_Tinctures._--The tinctures or hues of the shield and its charges are

seven in number--gold or yellow, silver or white, red, blue, black,

green and purple. Medieval custom gave, according to a rule often

broken, "gules," "azure" and "sable" as more high-sounding names for the

red, blue and black. Green was often named as "vert," and sometimes as

"synobill," a word which as "sinople" is used to this day by French

armorists. The song of the siege of Carlaverock and other early

documents have red, gules or "vermeil," sable or black, azure or blue,

but gules, azure, sable and vert came to be recognized as armorists'

adjectives, and an early 15th-century romance discards the simple words

deliberately, telling us of its hero that

"His shield was black and blue, sanz fable,

Barred of azure and of sable."

But gold and silver served as the armorists' words for yellows and

whites until late in the 16th century, when gold and silver made way for

"or" and "argent," words which those for whom the interest of armory

lies in its liveliest days will not be eager to accept. Likewise the

colours of "sanguine" and "tenne" brought in by the pedants to bring the

tinctures to the mystical number of nine may be disregarded.

[Illustration: Grimston. Ingilby. Gobioun. Longchamp.]

A certain armorial chart of the duchy of Brabant, published in 1600, is

the earliest example of the practice whereby later engravers have

indicated colours in uncoloured plates by the use of lines and dots.

Gold is indicated by a powdering of dots; silver is left plain. Azure is

shown by horizontal shading lines; gules by upright lines; sable by

cross-hatching of upright and horizontal lines. Diagonal lines from

sinister to dexter indicate purple; vert is marked with diagonal lines

from dexter to sinister. The practice, in spite of a certain

convenience, has been disastrous in its cramping effects on armorial

art, especially when applied to seals and coins.

Besides the two "metals" and five "colours," fields and charges are

varied by the use of the furs ermine and vair. Ermine is shown by a

white field flecked with black ermine tails, and vair by a conventional

representation of a fur of small skins sewn in rows, white and blue

skins alternately. In the 15th century there was a popular variant of

ermine, white tails upon a black field. To this fur the books now give

the name of "ermines"--a most unfortunate choice, since ermines is a

name used in old documents for the original ermine. "Erminees," which

has at least a 15th-century authority, will serve for those who are not

content to speak of "sable ermined with silver." Vair, although silver

and blue be its normal form, may be made up of gold, silver or ermine,

with sable or gules or vert, but in these latter cases the colours must

be named in the blazon. To the vairs and ermines of old use the heraldry

books have added "erminois," which is a gold field with black ermine

fails, "pean," which is "erminois" reversed, and "erminites," which is

ermine with a single red hair on either side of each black tail. The

vairs, mainly by misunderstanding of the various patterns found in old

paintings, have been amplified with "countervair," "potent,"

"counter-potent" and "vair-en-point," no one of which merits

description.

No shield of a plain metal or colour has ever been borne by an

Englishman, although the knights at Carlaverock and Falkirk saw Amaneu

d'Albret with his banner all of red having no charge thereon. Plain

ermine was the shield of the duke of Brittany and no Englishman

challenged the bearing. But Beauchamp of Hatch bore simple vair, Ferrers

of Derby "Vairy gold and gules," and Ward "Vairy silver and sable."

Gresley had "Vairy ermine and gules," and Beche "Vairy silver and

gules."

Only one English example has hitherto been discovered of a field covered

not with a fur but with overlapping feathers. A 15th-century book of

arms gives "Plumetty of gold and purple" for "Mydlam in Coverdale."

Drops of various colours which variegate certain fields and charges are

often mistaken for ermine tails when ancient seals are deciphered. A

simple example of such spattering is in the shield of Grayndore, who

bore "Party ermine and vert, the vert dropped with gold." Sir Richard

le Brun (14th century) bore "Azure a silver lion dropped with gules."

[Illustration: Brittany. Beauchamp. Mydlam. Grayndorge.]

A very common variant of charges and fields is the sowing or "powdering"

them with a small charge repeated many times. Mortimer of Norfolk bore

"gold powdered with fleurs-de-lys sable" and Edward III. quartered for

the old arms of France "Azure powdered with fleurs-de-lys gold," such

fields being often described as flowered or flory. Golden billets were

scattered in Cowdray's red shield, which is blazoned as "Gules billety

gold," and bezants in that of Zouche, which is "Gules bezanty with a

quarter ermine." The disposition of such charges varied with the users.

Zouche as a rule shows ten bezants placed four, three, two and one on

his shield, while the old arms of France in the royal coat allows the

pattern of flowers to run over the edge, the shield border thus showing

halves and tops and stalk ends of the fleurs-de-lys. But the commonest

of these powderings is that with crosslets, as in the arms of John la

Warr "Gules crusily silver with a silver lion."

[Illustration: Mortimer. Cowdray. Zouche. La Warr. Cheyndut. Applegarth.

Chester. Rye.]

_Trees, Leaves and Flowers._--Sir Stephen Cheyndut, a 13th-century

knight, bore an oak tree, the _cheyne_ of his first syllable, while for

like reasons a Piriton had a pear tree on his shield. Three pears were

borne (_temp._ Edward III.) by Nicholas Stivecle of Huntingdonshire, and

about the same date is Applegarth's shield of three red apples in a

silver field. Leaves of burdock are in the arms (14th century) of Sir

John de Lisle and mulberry leaves in those of Sir Hugh de Morieus. Three

roots of trees are given to one Richard Rotour in a 14th-century roll.

Malherbe (13th century) bore the "evil herb"--a teazle bush. Pineapples

are borne here and there, and it will be noted that armorists have not

surrendered this, our ancient word for the "fir-cone," to the foreign

_ananas_. Out of the cornfield English armory took the sheaf, three

sheaves being on the shield of an earl of Chester early in the 13th

century and Sheffield bearing sheaves for a play on his name. For a like

reason Peverel's sheaves were sheaves of pepper. Rye bore three ears of

rye on a bend, and Graindorge had barley-ears. Flowers are few in this

field of armory, although lilies with their stalks and leaves are in the

grant of arms to Eton College. Ousethorpe has water flowers, and now and

again we find some such strange charges as those in the 15th-century

shield of Thomas Porthelyne who bore "Sable a cheveron gules between

three 'popyebolles,' or poppy-heads vert."

The fleur-de-lys, a conventional form from the beginnings of armory,

might well be taken amongst the "ordinaries." In England as in France it

is found in great plenty.

Aguylon bore "Gules a fleur-de-lys silver."

Peyferer bore "Silver three fleur-de-lys sable."

[Illustration: Eton College.]

Trefoils are very rarely seen until the 15th century, although Hervey

has them, and Gausill, and a Bosville coat seems to have borne them.

They have always their stalk left hanging to them. Vincent, Hattecliffe

and Massingberd all bore the quatrefoil, while the Bardolfs, and the

Quincys, earls of Winchester, had cinqfoils. The old rolls of arms made

much confusion between cinqfoils and sixfoils (_quintefoilles e

sisfoilles_) and the rose. It is still uncertain how far that confusion

extended amongst the families which bore these charges. The cinqfoil and

sixfoil, however, are all but invariably pierced in the middle like the

spur rowel, and the rose's blunt-edged petals give it definite shape

soon after the decorative movement of the Edwardian age began to carve

natural buds and flowers in stone and wood.

[Illustration: Aguylon. Peyferer. Hervey. Vincent.]

Hervey bore "Gules a bend silver with three trefoils vert thereon."

Vincent bore "Azure three quatrefoils silver."

Quincy bore "Gules a cinqfoil silver."

Bardolf of Wormegay bore "Gules three cinqfoils silver."

Cosington bore "Azure three roses gold."

Hilton bore "Silver three chaplets or garlands of red roses."

[Illustration: Quincy. Bardolf. Cosington. Hilton.]

_Beasts and Birds._--The book of natural history as studied in the

middle ages lay open at the chapter of the lion, to which royal beast

all the noble virtues were set down. What is the oldest armorial seal of

a sovereign prince as yet discovered bears the rampant lion of Flanders.

In England we know of no royal shield earlier than that first seal of

Richard I. which has a like device. A long roll of our old earls, barons

and knights wore the lion on their coats--Lacy, Marshal, Fitzalan and

Montfort, Percy, Mowbray and Talbot. By custom the royal beast is shown

as rampant, touching the ground with but one foot and clawing at the air

in noble rage. So far is this the normal attitude of a lion that the

adjective "rampant" was often dropped, and we have leave and good

authority for blazoning the rampant beast simply as "a lion," leave

which a writer on armory may take gladly to the saving of much

repetition. In France and Germany this licence has always been the rule,

and the modern English herald's blazon of "Gules a lion rampant or" for

the arms of Fitzalan, becomes in French _de gueules au lion d'or_ and in

German _in Rot ein goldener Loewe_. Other positions must be named with

care and the prowling "lion passant" distinguished from the rampant

beast, as well as from such rarer shapes as the couchant lion, the lion

sleeping, sitting or leaping. Of these the lion passant is the only one

commonly encountered. The lion standing with his forepaws together is

not a figure for the shield, but for the crest, where he takes this

position for greater stableness upon the helm, and the sitting lion is

also found rather upon helms than in shields. For a couchant lion or a

dormant lion one must search far afield, although there are some

medieval instances. The leaping lion is in so few shields that no maker

of a heraldry book has, it would appear, discovered an example. In the

books this "lion salient" is described as with the hind paws together on

the ground and the fore paws together in the air, somewhat after the

fashion of a diver's first movement. But examples from seals and

monuments of the Felbrigges and the Merks show that the leaping lion

differed only from the rampant in that he leans somewhat forward in his

eager spring. The compiler of the British Museum catalogue of medieval

armorial seals, and others equally unfamiliar with medieval armory,

invariably describe this position as "rampant," seeing no distinction

from other rampings. As rare as the leaping lion is the lion who looks

backward over his shoulder. This position is called "regardant" by

modern armorists. The old French blazon calls it _rere regardant or

turnaunte le visage arere_, "regardant" alone meaning simply "looking,"

and therefore we shall describe it more reasonably in plain English as

"looking backward." The two-headed lion occurs in a 15th-century coat of

Mason, and at the same period a monstrous lion of three bodies and one

head is borne, apparently, by a Sharingbury.

[Illustration: PLATE IV.

THE BEGINNING OF A ROLL OF THE ARMS OF THOSE JOUSTING IN A TOURNAMENT

HELD ON THE FIELD OF THE CLOTH OF GOLD. BESIDES THE ARMS OF THE KINGS OF

FRANCE AND ENGLAND ARE TWO COLUMNS OF "CHEQUES," MARKED WITH THE NAMES

AND SCORING POINTS OF THE JOUSTERS.

_Drawn by William Gibb._

_Niagara Litho. Co., Buffalo, N. Y._]

[Illustration: England.]

The lion's companion is the leopard. What might be the true form of this

beast was a dark thing to the old armorist, yet knowing from the report

of grave travellers that the leopard was begotten in spouse-breach

between the lion and the pard, it was felt that his shape would favour

his sire's. But nice distinctions of outline, even were they

ascertainable, are not to be marked on the tiny seal, or easily

expressed by the broad strokes of the shield painter. The leopard was

indeed lesser than the lion, but in armory, as in the Noah's arks

launched by the old yards, the bear is no bigger than the badger. Then a

happy device came to the armorist. He would paint the leopard like the

lion at all points. But as the lion looks forward the leopard should

look sidelong, showing his whole face. The matter was arranged, and

until the end of the middle ages the distinction held and served. The

disregarded writers on armory, Nicholas Upton, and his fellows,

protested that a lion did not become a leopard by turning his face

sidelong, but none who fought in the field under lion and leopard

banners heeded this pedantry from cathedral closes. The English king's

beasts were leopards in blazon, in ballad and chronicle, and in the

mouths of liegeman and enemy. Henry V.'s herald, named from his master's

coat, was Leopard Herald; and Napoleon's gazettes never fail to speak of

the English leopards. In our own days, those who deal with armory as

antiquaries and students of the past will observe the old custom for

convenience' sake. Those for whom the interest of heraldry lies in the

nonsense-language brewed during post-medieval years may correct the

medieval ignorance at their pleasure. The knight who saw the king's

banner fly at Falkirk or Crecy tells us that it bore "Gules with three

leopards of gold." The modern armorist will shame the uninstructed

warrior with "Gules three lions passant gardant in pale or."

As the lion rampant is the normal lion, so the normal leopard is the

leopard passant, the adjective being needless. In a few cases only the

leopard rises up to ramp in the lion's fashion, and here he must be

blazoned without fail as a leopard rampant.

Parts of the lion and the leopard are common charges. Chief of these are

the demi-lion and the demi-leopard, beasts complete above their slender

middles, even to the upper parts of their lashing tails. Rampant or

passant, they follow the customs of the unmaimed brute. Also the heads

of lion and leopard are in many shields, and here the armorist of the

modern handbooks stumbles by reason of his refusal to regard clearly

marked medieval distinctions. The instructed will know a lion's head

because it shows but half the face and a leopard's head because it is

seen full-face. But the handbooks of heraldry, knowing naught of

leopards, must judge by absence or presence of a mane, speaking

uncertainly of leopards' faces and lions' heads and faces. Here again

the old path is the straighter. The head of a lion, or indeed of any

beast, bird or monster, is generally painted as "razed," or torn away

with a ragged edge which is pleasantly conventionalized. Less often it

is found "couped" or cut off with a sheer line. But the leopard's head

is neither razed nor couped, for no neck is shown below it. Likewise the

lion's fore leg or paw--"gamb" is the book word--may be borne, razed or

coupled. Its normal position is raided upright, although Newdegate seems

to have borne "Gules three lions' legs razed silver, the paws downward."

With the strange bearing of the lion's whip-like tail cut off at the

rump, we may end the list of these oddments.

Fitzalan, earl of Arundel, bore "Gules a lion gold."

Simon de Montfort bore "Gules a silver lion with a forked tail."

Segrave bore "Sable a lion silver crowned gold."

Havering bore "Silver a lion rampant gules with a forked tail, having

a collar azure."

Felbrigge of Felbrigge bore "Gold a leaping lion gules."

Esturmy bore "Silver a lion sable (or purple) looking backward."

Marmion bore "Gules a lion vair."

Mason bore "Silver a two-headed lion gules."

Lovetot bore "Silver a lion parted athwart of sable and gules."

Richard le Jen bore "Vert a lion gold"--the arms of Wakelin of

Arderne--"with a fesse gules on the lion."

Fiennes bore "Azure three lions gold."

Leyburne of Kent bore "Azure six lions silver."

[Illustration: Fitzalan. Felbrigge. Fiennes. Leyburne.]

Carew bore "Gold three lions passant sable."

Fotheringhay bore "Silver two lions passant sable, looking backward."

Richard Norton of Waddeworth (1357) sealed with arms of "A lion

dormant."

Lisle bore "Gules a leopard silver crowned gold."

Ludlowe bore "Azure three leopards silver."

Brocas bore "Sable a leopard rampant gold."

[Illustration: Carew. Fotheringhay. Brocas. Lisle.]

John Hardrys of Kent seals in 1372 with arms of "a sitting leopard."

John Northampton, Lord Mayor of London in 1381, bore "Azure a crowned

leopard gold with two bodies rampant against each other."

Newenham bore "Azure three demi-lions silver."

A deed delivered at Lapworth in Warwickshire in 1466 is sealed with

arms of "a molet between three demi-leopards."

Kenton bore "Gules three lions' heads razed sable."

[Illustration: Kenton. Pole. Cantelou. Pynchebek.]

Pole, earl and duke of Suffolk, bore "Azure a fesse between three

leopards' heads gold."

Cantelou bore "Azure three leopards' heads silver with silver

fleurs-de-lys issuing from them."

Wederton bore "Gules a cheveron between three lions' legs razed

silver."

Pynchebek bore "silver three forked tails of lions sable."

The tiger is rarely named in collections of medieval arms. Deep mystery

wrapped the shape of him, which was never during the middle ages

standardized by artists. A crest upon a 15th-century brass shows him as

a lean wolf-like figure, with a dash of the boar, gazing after his vain

wont into a looking-glass; and the 16th-century heralds gave him the

body of a lion with the head of a wolf, head and body being tufted here

and there with thick tufts of hair. But it is noteworthy that the arms

of Sir John Norwich, a well-known knight of the 14th century, are

blazoned in a roll of that age as "party azure and gules with a tiger

rampant ermine." Now this beast in the arms of Norwich has been commonly

taken for a lion, and the Norwich family seem in later times to have

accepted the lion as their bearing. But a portion of a painted roll of

Sir John's day shows on careful examination that his lion has been given

two moustache-like tufts to the nose. A copy made about 1600 of another

roll gives the same decoration to the Norwich lion, and it is at least

possible we have here evidence that the economy of the medieval armorist

allowed him to make at small cost his lion, his leopard and his tiger

out of a single beast form.

Take away the lions and the leopards, and the other beasts upon medieval

shields are a little herd. In most cases they are here to play upon the

names of their bearers. Thus Swinburne of Northumberland has the heads

of swine in his coat and Bacon has bacon pigs. Three white bears were

borne by Barlingham, and a bear ramping on his hind legs is for Barnard.

Lovett of Astwell has three running wolves, Videlou three wolves' heads,

Colfox three foxes' heads.

[Illustration: Lovett. Talbot. Saunders.]

Three hedgehogs were in the arms of Heriz. Barnewall reminds us of

extinct natives of England by bearing two beavers, and Otter of

Yorkshire had otters. Harewell had hares' heads, Cunliffe conies,

Mitford moles or moldiwarps. A Talbot of Lancashire had three purple

squirrels in a silver shield. An elephant was brought to England as

early as the days of Henry III., but he had no immediate armorial

progeny, although Saunders of Northants may have borne before the end of

the middle ages the elephants' heads which speak of Alysaunder the

Great, patron of all Saunderses. Bevil of the west had a red bull, and

Bulkeley bore three silver bulls' heads. The heads in Neteham's

14th-century shield are neat's heads, ox heads are for Oxwyk. Calves are

for Veel, and the same mild beasts are in the arms of that fierce knight

Hugh Calveley. Stansfeld bore three rams with bells at their necks, and

a 14th-century Lecheford thought no shame to bear the head of the ram

who is the symbol of lechery. Lambton had lambs. Goats were borne by

Chevercourt to play on his name, a leaping goat by Bardwell, and goats'

heads by Gateshead. Of the race of dogs the greyhound and the talbot, or

mastiff, are found most often. Thus Talbot of Cumberland had talbots,

and Mauleverer, running greyhounds or "leverers" for his name's sake.

The alaund, a big, crop-eared dog, is in the 15th-century shield of John

Woode of Kent, and "kenets," or little tracking dogs, in a 13th-century

coat of Kenet. The horse is not easily found as an English charge, but

Moyle's white mule seems an old coat; horses' heads are in Horsley's

shield, and ass heads make crests for more than one noble house. Askew

has three asses in his arms. Three bats or flittermice are in the shield

of Burninghill and in that of Heyworth of Whethamstede.

As might be looked for in a land where forest and greenwood once linked

from sea to sea, the wild deer is a common charge in the shield. Downes

of Cheshire bore a hart "lodged" or lying down. Hertford had harts'

heads, Malebis, fawns' heads (_testes de bis_), Bukingham, heads of

bucks. The harts in Rotherham's arms are the roes of his name's first

syllable. Reindeer heads were borne by Bowet in the 14th century.

Antelopes, fierce beasts with horns that have something of the ibex,

show by their great claws, their lion tails, and their boar muzzles and

tusks that they are midway between the hart and the monster.

[Illustration: Griffin.]

Of the outlandish monsters the griffon is the oldest and the chief. With

the hinder parts of a lion, the rest of him is eagle, head and

shoulders, wings and fore legs. The long tuft under the beak and his

pointed ears mark him out from the eagle when his head alone is borne.

At an early date a griffon rampant, his normal position, was borne by

the great house of Montagu as a quartering, and another griffon played

upon Griffin's name.

[Illustration: Drake.]

The wyver, who becomes wyvern in the 16th century, and takes a new form

under the care of inventive heralds, was in the middle ages a

lizard-like dragon, generally with small wings. Sir Edmund Mauley in the

14th century is found differencing the black bend of his elder brother

by charging it with three wyvers of silver. During the middle ages there

seems small distinction between the wyver and the still rarer dragon,

which, with the coming of the Tudors, who bore it as their badge, is

seen as a four-legged monster with wings and a tail that ends like a

broad arrow. The monster in the arms of Drake, blazoned by Tudor heralds

as a wyvern, is clearly a fire-drake or dragon in his origin.

The unicorn rampant was borne by Harlyn of Norfolk, unicorn's heads by

the Cambridgeshire family of Paris. The mermaid with her comb and

looking-glass makes a 14th-century crest for Byron, while "Silver a bend

gules with three silver harpies thereon" is found in the 15th century

for Entyrdene.

Concerning beasts and monsters the heraldry books have many adjectives

of blazonry which may be disregarded. Even as it was once the pride of

the cook pedant to carve each bird on the board with a new word for the

act, so it became the delight of the pedant herald to order that the

rampant horse should be "forcene," the rampant griffon "segreant," the

passant hart "trippant"; while the same hart must needs be "attired" as

to its horns and "unguled" as to its hoofs. There is ancient authority

for the nice blazonry which sometimes gives a separate colour to the

tongue and claws of the lion, but even this may be set aside. Though a

black lion in a silver field may be armed with red claws, and a golden

leopard in a red field given blue claws and tongues, these trifles are

but fancies which follow the taste of the painter, and are never of

obligation. The tusks and hoofs of the boar, and often the horns of the

hart, are thus given in some paintings a colour of their own which

elsewhere is neglected.

As the lion is among armorial beasts, so is the eagle among the birds. A

bold convention of the earliest shield painters displayed him with

spread wing and claw, the feat of a few strokes of the brush, and after

this fashion he appears on many scores of shields. Like the claws and

tongue of the lion, the beak and claws of the eagle are commonly painted

of a second colour in all but very small representations. Thus the

golden eagle of Lymesey in a red field may have blue beak and claws, and

golden beak and claws will be given to Jorce's silver eagle upon red. A

lure, or two wings joined and spread like those of an eagle, is a rare

charge sometimes found. When fitted with the cord by which a falconer's

lure is swung, the cord must be named.

Monthermer bore "Gold an eagle vert."

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Helmont, Jean" to "Hernosand" Volume 13, Slice 3 · 第 26 / 45 段