3. _Modern History._

Wars in Arabia.

(1) _Rule of Mehemet Ali._--Mehemet Ali was now undisputed master of

Egypt, and his efforts henceforth were directed primarily to the

maintenance of his practical independence. The suzerainty of the sultan

he acknowledged, and at the reiterated commands of the Porte he

despatched in 1811 an army of 8000 men, including 2000 horse, under the

command of his son Tusun, a youth of sixteen, against the Wahhabis

(q.v.). After a successful advance, this force met with a serious

repulse at the pass of Jedeida, near Safra, and retreated to Yembo'

(Yambu). In the following year Tusun, having received reinforcements,

again assumed the offensive, and captured Medina after a prolonged

siege. He next took Jidda and Mecca, defeating the Wahhabis beyond the

latter place and capturing their general. But some mishaps followed, and

Mehemet Ali, who had determined to conduct the war in person, left Egypt

for that purpose in the summer of 1813. In Arabia he encountered serious

obstacles from the nature of the country and the harassing mode of

warfare adopted by his adversaries. His arms met with various fortunes;

but on the whole his forces proved superior to those of the enemy. He

deposed and exiled the sharif of Mecca, and after the death of the

Wahhabi leader Saud II. he concluded in 1815 a treaty with Saud's son

and successor, Abdullah. Hearing of the escape of Napoleon from

Elba--and fearing danger to Egypt from the plans of France or Great

Britain--Mehemet Ali returned to Cairo by way of Kosseir and Kena. He

reached the capital on the day of the battle of Waterloo. His return was

hastened by reports that the Turks, whose cause he was upholding in

Arabia, were treacherously planning an invasion of Egypt.

During Mehemet Ali's absence in Arabia his representative at Cairo had

completed the confiscation, begun in 1808, of almost all the lands

belonging to private individuals, who were forced to accept instead

inadequate pensions. By this revolutionary method of land

"nationalization" Mehemet Ali became proprietor of nearly all the soil

of Egypt, an iniquitous measure against which the Egyptians had no

remedy. The attempt which in this year (1815) the pasha made to

reorganize his troops on European lines led, however, to a formidable

mutiny in Cairo. Mehemet Ali's life was endangered, and he sought refuge

by night in the citadel, while the soldiery committed many acts of

plunder. The revolt was reduced by presents to the chiefs of the

insurgents, and Mehemet Ali ordered that the sufferers by the

disturbances should receive compensation from the treasury. The project

of the _Nizam Gedid_ (New System), as the European system was called,

was, in consequence of this mutiny, abandoned for a time.

Tusun returned to Egypt on hearing of the military revolt at Cairo, but

died in 1816 at the early age of twenty. Mehemet Ali, dissatisfied with

the treaty concluded with the Wahhabis, and with the non-fulfilment of

certain of its clauses, determined to send another army to Arabia, and

to include in it the soldiers who had recently proved unruly. This

expedition, under his eldest son Ibrahim Pasha, left in the autumn of

1816. The war was long and arduous, but in 1818 Ibrahim captured the

Wahhabi capital of Deraiya. Abdullah, their chief, was made prisoner,

and with his treasurer and secretary was sent to Constantinople, where,

in spite of Ibrahim's promise of safety, and of Mehemet Ali's

intercession in their favour, they were put to death. At the close of

the year 1819, Ibrahim returned to Cairo, having subdued all present

opposition in Arabia.

Meanwhile the pasha had turned his attention to the improvement of the

manufactures of Egypt, and engaged very largely in commerce. He created

for himself a monopoly in the chief products of the country, to the

further impoverishment of the people, and set up and kept going for

years factories which never paid. But some of his projects were sound.

The work of digging (1819-1820) the new canal of Alexandria, called the

Mahmudiya (after the reigning sultan of Turkey), was specially

important. The old canal had long fallen into decay, and the necessity

of a safe channel between Alexandria and the Nile was much felt. Such

was the object of the canal then excavated, and it answered its purpose;

but the sacrifice of life was enormous (fully 20,000 workmen perished),

and the labour of the unhappy fellahin was forced. Another notable fact

in the economic progress of the country was the development of the

cultivation of cotton in the Delta in 1822 and onwards. The cotton grown

had been brought from the Sudan by Maho Bey, and the organization of the

new industry--from which in a few years Mehemet Ali was enabled to

extract considerable revenues--was entrusted to a Frenchman named Jumel.

Conquest of the Sudan begun.

In 1820 Mehemet Ali ordered the conquest of the eastern Sudan to be

undertaken. He first sent an expedition westward (Feb. 1820) which

conquered and annexed the oasis of Siwa. Among the pasha's reasons for

wishing to extend his rule southward were the desire to capture the

valuable caravan trade then going towards the Red Sea, and to secure the

rich gold mines which he believed to exist in Sennar. He also saw in the

campaign a means of getting rid of the disaffected troops, and of

obtaining a sufficient number of captives to form the nucleus of the new

army. The forces destined for this service were led by Ismail, then the

youngest son of Mehemet Ali; they consisted of between 4000 and 5000

men, Turks and Arabs, and left Cairo in July 1820. Nubia at once

submitted, the Shagia Arabs immediately beyond the province of Dongola

were worsted, the remnant of the Mamelukes dispersed, and Sennar reduced

without a battle. Mahommed Bey, the defterdar, with another force of

about the same strength, was then sent by Mehemet Ali against Kordofan

with a like result, but not without a hard-fought engagement. In October

1822 Ismail was, with his retinue, burnt to death by Nimr, the _mek_

(king) of Shendi; and the defterdar, a man infamous for his cruelty,

assumed the command of those provinces, and exacted terrible retribution

from the innocent inhabitants. Khartum was founded at this time, and in

the following years the rule of the Egyptians was largely extended and

control obtained of the Red Sea ports of Suakin and Massawa (see SUDAN:

_History_).

In 1824 a native rebellion of a religious character broke out in Upper

Egypt headed by one Ahmad, an inhabitant of Es-Salimiya, a village

situated a few miles above Thebes. He proclaimed himself a prophet, and

was soon followed by between 20,000 and 30,000 insurgents, mostly

peasants, but some of them deserters from the "Nizam Gedid," for that

force was yet in a half-organized state, and in part declared for the

impostor. The insurrection was crushed by Mehemet Ali, and about

one-fourth of Ahmad's followers perished, but he himself escaped and was

never after heard of. Few of these unfortunates possessed any other

weapon than the long staff (_nebbut_) of the Egyptian peasant; still

they offered an obstinate resistance, and the combat in which they were

defeated resembled a massacre. This movement was the last internal

attempt to destroy the pasha's authority.

Sufferings of the fellahin.

The fellahin, a patient, long-suffering race save when stirred by

religious fanaticism, submitted to the kurbash, freely used by the

Turkish and Bashi Bazuk tax-gatherers employed by Mehemet Ali to enforce

his system of taxation, monopolies, corvee and conscription. Under this

regime the resources of the country were impoverished, while the

finances fell into complete and incomprehensible chaos.

A vivid picture of the condition to which Egypt was reduced is painted

in the report drawn up in 1838 by the British consul-general, Colonel

Campbell:--

"The government (he wrote), possessing itself of the necessaries of

life at prices fixed by itself, disposes of them at arbitrary prices.

The fellah is thus deprived of his harvest and falls into arrears with

his taxes, and is harassed and bastinadoed to force him to pay his

debts. This leads to deterioration of agriculture and lessens the

production. The pasha having imposed high taxes has caused the high

prices of the necessaries of life. It would be difficult for a

foreigner now coming to Egypt to form a just idea of the actual state

of the country as compared with its former state. In regard to the

general rise in prices, all the ground cultivated under the Mamelukes

was employed for producing food--wheat, barley, beans, &c.--in immense

quantities. The people reared fowls, sheep, goats, &c., and the prices

were one-sixth, or even one-tenth, of those at present. This continued

until Mehemet Ali became viceroy in 1805. From that period until the

establishment of monopolies prices have gradually increased; but the

great increase has chiefly taken place since 1824, when the pasha

established his regular army, navy and factories."

The conclusion in 1838 of a commercial treaty with Turkey, negotiated by

Sir Henry Bulwer (Lord Dalling), struck a death-blow to the system of

monopolies, though the application of the treaty to Egypt was delayed

for some years. The picture of Egypt under Mehemet Ali is nevertheless

not complete without regard being had to the beneficent side of his

rule. Public order was rendered perfect; the Nile and the highways were

secure to all travellers, Christian or Moslem; the Bedouin tribes were

won over to peaceful pursuits, and genuine efforts were made to promote

education and the study of medicine. To European merchants, on whom he

was dependent for the sale of his exports, Mehemet Ali showed much

favour, and under his influence the port of Alexandria again rose into

importance. It was also under Mehemet Ali's encouragement that the

overland transit of goods from Europe to India via Egypt was resumed.

Ibrahim in the Morea.

Mehemet Ali was fully conscious that the empire which he had so

laboriously built up might at any time have to be defended by force of

arms against his master Sultan Mahmud II., whose whole policy had been

directed to curbing the power of his too ambitious valis, and who was

under the influence of the personal enemies of the pasha of Egypt,

notably of Khosrev, the grand vizier, who had never forgiven his

humiliation in Egypt in 1803. Mahmud also was already planning reforms

borrowed from the West, and Mehemet Ali, who had had plenty of

opportunity of observing the superiority of European methods of warfare,

was determined to anticipate the sultan in the creation of a fleet and

an army on modern lines, partly as a measure of precaution, partly as an

instrument for the realization of yet wider schemes of ambition. Before

the outbreak of the War of Greek Independence in 1821 he had already

expended much time and energy in organizing a fleet and in training,

under the supervision of French instructors, native officers and

artificers; though it was not till 1829 that the opening of a dockyard

and arsenal at Alexandria enabled him to build and equip his own

vessels. By 1823, moreover, he had succeeded in carrying out the

reorganization of his army on European lines, the turbulent Turkish and

Albanian elements being replaced by negroes and fellahin.[23] His

foresight was rewarded by the invitation of the sultan to help him in

the task of subduing the Greek insurgents, offering as reward the

pashaliks of the Morea and of Syria. Mehemet Ali had already, in 1821,

been appointed governor of Crete, which he had occupied with a small

Egyptian force. In the autumn of 1824 a fleet of sixty Egyptian

war-ships carrying a large force of disciplined troops concentrated in

Suda Bay, and, in the following March, Ibrahim as commander-in-chief

landed in the Morea. But for the action of European powers the

intervention of Mehemet Ali would have been decisive. His naval

superiority wrested from the Greeks the command of the sea, on which the

fate of the insurrection ultimately depended, while on land the Greek

irregular bands were everywhere routed by Ibrahim's disciplined troops.

The history of the events that led up to the battle of Navarino and the

liberation of Greece is told elsewhere (see NAVARINO and GREEK

INDEPENDENCE, WAR OF); the withdrawal of the Egyptians from the Morea

was ultimately due to the action of Admiral Sir Edward Codrington, who

early in August 1828 appeared before Alexandria and induced the pasha,

by no means sorry to have a reasonable excuse, by a threat of

bombardment, to sign a convention undertaking to recall Ibrahim and his

army.

The Syrian campaigns.

Before the final establishment of the new kingdom of Greece, the Eastern

question had late in 1831 entered into a new and more perilous phase,

owing to the revolt of Mehemet Ali against the sultan on pretext of

chastising the ex-slave Abdullah, pasha of Acre, for refusing to send

back Egyptian fugitives from the effects of Mehemet Ali's "reforms." The

true reason was the refusal of Sultan Mahmud to hand over Syria

according to agreement, and Mehemet Ali's determination to obtain at all

hazards what had been from time immemorial an object of ambition to the

rulers of Egypt. For ten years from this date the relations of sultan

and pasha remained in the forefront of the questions which agitated the

diplomatic world. It was not only the very existence of the Ottoman

empire that seemed to be at stake, but Egypt itself had become more than

ever an object of attention, to British statesmen especially, and in the

issue of the struggle were involved the interests of Great Britain in

the two routes to India by the Isthmus of Suez and the valley of the

Euphrates. The diplomatic and military history of this period will be

found sketched in the article on Mehemet Ali. Here it will suffice to

say that the victorious career of Ibrahim, who once more commanded in

his father's name, beginning with the storming of Acre on the 27th of

May 1832, and culminating in the rout and capture of Reshid Pasha at

Konia on the 21st of December, was arrested by the intervention of

Russia. As the result of endless discussions between the representatives

of the powers, the Porte and the pasha, the convention of Kutaya was

signed on the 14th of May 1833, by which the sultan agreed to bestow on

Mehemet Ali the pashaliks of Syria, Damascus, Aleppo and Itcheli,

together with the district of Adana. The announcement of the pasha's

appointment had already been made in the usual way in the annual firman

issued on the 3rd of May. Adana, reserved for the moment, was bestowed

on Ibrahim under the style of _muhassil_, or collector of the crown

revenues, a few days later.

Mehemet Ali now ruled over a virtually independent empire, subject only

to a moderate tribute, stretching from the Sudan to the Taurus

Mountains. But though he was hailed, especially in France, as the

pioneer of European civilization in the East, the unsound foundations of

his authority were not long in revealing themselves. Scarcely a year

from the signing of the convention of Kutaya the application by Ibrahim

of Egyptian methods of government, notably of the monopolies and

conscription, had driven Syrians, Druses and Arabs, who had welcomed him

as a deliverer, into revolt. The unrest was suppressed by Mehemet Ali in

person, and the Syrians were terrorized and disarmed. But their

discontent encouraged Sultan Mahmud to hope for revenge, and a renewal

of the conflict was only staved off by the anxious efforts of the

powers. At last, in the spring of 1839, the sultan ordered his army,

concentrated under Reshid in the border district of Bir on the

Euphrates, to advance over the Syrian frontier. Ibrahim, seeing his

flank menaced, attacked it at Nezib on the 24th of June. Once more the

Ottomans were utterly routed. Six days later, before the news reached

Constantinople, Mahmud died. Once more the Ottoman empire lay at the

feet of Mehemet Ali; but the powers were now more prepared to meet a

contingency which had been long foreseen. Their intervention was prompt;

and the dubious attitude of France, which led to her exclusion from the

concert and encouraged Mehemet Ali to resist, only led to his obtaining

less favourable terms. (See MEHEMET ALI.)

Mehemet Ali's authority confined to Egypt.

The end was reached early in 1841. New firmans were issued which

confined the pasha's authority to Egypt, the Sinai peninsula and certain

places on the Arabian side of the Red Sea, and to the Sudan. The most

important of these documents are dated the 13th of February 1841. The

government of the pashalik of Egypt was made hereditary in the family of

Mehemet Ali.[24] A map showing the boundaries of Egypt accompanied the

firman granting Mehemet Ali the pashalik, a duplicate copy being

retained by the Porte. The Egyptian copy is supposed to have been lost

in a fire which destroyed a great part of the Egyptian archives. The

Turkish copy has never been produced and its existence now appears

doubtful. The point is of importance, as in 1892 and again in 1906

boundary disputes arose between Turkey and Egypt (see below). Various

restrictions were laid upon Mehemet Ali, emphasizing his position of

vassalage. He was forbidden to maintain a fleet, and his army was not to

exceed 18,000 men. The pasha was no longer a figure in European

politics, but he continued to occupy himself with his improvements, real

or imaginary, in Egypt. The condition of the country was deplorable; in

1842 a murrain of cattle was followed by a destructive Nile flood; in

1843 there was a plague of locusts, whole villages were depopulated.

Meantime the uttermost farthing was wrung from the wretched fellahin,

while they were forced to the building of magnificent public works by

unpaid labour. In 1844-1845 there was some improvement in the condition

of the country as a result of financial reforms the pasha was compelled

to execute. Mehemet Ali, who had been granted the honorary rank of grand

vizier in 1842, paid a visit to Stamboul in 1846, where he became

reconciled to his old enemy Khosrev Pasha, whom he had not seen since he

spared his life at Cairo in 1803. In 1847 Mehemet Ali laid the

foundation stone of the great barrage across the Nile at the beginning

of the Delta. He was barely persuaded from ordering the barrage to be

built with stone from the pyramids! Towards the end of 1847 the aged

pasha's mind began to give way, and by the following June he was no

longer capable of administering the government. In September 1848

Ibrahim was acknowledged by the Porte as ruler of the pashalik, but he

died in the November following. Mehemet Ali survived another eight

months, dying on the 2nd of August 1849, aged eighty. He had done a

great work in Egypt; the most permanent being the weakening of the tie

binding the country to Turkey, the starting of the great cotton

industry, the recognition of the advantages of European science, and the

conquest of the Sudan. (F. R. C.)

Abbas I. and Said Pasha.

(2) _From the Death of Mehemet Ali to the British Occupation._--On

Ibrahim's death in November 1848 the government of Egypt fell to his

nephew Abbas I (q.v.), the son of Tusun. Abbas put an end to the system

of commercial monopolies, and during his reign the railway from

Alexandria to Cairo was begun at the instigation of the British

government. Opposed to European ways, Abbas lived in great seclusion,

and after a reign of less than six years he was murdered (July 1854) by

two of his slaves. He was succeeded by his uncle Said Pasha, the

favourite son of Mehemet Ali, who lacked the strength of mind or

physical health needed to execute the beneficent projects which he

conceived. His endeavour, for instance, to put a stop to the slave

raiding which devastated the Sudan provinces was wholly ineffectual. He

had a genuine regard for the welfare of the fellahin, and a land law of

1858 secured to them an acknowledgment of freehold as against the crown.

The pasha was much under French influence, and in 1856 was induced to

grant to Ferdinand de Lesseps a concession for the construction of the

Suez Canal. Lord Palmerston was opposed to this project, and the British

opposition delayed the ratification of the concession by the Porte for

two years. To the British Said also made concessions--one to the Eastern

Telegraph Company, and another (1854) allowing the establishment of the

Bank of Egypt. He also began the national debt by borrowing L3,293,000

from Messrs Fruhling & Goschen, the actual amount received by the pasha

being L2,640,000. In January 1863 Said Pasha died and was succeeded by

his nephew Ismail, a son of Ibrahim Pasha.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Edwardes, Sir Herbert Benjamin" to "Ehrenbreitstein" Volume 9, Slice 1 · 第 22 / 28 题