He had been reading my 'Athens Journal.'

'What struck me,' he said, 'in every page of it, was the resemblance of

King Otho to Louis Napoleon.'

'I see the resemblance,' I answered, 'but it is the resemblance of a

dwarf to a giant.'

'No,' he replied. 'Of a man five feet seven inches high to one five feet

eleven inches. There are not more than four inches between them. There is

the same cunning, the same coldness, the same vindictiveness, the same

silence, the same perseverance, the same unscrupulousness, the same

selfishness, the same anxiety to appear to do everything that is done,

and above all, the same determination to destroy, or to seduce by

corruption or by violence, every man and every institution favourable to

liberty, independence, or self-government. In one respect Otho had the

more difficult task. He found himself, in 1843, subject to a Constitution

carefully framed under the advice of England for the express purpose of

controlling him. He did not attempt to get rid of it by a _coup d'état_,

or even to alter it, but cunningly and skilfully perverted it into an

instrument of despotism. Louis Napoleon destroyed the Constitution which

he found, and made a new one, copied from that which had been gradually

elaborated by his uncle, which as a restraint is intentionally powerless

and fraudulent.

'A man,' he continued, 'may acquire influence either by possessing in a

higher degree the qualities which belong to his country and to his time,

or by possessing those in which they are deficient.

'Wellington is an example of this first sort. His excellences were those

of an Englishman carried almost to perfection.

'Louis Napoleon belongs to the second. If his merits had been impetuous

courage, rapidity of ideas, quickness of decision, frankness, versatility

and resource, he would have been surrounded by his equals or his

superiors. He predominated over those with whom he came in contact

because he differed from them. Because he was calm, slow, reserved,

silent, and persevering. Because he is a Dutchman, not a Frenchman.'

'He seems,' I said, 'to have lost his calmness.'

'Yes,' answered L. 'But under what a shock! And observe that though the

greatest risk was encountered by _him_, the terror was greatest among his

_entourage_. I do not believe that if he had been left to himself he

would have lost his prudence or his self-possession. He did not for the

first day. Passions are contagious. Everyone who approached him was

agitated by terror and anger. His intrepidity and self-reliance, great as

they are, were disturbed by the hubbub all round him. His great defects

are three. First, his habit of self-contemplation. He belongs to the men

whom the Germans call subjective, whose eye is always turned inwardly;

who think only of themselves, of their own character, and of their own

fortunes. Secondly, his jealousy of able men. He wishes to be what you

called him, a giant, and as Nature has not made him positively tall, he

tries to be comparatively so, by surrounding himself with dwarfs. His

third defect is the disproportion of his wishes to his means. His desires

are enormous. No power, no wealth, no expenditure would satisfy them.

Even if he had his uncle's genius and his uncle's indefatigability, he

would sink, as his uncle did, under the exorbitance of his attempts. As

he is not a man of genius, or even a man of remarkable ability, as he is

ignorant, uninventive and idle, you will see him flounder and fall from

one failure to another.

'During the three years that Drouyn de L'Huys was his minister he was

intent on home affairs--on his marriage, on the Louvre, on the artillery,

on his _bonnes fortunes_, and on the new delights of unbounded

expenditure. He left foreign affairs altogether to his minister. When

Drouyn de L'Huys left him, the road before him was plain--he had only to

carry on the war. But when the war was over, the road ended; neither

he nor Walewski nor any of his _entourage_ know anything of the country

in which they are travelling. You see them wandering at hazard. Sometimes

trying to find their way to Russia, sometimes to England. Making a treaty

with Austria, then attempting to injure her, and failing; attempting to

injure Turkey, and failing; bullying Naples, and failing; threatening

Switzerland, threatening Belgium, and at last demanding from England an

Alien Bill, which they ought to know to be incompatible with the laws and

hateful to the feelings of the people.

'He is not satisfied with seeing the country prosperous and respected

abroad. He wants to dazzle. His policy, domestic and foreign, is a policy

of vanity and ostentation--motives which mislead everyone both in private

and in public life.

'His great moral merits are kindness and sympathy. He is a faithful

attached friend, and wishes to serve all who come near him.

'His greatest moral fault is his ignorance of the difference between

right and wrong; perhaps his natural insensibility to it, his want of the

organs by which that difference is perceived--a defect which he inherits

from his uncle.'

'The uncle,' I said, 'had at least one moral sense--he could understand

the difference between pecuniary honesty and dishonesty, a difference

which this man seems not to see, or not to value.'

'I agree with you,' said L. 'He cannot value it, or he would not look

complacently on the peculation which surrounds him. Every six months some

magnificent hotel rises in the Champs Élysées, built by a man who had

nothing, and has been a minister for a year or two.'

On my return I found Tocqueville with the ladies. I gave him an outline

of what L. had said.

'No one,' he said, 'knows Louis Napoleon better than L.'

'My opportunities of judging him have been much fewer, but as far as they

have gone, they lead to the same conclusions. L. perhaps has not dwelt

enough on his indolence. Probably as he grows older, and the effects of

his early habits tell on him, it increases. I am told that it is

difficult to make him attend to business, that he prolongs audiences

apparently to kill time.

'One of the few of my acquaintances who go near him, was detained by him

for an hour to answer questions about the members of the _Corps

législatif_. Louis Napoleon inquired about their families, their

fortunes, their previous histories. Nothing about their personal

qualities. These are things that do not interest him. He supposes that

men differ only in externals. "That the _fond_ is the same in everyone."'

_April 26_.--Tocqueville spent the evening with us.

We talked of Novels.

'I read none,' he said, 'that end ill. Why should one voluntarily subject

oneself to painful emotions? To emotions created by an imaginary cause

and therefore impelling you to no action. I like vivid emotions, but I

seek them in real life, in society, in travelling, in business, but above

all in political business. There is no happiness comparable to political

success, when your own excitement is justified by the magnitude of the

questions at issue, and is doubled and redoubled by the sympathy of your

supporters. Having enjoyed that, I am ashamed of being excited by the

visionary sorrows of heroes and heroines.

'I had a friend,' he continued, 'a Benedictine, who is now ninety-seven.

He was, therefore, about thirteen when Louis XVI. began to reign. He is a

man of talents and knowledge, has always lived in the world, has attended

to all that he has seen and heard, and is still unimpaired in mind, and

so strong in body that when I leave him he goes down to embrace me, after

the fashion of the eighteenth century, at the bottom of his staircase.'

'And what effect,' I asked, 'has the contemplation of seventy years of

revolution produced in him? Does he look back, like Talleyrand, to the

_ancien régime_ as a golden age?'

'He admits,' said Tocqueville, 'the material superiority of our own age,

but he believes that, intellectually and morally, we are far inferior to

our grandfathers. And I agree with him. Those seventy years of revolution

have destroyed our courage, our hopefulness, our self-reliance, our

public spirit, and, as respects by far the majority of the higher

classes, our passions, except the vulgarest and most selfish ones--vanity

and covetousness. Even ambition seems extinct. The men who seek power,

seek it not for itself, not as the means of doing good to their country,

but as a means of getting money and flatterers.

'It is remarkable,' he continued, 'that women whose influence is

generally greatest under despotisms, have none now. They have lost it,

partly in consequence of the gross vulgarity of our dominant passions,

and partly from their own nullity. They are like London houses, all built

and furnished on exactly the same model, and that a most uninteresting

one. Whether a girl is bred up at home or in a convent, she has the same

masters, gets a smattering of the same accomplishments, reads the same

dull books, and contributes to society the same little contingent of

superficial information.

'When a young lady comes out I know beforehand how her mother and her

aunts will describe her. "Elle a les goûts simples. Elle est pieuse. Elle

aime la campagne. Elle aime la lecture. Elle n'aime pas le bal. Elle

n'aime pas le monde, elle y ira seulement pour plaire à sa mère." I try

sometimes to escape from these generalities, but there is nothing behind

them.'

'And how long,' I asked, 'does this simple, pious, retiring character

last?'

'Till the orange flowers of her wedding chaplet are withered,' he

answered. 'In three months she goes to the _messe d'une heure_.'

'What is the "messe d'une heure?"' I asked.

'A priest,' he answered, 'must celebrate Mass fasting; and in strictness

ought to do so before noon. But to accommodate fashionable ladies who

cannot rise by noon, priests are found who will starve all the morning,

and say Mass in the afternoon. It is an irregular proceeding, though

winked at by the ecclesiastical authorities. Still to attend it is rather

discreditable; it is a middle term between the highly meritorious

practice of going to early Mass, and the scandalous one of never going at

all.'

'What was the education,' I asked, 'of women under the _ancien régime_?'

'The convent,' he answered.

'It must have been better,' I said, 'than the present education, since

the women of that time were superior to ours.'

'It was so far better,' he answered, 'that it did no harm. A girl at that

time was taught nothing. She came from the convent a sheet of white

paper. _Now_ her mind is a paper scribbled over with trash. The women of

that time were thrown into a world far superior to ours, and with the

sagacity, curiosity, and flexibility of French women, caught knowledge

and tact and expression from the men.

'I knew well,' he continued, 'Madame Récamier. Few traces of her former

beauty then remained, but we were all her lovers and her slaves. The

talent, labour, and skill which she wasted in her _salon_, would have

gained and governed an empire. She was virtuous, if it be virtuous to

persuade every one of a dozen men that you wish to favour him, though

some circumstance always occurs to prevent your doing so. Every friend

thought himself preferred. She governed us by little distinctions, by

letting one man come five minutes before the others, or stay five minutes

after. Just as Louis XIV. raised one courtier to the seventh heaven by

giving him the _bougeoir_, and another by leaning on his arm, or taking

his shirt from him.

'She said little, but knew what each man's _fort_ was, and placed from

time to time a _mot_ which led him to it. If anything were peculiarly

well said, her face brightened. You saw that her attention was always

active and always intelligent.

'And yet I doubt whether she really enjoyed conversation. _Tenir salon_

was to her a game, which she played well, and almost always successfully,

but she must sometimes have been exhausted by the effort. Her _salon_ was

perhaps pleasanter to us than it was to herself.

'One of the last,' he continued, 'of that class of potentates was the

Duchesse de Dino. Her early married life was active and brilliant, but

not intellectually. It was not till about forty, when she had exhausted

other excitements, that she took to _bel esprit._ But she performed her

part as if she had been bred to it.'

This was our last conversation. I left Paris the next day, and we never

met again.

Correspondence & Conversations of Alexis de Tocqueville with Nassau William Senior from 1834 to 1859, Volume 2 · 第 65 / 83 题