CHAPTER VIII

Count Federigo's home administration and court--Description

of his palace and library at Urbino--His other palaces--The

resources of his state.

The three years and a half which had now passed since the Count's

marriage had been spent by him almost entirely in active service.

During his long absences, the state was in a great measure

administered by Countess Battista, who, notwithstanding her youth, is

said to have held the reins of government with admirable firmness and

good sense, as well as with a leniency and gentleness which

conciliated universal popularity.[114] The remainder of his life had a

more peaceful destiny, for not only was his almost domestic foe

Malatesta now reduced to harmless insignificance, but Italy enjoyed

comparative respite from her normal condition of unceasing strife. We

are assured that Federigo turned to excellent account the

opportunities this afforded for attending to the internal affairs of

the duchy, and ameliorating the position of his people. But his

biographers, deeming these objects much less momentous than his

military exploits, have unfortunately left us almost in the dark

regarding occupations and measures so infinitely more important, as

distinguishing his views from those of his age and order. Of the laws

which he promulgated, the manner of enacting and administering them,

the organisation and exercise of justice, the operation and limits of

popular rights, the extent and value of municipal suffrages, the

system of taxation and finance, the tendency and usage of trade, the

statistics of the duchy, the internal condition and well-being of the

people, we scarcely obtain a hint from those who prolixly dwell upon

battle-fields, detail sieges, and trace countermarches, few of which

offer variety of tactics or interesting results. Neither are

manuscript authorities in this respect more useful than the published

memoirs, for most of those we have seen are adulatory compositions,

occupied only with matter calculated to enhance our appreciation of

their hero as a successful general or patron of letters, but utterly

neglecting the internal policy of his government. The peculiar quality

of his mind unquestionably was that strict observance of good faith, a

total absence of which is the fatal characteristic, the indelible

stain of his age. There is thus every reason to believe that the

conditions imposed upon him at his succession in 1443 would be rigidly

fulfilled, and we have discovered no complaint ever made against him

of their non-observance. They provide, according to the lights then

enjoyed, for a popular election and control of magistrates, reduction

of burdens, fiscal reforms, public education, and medical aid,

restrictions on the prerogative in so far as it sheltered abuses,--and

it is obvious that, if carried out in their true spirit, they must

have offered no mean guarantees against such tyranny as the recent

historian of the Ausonian Republics has sweepingly charged upon all

mediæval dynasties.

[Footnote 114: Urb. Vat. MSS. No. 1236, her funeral oration.]

[Illustration: _A. Nini, del. A. Marchetti, sculp._

URBINO

_From an original drawing by Agostino Nini of Bologna_]

The few notices of his government wherewith Baldi has favoured us

savour of those minute and paternal attentions which ensure to a

prince great personal popularity. He tells us that the Count

commissioned certain persons called revisors to perambulate the state,

and investigate the condition of the people. Among the matters

specially committed to them were these: To inquire into the

requirements of the religious houses; to ascertain where maidens of

good reputation were unable from poverty to obtain husbands; to inform

themselves secretly as to modest paupers; to learn what traders or

shopkeepers were distressed by large families, debts, or any

particular misadventure. In order to secure efficiency to this

charitable espionage, these officers were privileged to pass at all

times into the sovereign's presence, and it is said that a porter or

groom of the chambers, who had rudely denied one of them access, was

summarily punished by a public whipping. Following up this system, the

Count, in his daily walks or rides, used to call to him the citizens

individually, questioning as to their welfare and circumstances, or

encouraging them in any enterprise or building they had undertaken.

"But," continues the Abbot of Guastalla, "to such details we do not

descend, as do some writers, overscrupulous about trifles; nor shall

we tell how, on daily recurring occasions, he interfered to maintain

the poor, to arrest litigation, to secure a pure administration of

justice, to protect the honour of families, and to recompense his

diligent servants. Still less do we collect his witty jests and

pleasant sayings, as these are things far too petty and unbecoming the

gravity of history, besides which, they all or most of them live in

the memory and mouths of the people. But since splendour is a virtue

peculiar to great princes, we shall touch upon some circumstances

regarding the nobleness, the numerical grandeur, and the magnificence

of his court."[115]

[Footnote 115: BALDI, _Vita e fatti di Federigo_, III., p. 59.]

This passage fairly represents the pervading spirit of Italian

biographies and local histories, though probably containing a latent

sneer from Baldi at the earlier work of Muzio, whose "petty details,"

with those scantily supplied by Vespasiano, will be greedily gathered

in a future page of this volume. Little deemed the reverend pedant how

independent the historic muse would become of the stilts on which he,

and many of his contemporaries, so unfortunately elevated her, or how

infinitely posterity would have preferred his despised omissions to

his solemn prosings! Nor is this our only complaint. His

illustrations of the Urbino court, thus magniloquently ushered,

consist of a dull catalogue of twelve or fifteen noble names, ending

with an apology for such trespass on his reader's patience, and a

reference to some unpublished manuscript for details. This excuse is

offered after devoting six pages, out of eight hundred, to the home

interests and adminstrations of his hero. In supplement to these

unsatisfactory allusions, we have recourse to such MSS. as detail the

establishment which gained for Federigo's court the high reputation it

enjoyed as a model of princely taste and munificence. Its constitution

may be seen at a glance, from this minute return of its members, by

one of their number.[116]

[Footnote 116: Vat Urb. MSS. No. 829, f. 55. Other nearly similar

lists of his household are preserved in No. 1248 of that library, and

in Vat. Ottob. MSS. No. 3141, f. 144, and Oliveriana MSS. No. 384, f.

1. There is no date affixed to any of these, but they were probably

drawn up after he had attained the ducal dignity.]

Counts of the duchy, and from other states 45

Knights of the Golden Spur 5

Gentlemen 17

Judges and councillors 2

Ambassadors and secretaries [at Naples, Rome, Florence,

Milan, and Siena] 7

Secretaries of state 5

Clerks in chancery [or public offices] 14

Teachers of grammar, logic, and philosophy [including

Maestro Paolo, astrologer, and Gian Maria Filelfo] 4

Architects and engineers [Luziano, Francesco di Giorgio,

Pipo the Florentine, Fra Carnevale, and Sirro of

Casteldurante] 5

Readers during meals 5

Transcribers of MSS. for library [besides many abroad] 4

Chaplains 2

Choristers of the chapel 3

Singing boys 5

Organists 2

Workers in tapestry 5

Dancing-masters for the pages 2

Dancing-masters 2

Apothecary 1

Master of the palace keys 1

Chamberlain 1

Master of the household 1

Treasurer 1

Chamber attendants 5

Pages 22

Carvers and sewers 3

Stewards of the buttery 4

Storekeepers 2

Purveyors 3

Grooms of the chamber 19

Table waiters 19

Footmen 31

Cooks 5

Various menial servants 8

Masters of horse and purveyors of the stable 5

Servants under them 50

Keeper of the bloodhounds 1

Keeper of the camel-leopard 1

------

Total household of the Duke 317

Captains in constant pay 4

Colonels of infantry 3

Trumpeters 6

Drummers 2

Master-armourers 3

HOUSEHOLD OF COUNTESS BATTISTA AND HER CHILDREN.

Ladies in waiting 7

[After the Duchess's death, Madonna Pantasilea

Baglione, sister of Brozo Baglione of Perugia, was

made governess to the Princesses.]

A great many female attendants.

Elderly and staid gentlemen 6

Servants of Prince Guidobaldo when a child 7

------

Total establishment, so far as enumerated 355

In this list may be detected obvious omissions, such as almoner,

librarians, heralds, &c., and it would be much increased by adding

servants of the noblemen entertained at his court. Music appears only

in the establishments of the chapel and of the guard, but in 1473, the

Count was visited by Martino and Giorgio, two German lute-players, to

whom he gave letters of recommendation on their departure for Siena.

The contemporary notice by Vespasiano affords us some standard of the

qualities of this court, which, not less than the martial prowess and

intellectual superiority of its Montefeltrian princes, constituted the

glory of Urbino. "His household was regulated much in the manner of a

religious establishment, and the five hundred mouths which it

contained lived with almost monastic regularity. There were no

mess-table manners there, no gambling nor blasphemous language, and

all expressed themselves with the utmost moderation. The Prince having

been entrusted by several personages of high station with their sons,

to be instructed in military service, he, with good regard also for

their good breeding, placed them in charge of a gentleman from

Lombardy of distinguished manners, long resident at his court

[probably Odasio], who exercised over these youths a paternal sway,

gaining their respectful deference, and correcting their little

errors, until an exemplary carriage became habitual to them." Thus,

too, Muzio: "Federigo maintained a suite so numerous and distinguished

as to rival any royal household. For not only did the most

distinguished chivalry resort to him as the first of Italian soldiers,

but thither were sent youths of the highest rank, to be reared under

his discipline, as to the most select of schools. And among the many

personages who thus frequented his court were Giovanni della Rovere,

Giulio and Francesco Orsini, Girolamo and Pier Antonio Colonna,

Ranuccio and Angelo Farnese, Andrea Doria, and Gian Giacomo Trivulzio,

with others of equal eminence. Attended by these, and by a concourse

of gentlemen and servants, as well as by a crowd of citizens, he

generally on festivals went to mass in procession, making a round

of the great churches in their turn. And, on his return home, he

would keep the burghers about him for a little in gracious

conversation, or calling for his dispatches, communicated portions

before kindly dismissing them."

[Illustration: _Alinari_

THE FLAGELLATION

_After the picture by Piero della Francesco, in the Sacristy of the

Duomo, Urbino._

_Supposed portraits of Duke Federigo and Caterino Zeno_]

One of the manuscripts just cited, which is entitled "Regulations and

Offices for the Court of the most serene Lord Duke of Urbino," after

insisting on a rigid observance of rules to be enforced by the master

of the household, imposes upon that functionary an obligation to

inform his lord privately of the arrival and quality of all strangers,

that he might regulate the degree of hospitality to be extended to

them. This was of three grades. Personages of the highest rank were

received and lodged in the palace; those of less distinction in a

separate building, attended on by the Prince's household; for a third

class an inn was provided, where they were lodged at his cost, and at

a fixed rate per head.[117] The liberal hospitalities of the court are

thus mentioned by its chronicler Sanzi:--

"Nor ought we to omit the greetings kind

And gracious, which with princely courtesy

He gave to coming strangers, ne'er before

Welcomed with gentler words, or phrase more cordial,

His aspect cheerful and his carriage plain.

Glorious was he in all things, but unmatched

In hospitality; for never guest

Arrived, such noble treatment hoping for,

Or went his way without a lingering look

Of friendly admiration."

[Footnote 117: Ordine ed Officii della Corte del Serenissimo Signore

il Duca de Urbino, Urb. Vat. MSS. No. 1248.]

His wide-spreading military renown, and the honourable reception thus

accorded them, attracted visitors from all quarters, until Urbino

attained that reputation as the resort of numerous celebrities which

in the next generation rendered its little court a model to Europe,

and which it never entirely lost while its independence lasted. But

this concourse of guests, and the additional importance conferred

upon the principality by considerable territorial aggrandisements,

rendered a new palace necessary. Baldi mentions it as commenced about

this time: Sanzi tells us it was undertaken to divert Federigo's grief

for the death of his Countess in 1472; whilst Lazzari and the

anonymous author of the Memoir regarding the devolution of the duchy

to the Church in 1631 note 1454 as the date of its foundation. In

truth, it was, like many great edifices in Italy, slowly progressive,

spreading over several generations, and finally left unfinished. The

same may be said of several other buildings promoted by the Count

during his intervals of leisure, such as the palaces of Gubbio and

Fossombrone, and the cathedral of Urbino; and it may be convenient in

this place to notice those creations which are prominently set forth

among the glories of his reign.

* * * * *

Of the three roads by which Urbino is approached, that on the

south-west, leading from Tuscany, gives the most favourable view of

the city, which is faithfully rendered on our frontispiece. The

central mass of building, beautifully relieved by a stately

spire-capped tower on either side of the grand entrance, and

stretching backwards to the domed cathedral, is the palace which we

are now to describe. The numerous accounts of it, repeated from one

copyist to another in somewhat over-strained panegyric, have spread

its fame throughout Italy, and the folio volume printed in 1724, at

the expense of Cardinal Annibale Albani, was got up with an

elaboration unusual in that age, but with the tasteless dulness which

then pervaded literary and artistic efforts in Italy. The Abbate

Pungileone has added little of importance by his tediously told

investigations, and other local antiquaries have scarcely been more

successful.[118]

[Footnote 118: _Memorie concernenti la Città d'Urbino._ It was edited

by Monsignor Bianchini, and was meant to extend to four folio volumes,

illustrating: (1) the city of Urbino; (2) the princes who ruled there;

(3) its most famous citizens; (4) their works. Of these only the first

volume saw the light, at the expense of Pope Clement XI., an Albani of

Urbino. It contains, 1st, Baldi's prolix and fulsome Encomio della

Patria; 2nd, his equally dull description of the ducal palace, with

seventy-four engravings of its architecture and sculpture; 3rd,

Bianchini's catalogue of the sculptured trophies, with seventy-two

engravings; 4th, his geometrical survey of the province of Urbino in

1723. It is a curious example of a volume compiled from promising

materials, but destitute of interest, and is dedicated to an English

exile whose name, once a watchword ominous to our island, frequently

meets us in Central Italy, and whose wanderings here found a brief

repose. See an account of the Chevalier de St. George's residence at

Urbino, in an article on the Stuarts in Italy, contributed by the

author of these pages to the _Quarterly Review_ for December, 1847,

vol. LXXX.]

In absence of further evidence, we may accept the doubtful testimony

already quoted, that the palace was begun in 1454,[*119] but we must

briefly refute the misstatement of Vasari, that its architect was

Francesco di Giorgio. In our twenty-seventh chapter, we shall have

occasion to notice much new matter regarding that artist, which recent

inquiries have detected, and to show the nature and extent of his

engineering labours in the service of the Montefeltrian princes. It

appears that the palace at Urbino, usually ascribed to his design, was

commenced by an architect whose name, almost overlooked by Italian

writers, is preserved by Giovanni Sanzi. The motive imputed by the

poet to his master in this great work is as follows:--

"Knowing how admirable and how grand

By every people, every age, are deemed

Time-honoured fabrics, and that active life

No higher aim can follow."

[Footnote *119: Cf. BUDINICH, _Il Palazzo Ducale di Urbino_ (Trieste,

1904). Rich in documents and designs.]

And he goes on to inform us that

"The architect, set over all the rest,

Was Lutian Lauranna, whose bright name

Survives in excellence the knell of death.

His apt and lofty genius ruled the work,

With the Count's sanction, for no prince possessed

A sounder judgment or a will more prompt."

The name of this artist was Luziano, son of Martini of Lovranna and

Jadia in Dalmatia, and we owe to Pungileone an interesting patent in

his favour, granted by Count Federigo at Pavia, on the 10th of June,

1468, in these terms:--

"Whereas, we, deeming those men to be worthy of distinction and

preference who are gifted with such genius and talent as have been in

all ages esteemed, especially for architecture founded upon arithmetic

and geometry, which, as foremost among the seven liberal arts, and as

depending upon exact science, require profound knowledge and great

ability, and are therefore highly appreciated by us; and whereas, we,

having sought everywhere, but particularly in Tuscany, the fountain of

architects, without finding any one really versant and skilful in that

profession, and having lately heard by report, and since ascertained

by full experience, the learning and attainments of the distinguished

Messer Lutiano, bearer hereof; and, further, we, having resolved to

erect in our city of Urbino a fair residence, in all respects

befitting the rank and reputation of our predecessors and

ourselves,--have, for these causes, selected the said Messer Lutiano

as engineer and chief of all those employed upon that fabric, in

building, hewing, woodwork," &c. &c. The deed goes on to enjoin upon

all the workmen implicit obedience to his orders, and to authorise his

entire control over them, and over the funds destined for the

palace.[120]

[Footnote 120: GAYE, _Carteggio d'Artisti_, I., p. 214, and

PUNGILEONE, _Elogio di Bramante_, 63. The original is in Latin.]

Although the date of this patent may appear inconsistent with that

already adopted for the foundation of the _Corte_, as this residence

was usually called, it is clear, from other documents printed along

with it, that operations were already considerably advanced under the

superintendence of Luziano. In the preceding year we find him designed

the Count's engineer, acting as a sort of clerk of the works, and

litigating with a builder from Como regarding measurements of masonry;

indeed, he seems to have continued these duties until his death at

Pesaro, soon after that of his patron, whose liberality enabled him to

leave considerable property to his children.

The edifice thus commenced was carried on by Baccio Pontelli, a

Florentine artist, who, though designing himself a carpenter, was much

employed by Sixtus IV. to erect important fabrics in Rome. It is

impossible now to decide whether he was at first assistant to

Lauranna, or what portion of the Corte we owe to him, the entire

credit of which seems claimed in a presumptuous epitaph, apparently of

his own composition, which is given by Gaye.[121] He was employed upon

it in 1481, when applied to by Lorenzo de' Medici to furnish a design

or plan of the already famous work, a request handsomely responded to

by Federigo, in that almost oriental exaggeration of compliment still

usual in Lower Italy, with the assurance that such a wish was a

command, and that he only regretted being unable to send him the

building itself, of which he might fully dispose. Baccio's letter

mentions it as then at the fifth story, and that his drawing had been

done from actual measurements, thus proving he had no access to the

original plan,--circumstances strongly presumptive that the design was

not his, but that of Luziano, who lived till the following year. The

praise bestowed by him on the carved ornaments and decorations render

it probable that they had been under his peculiar charge. There is no

evidence as to the length of Baccio's stay at Urbino, but he is said

to have obtained the privileges of citizenship, and to have built the

church of S. Bernardino and the castle of Sinigaglia.

[Footnote 121: _Carteggio_, I., pp. 274-6. The author has discussed

the point in No. 86 of the _Kunstblatt_ for 1836.]

Such are the architects whom recent investigations enable us to claim

as authors of the palace at Urbino, which Vasari and many others have

celebrated for the beauty and comfort of its internal arrangements,

the magnificence of its saloons, the convenience of its imposing

stairs; for its smiling chambers, its vast corridors, its airy

porticoes and pleasant baths, its gilded doors and windows, its rich

furniture, carpets, and brocades. The assertion of that writer, so

often inaccurate as to Umbrian matters, ascribing its merit to

Francesco di Giorgio, may now be considered as disposed of,

notwithstanding the zeal with which his countrymen of Siena have

reasserted his claims; but the lights lately thrown upon his

performances by Promis of Turin, enable us to restore to him the

credit of certain bellicose decorations, often imputed to Roberto

Valturio, and which have attracted attention rather from their

adaptation to the genius of Count Federigo than from their artistic

value. They consist of a frieze of military machines, which Vasari

mentions as painted in fresco, but which were carved in relief along

the exterior basement of the palace: designs for most of these remain

among the MSS. of Francesco, and they have been engraved and tediously

explained in Bianchini's ponderous work. Their original object was no

doubt to illustrate the pompous inscription which surrounds the great

court in immense capitals.[122] After being injured and scattered,

they were again collected about a century ago, and arranged by

Cardinal Stoppani along the corridor of the principal story. They are

each about three feet by two, rudely representing seventy-two engines

long since disused in war, and interesting only to the antiquary.

Among the sculptors employed upon them, and similar architectural

ornaments in the Corte, was Ambrogio Baroccio of Milan,

great-grandfather of a painter as to whom we shall have much to say in

our fifty-third chapter.

[Footnote 122: "Federicus Urbini Dux, Montisferetri ac Durantis Comes,

sanctæ Ro. ecclesiæ Confalonerius, atque Italici Confederationis

Imperator, hanc domum a fundamentis erectam, gloriæ et posteritati suæ

exædificavit: Qui bello pluries depugnavit, sexies signa contulit,

octies hostem profligavit, omniumque preliorum victor ditionem auxit.

Ejusdem justitia, clementia, liberalitas, et religio pace victorias

equarunt, ornaruntque."]

We need not weary our readers by minute descriptions of the palace,

which, upon near approach, hardly realises the imposing effect of its

site. The rugged and broken ground on which it stands has, in a great

degree, marred that unity of plan which is essential to architectural

grandeur and harmony, augmenting at the same time the difficulties of

construction. Notwithstanding this drawback, and the rambling

character which a portion of the building has consequently taken,

there is much beauty in the façade of the great court, and in the

unfinished elevation towards the cathedral, although the brickwork is

but partially cased with stone. Barbaro, in his commentary upon

Vitruvius, cites the grand stair as a model of beauty and convenience,

and the corridors of the principal story (enriched, since 1756, with

the museum of antique sculpture and inscriptions collected by Raffaele

Fabretti) are truly magnificent. From these open many splendid rooms,

among which is the great hall, about one hundred and twenty feet in

length, of noble proportions, and severe in a simplicity contrasting

with the chromatic decorations usual in Italy. In its elevated niches

were formerly placed the insignia of its lords and of their allies,

but of these none remain save the winged lion of St. Mark, which still

looks proudly down upon the deserted audience-chamber, where its

envoys used to be deferentially received by those long-departed dukes

who often bore its banner to victory. The next story, which from its

ornaments and devices appears to have been finished by Duke Guidobaldo

II., is the summer residence of the cardinal-legate of Urbino and

Pesaro, and, consequently, is seldom shown.

Each of the towers seen in the engraving, and considered by Passavant

as antecedent to Duke Federigo, contains a spiral staircase of curious

construction, leading to balconies whence may be enjoyed a most

characteristic prospect of the surrounding country, wherein

"Hills are not seen, but for the vales betwixt

The deep indentings."

Fatigued by its uptossed and almost barren undulations, the eye turns

for repose to the magnificent sierra, which bounds the horizon. On the

extreme left is Monte Catria, crowned by the convent of S. Albertino,

5600 feet above the sea. Then comes Monte del Cavallo, described by

Cimarelli as the most beautiful of all the Apennine chain, and named

from the horses of famous race bred by the later princes of Urbino, on

the luxuriant pastures of its gentle slopes and verdant meadows. Monte

Nerone, so called from an

"Unwritten story fondly traced

From sire to son,"

which tells that the blood-stained tyrant of Rome once dwelt there, is

supposed to be a slumbering volcano. Its rich iron ore was once highly

productive, and the herbs and simples grown on it were esteemed above

all others in Italy. Far on the sky-line are discerned the Sassi di

Simeone, twin rocks of singularly abrupt form, separated by the Tuscan

frontier. Northward from these stands the massive Monte Carpegna,

cradle of the Montefeltrian race, domineering over their original

fief, and giving its local name to the wind which sweeps from its

heights upon the Adriatic. The mountain view terminates with the

triple peaks of San Marino, isolated, it would seem, by nature, as

well as by the forms of its constitution and the accidents of its

history.

The merit specially dwelt upon in the old descriptions of this palace

is the carved work in wood and stone, executed by sculptors brought

from various places, and facilitated by the excellent quality of a

close-grained grey limestone, imported from the Dalmatian coast. The

most striking of its decorations are accordingly the elaborate tracery

encircling the architraves, doorways, lintels, and chimneys, and

running along the cornices. This consists of fine arabesque designs,

mingled with dancing loves, and interlaced with military trophies and

heraldic fancies, among which frequently occur the Garter of England,

the Ermine of Naples, the Eagle of Montefeltro, with several monograms

and devices usually worn by Count Federigo, the origin whereof is

described in No. V. of the Appendices. A kindred art, here lavishly

expended, is that of _tarsia_, or wood inlaying, which, unlike the

more modern _marquetrie_, was enriched by pure arabesque designs, and

even by historical or religious compositions. In this style, though

now sadly defaced, were many of the doors, and especially the tiny

chapel, with its adjoining sacristy, the latter elaborately panelled

in varied scrolls, and bearing the titles of Federigo, with the date

1476. On the stone-work of this chapel occur the devices and initials

of Duke Guidobaldo II., marking probably the alterations made by

him.[123]

[Footnote 123: Pungileone has found a payment of 7 florins, in 1473,

to Maestro Giacomo, from Florence, on account of _intarsia_ for the

audience-hall, which seems, from other entries there cited, to have

been decorated during 1464 with paintings now lost. _Elogio_ di G.

Santi, p. 47.]

The following passage, often quoted from the commencement of

Castiglione's _Cortegiano_, has given rise to considerable

misapprehension:--"Among other laudable actions, Federigo erected, on

the rugged heights of Urbino, a residence, by many regarded as the

most beautiful in all Italy, and so amply provided with every

convenience, that it appeared rather a palatial city than a palace. He

furnished it not only with the usual plenishings of rich brocades in

silk and gold, silver plate, and such like, but ornamented it with a

vast quantity of ancient marble and bronze sculptures, of rare

pictures, and musical instruments in every variety, excluding all but

the choicest objects." Now, it so happens that, with every desire to

verify what ought to be a valuable authority for a fact in itself most

interesting, and especially probable of that prince, we have not been

able to trace a single piece of sculpture, and hardly an easel

picture, to his possession (a few portraits, of course, excepted),

nor does one contemporary distinctly mention anything of the sort at

Urbino. But whilst truth compels us to an admission calculated to

impair his traditional reputation as an amateur of the fine arts,

there was one branch of them which found in him a most zealous patron;

and among the adornments of his palace was a treasure rivalling in

beauty and excelling in importance all coeval museums of art.

To the right and left of the carriage entrance into the great

court-yard are two handsome saloons, each about forty-five feet by

twenty-two, and twenty-three in height. That on the left contained the

famous library of manuscripts collected by Count Federigo; the

corresponding one received the printed books, which, gradually

purchased by successive dukes, became, under the last sovereign, a

copious collection. Baldi, in his description of the palace, printed

in Bianchini's work, dwells on the judicious adaptation of the former,

its windows set high against the northern sky, admitting a subdued and

steady light which invited to study; its air cool in summer, temperate

in winter; its walls conveniently shelved; the character and objects

of the place fittingly set forth in a series of rude hexameters

inscribed on the cornices.[124] Adjoining was a closet fitted up with

inlaid and gilded panelling, beneath which Timoteo della Vite, a

painter whose excellence we shall attest in our thirtieth chapter,

depicted Minerva with her ægis, Apollo with his lyre, and the nine

muses with their appropriate symbols. A similar small study was fitted

up immediately over this one, set round with armchairs encircling a

table, all mosaicked with _tarsia_, and carved by Maestro Giacomo of

Florence, while on each compartment of the panelling was the portrait

of some famous author, and an appropriate distich. One other article

of furniture deserves special notice--a magnificent eagle of gilt

bronze, serving as a lectern in the centre of the manuscript room. It

was carried to Rome at the devolution of the duchy to the Holy See,

but was rescued by Pope Clement XI. from the Vatican library, and

restored to his native town, where it has long been used in the choir

of the cathedral.

[Footnote 124:

"Sint tibi divitiæ; sint aurea vasa, talenta

Plurima, servorum turbæ, gemmæque nitentes;

Sint vestes variæ, pretiosa monilia, torques;

Id totum hæc longe superat præclara supellex.

Sint licet aurati niveo de marmore postes,

Et variis placeant penetralia picta figuris;

Sint quoque Trojanis circumdata moenia pannis,

Et miro fragrent viridaria culta decore.

Extra intusque domus regali fulgida luxu,

Res equidem mutæ; sed BIBLIOTHECA parata est,

Jussa loqui, facunda nimis, vel jussa tacere,

Et prodesse potens, et delectare legentem.

Tempora lapsa docet, venturaque plurima pandit,

Explicat et cunctos coeli terræque labores."]

[Illustration: _Alinari_

FIFTEENTH CENTURY COURT OF THE PALAZZO DUCALE, URBINO]

Roscoe has well observed that "by no circumstance in the character of

an individual is the love of literature so strongly evinced, as by the

propensity for collecting together the writings of illustrious

scholars, and compressing 'the soul of ages past' within the narrow

limits of a library." But it is not easy now to appreciate the

obstacles attending such a pursuit in the age of Federigo. The science

of bibliography can scarcely be said to have existed before the

invention of printing, in consequence of the extreme difficulty of

becoming acquainted with works of which there were but few copies, and

these widely scattered, perhaps scarcely known. Great outlay was

required, either to search out or transcribe manuscripts, and even the

laborious habits which then accompanied learning shrank from a task so

beset by obstructions. Yet there was a bright exception in Thomas of

Sarzana, whose learning supplied the knowledge, and whose elevation to

the triple tiara as Nicholas V. procured him the opportunities,

necessary for amassing a library. Not only did he found that of the

Vatican, but he prepared for Cosimo _Pater patriæ_ a list of authors

for the infant collection of S. Marco, at Florence, which, being

recognised as a standard catalogue, was adopted by Count Federigo.

The longer life allowed to the latter enabled him to outstrip these

bibliomaniacs, and all contemporary accumulators, until the fame of

his library stood unrivalled. Accordingly Ruscelli, in his _Imprese

Illustri_, avers it to be "notorious that the earliest and most famous

collection formed out of the ruins of antiquity was that of Urbino,

from whence many excellent authors were edited, and copies supplied."

Marsilio Ficino and Leandro Alberti, with others of equal weight, have

borne similar testimony, the former from common report, the latter

from ocular demonstration; but we shall content ourselves with quoting

from two contemporaries, familiar with what they describe. To begin

with old Sanzi:--

"No fitting outlay on the work he spared

The eye to please; but more intent to feed

The mind, he ardently began to build

A library, so vast, and so select,

As to supply each intellect and taste.

With noble aim such books he there amassed,

That every genius might its flight direct

To kindred objects. Foremost in the band

The works of holy churchmen, all adorned

And bound with wond'rous beauty;

Next what survives of ancient wisdom's thoughts

In classic tongue contained; historians all;

The sacred choir of charming poesy;

In law and medicine many famous names,

Symmetrically ranged; there, too, I note

A wealth of books in divers languages,--

Arab and Greek, with Hebrew reverend;

And sundry others whose rich ornaments

Deserve detailed description, for I've seen

Men of the finest taste in wonder lost

Before them."

No poet's licence need be suspected in this description, for it is

thus fully borne out by Vespasiano, who was originally an agent in

amassing these treasures, and subsequently their custodier.[125] "We

have now to mention the high estimation in which he held all Greek and

Latin authors, sacred or profane; and to him alone was given the

enterprise to carry out what no one, for above a thousand years past,

had done, by establishing a library superior to any formed during all

that period. In no respect did he look to expense; and whenever he

learned the existence of any desirable book in Italy, or abroad, he

sent for it without heeding the cost. It is now above fourteen years

since he began to make this collection, and he has ever since

maintained at Urbino, Florence, and elsewhere, thirty-four

transcribers, and has resorted to every means requisite for amassing a

famous and excellent library,--which it now is. He has, in the first

place, all the Latin poets, with their best commentaries; also the

entire works of Cicero, with all the orators and grammarians in that

language. In history, he commissioned every known work of that or the

Greek tongue, as well as the orators of the latter. In moral and

natural philosophy, no author of these languages is wanting. In the

faculty of theology he has been most profuse, having, besides the four

doctors of the Church, St. Bernard, Tertullian, Hilary, Remigius, Hugh

of St. Victor, Isidore, Anselm, Rabanus, Dionysius the Areopagite, St.

Basil, Cyril, Gregory Nazarene, John of Damascus, Eusebius, Origen,

St. Thomas Aquinas, Albertus Magnus, Alexander de Alexandro, Duns

Scotus, Bonaventura, Richard Mediavilla, Archbishop Antonio, with all

the modern doctors. There are further all the best civilians, with the

lectures of Bartolomeo Capretti. He had the Bible, that best of books,

written in two volumes, with the richest and most beautiful

illustrations, bound in brocade of gold, and lavishly ornamented with

silver; and he made it be thus gorgeously adorned as the chief of all

literature, and it has no equal in our time.[126] There are also all

the Commentaries on the Bible in Greek and Latin, including Nicolò de

Lira. He further has all the treatises on astrology, geometry,

arithmetic, architecture, and military tactics, and a very curious

volume with every ancient and modern military engine: also all books

on painting, sculpture, and music; the standard writers on civil law;

the _Speculum Innocentiæ_; in medicine, the works of Hippocrates,

Galen, and Avicenna; the writings of Averröe on logic, ethics, and

physics; a volume of early councils; the writings of Boethius on

logic, philosophy, and music; and those of modern authors, with Pius

II. at their head. There are all the works of Petrarch, Dante,[*127]

Boccaccio, Colluccio, Leonardo d'Arezzo, Fra Ambrogio, Gianozzo

Manetti, Guarino, Panhormita, Francesco Filelfo, Perotto, Campano,

Mafeo Vegeo, Nicolò Secondino, Pontano, Bartolomeo Fazii, Gasparino,

Paolo Vergaio, Giovanni Argiropolo, Francesco Barbaro, Leonardo

Giustiniani, Donato Acciaiuolo, Alamanno Remicini, Christofero da

Prato the elder, Poggio, Giovanni Tartellio, Francesco d'Arezzo, and

Lorenzo Valla. It was his object to obtain every book in all branches

of learning, ancient and modern, original or translated. He had also

of Greek classics, with their commentaries, Aristotle, Plato, Homer,

Sophocles, Pindar, Menander, Plutarch, Ptolemy, Herodotus, Pausanias,

Thucydides, Polybius, Demosthenes, Æschines, Plotinus, Theophrastus,

Hippocrates, Galen, and Xenophon; the New Testament, St. Basil and

other fathers in Greek, with the Book of Paradise, lives of the

Egyptian saints, lives of Balaam and Jehosaphat; and all works on

geometry, arithmetic, and astrology, as well as every other attainable

writer in that language. It was the same as to Hebrew books, beginning

with the Bible, and including philosophy, medicine, and other

faculties, with every known commentary; and there was a remarkable

polyglot Psalter in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin.

[Footnote 125: Commentary on Duke Federigo, Vat. Urb. MSS. No. 941, f.

43. See his _Life of Nicholas V._; MURATORI, _Script._, XXV., 268,

274; also below, ch. XXIV.]

[Footnote 126: The Urbino Bible, noticed again in this extract, will

be more particularly described in VI. of the Appendices.]

[Footnote *127: On the "veltro" Dante, see Dennistoun's note in the

Appendix to this vol., p. 448, and L. FRATI, _Federico Duca d'Urbino e

il "Veltro" Dante_, in _Arch. St. per le Marche e per l'Umbria_, vol.

II., pp. 360-67. Cf. also VESPASIANO, _Vite_ (Barbera, Firenze), p.

86.]

"On all this the Duke spent upwards of 30,000 ducats; and he made a

rule that every book should be bound in crimson, ornamented with

silver, from the Bible already described down to the modern authors.

It is thus a truly rich display to see all these books so adorned, all

being manuscripts on vellum, with illuminations, and each a complete

copy,--perfections not found in any other library. Indeed, shortly

before he went to the siege of Ferrara, I compared the catalogue with

lists of other libraries which he had procured, such as those of the

Vatican, Florence, St. Mark, Pavia, down to that of the University of

Oxford in England, and found that all but his own had deficiencies and

duplicates."

The book of regulations for the court and household of Guidobaldo I.

contains these rules for the administration of the library[128]:--"The

librarian should be learned, of good presence, temper, and manners;

correct and ready of speech. He must get from the gardrobe an

inventory of the books, and keep them arranged and easily accessible,

whether Latin, Greek, Hebrew, or others, maintaining also the rooms in

good condition. He must preserve the books from damp and vermin, as

well as from the hands of trifling, ignorant, dirty, and tasteless

persons. To those of authority and learning, he ought himself to

exhibit them with all facility, courteously explaining their beauty

and remarkable characteristics, the handwriting and miniatures, but

observant that such abstract no leaves. When ignorant or merely

curious persons wish to see them, a glance is sufficient, if it be not

some one of considerable influence. When any lock or other requisite

is needed, he must take care that it be promptly provided. He must let

no book be taken away but by the Duke's orders, and if lent must get a

written receipt, and see to its being returned. When a number of

visitors come in, he must be specially watchful that none be stolen.

All which is duly seen to by the present courteous and attentive

librarian, Messer Agabito."

[Footnote 128: Vat. Urb. MSS. No. 1248, f. 58.]

Without attempting any enumeration of those who filled the office thus

regulated, we may refer to Vespasiano, already mentioned in that

capacity, and to Lorenzo Abstemio of Macerata, an eminent professor of

literature about 1500. But the most useful of them was probably

Veterano, who was spared to serve three Dukes of the two Urbino

dynasties, and the fruits of whose laborious caligraphy may still be

recognised in many a fair MS. at the Vatican. Among these is a

Commentary on the Triumphs of Petrarch, a note on the colophon of

which informs us that it was one of about sixty volumes copied by him

on parchment for this collection. A gluttonous patriotism has led some

encomiasts of the duchy into the glaring absurdity of imputing the

authorship of these manifold works to their transcriber, whose

original compositions, to be noticed in our twenty-fifth chapter,

suggest few regrets that his long life should have been chiefly

devoted to more mechanical occupations. We are fortunately able to

test the reputation enjoyed by Count Federigo's library; for, although

some of its treasures were lost in the revolutions of 1503 and 1517,

and although the MSS. transported to the Vatican in 1658 included many

additions subsequent to his death, still the volumes most important to

literature, and most embellished by art, may, with few exceptions, be

attributed to his liberality. The estimate of 30,000 ducats, already

stated from Vespasiano as the cost of the collection in his time, is

carried to 40,000 by Gallo Galli, who lived under Duke Guidobaldo

II., thus affording a probable inference as to the augmentation it had

received between 1482 and 1566. This increase, which went on until the

devolution of the duchy in 1631, was chiefly by a mass of unpublished

writings of local interest or authorship, without any pretence to

artistic beauty. The numbers now catalogued are thus no evidence of

its original extent; but we may mention that an inventory by Stefano

Gradio, though by no means complete, includes 1361 entries; that

Platner, in the _Beschreibung der Stadt Rom_, estimates the ducal MSS.

at 1711; but that the catalogue compiled by Mauro Costa, in 1797, and

now actually in use, exceeds four thousand articles. As some of the

illuminated MSS. executed for Count Federigo are of the highest

interest, we shall notice a few of them in VI. of the Appendices, and

in our forty-eighth chapter shall mention the fate of this library,

after the extinction of the ducal line.

"Within this curious palace dwelt a soul

Gave lustre to each part, and to the whole:

This drest his face in courteous smiles, and so

From comely gestures sweeter manners flow.

This courage joyned to strength; so the hand, bent,

Was valour's; opened, bounty's instrument;

Which did the scale and sword of justice hold,

Knew how to brandish steel and scatter gold."

THOMAS CAREW.

Before concluding our account of the Corte, we may mention some

appurtenances intended for the more material requirements of its

inmates. Of the garden we can say nothing, horticulture being then a

latent science; neither need we linger upon the court-yard provided

for tennis or ball. But the stable-range, built by Francesco di

Giorgio in 1475, is thus curiously described by himself: "From the

stable, constructed by me, for my most illustrious Duke of Urbino, may

be seen how much a complete and perfect set ought to include. It is

capable of containing three hundred horses, half on either side,

being twenty-eight feet wide, thirty-six high, and three hundred and

sixty long,[129] and over it there is a beautiful loft for hay and

straw, with square holes for throwing down the forage, and above all a

roof. There are several contiguous rooms, the first being a yard or

shed, wherein to mount and dismount, or to shoe the horses; in it is a

fountain with two troughs, and a pipe passing thence under the

mangers, with various stop-cocks for the supply of water, by means

whereof the stable can be cleansed, and to facilitate this operation

the floor falls towards the centre, enabling such horses as wish it to

stand higher before. Next the fountain is a corn-store, with the

head-groom's rooms above it, overlooking the stable, and beyond these

a servant's room, and one for medicines, saddlery, repairs, &c.

Lastly, there is a great tower, with a winding-stair, accessible only

to the owner, whence he can see the entire establishment; and this,

being known to the overseer and servants, is a check upon their good

conduct."

[Footnote 129: There must be some mistake as to the length, which

would scarcely half suffice for a hundred and fifty horses. See the

original in Promis' Turin edition of Francesco di Giorgio's Works, I.,

p. 171.]

In a letter by Gallo Galli to Duke Guidobaldo II. in 1566, he mentions

having seen memoranda stating the cost of the Urbino palace at 200,000

ducats, the silver plate at 40,000, a set of tapestries representing

the siege of Troy at 10,000, and the MSS. library at 40,000. Before

leaving the subject we shall transcribe from the _Cortegiano_ an

anecdote, not on account of its value, but as a specimen of the dull

wit which Castiglione thought worth commemorating as the gossip of his

model court. "Recollect also the silly trait, just related by our Lord

Duke, of an abbé who, standing by while Duke Federigo was discussing

what to do with the vast quantity of earth excavated from the

foundations of this palace, exclaimed, 'My Lord, I have thought of a

capital contrivance. Desire an immense ditch to be made, into which

it may be put without more ado.' The Duke answered with a smile, 'And

where shall we place the earth of the ditch itself?' To which the abbé

replied, 'Make it big enough for both.' And though the Duke repeated

that the larger it was the more earth would there be to remove, he

never could see it, but went on saying, make it so much the greater!"

Sanzi informs us that Federigo had intended to erect, in connection

with this residence, a fane unequalled in regularity, beauty, and

ornament, in order at once to manifest his piety and to provide a last

home for his remains. The cathedral adjoining it, though founded by

his father in 1439, was scarcely well begun until 1471, and when

completed, in no way realised his project.[130] The church of S.

Bernardino, also left unfinished at his death, was in some degree a

substitute, being not only a special memorial of his piety, but

supplying a mausoleum for himself and the few after members of his

dynasty.

[Footnote 130: Much confusion of dates has arisen regarding this

church, owing to its slow advance,--unusually protracted even for

Italy. Lazzarini tells that it was founded by Federigo in 1447, and

consecrated to S. Crescentino in 1534, but that the façade was not

completed till 1781. The cupola, planned by Muzio Oddi, was erected in

1604, but fell in 1789. The pulpit and organ were designed by Girolamo

della Genga, and the latter was painted by Baroccio. The stuccoes were

executed by Federigo Brandani, who died in 1575.]

Of the other residences that shared the cares of Count Federigo,

Gubbio was the most important. Sanzi describes it as facing the

south-east, and flanked by mountains on the north, overlooking fertile

valleys and smiling champaigns, and excelling the attractions of

Urbino in charming prospects and pleasant pathways. Notwithstanding

the general truth of this eulogy, nothing could be more consistent

with beauty or convenience than its site, planted on a slope, with the

cathedral right in front, crowded round with poor buildings, and

accessible only by precipitous alleys. Its architecture is disputed

between Francesco di Giorgio and Baccio Pontelli,[*131] nor would it

add much credit to either, its sole merit being minute decorations in

hewn work and inlaid panelling, both after the style we have described

at Urbino. Although the initials of the two Montefeltrian dukes appear

in these, it is believed to have been chiefly built by Guidobaldo, and

the oak-tree cognisance of the Della Rovere indicates in some parts a

still later date. The constant recurrence of the Garter among its

ornamental devices is gratifying to the very rare English visitors of

this Apennine town, but no traveller of taste and intelligence can be

otherwise than shocked to find this once chosen sanctuary of Italian

refinement and high breeding, the residence in which Castiglione

recounted his reception at the Tudor court, and where Fregoso and

Bembo were successively bishops, degraded to vile uses and menaced by

speedy ruin. It is now in the hands of a person who there manufactures

wax candles and silk, but on my second visit in 1843 was closed up

entirely and inaccessible. I owe to the obliging attention of Signor

Luigi Bonfatti, a local antiquary of taste and intelligence, who is

preparing a work on the early painters of Gubbio, this notice of the

building and its remaining decorations: "Differing much from the

architecture at Urbino, its court-yard is very fine, of the mixed or

composite style usual in that age. The windows, doors, and chimneys

have stone lintels, exquisitely chiselled in low relief with masterly

arabesque designs, those in the interior being touched with gold. The

ceilings, now partially decayed, are all of wood, in half-relief

compartments, with heavy cornices, and roses coloured and gilded. The

palace was completed by Duke Guidobaldo, who commissioned the cabinet

or closet of superb _intarsia_, thirteen by six and a half feet. This

tiny room is nineteen feet high, but the inlaid work goes only

half-way up. It is of the finest patterns and workmanship, including

several emblematic representations of music, literature, physical

science, geography, and war. On the cornice is an inscription now in

part illegible.... It was, in my opinion, the work of Antonio Mastei

of Gubbio, a famous artist in wood, who executed the beautiful choir

of S. Fortunato at Todi, and who is known to have been much in favour

with Dukes Guidobaldo and Francesco Maria I., the latter of whom gave

him an exemption from imposts."[132]

[Footnote *131: It is the work of Lorenzo Laurana.]

[Footnote 132: The kindness of Mr. F.C. Brooke, of Ufford Place,

Suffolk, enables me to supplement from his note-book this imperfect

mention of the most interesting feature of the palace. "The small

cabinet has shared a better fate than that of the remainder of the

apartments, and requires little else than cleaning up to restore it to

its original state. The ceiling is divided into several scanty

compartments, of octangular form and relieved with gold, while the

wainscoted walls are inlaid with _tarsia_, representing bookcases, or

rather cupboards, with their contents, amongst which are a ship, a

tambourine, military weapons, a cage with a parrot in it, and, as if

for the sake of variety only, a few volumes of books, over one of

which, containing music, with the word 'ROSABELLA' inscribed on its

pages, is suspended a crucifix. On the central case opposite to the

window, and occupying as it were the post of honour, is the Garter,

with its motto, 'HONI SOIT Q MAL I PENSE'; a device which has been

sculptured on the exterior of the stone architrave of the door of this

apartment. It appears again in _tarsia_ in the recess of the window,

where may also be seen, within circles, 'G. UBALDO DX.' and 'FE DUX.'

On the frieze, and in a single line interrupted only by the spaces

occupied by the door and window, is the following inscription in

_tarsia_:--

"'Aspicis æternos venerandæ matris alumnos,

Doctrina excelsos ingenioque viros.

Vi nuda cervice cadant ante...

... genu.

Justiciam pietas vincit reverenda, nec ullum

Poenitet ultrici succubuisse suæ.'

"I might also have mentioned as amongst the devices, the crane

standing on one leg, and holding, with the foot of the other which is

raised, the stone he is to drop as a signal of alarm for his

companions. Among other feigned contents of a bookcase are an

hour-glass, guitar, and pair of compasses; in another are seen a

dagger, dried fruits in a small basket made of thin wood, and a

tankard; while in a third is represented an open book surmounted with

the name of Guidobaldo, who probably made the description inscribed on

the two pages of the volume, comprising verses 457 to 491 of the tenth

_Æneid_."

It is unnecessary here to introduce this long quotation; for the last

combat and death of Pallas by the spear of Turnus, however happily

described by Virgil, bear no traceable analogy to incidents in the

Montefeltrian family. Mr. Brooke conjectures that it was recommended

by the passage,--

"Stat sua cuique dies; breve et irreparabile tempus

Omnibus est vitæ; sed famam extendere factis,

Hoc Virtutis opus:"

a sentiment equally beautiful in itself, and appropriate to the

fortunes of Guidobaldo; yet why not have given point to the epigram by

isolating it from the inappropriate context?]

Muzio and Baldi impute to Federigo's munificence many other palaces in

his state, such as Fossombrone, Cagli, Casteldurante, La Carda,

Mercatello, &c.; but most of these were probably forts, of which

Francesco di Giorgio speaks as having one hundred and thirty-six under

his charge at once, for this prince. At the two first-named places,

there still remain residences dating from this reign, and the parks or

game-preserves which formerly surrounded them, embracing circuits of

seven and five miles respectively, were walled in by the Count, and

stocked with fallow-deer.[133] These have long ago run to waste, and

the palaces, with their ample halls,

"Shadowy with remembrances

Of the majestic past,"

are now desolate and rapidly falling to ruin.[*134]

[Footnote 133: We have very few notices of his sporting tastes; but

the Vatican collection of his letters includes one of the King of

France, on sending, at his request, a brace of dogs.]

[Footnote *134: The palace of Urbino was indeed the wonder of the age.

Dennistoun, however, tells us little or nothing about Federigo's

villas. The gardens of Lorenzo de' Medici at Poggio a Caiano were

provided with every vegetable, both for ornament and use, which the

most diligent search could supply. Indeed, his was one of the first

collections of plants made in Europe. Alessandro Braccio, in a Latin

poem addressed to Bernardo Bembo, gives a graphic account of it.

Laurentian Library, Plut. LXXXVI., sup. cod. 41. Band. Cat., III.,

787. The poem is given by Roscoe, _Lorenzo de' Medici_, App. XXV.]

* * * * *

It has been aptly observed that "of works which appeal to the eye, any

description must be tedious and inconclusive," but less could not have

been said of creations which constituted the chief praise of Count

Federigo among his contemporaries, and his most enduring glory with

posterity. Nor can it but excite our interest to inquire whence means

were obtained for so lavish an outlay, and for his munificent

patronage of letters and arts. When the eye wanders over the map of

Urbino, as possessed by its dukes of the Della Rovere dynasty, it is

difficult to restrict our conceptions to its true limits at this

date. It would probably now be impossible to define these with perfect

accuracy, much of its frontier being then debatable land.[135] Into

this category had fallen part of the original fief of Montefeltro,

lying north of the Foglia. The proper territory of Urbino occupied the

central portion of the far-receding stripe situated between that river

and the Metauro, its upper section being the Brancaleone country, its

sea-board divided between Pesaro and Fano. Out-lying were the holdings

of Gubbio and Cagli, the latter perhaps reaching to the recently

acquired townships of Fossombrone. The state composed of these

straggling parts may have included about one-fourth of the subsequent

duchy; but cut off from the coast, and from the fertile districts

which skirt the Adriatic, its rugged uplands and rude climate derived

from nature few elements of wealth. The various wars which had swept

it, and especially the forays and reprisals it had long endured from

the tyrant of Rimini, might well have exhausted its resources, and

utterly impoverished both sovereign and people. The fact was, however,

quite otherwise, war being a source of wealth to both. Military

service was their only trade, and so well did they ply it, that during

thirty-four years, short intervals excepted, the Count drew continuous

pay from some foreign power or adventurer. The value of these

engagements may be estimated from some examples. In 1453 his war pay

from Alfonso of Naples exceeded 8000 ducats a month, and for many

years he had from him and his son an annual peace-pension of 6000 in

name of past services. At the close of his life, when captain-general

of the Italian league, he drew in war 165,000 ducats of annual

stipend, 45,000 being his own share; in peace 65,000 in all. Of these

vast sums a considerable portion went among his hardy mountaineers,

besides their contingent of plunder and perquisites picked up in the

field. Thus was war rendered so acceptable to their interests, as well

as to their tastes and habits, that Sanzi compares them, when their

arms are cast aside, to "unpinioned eagles." Nor did the ravages of

invasion prove so destructive as might be supposed. The entire

population were located in villages or townlets, each a fastness

capable of resistance, which, even when unsuccessful, gave time to

conceal their valuables: thus when the sack began, they had only to

save their persons, and these generally were allowed to go

unharmed.[136]

[Footnote 135:

"Nunc ager Umbreni sub nomine, nuper Ofelli

Dictus; erat nulli proprius, sed cedit in usum

Nunc mihi, nunc aliis."

HORACE, _Sat._, ii. 2.]

[Footnote 136: See, as to later statistics of the duchy, the Appendix

to Vol. III.]

Memoirs of the Dukes of Urbino, Volume 1 (of 3) Illustrating the Arms, Arts, and Literature of Italy, from 1440 To 1630. · 第 8 / 19 章