FIFTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 81, Art. 5]

Whether If Eve, and Not Adam, Had Sinned, Their Children Would Have

Contracted Original Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that if Eve, and not Adam, had sinned,

their children would have contracted original sin. Because we

contract original sin from our parents, in so far as we were once in

them, according to the word of the Apostle (Rom. 5:12): "In whom all

have sinned." Now a man pre-exists in his mother as well as in his

father. Therefore a man would have contracted original sin from his

mother's sin as well as from his father's.

Obj. 2: Further, if Eve, and not Adam, had sinned, their children

would have been born liable to suffering and death, since it is "the

mother" that "provides the matter in generation" as the Philosopher

states (De Gener. Animal. ii, 1, 4), when death and liability to

suffering are the necessary results of matter. Now liability to

suffering and the necessity of dying are punishments of original sin.

Therefore if Eve, and not Adam, had sinned, their children would

contract original sin.

Obj. 3: Further, Damascene says (De Fide Orth. iii, 3) that "the Holy

Ghost came upon the Virgin," (of whom Christ was to be born without

original sin) "purifying her." But this purification would not have

been necessary, if the infection of original sin were not contracted

from the mother. Therefore the infection of original sin is

contracted from the mother: so that if Eve had sinned, her children

would have contracted original sin, even if Adam had not sinned.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Rom. 5:12): "By one man sin

entered into this world." Now if the woman would have transmitted

original sin to her children, he should have said that it entered by

two, since both of them sinned, or rather that it entered by a woman,

since she sinned first. Therefore original sin is transmitted to the

children, not by the mother, but by the father.

_I answer that,_ The solution of this question is made clear by what

has been said. For it has been stated (A. 1) that original sin is

transmitted by the first parent in so far as he is the mover in the

begetting of his children: wherefore it has been said (A. 4) that if

anyone were begotten materially only, of human flesh, they would not

contract original sin. Now it is evident that in the opinion of

philosophers, the active principle of generation is from the father,

while the mother provides the matter. Therefore original sin is

contracted, not from the mother, but from the father: so that,

accordingly, if Eve, and not Adam, had sinned, their children would

not contract original sin: whereas, if Adam, and not Eve, had sinned,

they would contract it.

Reply Obj. 1: The child pre-exists in its father as in its active

principle, and in its mother, as in its material and passive

principle. Consequently the comparison fails.

Reply Obj. 2: Some hold that if Eve, and not Adam, had sinned, their

children would be immune from the sin, but would have been subject to

the necessity of dying and to other forms of suffering that are a

necessary result of the matter which is provided by the mother, not

as punishments, but as actual defects. This, however, seems

unreasonable. Because, as stated in the First Part (Q. 97, AA. 1, 2,

ad 4), immortality and impassibility, in the original state, were a

result, not of the condition of matter, but of original justice,

whereby the body was subjected to the soul, so long as the soul

remained subject to God. Now privation of original justice is

original sin. If, therefore, supposing Adam had not sinned, original

sin would not have been transmitted to posterity on account of Eve's

sin; it is evident that the children would not have been deprived of

original justice: and consequently they would not have been liable to

suffer and subject to the necessity of dying.

Reply Obj. 3: This prevenient purification in the Blessed Virgin was

not needed to hinder the transmission of original sin, but because it

behooved the Mother of God "to shine with the greatest purity" [*Cf.

Anselm, De Concep. Virg. xviii.]. For nothing is worthy to receive

God unless it be pure, according to Ps. 92:5: "Holiness becometh Thy

House, O Lord."

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 533 / 746 题