I am indebted to the eminent Prof. Paul Haupt, of Johns Hopkins
University, for drawing my attention to the existence of an extremely
important and interesting ancient map of Babylonia on an unfortunately
broken and mutilated clay tablet also inscribed with cuneiform characters.
This tablet is reproduced in photogravure and illustrated by a pencil
drawing on pp. 100 and 101 of the Notes on “the Book of Ezekiel”
(translated by Prof. C. H. Toy), which forms Part 12 of the monumental
polychrome edition of the Bible, which is being edited by Prof. Paul
Haupt, with the assistance of Dr. Horace Howard Furness. Although
designated as a “Babylonian map of the world” it obviously represents
Babylonia as a Middle Kingdom, traversed by the Euphrates and containing
Babylon, surrounded by other cities situated in the Euphratean valley.
Babylonia is enclosed in two large concentric circles representing the
sea, designated in a cuneiform inscription as the “Bitter stream” or “Salt
water river.” Triangles extend beyond the outer circle, recalling the four
“rays or spokes” of the image of Shamash (fig. 65). Cuneiform characters,
in one of these triangular spaces, designate it as an island. Professor
Toy states that “there seem to have been originally seven of these
triangles, but most of them are broken away.” In point of fact only one of
the triangles is whole, and distinct traces of three others are preserved.
As the mutilated condition of the tablet forbids certainty as to the
original number of triangles, I venture to point out that it seems more
likely that instead of seven there were originally six triangles around
the central disc and that the map of Babylonia constitutes an image of a
confederated state, like those of India and Persia (see pp. 480 and 484),
conceived as formed of “six dependent and allied states surrounding the
seventh ruling state in the centre.”
Referring the reader to p. 348 of this work where “the seven kings” of
Babylon are mentioned and seven-fold organization is discussed, I merely
state that the importance of the Babylonian map can scarcely be overrated
as a proof of the application in remote antiquity of the cosmical scheme
to territorial divisions. It will be for Assyriologists to determine for
us the relative ages of the Sippara tablet (p. 332 and fig. 65, 1), and
the Babylonian Map tablet and to define their respective connections with
the “four regions” and “seven directions,” or with quadruplicate and
seven-fold schemes of organization. It is my hope that their researches
will lead to definite knowledge as to the date when these cosmical schemes
were employed in the Euphratean valley.
In conclusion I draw attention to the two interesting wheel-shaped maps of
the world also published in the “Notes on Ezekiel” (p. 105), and the
remarkable diagram (p. 197), showing the allotment of the land of Canaan
according to Ezekiel. On p. 204, in the Notes of Chapter 48 of Ezekiel,
there are valuable details concerning the geographical distribution of the
tribes of Israel, and the position, in the centre, of the sacred
reservation and the symmetrical arrangement of the gates of Jerusalem,
which were associated with the cardinal points and tribal representatives.