ONE QUESTION TOO MANY

What lawyer has not, at some time, in the trial of a case asked

just _one question_ too many? I know of nothing better along that

line of inquiry than the following related by Governor Knott.

He was attending the Circuit Court in one of the Green River counties

in Kentucky, when the case of the "Commonwealth _versus_ William

Jenkins" was called for trial. The aforesaid William was under

indictment for having bitten off the ear of the prosecuting witness.

Fairly strong but by no means conclusive testimony against the

defendant had been given when the State "rested."

A lawyer of the old school, who still carried his green bag into

Court, and who never wearied of telling of his conflicts at the

bar with Grundy, Holt, and Ben Hardin, in their palmiest days, was

retained for the defence. His chief witness was Squire Barnhouse,

who lived over on the "Rolling Fork." He was the magistrate for

his precinct, deacon in the church, and the recognized oracle

for the neighborhood. Upon direct examination, in the case _at

bar,_ he testified that "he knowed the defendant William Jenkins; had

knowed him thirty year or more; knowed his father and mother afore

him." Inquired of then as to the general reputation of the defendant,

as to his being "a peaceable and law-abiding citizen," he was found

to be all that could be reasonably desired.

Squire Barnhouse was then asked whether he was present at the Caney

Fork muster, where it was alleged that the defendant had bitten

off the ear of the prosecuting witness. It turned out that he was

present. Further questioned as to whether he had paid particular

attention to the fight, he replied that he did; that he "had never

seed Billy in a fout before, and he had a kind of family pride in

seein' how _he would handle himself."_ Further questioned as to

whether he saw the defendant bite off the ear of the prosecuting

witness he replied, "No, sir, nothin' uv the kind, nothin' uv the kind."

This was followed by the inquiry as to whether his opportunities were

such that he would most probably have seen it, if it had occurred.

"In course I would, in course I would," was the emphatic reply.

The witness was here turned over to the Commonwealth's attorney,

who declined to cross-examine, and Squire Barnhouse was in the act

of leaving the stand when in an evil hour it occurred to defendant's

counsel to ask one question more.

"By the way, Squire, _just one more question,_ just where you stand;

now I understood you to say"--repeating the answers already given;

"now just this question, did you see anything occur while the fight

was going on, or after it was over, that would lead you to believe

that this defendant had bitten off the ear of the prosecuting

witness?"

The Squire, half down the witness stand, answered, "No, sir, nothing

uv the kind," then, slowly and thoughtfully, "nothing uv the kind."

A moment's pause. "Well, since you mention it, I do remember that

just as Billy rizened up offen him the last time, I seed him spit out

a piece of ear, _but whose ear it was,_ I don't pertend to know."

Something of Men I Have Known With Some Papers of a General Nature, Political, Historical, and Retrospective · 第 20 / 41 题