make sure of the divine assistance, by partaking of the

sacrament. "Certainly," he says, "the part taken by the missionaries in

expeditions of this character, was a preponderating one." He also

ventures the theory that, as the heathen Iroquois never penetrated into

New England, the only enemies of the faith upon whom the missionaries

could exercise the zeal of their Abenaquis converts were the

English.[42]

The fighting along the frontier lasted all through the summer and autumn

of 1689. The winter brought respite from attack, and the settlers were

beginning to indulge a sense of security when Hertel and his fifty men

crept up to the little settlement of Salmon Falls, on the borders of

New Hampshire and Maine. The attack was made in very similar fashion to

that at Schenectady. The assailants burst in at night and at once began

to apply tomahawk and torch. Thirty persons, men, women, and children

indiscriminately, were slaughtered, and fifty-four were made prisoners.

Hearing that a force of English from Piscataqua, now Portsmouth, was

hastening to the scene, Hertel ordered a retreat. At Wooster River the

pursuers caught up with him, but, taking up an advantageous position on

the far side of that stream, he held them in check, killing several as

they tried to cross the narrow bridge. At night he resumed his retreat.

Some of the prisoners were given to his Indians to torture and kill. It

was unfortunate that Father Thury was not present to inspire milder

sentiments in these converts.

Hertel was a born fighter, and when, upon reaching one of the Abenaquis

villages on the Kennebec, he learnt that the Quebec party under M. de

Portneuf had just passed south, he determined to follow them with

thirty-six of his men, though he was obliged to leave behind him his

eldest son who had been badly wounded in the fight at Wooster River. A

number of Indian warriors joined the party at a point on the Kennebec;

and on the 25th May, the united force, numbering between four and five

hundred men, encamped in the forest not far from the English forts on

Casco Bay. The principal of these was Fort Loyal, a palisaded place

mounting eight cannon. The others were simple blockhouses. The several

garrisons consisted of about one hundred men under the command of

Captain Sylvanus Davis, whose narrative in the original--and most

original--spelling has come down to us. The garrison first knew that an

enemy was at hand by hearing the war-whoop of the Indians, who had just

scalped an unfortunate Scotsman found wandering about in the

neighbourhood, all unconscious of danger. Thirty volunteers at once

sallied forth from the fort to meet the foe. They had not gone far when

they received a volley at close range which killed half of them. Of the

remaining half only four reached the fort, all wounded. During the night

the men in the blockhouses crept into the fort, together with the

inhabitants of some neighbouring houses. The place could not be carried

by assault, so Portneuf determined to besiege it in due form by opening

trenches and working his way in. The work was well and rapidly done, and

Davis saw that surrender was inevitable. He inquired if there were any

French in the attacking force, and, if so, whether they would give

quarter. The answer was affirmative on both points. Davis inquired

whether the quarter would include men, women, and children, wounded and

unwounded, and whether they would all be allowed to retire to the

nearest English town. This was agreed to and sworn to; but, no sooner

had the occupants of the fort filed out, than the Indians fell upon

them, killed a number, and made prisoners of the rest. Davis protested,

but he was told that he and his people were rebels against their lawful

king, and therefore without any claim to consideration. The captives,

Davis among them, were carried off to Quebec, where they arrived about

the middle of June. The fort was burned, the guns were spiked, the

neighbouring settlements destroyed, and the dead left unburied.

Thus had Frontenac's expeditions fared. They had spread grief and alarm

amongst the English settlements, but had inflicted no serious blow on

English power. They had shown how expert the colonial French had become

in the methods of Indian warfare, and also to how large an extent they

had themselves inbibed the Indian spirit. We may doubt whether Frontenac

philosophized much on the subject; his immediate object was to produce

an effect on the minds of his wavering Indian allies and his sullen

Indian enemies; and the raids into English territory, with the

slaughterings and burnings, were doubtless well adapted to that purpose.

If Onontio was strong enough and bold enough to make war in this fashion

on Corlaer and Kishon[43] at once, there was something for allies, and

enemies as well, to reflect on. This view of the matter finally

prevailed with the Lake tribes. For some two or three years trade had

been almost at a standstill, and furs had accumulated which the savages

were now anxious to turn into European goods. With one accord they

determined to try the Montreal market once more, and see Onontio face to

face.

During the winter, while his guerrilla forces were in the field,

Frontenac had not been idle. Having arranged for offensive measures, he

next took thought for defensive ones; and, as if with a prevision that

Quebec itself might not be exempt from attack, he devoted special

attention to strengthening the fortifications of that place. He caused a

vast amount of timber to be cut for palisades, with which he protected

the city at the rear, its only weak point. In the spring he began the

erection of a strong stone redoubt; and the work was pushed with so much

vigour that by midsummer it was well advanced towards completion. These

pressing occupations did not, however, absorb all his thoughts. The fact

of his having been chosen a second time by the king for the governorship

of Canada, notwithstanding all the criticism of which he had formerly

been the object, gave him a position of manifest strength, which even

his bitterest opponents of former days could not ignore. The Sovereign

Council as a whole recognized the fact, and was anxious to arrange

matters so as, if possible, to avoid friction for the future.

The governor on his part was determined to preserve an attitude of

dignified, not to say haughty, reserve, and throw upon the council the

task of making such advances as might be necessary. In pursuance of this

policy, he refrained from attending the meetings, though his presence

was much required. The council having deputed Auteuil, the

attorney-general, to wait upon him and invite his attendance, he replied

that the council should be able to manage its own business and that he

would come when he thought the king's service required it. It is hard to

understand why Auteuil should have been chosen for this negotiation; for

Frontenac must have had a vivid recollection of the insolence with which

he had been treated during his first administration by this individual,

then a raw youth of not much over twenty. The next move of the council

was to send four of their number to repeat the invitation, and to ask

the governor at the same time with what ceremonies he would wish to be

received. His answer was that if they would propose the form he would

tell them whether it was satisfactory. The council felt that the

governor was pushing his advantage a little too far; but nevertheless

they applied themselves to the question, and, having devised a form

which they thought could not fail to be acceptable, sent Villeray, the

first councillor, to the chateau to explain what was proposed. Villeray

was as deferential and complimentary as he knew how; but the end was not

yet. "See the bishop, and any other parties who have knowledge of such

matters, and get their opinion," said the governor. The bishop was

consulted accordingly, but very properly declined to give any opinion.

Thrown back on their own resources the councillors devised the following

scheme: that, when his Lordship, the count, should decide to make his

first visit to the council, four of its members should present

themselves at the chateau in order to accompany him to the place of

meeting, which was the intendant's palace on the bank of the St.

Charles; and that, on all subsequent occasions, he should be met by two

councillors at the head of the stairs and respectfully conducted to his

seat. This was duly explained by the first councillor, Villeray, who

said he was authorized to add that any modification of the plan which

the governor might suggest would be gladly adopted by the council. This

was submission indeed, yet still the count hesitated. He asked to see

the minutes of the council in which the resolution bearing on the matter

was recorded. Villeray struggled up Palace Hill with the official

register, and presented himself again before the potentate, who found

the entry in good shape, but reserved his final answer. A few days

later, having been again waited on, he graciously informed the

deputation that the arrangement proposed was quite satisfactory. With

what must really be called a fatuous self-complacency, he added that,

had the council wished to go too far in the way of obsequiousness, he

could not have consented to it, as, being himself its head, he was

jealous of its dignity and honour. If for some men there is, as the poet

hints, "a far-off touch of greatness" in knowing they are not great, it

is to be feared Frontenac did not possess that particular touch.

Not only were the fortifications of Quebec strengthened, but steps were

also taken to form a local militia guard under the command of the

town-major, Prevost. Leaving to that officer the supervision of whatever

work was still required on the defences, Frontenac, accompanied by the

intendant and Madame Champigny, left the capital on the 22nd July for

Montreal, where his presence was much required. He probably did some

inspection of posts on the way, for he did not reach the end of his

journey till the 31st. Trade at this time was pretty much at a

standstill. Bands of mission Indians were on the war-path against the

English; and every now and again the Iroquois would swoop down on the

settlements, notwithstanding the fact that scouts were kept continually

employed along the routes by which they were accustomed to make their

approaches. Under the new administration the lesson of Lachine, the

lesson of eternal watchfulness, was being taken to heart. The governor

had much to occupy his thoughts. At Montreal, as at Quebec, he was

anxious to perfect the organization of the military forces, and to place

the city, from every point of view, in the best possible condition of

defence. He had not as yet received news as to how Louvigny and Perrot

had succeeded among the Lake tribes; yet upon the success of their

mission hung the most momentous issues. Was Canada to secure allies in

the West who would hold at least in partial check the Iroquois power, or

were Hurons, Ottawas, Iroquois, and English to combine their forces for

her destruction? Meantime bad news had come from Acadia. Port Royal and

other fortified posts had been captured; the English were in possession

of the entire country; the governor had been carried captive to Boston.

It was known that the English of Albany and New York were moving: what

the next news would be, who could tell?

On the 18th August news came. In hot haste the officer in command at

Lachine had despatched a messenger to say that Lake St. Louis to the

west was covered with Iroquois canoes bearing down on the island. The

terror of the inhabitants, in spite of the presence of the governor

amongst them, was extreme. Orders were given to fire alarm guns to warn

the inhabitants of the surrounding country; and other measures of

protection were being hastily concerted, when a second messenger arrived

to say that it was all a mistake. It was not the dreaded Iroquois who

were close at hand, but a large body of Lake Indians who were coming to

trade. Fear was at once turned into joy. The envoys sent to the upper

country in May had been successful; a great danger had been averted.

Perrot with his scalps and Frontenac with his vigorous and aggressive,

if somewhat primitive and ruthless, war policy had turned the scale in

favour of Canada. Firm alliances would now be made, and there would be a

big market at Montreal.

The next day the canoes, laden with the accumulated furs of the last two

or three years, shot the Lachine Rapids and landed at Montreal. There

were about five hundred Indians in all, Hurons, Ottawas, Crees,

Ojibways, and various other tribes, all bent on buying, selling, and

negotiating. It was not the habit, however, of these savages to enter

precipitately on any kind of business; and three days were allowed to

elapse before they opened their great council at which, tribe by tribe,

they were to lay their views before the governor. The first to speak

were the Ottawas, and their talk was almost exclusively of trade. Their

instinct for business was keen, and had it been possible they would

probably have steered clear of politics. They had had some experience of

the low prices of English goods, and were very insistent that the French

should deal with them on equally favourable terms. The spokesman of the

Hurons, a much weaker tribe numerically, was not so narrowly commercial

in his views. He said he had come down to see his father, to listen to

his voice, and to do his will. He presented three belts. By the first he

prayed that the war might be prosecuted against the Iroquois as well as

against the English. If not, he feared he and his father would both

die. The second thanked the count for his former services to their

nation. The third prayed him to take pity on the Ottawas, and give them

good bargains. Such a manifestation of interest in the Ottawas was very

touching; but probably the Huron orator, whose people had a certain

reputation for subtlety, calculated that, if a lower tariff were made

for the Ottawas, all would get the benefit of it. On the twenty-fifth of

the month, the count entertained them all at a great feast. Two oxen and

six large dogs furnished the meat, which was cooked with prunes. Two

barrels of wine were provided to wash this down, and liberal rations of

tobacco were served out to every man. Before the feasting began, the

count stood up to address his guests. He assured them that he meant to

prosecute the war with the Iroquois until he had brought it to a

successful issue, and forced them to sue for peace. Then, when peace was

made, it should be a general peace: all should be included in it, and

the Iroquois themselves would again be his children. Meantime, however,

they were preparing to invade the country; and the question was whether

to await their arrival or go to meet them. Then ensued a remarkable

performance, which might well have employed a livelier pen than that of

Monseignat who gives us the account of it. Seizing a hatchet, the aged

governor, war-worn but yet fiery and vigorous, began to sing the war

song, walking to and fro in the most excited manner, and brandishing

the hatchet over his head in true Indian fashion. The effect was

electric. The old Onontio was surpassing himself. Here was a leader

whose very presence banished fear. When he had sufficiently excited

their admiration, and stimulated their warlike ardour, he handed the

hatchet to the different chiefs in turn, and to a number of Frenchmen,

who all imitated Onontio's example, vowing vengeance on the foe. Then

began the feast, a function to which it is needless to say the savage

guests brought ravenous appetites. In diplomacy dinners have been known

to work wonders; and Frontenac was seeking the hearts of his guests

through a well-recognized channel.

We have seen that the mission sent by the governor to the Iroquois

towards the close of the previous year, and which returned in the

following month of March, had not accomplished any satisfactory result.

The count waited till navigation was open before resuming negotiations.

He then determined to restore to their nation the four returned Iroquois

who had formed his first embassy, and to make them the bearers of belts

which he hoped would speak strongly in favour of peace. With these

Indians he sent a French gentleman, the Chevalier d'Eau. He tendered the

mission in the first place to the gay and dashing Baron La Hontan; but

that young man, who was well versed in the classics, was afraid of the

Iroquois even when carrying gifts to them; and, with marked discretion,

declined the honour. The Chevalier d'Eau had no reason to congratulate

himself on having accepted it. He made his appearance amongst the

Iroquois at a most unfavourable moment. The affair at Schenectady was

fresh in their recollection; and though their own people had, through

motives of policy, been spared on that occasion, they were under a

strong pledge to the English to assist in revenging the slaughter. A

couple of Frenchmen who accompanied the chevalier were burnt; he himself

was soundly thrashed and handed over as a prisoner to the English; the

messages of the belts were disregarded. No news of the fate of the envoy

had reached Frontenac up to the time of the gathering of the western

Indians at Montreal; but after their departure the facts concerning them

were obtained from some Iroquois prisoners at Fort Frontenac. The one

great gain of the year had been the winning over of the Lake tribes, a

result which at once assured the safety of the French traders and

missionaries in the West, and prevented that isolation of the colony

which would have followed had an alliance been struck between those

tribes and the Iroquois.

[Footnote 33: _Frontenac et ses Amis_, p. 93.]

[Footnote 34: _Comte de Frontenac_, p. 358.]

[Footnote 35: Far from yielding to Frontenac's view of the matter,

Denonville doggedly adhered to his own opinion that the fort ought to be

entirely abandoned; and, when it was found that it had only been partly

destroyed, he wrote to the king advising that Frontenac should be

ordered to send up three hundred men with instructions to demolish it

utterly.]

[Footnote 36: Parkman tells the story in his usual brilliant manner in

chapter iii. of his _Old Regime in Canada_. Pere Charlevoix gives the

facts and adds: "Je l'ai vu en 1721, age de quatre-vingt ans, plein de

forces et de sante; toute la colonie rendant hommage a sa vertu et a son

merite," vol. ii. p. 111, edition of 1744.]

[Footnote 37: _New York Colonial Documents_, p. 464.]

[Footnote 38: Perrot and his party, according to Monseignat's narrative,

left the end of the Island of Montreal on the 22nd May. The Albany--or

more correctly Schenectady party, for they did not venture to attack

Albany--returned towards the end of March. Frontenac's message must have

been composed some months before Perrot's departure, otherwise he would

undoubtedly have mentioned with pride the Schenectady massacre. It was

certainly not up to date.]

[Footnote 39: "There was little resistance," says Pere Chretien

Leclercq, a contemporary writer, "except at one house, where Sieur de

Marque Montigny was wounded; but Sieur de Ste. Helene, having come up,

all were slaughtered with sword or tomahawk, the Indians sparing no

one."--_Premier Etablissement de la Foi._]

[Footnote 40: _Documentary History of New York_, vol. ii. pp. 164-9.]

[Footnote 41: _New York Colonial Documents_, vol. ix. p. 440. See also

Lorin, _Comte de Frontenac_, chap. x.]

[Footnote 42: _Comte de Frontenac_, p. 367.]

[Footnote 43: Names given by the Indians to the governors of New York

and Massachusetts; Corlaer being a corruption of Cuyler, a Dutchman of

the early period held in high honour by them, and Kishon signifying "The

Fish."]

Count Frontenac Makers of Canada, Volume 3 · 第 9 / 12 章