THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 114, Art. 3]

Whether a Man in Grace Can Merit Eternal Life Condignly?

Objection 1: It would seem that a man in grace cannot merit eternal

life condignly, for the Apostle says (Rom. 8:18): "The sufferings of

this time are not worthy (_condignae_) to be compared with the glory

to come, that shall be revealed in us." But of all meritorious works,

the sufferings of the saints would seem the most meritorious.

Therefore no works of men are meritorious of eternal life condignly.

Obj. 2: Further, on Rom. 6:23, "The grace of God, life everlasting,"

a gloss says: "He might have truly said: 'The wages of justice, life

everlasting'; but He preferred to say 'The grace of God, life

everlasting,' that we may know that God leads us to life everlasting

of His own mercy and not by our merits." Now when anyone merits

something condignly he receives it not from mercy, but from merit.

Hence it would seem that a man with grace cannot merit life

everlasting condignly.

Obj. 3: Further, merit that equals the reward, would seem to be

condign. Now no act of the present life can equal everlasting life,

which surpasses our knowledge and our desire, and moreover, surpasses

the charity or love of the wayfarer, even as it exceeds nature.

Therefore with grace a man cannot merit eternal life condignly.

_On the contrary,_ What is granted in accordance with a fair

judgment, would seem a condign reward. But life everlasting is

granted by God, in accordance with the judgment of justice, according

to 2 Tim. 4:8: "As to the rest, there is laid up for me a crown of

justice, which the Lord, the just judge, will render to me in that

day." Therefore man merits everlasting life condignly.

_I answer that,_ Man's meritorious work may be considered in two

ways: first, as it proceeds from free-will; secondly, as it proceeds

from the grace of the Holy Ghost. If it is considered as regards the

substance of the work, and inasmuch as it springs from the free-will,

there can be no condignity because of the very great inequality. But

there is congruity, on account of an equality of proportion: for it

would seem congruous that, if a man does what he can, God should

reward him according to the excellence of his power.

If, however, we speak of a meritorious work, inasmuch as it proceeds

from the grace of the Holy Ghost moving us to life everlasting, it is

meritorious of life everlasting condignly. For thus the value of its

merit depends upon the power of the Holy Ghost moving us to life

everlasting according to John 4:14: "Shall become in him a fount of

water springing up into life everlasting." And the worth of the work

depends on the dignity of grace, whereby a man, being made a partaker

of the Divine Nature, is adopted as a son of God, to whom the

inheritance is due by right of adoption, according to Rom. 8:17: "If

sons, heirs also."

Reply Obj. 1: The Apostle is speaking of the substance of these

sufferings.

Reply Obj. 2: This saying is to be understood of the first cause of

our reaching everlasting life, viz. God's mercy. But our merit is a

subsequent cause.

Reply Obj. 3: The grace of the Holy Ghost which we have at present,

although unequal to glory in act, is equal to it virtually as the

seed of a tree, wherein the whole tree is virtually. So likewise by

grace of the Holy Ghost dwells in man; and He is a sufficient cause

of life everlasting; hence, 2 Cor. 1:22, He is called the "pledge" of

our inheritance.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 739 / 746 题