51 Thirteenth Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington, 1896.

52 In abbreviated form I note here, inviting special comparison with

Mexico, that the Zuñi Upper world was symbolized by the sun, eagle

and turquoise; the Lower world by the rattlesnake, water and toad.

53 Landa states that Mayapan signified “the banner of Maya,” the latter

being the name of the “tongue of land” on which the capital was

situated. This explanation is, however, scarcely satisfactory, for

pantli is Nahuatl. If the entire word be regarded as Nahuatl, we

obtain “the banner of the hand.” As another Maya name for the

capital was Ho and this means five it seems possible that this

numeral and sound were actually expressed by an open hand and that

the Nahuatl name thus arose.

54 As throughout America four brothers are always found associated, in

consequence of the general spread of the quadruple organization, the

fact that three rulers only are mentioned here and that three

powerful tribes were found in possession of Yucatan, indicates that

these must have separated themselves from their original State. The

subsequent reduction of their number to two shows further

dissension.

55 It seems reasonable to refer to this date the expulsion of the Maya

tribe, the Huaxtekans, who founded their colony at Panuco, named

their capital Tuch-pan and carried with them their execrable

practices and ideas. At the same time they possessed and handed down

such a proficiency in the art of weaving that at the time of

Montezuma the most beautiful textile fabrics, furnished to him as

tribute, were the Huaxtecan “centzon-tilmatli” or mantles of four

hundred colors, “finely woven and covered with intricate and

artistic designs.” This circumstance points to a possible connection

with Zilan, the reputed Maya centre of female industry. It has been

stated by good authorities that the only antiquities thus far found

in America, which testify to the existence of a degraded and obscene

cult, are from the region of Panuco.

56 It is interesting to note in the above description absolutely no

mention of woman in the organization of Mayapan. It is therefore to

be presumed that they were excluded from this capital, and

inhabited, as in Mexico, their own town, under female rulership and

that of the “lords of the Night.”

57 See the Atlatl or Spear-thrower of the Ancient Mexicans. Peabody

Museum Papers, vol. 1, no. 3. Cambridge, 1891.

58 Relacion. ed. Brasseur de Bourbourg, p. 52. In a note the Abbé

states that the above description recalls the monoliths of Copan and

Quirigua.

59 We are told that the Cheles inhabited a province named Ah-bin-chel,

and that their capitals were Tikoh and Izamal (literally, Ah=they

who are of, kin=sun, chel=sort of bird and the ancient name of a

sacerdotal lineage in Yucatan). Thence the title Chelekat=holiness,

highness, grandeur, given to the head of this lineage (Brasseur de

Bourbourg). Ix-chel=the woman-bird, was the high-priestess or

medicine-woman and midwife. The Cheles, Tutul-xius and Cocomes were

the three most powerful tribes at the time of the Conquest. It is

noteworthy that they all had bird names and that the word chel, the

totemic bird of the Cheles, so closely resembles ché=tree, that the

combination of a ché or tree as a symbol of the tribe and the

chel-bird would have been suggested by the language.

60 According to Señor Garcia Cubas, “this peninsula of Yucatan must

have been united at one time, to the island of Cuba, the determining

cause of their separation being the impetuous current of the Gulf of

Mexico” (Atlas Metodico, Mexico, 1874, p. 32).

61 For a general account of the ruins of Copan and for a plan on which

the position of the different structures, stelæ, altars and

prominent sculptures are given, I refer to the Memoirs of the

Peabody Museum vol. I, no. 1, containing a preliminary report, of

the Explorations by the Museum. Cambridge, 1896.

62 Historia de la Provincia de Yucathan, by Friar Diego Lopez

Cogolludo, Madrid, 1688.

63 It seems to me that this statement establishes once and for all the

order in which these sculptured glyphs are to be read. It is evident

that in fastening them to the walls the idea was that of building up

the calculiform record by placing the stones above each other, in

the same manner that a stone wall would be raised. Accordingly, the

earliest records would form the base and the last be at the top.

64 See Biologia Centrali Americana, pt. I, Copan “a” pl. 9. Casts of

this sculpture and of two others nearly identical, from Copan, are

in the Peabody Museum.

65 It is my intention to reproduce these plans of Copan and Quirigua

and of other ancient American capitals in the publication I have

undertaken to make in co-editorship with Mr. E. W. Dahlgren of

Stockholm, of the beautiful map of the City of Mexico and its

surroundings, painted by Alonzo de la Cruz, the cosmographer of

Philip II of Spain. Mr. Dahlgren published an interesting account of

this map, which is preserved in the library of the university at

Upsala, in 1889, with its uncolored reproduction on a reduced scale.

In his monumental work on ancient cartography, Baron Nordenskjöld

also published an uncolored production of this map and, with Dr.

Bovallius, exhibited a beautiful facsimile of this precious

document, at the Historical Exposition in Madrid, in October, 1892.

During the previous summer at Stockholm, I had personally

superintended the painting of a perfect facsimile copy of the map

which I exhibited in the Anthropological Building of the World’s

Columbian Exposition in 1893. The original map was exhibited in

Stockholm during the meeting of the Congress of Americanists at

Stockholm in 1894, and I suggested that it ought to be published in

exact facsimile and in colors, particularly on account of the many

hieroglyphic names of localities it exhibits. It was thereupon

agreed by Mr. Dahlgren and myself that we should jointly publish the

map with an accompanying text in English, my share of the work being

principally the decipherment of the hieroglyphs of localities, the

classification of the tribes inhabiting them, as well as the

presentation of all historical facts connected with them that I

could obtain from the native and early Spanish chronicles. With

characteristic liberality the Duc de Loubat most kindly supported

the proposed publication by subscribing to twenty copies of it in

advance and depositing the payment for these at the Academy of

Sciences. The reproduction of the map has been facilitated by this

generous action and I take great pleasure in expressing here our

grateful appreciation to the Duc de Loubat, who has been patiently

awaiting the achievement of our undertaking. Both Mr. Dahlgren and I

have been prevented from completing this up to the present, by work

planned previously to the publication of the map. The present

publication will prove, however, that the social organization of the

Mexicans has been the object of my painstaking study and that, until

I had satisfactorily set forth the fundamental principles which

influenced not only the distribution of the population, but the

ground-plan of the capital itself, any text I could publish with the

map would be incomplete. As matters now stand, I propose to treat of

the City of Mexico as a type of an ancient American sacred city, to

compare its ground plan with those of other native capitals and to

trace, as far as possible, the localization of the various tribes

and classes of the ancient population, so that we can form an

adequate idea of the topography and machinery of the great state

known as the Empire of Montezuma. I hope and expect to complete this

publication in a reasonable period of time but dare not define its

limits, as all scientific research demands more time and strength

than can be determined upon in advance. In conclusion I would state

that, at the Congress of Americanists which took place at the city

of Mexico in 1895, the distinguished Mexican cartographer, Señor

Garcia Cubas, whose splendid maps of Mexico are well known, made an

interesting communication on this map, of which he had seen a copy.

66 It has been surmised that the name Palenque is of Spanish origin and

means “a palisade;” but it seems far more likely to be the

approximate rendering of the sound of the old native word by a

Spanish word, in the same way that the Nahuatl Quauh-nahuac became

the Spanish Cuerna-vaca, literally cow’s horn.

67 Brasseur de Bourbourg’s Maya Vocabulary contains an interesting

instance of a native tribe or lineage bearing the name of a bird:

“Chel: name of a kind of bird; ancient name of a great sacerdotal

family reigning at Tecoh (near Izamal, Yucatan). Thence the title

‘Chelekat,’ which meant holy, exalted, great, and was applied to the

head of this family.”

68 On a large tablet at Ixkun, the cast of which is now in Mr.

Maudslay’s collection at the South Kensington Museum, similarly

placed figures support on their bent backs and shoulders standing

personages, facing each other, and surrounded by glyphs. In this

case, however, the men who serve as footstools, are bound and

distinctly show a difference of type and costume, so that there can

be no doubt that the tablet commemorated the conquest of an alien

tribe.

69 Estudio arqueologico y jeroglifico del Calendario o gran libro

astronomico.... Mexico. 1889.

The Fundamental Principles of Old and New World Civilizations A Comparative Research Based on a Study of the Ancient Mexican Religious, Sociological, and Calendrical Systems · 第 147 / 158 题