We have passed the hundredth anniversary of the birth of Longfellow,

and he still remains the favorite American poet. Not that Longfellow

is one of the great world poets; Longfellow himself would have been

offended with that eulogistic extravagance which would place him among

the few immortals. He is not a Homer, nor a Dante, nor a Shakspere.

No, he is not even a Wordsworth in philosophic insight into nature,

nor a Shelley in power to snatch the soul into the starry empyrean,

nor a Tennyson in variety and passion, nor a Milton in grandeur of

poetic expression. He is--only Longfellow. But that means he has his

own peculiar charm. It is idle to detract from the fame of one man

because he is not some one else. Roast beef may be more nutritious

than strawberries, but that is no criticism upon the flavor of the

strawberry. Longfellow is not Milton, but then neither is Milton

Longfellow:

If I cannot carry forests on my back

Neither can you crack a nut.

Of late years the critics have been finding fault with Longfellow.

They have said that really Longfellow is no poet. Frederic Harrison

calls Evangeline "goody, goody dribble!" and Quiller-Couch in his

anthology gives three pages to Longfellow and seven to Wilfred Scawen

Blunt--but who is Blunt? When I was in Berlin I found in a German

history of English and American Literature one-half a page devoted to

Longfellow and ten pages to Poe. Perhaps some of this criticism is but

the natural reaction following the extreme praise that ensued after

the death of Longfellow in 1882.

[Illustration: HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW

From a wood engraving of a life photograph]

But Longfellow is surviving all derogatory criticism. He is still the

poet with the universal appeal. It is altogether probable that he is

more widely read to-day than any other American poet. Even foreigners

still express their affection for this poet of the domestic

affections. In 1907 Sir Henry Mortimer Durand, the English Ambassador

to the United States, made an address in which he made graceful

acknowledgement of his debt to this American poet:

"I owe much of the pleasure of my life to American writers of every

shade of thought.... But I owe to one American writer much more than

pleasure. Tastes differ and fashions change, and I am told that the

poetry of Longfellow is not read as it used to be. Men in my own

country have asked me whether the rivers of Damascus were not better

than all the waters of Israel, whether Shakspere, and Milton, and

Shelley, and Keats were not enough for me, that I need go to

Longfellow. And Americans have seemed surprised that I did not speak

rather of Lowell and Bryant and others. Far be it from me to say a

word against any of them. I have loved them all from my youth up,

every one of them in his own way, and Shakspere as the master and

compendium of them all. No one, I suppose, would place Longfellow as a

poet quite on the same level with some of them. But the fact remains

that, for one reason or another, perhaps in part from early

associations, Longfellow has always spoken to my heart. Many a time,

in lands far away from the land he loved so well, I have sought for

sympathy in happiness and in sorrow--

Not from the grand old masters,

Not from the bards sublime,

Whose distant footsteps echo

Through the corridors of time--

but from that pure and gentle and untroubled spirit."

Professor E.A. Grosvenor, of Amherst, years ago published an article

on Longfellow that was widely copied. It is an interesting account of

a conversation in 1879 on board the Messageries steamer _Donai_, bound

from Constantinople to Marseilles. On board many nationalities were

represented. The story is a fine illustration of the wide-spread

popularity of the American poet.

"One evening, as we were quitting the Straits of Bonifacio, some one

remarked at dinner that, though Victor Hugo was born in Paris, the

earliest impressions of his life were received in Corsica, close to

which we were passing. Ten or twelve of us lingered after the meal was

finished to talk of the great French poet. One of the party spoke of

him as embodying, more than any other writer, the humanistic

tendencies of the nineteenth century and as the exponent of what is

best in humanity.

"We had been talking in French, when the Russian lady exclaimed in

English to the gentleman who had last spoken, 'How can you, an

American, give to him the place that is occupied by your own

Longfellow? Longfellow is the universal poet. He is better known, too,

among foreigners than any one except their own poets! Then she

commenced repeating in rich, mellow tones:

I stood on the bridge at midnight,

As the clocks were striking the hour,

And the moon rose over the city

Behind the dark church tower.

I recall how her voice trembled over the words:

And the burden laid upon me

Seemed greater than I could bear.

and how it swelled out in the concluding lines:

As the symbol of love in Heaven,

And its wavering image here.

It was dramatic and never to be forgotten. Then she added, 'I long to

visit Boston that I may stand on the Bridge.'

"In the company was an English captain returning from the Zulu war. He

was the son of that member of Parliament' who had been the chief

supporter of the claimant in the famous Tichborne case, and who had

poured out his money like water in behalf of the man whom he

considered cruelly wronged. The captain was a typical British soldier,

with every characteristic of his class. Joining our steamer at Genoa,

he had so far talked only of the Zulus and, with bitter indignation,

of the manner in which the Prince Imperial had been deserted by

British soldiers to be slain by savages. As soon as the Russian lady

had concluded he said: 'I can give you something better than that,'

and began in a voice like a trumpet:

Tell me not in mournful numbers

Life is but an empty dream.

His recitation of the entire poem was marked by the common English

upheaval and down-letting of the voice in each line; but it was

evident that he loved what he was repeating.

"Then a tall, lank, gray-haired Scotchman, who knew no French, who had

hardly mingled with the other passengers, and who seemed always

communing with himself, suddenly commenced:

There is no flock, however watched and tended,

But one dead lamb is there.

He repeated only a few stanzas, but could apparently have given the

whole poem, had he wished.

"For myself, I know that my contribution was _My Lost Youth_,

beginning

Often I think of the beautiful town,

That is seated by the sea;

Often in thought go up and down

The pleasant streets of that dear old town

And my youth comes back to me.

Never did the distance from an early home seem so great to one, New

England born, as in that strange company, gathered from many lands,

each with words upon the lip which the American had first heard in

childhood.

"A handsome, olive-cheeked young man, a Greek from Manchester,

educated and living in England, said, 'How do you like this?' Then he

began to sing:

Stars of the summer night,

Far in yon azure deeps,

Hide, hide your golden light!

She sleeps!

My lady sleeps!

Sleeps!

So he rendered the whole of that exquisite serenade--dear to American

college students--with a freedom and a fire which hinted that he had

sung it at least once before on some more appropriate occasion.

Perhaps to some dark-eyed maiden of that elegant Greek colony of

Manchester it had come as a revelation, and perhaps she had first

heard it sung in front of her father's mansion and had looked down,

appreciative but unseen, from above.

"The captain of the _Donai_ was not her regular commander, but an

officer of the national French navy, who was in charge only for a few

voyages. A thorough Frenchman, no one would have accused him of

knowing a word of any tongue, save his own. Versatile, overflowing

with wit and _bons mots_, it must have wearied him to be silent so

long. To our astonishment, in accents so Gallic that one discerned

with difficulty that he was attempting English, he intoned:

Zee seds of neet fair valeeng fast,

Ven t'rough an Alpeen veelage past

A yout, who bore meed snow and eece

A bannair veed dees strange deveece

Excelsiorr!

"'_Eh, voila_,' he exclaimed with satisfaction, '_J'ai appris cela a

l'ecole. C'est tout l'anglais que je sais._'

"'_Mais, commandant_,' said the Russian lady, '_ce n'est pas l'anglais

du tout ce que vous venez de dire la._'

"'_Ah, oui, madame, ca vient de votre Longfellow._'

"None of the other passengers contributed, but already six

nationalities had spoken--Scotch, Russian, Greek, French, English, and

American. As we arose from the table and went up on deck to watch the

lights glimmering in Napoleon's birthplace, Ajaccio, the Russian lady

said: 'Do you suppose there is any other poet of any country, living

or dead, from whom so many of us could have quoted? Not one. Not even

Shakspere or Victor Hugo or Homer.'"

LVIII

HENRY DAVID THOREAU

During his lifetime Thoreau published but two books,--_Walden_, and

the _Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers_,--and these had but

limited sale while the author was living. Over seven hundred copies of

the _Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers_ were returned, to

Thoreau by his publisher. Thoreau must have had a helpful sense of

humor, for after lugging the burden upstairs he complacently

remarks,--"I have now a library of nearly nine hundred volumes, over

seven hundred of which I wrote myself." In recent times a costly

edition of all Thoreau's writings has been published. He is one of the

rare spirits whose fame increases with the years. But of all his

voluminous writings _Walden_, so it seems to me, is the most readable,

the freshest, the most stimulating. Higginson says that it is,

perhaps, the only book yet written in America that can bear an annual

reading.

_Walden_ is a record of Thoreau's sojourn for about two years in the

woods by Walden Pond. He went about two miles from his mother's door,

built a little house or hut, and there lived, reading his favorite

books, philosophizing, studying nature, and to a great extent

avoiding society. Some people have condemned him as selfish, others

have defended him. His best defense is his work. If anything so fresh

and readable as _Walden_ be the result, we might be willing to deny

ourselves the society of some of our urban friends, without charging

them with selfishness. Thoreau is sometimes called a "wild man"; in a

sense, he is untamed. He himself confessed,--"There is in my nature,

methinks, a singular yearning toward all wildness." Yet he was a true

lover of men. He hated slavery and went to jail rather than pay his

taxes, because he disbelieved in supporting a government that upheld

slavery. When his friend, the philosophic Emerson, peered into the

prison cell and said,--"Henry, why are you here?" the quick retort

was,--"Why are you not here?"

It must be remembered that Thoreau lived in a time of social

experiment. Hawthorne had thrown in his lot for a brief time with the

Brook Farm idealists. Why should not Thoreau make an experiment of his

own? Why not live the simple life before Wagner wrote about it? He was

tired of the conventionalities of society, of the incessant

interruptions to steady thought. Society is naught but a conspiracy to

compel imitation. "The head monkey of Paris puts on a traveler's cap,

and all the monkeys in America do the same." So Thoreau moves out into

the woods by the side of Walden Pond. Before he can live there he must

build his house:

"Near the end of March, 1845, I borrowed an axe and went down to the

woods by Walden Pond, nearest to where I intended to build my house,

and began to cut down some tall arrowy pines, still in their youth,

for timber. It is difficult to begin without borrowing, but perhaps it

is the most generous course thus to permit your fellow-men to have an

interest in your enterprise. The owner of the axe as he released his

hold on it, said that it was the apple of his eye; but I returned it

sharper than I received it."

His house, when finished, was ten feet wide and fifteen long. The

exact cost was twenty-eight dollars, twelve and one-half cents. In

_Walden_ he gives an itemized account of the cost. And then he adds,

with a twinkle of his eye, I think,--"I intend to build me a house

which will surpass any on the main street in Concord in grandeur and

luxury, as soon as it pleases me as much and will cost me no more than

my present one."

Thoreau also finds some satisfaction that his house cost him less than

the year's rent of a college room at Harvard; for there the mere rent

of a student's room, "which is only a little larger than my own, is

thirty dollars each year, though the corporation had the advantage of

building thirty-two side by side and under one roof."

In this book he gives a very interesting account of what his food cost

him during the eight months from July 4 to March 1. Here is his list:

Rice $1.73-1/2

Molasses 1.73

Rye meal 1.04-3/4

Indian meal .99-3/4

Pork .22

Flour .88

Sugar .80

Lard .65

Apples .25

Dried apple .22

Sweet potatoes .10

One pumpkin .06

One watermelon .02

Salt .03

"Yes," says he, "I did eat $8.74, all told; but I should not thus

unblushingly publish my guilt, if I did not know that most of my

readers were equally guilty with myself, and that their deeds would

look no better in print." In this connection one may call to mind a

reported saying of Mrs. Emerson's to the effect that Henry never got

very far away from the sound of the dinner horn. It is not hard to

imagine that the hospitable Emerson often invited the kindred-spirited

Thoreau into his house for a warm and abundant dinner. Another writer

recently has advanced also this thought: Thoreau was not so much of a

selfish hermit as it might appear. He went into the woods to make his

house or hut a station on the underground railroad. If this be true, a

new and different light is thrown upon Thoreau's conduct.

Thoreau was a great lover of nature and the things of nature loved

him. Dr. Channing gives us this glimpse of the man:

"Thoreau named all the birds without a gun, a weapon he never used in

mature years. He neither killed nor imprisoned any animal, unless

driven by acute needs. He brought home a flying squirrel, to study its

mode of flight, but quickly carried it back to the wood. He possessed

true instincts of topography, and could conceal choice things in the

bush and find them again.... If Thoreau needed a box in his walk, he

would strip a piece of birch bark off the tree, fold it, when cut

straightly, together, and put his tender lichen or brittle creature

therein."

Emerson supplements this picture with the following account of a visit

he once made to Walden:

"The naturalist waded into the pool for the water plants, and his

strong legs were no insignificant part of his armor. On this day he

looked for the menyanthes and detected it across the wide pool; and,

on examination of the floret, declared that it had been in flower five

days. He drew out of his breast-pocket a diary, and read the names of

all the plants that should bloom that day, whereof he kept account as

a banker does when his notes are due.... He could pace rods more

accurately than another man could measure them with rod and chain. He

could find his way in the woods at night better by his feet than by

his eyes. He knew every track in the snow and on the ground, and what

creature had taken the path in the snow before him."

Thoreau could write the most beautiful descriptions when he was so

inclined. Here is an exquisite description of a snowstorm.

"Did you ever admire the steady, silent, windless fall of the snow, in

some lead-colored sky, silent save the little ticking of the flakes as

they touched the twigs? It is chased silver, molded over the pines and

oak leaves. Soft shades hang like curtains along the closely-draped

wood-paths. Frozen apples become little cider-vats. The old crooked

apple-trees, frozen stiff in the pale, shivering sunlight, that

appears to be dying of consumption, gleam forth like the heroes of one

of Dante's cold hells; we would mind any change in the mercury of the

dream. The snow crunches under the feet; the chopper's axe rings

funereally through the tragic air. At early morn the frost on

button-bushes and willows was silvery and every stem and minutest twig

and filamentary weed came up a silver thing, while the cottage smoke

rose salmon-colored into that oblique day. At the base of ditches were

shooting crystals, like the blades of an ivory-handled penknife, the

rosettes and favors fretted of silver on the flat ice. The little

cascades in the brook were ornamented with transparent shields, and

long candelabrums and spermaceti-colored fools'-caps and plated

jellies and white globes, with the black water whirling along

transparently underneath. The sun comes out, and all at a glance,

rubies, sapphires, diamonds, and emeralds start into intense life on

the angles of the snow crystals."

LIX

THE LAST DAYS OF EDGAR ALLAN POE

There has been great difference of opinion concerning the genius of

Poe. His life also has been the subject of much controversy. By some

Poe is painted as a fiend incarnate, by others as a man more sinned

against than sinning. When Howells visited Emerson he was surprised to

hear the Concord Sage refer to Poe as the "jingle man," but then

Emerson himself had been treated rather contemptuously by Poe, and

that, together with Emerson's lack of appreciation of melody, may

account for the "jingle man" expression.

It is not strange that Poe has been the subject of bitter criticism.

He himself was bitter and unjust in his criticisms of others. He once

wrote: "Bryant is not _all_ a fool. Mr. Willis is not _quite_ an ass.

Mr. Longfellow _will_ steal, but, perhaps, he cannot help it." The man

who will write like that must expect similar vituperation in return.

To have friends, a man must be friendly. Poe was lacking in those warm

human sympathies that attract our fellow-men. The human touch lacking

in his art is also lacking in his life. "Except the wife who idolized

him," writes Mr. Woodberry in his excellent Life of Poe, "and the

mother who cared for him, no one touched his heart in the years of his

manhood, and at no time was love so strong in him as to rule his life;

as he was self-indulgent, he was self-absorbed, and outside of his

family no kind act, no noble affection, no generous sacrifice is

recorded of him."

In _Scribner's Magazine_, 1878, Mrs. Susan T. Weiss in writing of the

_Last Days of Edgar Allan Poe_, one of the most accurate accounts of

this period of the poet's life, gives us a more pleasing impression.

We quote the following extracts:

It was a day or two after his arrival that Poe, accompanied by his

sister, called on us.... The remembrance of that first meeting with

the poet is still as vividly impressed upon my mind as though it had

been but yesterday. A shy and dreamy girl, scarcely more than a child,

I had all my life taken an interest in those strange stories and poems

of Edgar Poe; and now, with my old childish impression of their author

scarcely worn off, I regarded the meeting with an eager, yet shrinking

anticipation. As I entered the parlor, Poe was seated near the window,

quietly conversing. His attitude was easy and graceful, with one arm

lightly resting on the back of his chair. His dark curling hair was

thrown back from his broad forehead--a style in which he habitually

wore it. At sight of him, the impression produced upon me was of a

refined, highbred, and chivalrous gentleman. I use this word

"chivalrous" as exactly descriptive of something in his whole

_personnel_, distinct from either polish or high-breeding, and which,

though instantly apparent, was yet an effect too subtle to be

described. He rose on my entrance, and, other visitors being present,

stood with one hand on the back of his chair, awaiting my greeting. So

dignified was his manner, so reserved his expression, that I

experienced an involuntary recoil, until I turned to him and saw his

eyes suddenly brighten as I offered my hand; a barrier seemed to melt

between us, and I felt that we were no longer strangers....

While upon this subject, I venture, though with great hesitation, to

say a word in relation to Poe's own marriage with his cousin, Virginia

Clemm. I am aware that there exists with the public but one view of

this union, and that so lovely and touching in itself, that to mar the

picture with even a shadow inspires almost a feeling of remorse. Yet

since in the biography of a distinguished man of genius truth is above

all things desirable, and since in this instance the facts do not

redound to the discredit of any party concerned, I may be allowed to

state what I have been assured is truth.

Poets are proverbial for uncongenial marriages, and to this Poe can

scarcely be classed as an exception. From the time when as a youth of

nineteen he became a tutor to his sweet and gentle little cousin of

six years old, he loved her with the protective tenderness of an elder

brother. As years passed he became the subject of successive fancies

or passions for various charming women; but she gradually budding into

early womanhood experienced but one attachment--an absorbing devotion

to her handsome, talented, and fascinating cousin. So intense was this

passion that her health and spirits became seriously affected, and

her mother, aroused to painful solicitude, spoke to Edgar about it.

This was just as he was preparing to leave her house, which had been

for some years his home, and enter the world of business. The idea of

this separation was insupportable to Virginia. The result was that

Poe, at that time a young man of twenty-eight, married his little,

penniless, and delicate child-cousin of fourteen or fifteen, and thus

unselfishly secured her own and her mother's happiness. In his wife he

had ever the most tender and devoted of companions; but it was his own

declaration that he ever missed in her a certain intellectual and

spiritual sympathy necessary to perfect happiness in such an union....

He was never a deliberately unkind husband, and toward the close of

Mrs. Poe's life he was assiduous in his tender care and attention. Yet

his own declaration to an intimate friend of his youth was that his

marriage "had not been a congenial one;" and I repeatedly heard the

match ascribed to Mrs. Clemm, by those who were well acquainted with

the family and the circumstances. In thus alluding to a subject so

delicate, I have not lightly done so, or unadvisedly made a statement

which seems refuted by the testimony of so many who have written of

the "passionate idolatry" with which the poet regarded his wife. I

have heard the subject often and freely discussed by Poe's most

intimate friends, including his sisters, and upon this authority I

speak. Lovely in person, sweet and gentle in disposition, his young

wife deserved, doubtless, all the love that it was in his nature to

bestow. Of his unvarying filial affection for Mrs. Clemm, and of her

almost angelic devotion to himself and his interests, there can be no

question.

Once in discussing _The Raven_, Poe observed that he had never heard

it correctly delivered by even the best readers--that is, not as he

desired that it should be read. That evening, a number of visitors

being present, he was requested to recite the poem, and complied. His

impressive delivery held the company spell-bound, but in the midst of

it, I, happening to glance toward the open window above the level roof

of the greenhouse, beheld a group of sable faces the whites of whose

eyes shone in strong relief against the surrounding darkness. These

were a number of our family servants, who having heard much talk about

"Mr. Poe, the poet," and having but an imperfect idea of what a poet

was, had requested permission of my brother to witness the recital. As

the speaker became more impassioned and excited, more conspicuous grew

the circle of white eyes, until when at length he turned suddenly

toward the window, and, extending his arm, cried, with awful

vehemence, "Get thee back into the tempest, and the night's Plutonian

shore!" there was a sudden disappearance of the sable visages, a

scuttling of feet, and the gallery audience was gone. Ludicrous as was

the incident, the final touch was given when at that moment Miss Poe,

who was an extraordinary character in her way, sleepily entered the

room, and with a dull and drowsy deliberation seated herself on her

brother's knee. He had subsided from his excitement into a gloomy

despair, and now, fixing his eyes upon his sister, he concluded:

And the raven never flitting, still is sitting, _still_ is sitting,

On the pallid bust of Pallas, just above my chamber door;

And its eyes have all the seeming of a demon that is dreaming--

Stories of Authors, British and American · 第 17 / 21 段