THE PLAN OF THE TRANSLATION.

The translation of Bana presents much difficulty from the elaboration

of his style, and it has been a specially hard task, and sometimes

an impossible one, to give any rendering of the constant play on

words in which he delights. I have sometimes endeavoured to give

what might be an English equivalent, and in such cases I have

added in a note the literal meaning of both alternatives; perhaps

too much freedom may have been used, and sometimes also the best

alternative may not have been chosen to place in the text; but those

who have most experience will know how hard it is to do otherwise

than fail. Some long descriptions have been omitted, such, e.g.,

as a passage of several pages describing how the dust rose under

the feet of Candrapida's army, and others where there seemed no

special interest or variety to redeem their tediousness. A list of

these omissions [33] is given at the end, together with an appendix,

in which a few passages, chiefly interesting as mentioning religious

sects, are added. I have acted on Professor Cowell's advice as to the

principle on which omissions are made, as also in giving only a full

abstract, and not a translation, of the continuation of 'Kadambari'

by Bhushana. It is so entirely an imitation of his father's work in

style, with all his faults, and without the originality that redeems

them, that it would not reward translation. In my abstract I have

kept the direct narration as more simple, but even when passages are

given rather fully, it does not profess in any case to be more than

a very free rendering; sometimes only the sense of a whole passage

is summed up. I regret that the system of transliteration approved

by the Royal Asiatic Society came too late for adoption here.

The edition of 'Kadambari' to which the references in the text are

given is that of the Nirnaya-Sagara Press (Bombay, 1890), which

the full commentary makes indispensable, but I have also throughout

made use of Professor Peterson's edition (Bombay Sanskrit Series,

No. xxiv.). For the last half of the Second Part [34] I have referred

to an anonymous literal translation, published by the New Britannia

Press Depository, 78, Amherst Street, Calcutta.

I have now to offer my grateful thanks to the Secretary of State

for India, without whose kind help the volume could not have been

published. I have also to thank Miss C. M. Duff for allowing me to use

the MS. of her 'Indian Chronology'; Miss E. Dale, of Girton College,

for botanical notes, which I regret that want of space prevented my

printing in full; Mr. C. Tawney, librarian of the Indian Office, for

information as to the sources of Indian fiction; Mr. F. F. Arbuthnot

and Professor Rhys-Davids, for valuable advice; Professor C. Bendall,

for his description of the Kamandakiya-Niti-Çastra, and his constant

kindness about my work; Mr. F. W. Thomas, of Trinity College, for

letting me see the proof-sheets of the translation of the 'Harsha

Carita'; and others for suggested renderings of difficult phrases,

and for help of various kinds.

But especially my thanks are due to Professor Cowell [35] for a

generosity and unwearied helpfulness which all his pupils know,

and which perhaps few but they could imagine. I read through with

him the whole of the First Part before translating it myself, so that

mistakes in the translation, many as they may be, can arise only from

misunderstanding on my part, from too great freedom of rendering,

or from failing to have recourse to the knowledge he so freely gives.

'Vrihatsahayah karyantam kshodiyanapi gacchati;

Sambhuyambodhim abhyeti mahanadya nagapaga.'

The Kādambarī of Bāṇa · 第 14 / 31 题