FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 100, Art. 1]

Whether All the Moral Precepts of the Old Law Belong to the Law of

Nature?

Objection 1: It would seem that not all the moral precepts belong to

the law of nature. For it is written (Ecclus. 17:9): "Moreover He

gave them instructions, and the law of life for an inheritance." But

instruction is in contradistinction to the law of nature; since the

law of nature is not learnt, but instilled by natural instinct.

Therefore not all the moral precepts belong to the natural law.

Obj. 2: Further, the Divine law is more perfect than human law. But

human law adds certain things concerning good morals, to those that

belong to the law of nature: as is evidenced by the fact that the

natural law is the same in all men, while these moral institutions

are various for various people. Much more reason therefore was there

why the Divine law should add to the law of nature, ordinances

pertaining to good morals.

Obj. 3: Further, just as natural reason leads to good morals in

certain matters, so does faith: hence it is written (Gal. 5:6) that

faith "worketh by charity." But faith is not included in the law of

nature; since that which is of faith is above nature. Therefore not

all the moral precepts of the Divine law belong to the law of nature.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Rom. 2:14) that "the Gentiles,

who have not the Law, do by nature those things that are of the Law":

which must be understood of things pertaining to good morals.

Therefore all the moral precepts of the Law belong to the law of

nature.

_I answer that,_ The moral precepts, distinct from the ceremonial and

judicial precepts, are about things pertaining of their very nature

to good morals. Now since human morals depend on their relation to

reason, which is the proper principle of human acts, those morals are

called good which accord with reason, and those are called bad which

are discordant from reason. And as every judgment of speculative

reason proceeds from the natural knowledge of first principles, so

every judgment of practical reason proceeds from principles known

naturally, as stated above (Q. 94, AA. 2, 4): from which principles

one may proceed in various ways to judge of various matters. For some

matters connected with human actions are so evident, that after very

little consideration one is able at once to approve or disapprove of

them by means of these general first principles: while some matters

cannot be the subject of judgment without much consideration of the

various circumstances, which all are not competent to do carefully,

but only those who are wise: just as it is not possible for all to

consider the particular conclusions of sciences, but only for those

who are versed in philosophy: and lastly there are some matters of

which man cannot judge unless he be helped by Divine instruction;

such as the articles of faith.

It is therefore evident that since the moral precepts are about

matters which concern good morals; and since good morals are those

which are in accord with reason; and since also every judgment of

human reason must needs by derived in some way from natural reason;

it follows, of necessity, that all the moral precepts belong to the

law of nature; but not all in the same way. For there are certain

things which the natural reason of every man, of its own accord and

at once, judges to be done or not to be done: e.g. "Honor thy father

and thy mother," and "Thou shalt not kill," "Thou shalt not steal":

and these belong to the law of nature absolutely. And there are

certain things which, after a more careful consideration, wise men

deem obligatory. Such belong to the law of nature, yet so that they

need to be inculcated, the wiser teaching the less wise: e.g. "Rise

up before the hoary head, and honor the person of the aged man," and

the like. And there are some things, to judge of which, human reason

needs Divine instruction, whereby we are taught about the things of

God: e.g. "Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the

likeness of anything"; "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy

God in vain."

This suffices for the Replies to the Objections.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 643 / 746 题