Mr. DULLES. Eight enclosures.
Mr. EISENBERG. Marked "15"--the next one has 17 scratched out and also
18 appearing on it--19 for the third enclosure, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24.
Mr. DULLES. With the numbers as indicated in the record.
(Commission Exhibit No. 660 was marked, and received in evidence.)
Mr. EISENBERG. And finally an envelope of the same size, marked "three
photos, Box C." Mr. Latona, these are the photos you gave me?
Mr. LATONA. Yes; they are.
Mr. EISENBERG. May I have these admitted as 661, Mr. Chairman?
Mr. DULLES. It will be admitted as Exhibit 661, with how many
enclosures?
Mr. EISENBERG. There are three enclosures.
Mr. DULLES. And the three enclosures; are they identified in any way?
Mr. EISENBERG. Yes, sir; they are subnumbered 10, 11 and 12.
Mr. DULLES. With the subnumbers 10, 11 and 12.
(Commission Exhibit No. 661 was marked, and received in evidence.)
Mr. EISENBERG. Are all these photographs accurate reproductions of
the prints appearing on the objects whose name is on the front of the
envelope in which the photographs are stored?
Mr. LATONA. They are.
Mr. EISENBERG. They were taken by you or under your supervision?
Mr. LATONA. They were.
Mr. EISENBERG. Can you identify by number, Mr. Latona, the photographs
of box A which contain prints of Lee Harvey Oswald?
Mr. LATONA. I will have to do it in a negative fashion and tell you
that it is not 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, or 35.
Mr. EISENBERG. Then it would be No. 25 which is in that sequence?
Mr. LATONA. Yes.
Mr. EISENBERG. And did you mention 34?
Mr. LATONA. I did not.
Mr. EISENBERG. So 34 would also be an identified print in that sequence?
Mr. LATONA. That is right.
Mr. EISENBERG. Did you print anything on the back of these photographs,
Mr. Latona?
Mr. LATONA. At the time I gave you the photographs I marked nothing on
them.
Mr. EISENBERG. So that any printing here would have been put on
subsequent to the time you prepared them?
Mr. LATONA. That is correct.
Mr. EISENBERG. Referring specifically to a photograph I take at random,
which is No. 35, is this your handwriting?
Mr. LATONA. It is not.
Mr. EISENBERG. None of the printing appearing on the back of that
photograph?
Mr. LATONA. It is not.
Mr. EISENBERG. Let the record state that, as will be dealt with
later, this printing was put on by Mr. Mandella of the New York
Police Department. Now in the case of box D, of which there are two
photographs, 7 and 13, could you state which was the photograph of
Oswald's print?
Mr. LATONA. Thirteen.
Mr. EISENBERG. Just to reiterate, in no case did you put writing on the
back of these photographs?
Mr. LATONA. I did not.
Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Latona, did anyone else in the FBI examine the
objects which you have been discussing today----
Mr. LATONA. Yes.
Mr. EISENBERG. To determine whether the fingerprints of Lee Harvey
Oswald appeared on them?
Mr. LATONA. Yes.
Mr. EISENBERG. What was that person's name?
Mr. LATONA. His name is Ronald G. Wittmus.
Mr. EISENBERG. Was his examination conducted independently of yours?
Mr. LATONA. It was.
Mr. EISENBERG. Who conducted the examination first?
Mr. LATONA. In the case of the wrapping paper, I did. In the case of
the boxes I believe he did.
Mr. EISENBERG. And the rifle?
Mr. LATONA. I conducted the examination of the rifle.
Mr. EISENBERG. The lift from the rifle?
Mr. LATONA. Yes; directly.